CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02514421Updated Apr 29, 2019

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Electrochemotherapy in the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

A Phase 1 interventional study of Electroporation and gemcitabine in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-29.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Apr 2017, 9 years 5 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to see how well electrochemotherapy works at treating people with Stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Electrochemotherapy is a treatment that combines electroporation and chemotherapy administration. Electroporation uses an electric current to produce holes in pancreatic tumor, which causes the tumor cells to die or take up a higher concentration of administered chemotherapy agent. This study will test the safety and look at the effect of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study will also help to find the safest and most effective amount of electroporation voltage to apply to this type of tumor.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase I dose escalation trial using a 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme to evaluate the maximum tolerated field strength dose of administered irreversible electroporation in combination with chemotherapy. During the first cycle of chemotherapy, patients will receive electroporation of the primary pancreatic tumor prior to administration of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. The schedule of administration of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel will be administered as per standard of care. The investigators will use non-invasive dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to detect and describe changes within the tumor. Safety will be determined by assessing the number of class three or higher toxicity events in cohorts of 6 patients at progressively higher electroporation voltages. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as one voltage level less than the voltage at which two or more patients out of six total patients have a class three or higher toxicity event.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • electrochemotherapy
  • electroporation
  • radiogenomics
  • imaging
  • magnetic resonance spectroscopy
03

In context

Adenocarcinoma

2,002 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma; 375 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 45 across 1,551 interventional studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma.

Browse Adenocarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically or cytologically proven pancreatic carcinoma which is safely accessible by percutaneous methods;
  • Locally advanced un-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma;
  • At least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (longest diameter >=20 mm using conventional techniques or >=10 mm with spiral CT or MRI scan);
  • WHO performance status (PS) \< 2 or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \< 2;
  • Age >18;
  • Life expectancy > 3 months;
  • No history of gastric or esophageal varices;
  • No active, uncontrolled infection;
  • All patients must have adequate physiologic (hematologic, renal and hepatic) reserves as evidenced by: neutrophil count >1500/mL; platelet count >100,000/mL; serum creatinine \<1.5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) value; serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) \<2.5 x ULN and bilirubin \<1.5 x ULN functions
  • Pain and biliary obstruction controlled before the start of the study
  • Absence of psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule;
  • Women of childbearing potential (defined as sexually mature woman who 1) has not undergone hysterectomy [the surgical removal of the uterus] or bilateral oophorectomy [the surgical removal of both ovaries] or 2) has not been naturally post-menopausal for at last 24 consecutive months) must have a negative pregnancy test prior to starting therapy. Men and women of childbearing potential must be willing to use effective contraceptive while on treatment and for a reasonable period thereafter.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel;
  • Prior history of pancreatic electroporation;
  • Untreatable contrast allergy;
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, or any of the excipients;
  • Presence of metal biliary stent;
  • Psychosis or seizures;
  • Evidence of serious gastrointestinal bleeding or bowel obstruction;
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Women of childbearing potential who are not using adequate protection;
  • Inability to tolerate MRI imaging
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Electrochemotherapy with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel

    During the first cycle of chemotherapy, patients will receive electroporation of the primary pancreatic tumor prior to administration of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and abraxane. The schedule of administration of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel will be administered as per standard of care. The chemotherapy schedule will include administration of nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 intravenous (IV) over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, followed by gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28 day cycle.

    Device: Electroporation · Drug: gemcitabine · Drug: nab-paclitaxel

Interventions

  • DeviceElectroporation

    Irreversible electroporation (IRE) will be performed under computed tomography (CT) guidance, during which 2 to 6 needles are advanced into the pancreatic tumor where a specified field strength will be applied.

    Also known as: Irreversible electroporation (IRE)

  • Druggemcitabine

    The chemotherapy schedule will include administration of gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28 day cycle.

    Also known as: Gemzar

  • Drugnab-paclitaxel

    The chemotherapy schedule will include administration of nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 intravenous (IV) over approximately 30 to 45 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15.

    Also known as: Abraxane

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants who experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs)

    A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is any Grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0) that is possibly related to the electrochemotherapy treatment. CTCAE 4.0 Grade 3 is a severe AE and Grade 4 is a life-threatening or disabling AE. DLTs are collected to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), which is defined as as one field strength level less than the field strength at which two or more patients out of six total patients experience a DLT.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants who demonstrated no clinical change or clinical improvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma outcome as assessed by time to progression

    Time to progression is the time after treatment until tumor enlargement or metastatic disease is identified.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Number of participants who demonstrated no clinical change or clinical improvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma outcome as assessed by one year survival

    One year survival is the number of patients who are alive one year after treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Number of participants who demonstrated no clinical change or clinical improvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma outcome as assessed by tumor imaging

    We will assess tumor size changes and tumor staging through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Number of participants who demonstrated diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Number of participants who demonstrated magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) changes

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Number of groups of patients who have similar pancreatic tumor gene expression characteristics and associated imaging characteristics after electrochemotherapy

    Gene expression characteristics are identified by biopsy specimen evaluation. Imaging characteristics are evaluated by MRI and MRS.

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Number of groups of patients who have similar pancreatic tumor gene expression characteristics and associated clinical outcomes after electrochemotherapy

    Gene expression characteristics are identified by biopsy specimen evaluation. Clinical outcomes are evaluated by time to progression and 1 year survival. Time to progression is the time after treatment until tumor enlargement or metastatic disease is identified. One year survival is the number of patients who are alive one year after treatment.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02514421
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Responsible party
Anil K Pillai (Assistant Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2015
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
Apr 18, 2017
Completion
Apr 18, 2017
Last update
Apr 29, 2019

Study contacts

Anil K Pillai, MD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion