CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02498977LIFTUpdated Mar 7, 2024

Liver Immunosuppression Free Trial

A Phase 4 interventional study of Biomarker and Tacrolimus, cyclosporine and/or mycophenolic acid, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine in Transplantation, Liver, sponsored by King's College London. Terminated at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-07.

Sponsored by King's College London · Phase 4, Interventional, and Health services research

Why this study was terminated
Primary endpoint not reached.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
116
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

LIFT is prospective randomised marker-based trial to assess the clinical utility and safety of biomarker-guided immunosuppression withdrawal in liver transplantation. 'LIFT' aims to validate a biomarker test of operational tolerance to stratify liver transplant recipients before withdrawing immunosuppressive medication. Primary objective is clinical utility and risk/benefit ratio of employing a transcriptional test of tolerance to stratify liver recipients prior to immunosuppression withdrawal. Secondary objectives are: safety of biomarker-guided immunosuppression withdrawal; health-economic and quality of life impact of biomarker-guided immunosuppression withdrawal; improvement in drug-related co-morbidities; prevalence of tolerance over time; role of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies; identify mechanisms of liver allograft tolerance. It is a prospective, multi-centre, phase IV, biomarker-strategy design trial with a randomized control group in which adult liver transplant recipients will undergo immunosuppression withdrawal. The sample size is 148 patients.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-centre, phase IV, biomarker-strategy design trial with a randomised control group in which adult liver transplant recipients will undergo immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal. Immunosuppression drugs (IS) are: Tacrolimus, cyclosporine and/or mycophenolic acid, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine.

Enrolled participants will be randomised 1:1 to either: 1) Non-Biomarker-based IS weaning (Weaning-All; Arm A); or 2) Biomarker-based IS weaning (Arm B). In participants allocated to Arm A IS will be withdrawn regardless of the result of the biomarker test. Among participants allocated to Arm B, only those found to be biomarker-positive (Arm B+, i.e. potentially tolerant) will be offered IS withdrawal, while biomarker-negative participants (Arm B-, i.e. potentially non-tolerant) will remain on their baseline maintenance IS. This will allow us to demonstrate that the biomarker is a useful test to personalise IS by offering drug withdrawal only to those participants who are likely to complete the process successfully, avoiding unnecessary rejections among those who have not developed tolerance. Comparing the outcome of IS withdrawal between arms A and B+ will provide direct evidence of the clinical usefulness of the test as a function of its predictive accuracy. We have established that for the biomarker to drive safe IS withdrawal its Positive Predictive Value should be no less than 0.80, and its sensitivity at least 070. To account for centre effects, we will use stratified randomization. Furthermore, to avoid biases, participants undergoing drug withdrawal and their physicians will be blinded to the biomarker results. Participants randomized to Arm B- will know their biomarker status, and will be maintained in the study until its termination and contribute to secondary clinical outcomes and to the evaluation of the stability of the tolerance signature.

Cost and quality of life (HrQOL) assessments will be conducted alongside the trial to estimate the health-economic implications of the 2 different strategies. Furthermore, sequential biological specimens will be collected to conduct ancillary mechanistic studies. Recruitment will take place in 11 European liver transplant units (King's College Hospital, Royal Free London, Newcastle, Birmingham, Leeds, Edinburgh, Cambridge, Leuven, Hannover, Berlin and Barcelona).

02

Conditions studied

  • Transplantation, Liver

Keywords

  • Liver
  • Transplant
  • Immunosuppression
03

In context

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. At the time of screening: more than 3 years post-transplant if participants are ≥50 years old, OR more than 6 years post-transplant if participant age is 18-49 years old.
  2. Recipient of either deceased or living donor liver transplant.
  3. Recipient of single organ transplant only
  4. Liver function tests: direct bilirubin ≤17.1 umol/L and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤60 IU/L at the screening visit.
  5. On calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) based maintenance IS and no more than one of the following: Low dose mycophenolic acid (≤ 1080 mg daily), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF ≤ 1500 mg daily), or azathioprine (≤ 150 mg daily); or on mycophenolate/mycophenolic monotherapy (effective contraception must be used before beginning mycophenolate therapy, during therapy, and for six weeks following discontinuation of therapy).
  6. Ability to sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Serum positivity for Hepatitis C virus (HCV-RNA)
  2. Serum positivity for HIV-1 infection, Hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen or HBV-DNA
  3. Immune-mediated liver disease in which IS discontinuation is inadvisable (autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis).
  4. Acute or chronic rejection within the 52 weeks prior to screening.
  5. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<40 mL/min (to mitigate the risk of worsening renal failure should rejection occur and high level of CNI be required).
  6. The need for chronic anti-coagulation that cannot be safely discontinued to safely perform for a liver biopsy.
  7. Baseline (screening) liver biopsy showing any of the following: a) acute rejection according to Banff criteria; b) early or late chronic rejection according to Banff criteria; c) inflammatory activity and/or fibrosis in excess of permissive criteria; f) any other findings that might make participation in the trial unsafe. Eligibility will be determined by the central pathologist.
  8. Patient age \<18 years old at the time of transplant.
  9. Pregnant females and females of childbearing age not using effective contraception.
  10. Current illicit drug or alcohol abuse.
  11. Inability to participate in frequent monitoring of liver function (every 3 weeks) and clinical visits during IS withdrawal.
  12. Inability to comply with study directed treatment.
  13. Any medical condition that in the opinion of the principal investigator would interfere with safe completion of the trial.
  14. Participation in another clinical trial during the month prior to enrollment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
116 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A (weaning)

    All participants satisfying clinical criteria will be weaned off immunosuppression drugs irrespective of biomarker result.

    Drug: Tacrolimus, cyclosporine and/or mycophenolic acid, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine

  • Active comparator
    Arm B+ (weaning- positive biomarker)

    Participants with a positive biomarker will be weaned of immunosuppression drugs.

    Genetic: Biomarker

  • Active comparator
    Arm B- (maintenance)

    Participant with negative biomarker test result will be informed of the result and will remain on baseline maintenance immunosuppression drugs.

    Genetic: Biomarker

Interventions

  • GeneticBiomarker

    Real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) gene expression measurement

  • DrugTacrolimus, cyclosporine and/or mycophenolic acid, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine

    Immunosuppression drugs as per protocol

    Also known as: IS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Successful discontinuation of IS with maintenance of normal allograft status

    Number of patients with successful discontinuation of IS with maintenance of normal allograft status as assessed by liver biopsy and liver tests 12 months after IS withdrawal (operational tolerance)

    Time frame: 12 months from IS withdrawal

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of tolerant participants remaining free of rejection

    Measures of rejection in patients (incidence, severity, timing, steroid resistant rejection, chronic rejection) and to investigate if liver transplant recipients under IS become operationally tolerant over time.

    Time frame: 3 years post IS withdrawal

  2. Renal function at 1, 2 and 3 years after enrollment and change in co-morbidities

    To determine the extent to which IS withdrawal improve drug-related co-morbidities associated with IS use (hypertension, cardiovascular risk profile, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, malignancy) and to explore the association between operational liver transplant tolerance, iron metabolism, immunosenescence, and specific gut microbiome profiles.

    Time frame: 3 years post IS withdrawal

  3. Development of anti-HLA antibodies (before and after initiation of IS withdrawal).

    To determine if the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies influence the success of IS withdrawal, and whether IS withdrawal promotes the development of anti-HLA antibodies in liver transplant recipients.

    Time frame: 3 years post IS withdrawal

  4. Change in Health related quality of life (HrQOL)

    To assess the effect of IS withdrawal on the quality of life of liver transplant recipients.

    Time frame: 3 years post IS withdrawal

  5. Costs of treatment

    Measuring pharmacoeconomic impact of IS withdrawal.

    Time frame: 3 years post IS withdrawal

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Newcastle, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02498977
Lead sponsor
King's College London
Collaborators
King's College Hospital NHS Trust, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2015
Start date
Oct 2015
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Dec 31, 2021
Last update
Mar 7, 2024

Study contacts

Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo
principal investigator · King's College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion