ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02511509ESBECTUpdated Oct 3, 2016

Bifrontal and Bitemporal Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia

An interventional study of Bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy and Bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy in Schizophrenia, sponsored by Medical University of Lodz. Status unknown at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-03.

Sponsored by Medical University of Lodz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Electroconvulsive therapy has been used in clinical practice since 1938, a number of randomized trials found significant differences favoring ECT in response rates between individuals with depression receiving real and sham ECT. Results of early studies performed on patients with schizophrenia weren't so clear, only few of these trials found appreciable differences between real and sham ECT in clinical outcome. The recent, more reliable studies have found that ECT is efficacious on different symptoms which might be present in the course of schizophrenia, for example, psychotic and affective ones, as well as suicidality. The serious complications of electroconvulsive therapy are rare, however, more frequent side effects may include cognitive impairment and postictal delirium. Thus, the researchers try to develop new, more effective and less harmful procedures of ECT, like bifrontal electrodes. The available studies revealed that bifrontal ECT has equal efficacy to bitemporal ECT with less cognitive impairment, but the literature examining this placement is limited to major depressive disorder and the results are inconsistent. In the worldwide literature there is lack of studies regarding the use of bifrontal ECT among patients with schizophrenia. It is interesting how bifrontal ECT would affect axial symptoms of schizophrenia, since the electrodes in this procedure are placed over the brain areas responsible for negative symptoms. This randomized, double blind study is going to assess whether the bifrontal ECT is more effective in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, has less harmful impact on the cognitive functions and decrease the frequency and severity of postictal delirium comparing to the bitemporal ECT. Moreover, as the first worldwide will assess the brain dopaminergic activity with the use of PET in the patients with schizophrenia after ECT and the impact of the ECT on the concentration of such neurotrophins as brain-derived neurotrophic factor-BDNF, neuron specific enolase-NSE and protein S100B.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy
  • Bifrontal ECT
  • Bitemporal ECT
  • Cognitive functions
  • Postictal delirium
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,539 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 473 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 70 across 2,924 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Lodz is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia (apart from residual type)
  • The patients qualified for ECT according the standard protocol
  • Antipsychotic treatment with dibenzepins according to the following scheme: the dose of clozapine not higher than 450mg, the dose of olanzapine not higher than 20mg and the dose of quetiapine not higher than 600mg per day
  • If needed concomitant treatment allowed with hydroxyzine (max. 100mg per day) and lorazepam (max. 4mg per day)
  • Anaesthesia conducted with the use of suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The lack of patient's consent
  • Mental retardation confirmed with the psychological and psychiatric examination (IQ\<70; fulfilled DSM-V criteria for mental retardation)
  • Dementia diagnosed on the basis of DSM-V criteria
  • Substance abuse during the year prior study enrolment or substance addiction
  • The presence of symptoms which met DSM-V criteria for affective episode (an episode of mania, hypomania or depression)
  • The ECT conducted during 6 months prior the study enrolment
  • The history of previous ineffective ECT
  • The need for antipsychotic treatment other than derivatives of dibenzothiazepines or in doses higher than 450mg of clozapine, 20mg of olanzapine and 600mg of quetiapine per day
  • The women in the generative period who do not use effective contraception (sexual abstinence, contraceptives, intrauterine device, mechanical contraceptive devices)
  • The need for use of other than suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine anaesthetics and concomitant medications
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy

    The ECT courses will be held twice or three times a week. There is no stated minimal nor maximal number of ECT courses. If there is no improvement after 12 courses, the ECT will be regarded as ineffective.

    Device: Bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy

  • Active comparator
    Bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy

    The ECT courses will be held twice or three times a week. There is no stated minimal nor maximal number of ECT courses. If there is no improvement after 12 courses, the ECT will be regarded as ineffective.

    Device: Bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceBifrontal electroconvulsive therapy

    The centre of each electrode will be placed 4-5 cm above the outer canthus of the eye along a vertical line perpendicular to a line connecting the pupils.

  • DeviceBitemporal electroconvulsive therapy

    The centre of the stimulus electrodes will be applied 2-3 cm above the midpoint of the line connecting the outer canthus of the eye and the external auditory meatus on each side of the individual's head.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  2. Clinical Global Impression

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  3. Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale

    Assessment conducted after the each ECT course.

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  4. Confusion Assessment Method

    Assessment conducted after the each ECT course.

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  5. Verbal Memory Test

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  6. Visual Memory Test

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  7. Finger Tapping Test

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  8. Symbol Digit Coding Test

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  9. Stroop Test

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  10. Shifting Attention Test

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  11. Continuous Performance Test

    Assessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positron Emission Tomography to assess the impact of ECT on the dopaminergic system activity

    Assessment conducted before the first and after the last ECT course.

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  2. The concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

    The blood samples will be collected on baseline, 2 and 6 hours after the first ECT course, 2 hours after the 3rd, 6th, 9th and the last ECT course

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  3. The concentration of neuron specific enolase.

    The blood samples will be collected on baseline, 2 and 6 hours after the first ECT course, 2 hours after the 3rd, 6th, 9th and the last ECT course

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  4. The concentration of protein S100B

    The blood samples will be collected on baseline, 2 and 6 hours after the first ECT course, 2 hours after the 3rd, 6th, 9th and the last ECT course

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders Medical University of Lodz
    Lodz, 92-213, Poland
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02511509
Responsible party
Jakub Kazmierski (PhD, Medical University of Lodz) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 3, 2016

Study contacts

Jakub Kazmierski, PhD
Contact
jakub.kazmierski@umed.lodz.pl
0048426757232
Iwona Kloszewska, Prof.
principal investigator · Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion