CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02533089Updated Mar 24, 2020Results posted

Training Lay Healthcare Workers to Optimize TB Care and Improve Outcomes in Malawi

An interventional study of KT intervention in Tuberculosis, sponsored by Dignitas International. Completed at 1 site in Malawi. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-24.

Sponsored by Dignitas International · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,153
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Task shifting of less complex healthcare tasks to lay health workers (LHWs) is increasingly employed strategy to address the global shortage of skilled health workers. Despite availability of effective treatment, tuberculosis (TB) remains an important cause of mortality with 1.3 million lives lost globally to TB in 2012. The greatest proportion of new TB cases occurs in Africa and over 95% of TB deaths occur in low income countries (LICs). In response to the combined high TB burden and severe healthcare worker shortages in these settings, outpatient TB care is among the tasks commonly shifted to LHWs.

LHWs are community members who have received some training but are not healthcare professionals. Randomised trials show LHWs improve access to basic health services and TB treatment outcomes, however, insufficient training and supervision are recognized barriers to their effectiveness.

The investigators' goal is to improve TB care provided by LHWs in Malawi by implementing and evaluating a knowledge translation (KT) strategy designed to facilitate incorporation of evidence into LHW practice. The investigators will employ a mixed methods design including a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of the strategy and qualitative methods to understand barriers and facilitators to scalability and sustainability of the program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,417 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,153 is above the median of 150 across 952 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Dignitas International is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • all health centers in participating districts that routinely provide TB care will be included.
  • LHWs who have received the intervention and patients receiving care at participating health centers will be eligible to participate in interviews

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • health centers that do not routinely provide TB care
  • LHWs unwilling or unable to give informed consent.
  • TB patients less than 18 years of age unaccompanied by a parent or guardian, patients/guardians or LHWs unwilling or unable to give informed consent, patients presenting to a health center they are not routinely followed at.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Enrollment
1,153 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    KT intervention

    Multifaceted KT strategy employing peer-trainer led educational outreach, a point of care reminder tool, and a peer mentoring network.

    Other: KT intervention

  • No intervention
    Control

    Control sites will receive no intervention, with LHW training left to the discretion of the health centers TB focus LHW. Control sites will not have access to the point of care tool.

Interventions

  • OtherKT intervention

    Multifaceted KT intervention employing peer-trainer led educational outreach, a point of care reminder tool, and a peer mentoring network.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.

    primary outcome =proportion of cases successfully treated, defined as the total number of cases cured and completing treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)

    secondary outcome =proportion of default cases (treatment interrupted \>= 2 consecutive months)

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Proportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases

    secondary outcome = proportion of successes among HIV co-infected cases

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2020
Limitations and caveats
outcome data limited to TB register outcome data. give small number of defaults \& high proportion of missing outcome data secondary outcomes not analyzed, factors related to missing outcome analyzed and included in primary analysis

Participant flow

103 health centers enrolled, a total of 1153 patients

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneKT InterventionControl
Started605548
Completed364434
Not completed241114

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.

primary outcome =proportion of cases successfully treated, defined as the total number of cases cured and completing treatment.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.
ParticipantsKT InterventionControl
Proportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.297348
SecondaryProportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)

secondary outcome =proportion of default cases (treatment interrupted \>= 2 consecutive months)

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)
ParticipantsKT InterventionControl
Proportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)46
SecondaryProportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases

secondary outcome = proportion of successes among HIV co-infected cases

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases
ParticipantsKT InterventionControl
Proportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases00

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
KT Intervention49/605 (8.1%)0/605 (0%)0/605 (0%)
Control61/548 (11.1%)0/548 (0%)0/548 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)KT InterventionControlTotal
Mean35.4 (0 to 94)36.3 (0 to 94)35.9 (0 to 94)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)KT InterventionControlTotal
Female273227500
Male332321653
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)KT InterventionControlTotal
Count of participants——0
TB type = pulmonary TB
TB type = pulmonary TB(Participants)KT InterventionControlTotal
Count of participants457455912
08

Study locations

1 site
  • 4 Districts, SE zone of Malawi (Balaka, Machinga, Mangochi, Mulanje)
    Malawi, Malawi
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, Hamid JS, Zwarenstein M, Schull MJ, Chan AK, Martiniuk A, van Schoor V. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 2;11(7):e048499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048499. PubMed 34215610 ↗
  • Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, Hamid JS, Lebovic G, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Schull MJ, Chan AK, Martiniuk A, van Schoor V. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020 Dec 11;15(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01067-y. PubMed 33308257 ↗
  • Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Chan AK, Hamid JS, Kawonga H, Martiniuk AL, Schull MJ, van Schoor V, Zwarenstein M, Barnsley J, Straus SE. The impact of a knowledge translation intervention employing educational outreach and a point-of-care reminder tool vs standard lay health worker training on tuberculosis treatment completion rates: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Sep 7;17(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1563-2. PubMed 27604571 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 15, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02533089
Lead sponsor
Dignitas International
Collaborators
Unity Health Toronto
Responsible party
Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie (Dr., Unity Health Toronto) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2015
Start date
May 2016
Primary completion
Feb 2018
Completion
Feb 2018
Results posted
Mar 24, 2020
Last update
Mar 24, 2020

Study contacts

Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion