CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02541656VPP CoelioUpdated Dec 13, 2018

Dynamic Preload Dependence Indices in Laparoscopic Surgery

An interventional study of Study of preload dependence indices after volume expansion in laparoscopy with Saldinger technique. in Laparoscopic Surgery, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-13.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2015, registered Jul 2015).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A goal-directed fluid management is definitely beneficial in high risk surgery. The fluid administration can be directed by cardiac output monitoring which evaluate the response to repeated fluid challenge or by preload dependence indices. These indices are not well validated in laparoscopic surgery while pneumoperitoneum can alter venous return or pulmonary compliance.

The aim of the study is to study the validity of pulse pressure variation to predict fluid response under laparoscopic conditions and to describe the effect of the pneumoperitoneum on the dynamic preload indicators, i.e. the pulse pressure variation, the plethysmographic waveform of pulse oximetry variation and the stroke volume variation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparoscopic Surgery

Keywords

  • Preload dependence indices
  • pulse pressure variation
  • plethysmographic waveform of pulse oximetry variation
  • stroke volume variation
  • laparoscopy
  • pneumoperitoneum
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Need to laparoscopic colectomy or hepatic resection
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac arrhythmia
  • Esophageal and cervical pathologies
  • Radial artery Allen test negative
  • Allergy to anesthesic treatment, to egg or soja
  • Severe kidney failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min)
  • Age \< 18 years old
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    preloaddependence indice after volume expansion in laparoscopy

    The measurements of pulse pressure variation, plethysmographic waveform of pulse oximetry variation and stroke volume variation will be performed before pneumoperitoneum at the beginning of the surgery, and will be repeated after pneumoperitoneum insufflation applying each time modification of preload conditions (applying reverse Trendelenburg position followed by Trendelenburg position). The responses will be appreciated by the measurements of the stroke volume.

    Procedure: Study of preload dependence indices after volume expansion in laparoscopy with Saldinger technique.

Interventions

  • ProcedureStudy of preload dependence indices after volume expansion in laparoscopy with Saldinger technique.

    The measurements of pulse pressure variation, plethysmographic waveform of pulse oximetry variation and stroke volume variation will be performed before pneumoperitoneum at the beginning of the surgery, and will be repeated after pneumoperitoneum insufflation applying each time modification of preload conditions (applying reverse Trendelenburg position followed by Trendelenburg position). The responses will be appreciated by the measurements of the stroke volume.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assess the validity of pulse pressure variation (in %)

    Performing a fluid challenge after pneumoperitoneum insufflation, the association between pulse pressure variation value and stroke volume variation will be performed. Responder patients are defined by stroke volume augmentation \> 15 %

    Time frame: at Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Threshold value to predict fluid response in laparoscopic conditions.

    A fluid challenge is performed after pneumoperitoneum insufflation to assess the fluid response and calculate the threshold value of fluid response.

    Time frame: at Day 0

  2. Effect of the pneumoperitoneum insufflation on the preload dependence indices : plethysmographic waveform of pulse oximetry variation .

    The measures are performed after applying patient positioning which modify preload conditions. These measures are repeated before and after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and the values of each indices are compared.

    Time frame: at Day 0

  3. Effect of the pneumoperitoneum insufflation on the preload dependence indices : stroke volume variation .

    The measures are performed after applying patient positioning which modify preload conditions. These measures are repeated before and after pneumoperitoneum insufflation and the values of each indices are compared.

    Time frame: at Day 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Lyon, 69002, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02541656
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 4, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Last update
Dec 13, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion