CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02519023Updated Feb 8, 2019Results posted

TAP vs Surgical Infiltration of Local Anesthetic in Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Liposomal Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine in Acute Pain, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-08.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
87
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Laparoscopic and Robotic assisted hysterectomy is a surgical procedure that is a minimally invasive way in which to remove the uterus, which has less scarring and fewer complications. However, this procedure, much like its open-surgical counterpart, is often associated with significant post-operative pain. To augment this pain there are many different analgesic techniques available to offset pain. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is one such procedure involving the injection of a local anesthetic into the plane of the transversus abdominal muscle where the terminal branches of nerves lie. A similar, yet different analgesic approach is that of direct injection of local anesthetic into the incision by the surgeon during or just after surgical procedures. These two approaches have both been proven to decrease post-operative pain in patients for many procedures, but never compared to one another.

Read the detailed description

This is a double blinded randomized study. All patients will receive one form of local anesthetic pain relief either from TAP or infiltration. Patients will be randomized to one of two study arms in a double-blinded, placebo controlled study. All patients will receive a TAP infiltration and all patients will receive infiltration into the incision.

In one arm the TAP infiltration will contain 10 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine with epinephrine injected followed by 20 mL of a 50:50 mixture of liposomal bupivacaine and normal saline. This will then be repeated on the contralateral side. In the same arm the surgeon infiltration into the incision will consist of 10 ml of normal saline per port site, 5 ml prior to incision and 5 ml prior to closure at each port site.

In the second arm the bilateral TAP infiltration will consist of 30 mL of normal saline per side. In the same arm the surgeon infiltration will consist of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per port site. The surgeon infiltration will consist of 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine prior to incision and 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine prior to closure at each port site.

A TAP infiltration is an injection of local anesthetic under the covering of the transversus abdominis muscle layer which provides effective post operative analgesia.2-5 This layer is found using an ultrasound, which is a beam of high frequency sound that allows one to visualize images in the body. Then using this ultrasound the investigators can see our needle as it pierces the covering of the transversus abdominis muscle layer and watch as the local anesthetic is infiltrated into this plane. This is done on both sides of the abdomen to provide analgesia to the skin, muscle, and facial layers of the abdomen. This is currently standard of care at our institution and will be performed within one hour of surgical incision. The injection will consist of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine followed by 20 mL of liposomal bupivacaine saline mixture or 10 ml of saline followed by 20 ml of saline and then repeated on the contralateral side.

Surgical Infiltration of the study solution will be performed both prior to incision and at the end of surgery just prior to closure of incisions. At each time, the surgeon will inject 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine into each of the port site incisions.

Investigational Drug Service (IDS) pharmacy will be charged with the blinding of medications vs. saline for these procedures.

Following the procedure, all individuals will receive scheduled acetaminophen (1 gram every 6 hours), scheduled ibuprofen (800 mg every 8 hours), and PRN oxycodone 5-10mg q4h if pain is rated at more than 5 out of 10 on a numerical pain scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Acute Pain

876 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 87 is close to the median of 90 across 732 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,184 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 132 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Females >/=18-years of age
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic/robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Contraindication to surgical infiltration or regional blockade
  • History of long term opioid intake (greater than 3 weeks prior to surgery) or chronic pain disorder
  • Inability to understand the informed consent and demands of the study
  • Surgery scheduled to start after 1700
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
87 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TAP-Block with liposomal bupivacaine

    TAP infiltration will contain 10 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine with epinephrine injected followed by 20 mL of a 50:50 mixture of liposomal bupivacaine and normal saline. This will then be repeated on the contralateral side. In the same arm the surgeon infiltration into the incision will consist of 10 ml of normal saline per port site, 5 ml prior to incision and 5 ml prior to closure at each port site.

    Drug: Liposomal Bupivacaine · Device: Ultrasound · Drug: Epinephrine · Drug: acetaminophen · Drug: ibuprofen · Drug: Oxycodone

  • Active comparator
    Surgical infiltration with bupivacaine

    Surgical Infiltration of the study solution will be performed both prior to incision and at the end of surgery just prior to closure of incisions. At each time, the surgeon will inject 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine into each of the port site incisions.

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Device: Ultrasound · Drug: acetaminophen · Drug: ibuprofen · Drug: Oxycodone

Interventions

  • DrugLiposomal Bupivacaine

    In one arm the TAP infiltration will contain 10 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine with epinephrine injected followed by 20 mL of a 50:50 mixture of liposomal bupivacaine and normal saline. This will then be repeated on the contralateral side.

    Also known as: Exparel

  • DrugBupivacaine

    Surgical Infiltration of the study solution will be performed both prior to incision and at the end of surgery just prior to closure of incisions. At each time, the surgeon will inject 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine into each of the port site incisions.

  • DeviceUltrasound

    An ultrasound, which is a beam of high frequency sound that allows one to visualize images in the body, will be used to aid investigators to observe the local anesthetic being infiltrated into the plane

  • DrugEpinephrine

    TAP infiltration will contain 10 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine with epinephrine.

  • Drugacetaminophen

    all individuals will receive scheduled acetaminophen (1 gram every 6 hours),

  • Drugibuprofen

    all individuals will receive scheduled ibuprofen (800 mg every 8 hours)

  • DrugOxycodone

    all individuals will receive PRN oxycodone 5-10mg q4h if pain is rated at more than 5 out of 10 on a numerical pain scale.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Opioid Use for Pain Control

    total opioid used from time 0 after surgery through 72 hours after surgery was complete.

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum Pain Scores as Measured by Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10)

    the Numerical rating scale goes from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). Higher values are a worse outcome. The maximal number for maximal pain scores from 0-72 hours is 30. Thus the range for this outcome is 0 to 30 with 30 being a worse outcome. This is because the 0-72 hour maximal pain scores are additive from the 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 hours. Each 24 hour subset has a maximal score of 10 and adding all three results in maximal score of 30.

    Time frame: 0-72 hours post-procedure

  2. Total Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents

    Time frame: 0-24 post-procedure

  3. Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR15) Score

    The quality of recovery is a survey given to patients. It is 15 questions. The scale of the QOR 15 Score is 0 to 150. 150 is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 72 hours post-procedure

  4. Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)

    The overall benefit of analgesia score is based off 7 questions given to patients it is scored 0-28. 28 is considered a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 72 hours post-procedure

  5. Number of Participants With Nausea and Vomiting

    Time frame: 72 hours post-procedure

  6. Length of Time in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Recovery

    time from start of recovery until patient was deemed ready to discharge from phase 2 recovery. Phase 2 recovery is the phase of the post anesthesia care where patients are readied to be discharge form the post anesthesia care unit. There are guidelines with regards to when patients are able to be discharged and when those points are met by the patient they are deemed ready to discharge.

    Time frame: an expected average of 120 mins

  7. Number of Patients Admitted Post Operatively

    Time frame: 72 hours post-procedure

  8. Opioid Used From 24-48 Hours Post Surgery

    opioids in mg of morphine equivalents used from 24-48 hours after surgery

    Time frame: 24-48 hours after the end of surgery

  9. Total Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents

    opioid use from time 48-72 hours in mg morphine equivalents

    Time frame: 48-72 hours after end of surgery

  10. Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management

    number of patients who answered yes to if they were satisfied with their pain management

    Time frame: at 72 hours after surgery

  11. Maximal Pain Score of Patient From Time 0-24 Hours After Surgery

    the maximal pain score felt by patient during this time period. This is based on a numerical rating scale of 0-10. 0 is best outcome and 10 is worst outcome.

    Time frame: 0-24 hours after surgery

  12. Maximal Pain Score for Patient From Time 24-48 Hours After Surgery

    the maximal pain score felt by patient during this time period. This is based on a numerical rating scale of 0-10. 0 is best outcome and 10 is worst outcome.

    Time frame: 24-48 hours after surgery

  13. Maximal Pain Score Patient Felt From 48-72 Hours After Surgery

    the maximal pain score felt by patient during this time period. This is based on a numerical rating scale of 0-10. 0 is best outcome and 10 is worst outcome.

    Time frame: 48-72 hours after surgery

07

Results

Posted Dec 5, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Started4938
Completed3131
Not completed187

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Opioid Use for Pain Control

total opioid used from time 0 after surgery through 72 hours after surgery was complete.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Median · mg Morphine equivalents
Total Opioid Use for Pain Control
mg Morphine equivalentsTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Total Opioid Use for Pain Control20.8 (0 to 66)25.0 (5 to 72)
SecondaryMaximum Pain Scores as Measured by Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10)

the Numerical rating scale goes from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). Higher values are a worse outcome. The maximal number for maximal pain scores from 0-72 hours is 30. Thus the range for this outcome is 0 to 30 with 30 being a worse outcome. This is because the 0-72 hour maximal pain scores are additive from the 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 hours. Each 24 hour subset has a maximal score of 10 and adding all three results in maximal score of 30.

Time frame:
0-72 hours post-procedure
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Maximum Pain Scores as Measured by Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10)
scores on a scaleTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Maximum Pain Scores as Measured by Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0-10)8 (0 to 29)13 (3 to 30)
SecondaryTotal Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents
Time frame:
0-24 post-procedure
Reported as:
Median · mg of morphine equivalents
Total Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents
mg of morphine equivalentsTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Total Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents7.5 (0 to 55)22.5 (0 to 90)
SecondaryQuality of Recovery 15 (QoR15) Score

The quality of recovery is a survey given to patients. It is 15 questions. The scale of the QOR 15 Score is 0 to 150. 150 is a better outcome.

Time frame:
72 hours post-procedure
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR15) Score
scores on a scaleTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR15) Score126 (79 to 146)115 (65 to 136)
SecondaryOverall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)

The overall benefit of analgesia score is based off 7 questions given to patients it is scored 0-28. 28 is considered a worse outcome.

Time frame:
72 hours post-procedure
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)
scores on a scaleTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS)2 (0 to 10)3 (0 to 11)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Nausea and Vomiting
Time frame:
72 hours post-procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Nausea and Vomiting
ParticipantsTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Number of Participants With Nausea and Vomiting1016
SecondaryLength of Time in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Recovery

time from start of recovery until patient was deemed ready to discharge from phase 2 recovery. Phase 2 recovery is the phase of the post anesthesia care where patients are readied to be discharge form the post anesthesia care unit. There are guidelines with regards to when patients are able to be discharged and when those points are met by the patient they are deemed ready to discharge.

Time frame:
an expected average of 120 mins
Reported as:
Median · hours
Length of Time in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Recovery
hoursTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Length of Time in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Recovery3.3 (1 to 8)3.1 (1 to 9)
SecondaryNumber of Patients Admitted Post Operatively
Time frame:
72 hours post-procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Admitted Post Operatively
ParticipantsTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Number of Patients Admitted Post Operatively1116
SecondaryOpioid Used From 24-48 Hours Post Surgery

opioids in mg of morphine equivalents used from 24-48 hours after surgery

Time frame:
24-48 hours after the end of surgery
Reported as:
Median · mg of morphine equivalents
Opioid Used From 24-48 Hours Post Surgery
mg of morphine equivalentsTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Opioid Used From 24-48 Hours Post Surgery0 (0 to 45).5 (0 to 38)
SecondaryTotal Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents

opioid use from time 48-72 hours in mg morphine equivalents

Time frame:
48-72 hours after end of surgery
Reported as:
Median · mg morphine equivalents
Total Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents
mg morphine equivalentsTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Total Opioid Taken by Patient as Tabulated and Converted to Morphine Equivalents0 (0 to 25)5 (0 to 34)
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction With Pain Management

number of patients who answered yes to if they were satisfied with their pain management

Time frame:
at 72 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management
ParticipantsTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management3024
SecondaryMaximal Pain Score of Patient From Time 0-24 Hours After Surgery

the maximal pain score felt by patient during this time period. This is based on a numerical rating scale of 0-10. 0 is best outcome and 10 is worst outcome.

Time frame:
0-24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Maximal Pain Score of Patient From Time 0-24 Hours After Surgery
units on a scaleTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Maximal Pain Score of Patient From Time 0-24 Hours After Surgery3 (0 to 10)5 (2 to 10)
SecondaryMaximal Pain Score for Patient From Time 24-48 Hours After Surgery

the maximal pain score felt by patient during this time period. This is based on a numerical rating scale of 0-10. 0 is best outcome and 10 is worst outcome.

Time frame:
24-48 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Maximal Pain Score for Patient From Time 24-48 Hours After Surgery
units on a scaleTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Maximal Pain Score for Patient From Time 24-48 Hours After Surgery3 (0 to 9)4 (0 to 10)
SecondaryMaximal Pain Score Patient Felt From 48-72 Hours After Surgery

the maximal pain score felt by patient during this time period. This is based on a numerical rating scale of 0-10. 0 is best outcome and 10 is worst outcome.

Time frame:
48-72 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Maximal Pain Score Patient Felt From 48-72 Hours After Surgery
units on a scaleTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
Maximal Pain Score Patient Felt From 48-72 Hours After Surgery2 (0 to 10)3 (0 to 10)

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event data was kept up to 30 days after surgery. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TAP-Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)10/31 (32.3%)
Surgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)16/31 (51.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With Bupivacaine
nausea/vomitingGastrointestinal disorders10/3116/31

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With BupivacaineTotal
Median58 (32 to 77)62 (32 to 88)59 (32 to 88)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With BupivacaineTotal
Female313162
Male000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)TAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With BupivacaineTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)TAP-Block With Liposomal BupivacaineSurgical Infiltration With BupivacaineTotal
United States313162
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Feierman DE, Kronenfeld M, Gupta PM, Younger N, Logvinskiy E. Liposomal bupivacaine infiltration into the transversus abdominis plane for postsurgical analgesia in open abdominal umbilical hernia repair: results from a cohort of 13 patients. J Pain Res. 2014 Aug 16;7:477-82. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S65151. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25170277 ↗
  • Mitchell AU, Torup H, Hansen EG, Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB, Rosenberg J, Moller AM. Effective dermatomal blockade after subcostal transversus abdominis plane block. Dan Med J. 2012 Mar;59(3):A4404. PubMed 22381092 ↗
  • Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26. PubMed 19561014 ↗
  • Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 May;54(5):529-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02215.x. Epub 2010 Feb 17. PubMed 20175754 ↗
  • Singh M, Chin KJ, Chan V. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block: a useful adjunct in the management of postoperative respiratory failure. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Jun;23(4):303-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.05.012. PubMed 21663815 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 25, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02519023
Lead sponsor
University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 10, 2015
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
May 2017
Completion
Jun 2017
Results posted
Dec 5, 2018
Last update
Feb 8, 2019

Study contacts

Melissa Geller, MD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion