ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02494544Updated Nov 21, 2025Results posted

A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Functional Outcome After Knee Replacement

An interventional study of Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement and ConforMIS iTotal Knee Replacement in Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Restor3D. Terminated at 8 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.

Sponsored by Restor3D · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Why this study was terminated
Decision of investigational team
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
215
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients will be consecutively enrolled by implant. Implant groups will be those who have undergone surgery with either a ConforMIS iTotal® CR TKA or an Off-the- Shelf (OTS) system.

The patient will conduct functional testing and answer questionnaires.

The results will compare the ConforMIS iTotal with an Off the Shelf Knee replacement.

Read the detailed description

To compare functional and patient reported outcome data for a consecutively enrolled group of subjects who have undergone surgery with either a ConforMIS iTotal® CR TKA or an Off-the- Shelf (OTS) system.The person conducting the functional testing will be blinded to the device implanted. Sites will perform the off-the-shelf total knees conventional instrumentation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • knee implant
  • knee replacement
  • total knee replacement
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

2,974 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 438 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 215 is above the median of 80 across 2,240 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Restor3D is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical condition included in the approved Indications For Use for the iTotal CR
  • Osteoarthritis, as confirmed by the investigator's assessment of disease status at screening visit that warrants a TKR procedure. Disease status is assessed by Clinical and Radiographic assessment
  • Willingness to participate in the clinical study, to give and to attend all follow-up visits
  • > 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion:

  • Subject will require a simultaneous bilateral procedure
  • Other lower extremity surgery within 1 year
  • Severe (> 15º) fixed valgus or varus deformity
  • Severe (> 15º) extension deficit
  • Severe instability due to advanced loss of osteochondral structure
  • Loss of bone or musculature, osteoporosis, neuromuscular or vascular compromise in the area of the joint to be operated on to an extent that the procedure is unjustified
  • Insufficient bone stock on the femoral or tibial surfaces
  • Contralateral knee replacement surgery within the past 6 months
  • > 40
  • Active (defined as a history of any invasive malignancy - except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless patient has been treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years
  • Poorly controlled diabetes (defined as >7 or surgeon discretion)
  • Other physical disability affecting the hips, spine, or contralateral knee that limits function
  • Disabling chronic pain with narcotic dependence
  • Compromised PCL or collateral ligament
  • Prior history of failed implant surgery of the joint to be treated, including Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA), or Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (BKA)
  • Prior history of failed high tibial osteotomy (HTO)
  • Participation in another clinical study which would confound results
  • Inability to complete the protocol in the opinion of the clinical staff due to safety or other reasons
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
215 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ConforMIS iTotal Knee replacement

    iTotal patient-specific knee replacement system

    Device: ConforMIS iTotal Knee Replacement

  • Active comparator
    DePuy total knee replacement

    Off the shelf knee replacement system

    Device: Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement

  • Active comparator
    Zimmer total knee replacement

    Off the shelf knee replacement system

    Device: Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement

  • Active comparator
    Biomet total knee replacement

    Off the shelf knee replacement system

    Device: Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement

  • Active comparator
    Smith & Nephew total knee replacement

    Off the shelf knee replacement system

    Device: Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement

  • Active comparator
    Stryker total knee replacement

    Off the shelf knee replacement system

    Device: Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement

Interventions

  • DeviceOff the Shelf Total Knee Replacement

    A knee replacement system by DePuy, Zimmer, Biomet, Smith \& Nephew, or Stryker

  • DeviceConforMIS iTotal Knee Replacement

    A knee replacement performed with patient specific implant and surgical jigs.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Activities Subscale Score Within the Knee Society Score (KSS) Measure

    Comparing the functional testing differences between iTotal and off the shelf. "Total Functional Activities Score" - a subscale within the Knee Society Score (KSS) with its individual subscale score. The Total Functional Activities Score subscale interprets the functional knee health of each patient via a series of tests such as walking/standing (30 points), standard activities (30 points), advanced activities (25 points), and sports/recreational activities (15 points). Deductions to score are made for factors that limit a patient's mobility, such as needing to use an ambulatory device. The subscale scoring system ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction Subscale Score Within the Knee Society Score (KSS) Measure

    Measuring and comparing the differences between iTotal and off the shelf knees with patient reported outcomes. "Patient Satisfaction", a subscale within the Knee Society Score (KSS), was utilized to capture this metric. The Patient Satisfaction subscale combines scores given for certain responses (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied) across 5 questions. These questions are designed to determine the level of satisfaction a patient has with their implant across both everyday and active activities. This score ranges from 0-40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Incidents of Major Procedure-related and Device Related Complications (Including Revision Rates)

    All complications were stratified according to clinicaltrials.gov reporting standards and each site labeled each complication as either device-related, non-device-related, procedure-related, and non-procedure-related.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Oct 8, 2025

Participant flow

While "Biomet Total Knee Replacement" and "Smith and Nephew Total Knee Replacement" Arms/Groups were listed as possible study groups, no included patients utilized these implant systems. This included patients who failed to meet screening criteria, failed to reach the protocol's required follow-up duration, etc. These arms/groups were only established before the study to represent the possible study groups based on available implant systems on the market.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee Replacement
Started13138190026
Completed8128190019
Not completed50100007

Outcome measures

PrimaryFunctional Activities Subscale Score Within the Knee Society Score (KSS) Measure

Comparing the functional testing differences between iTotal and off the shelf. "Total Functional Activities Score" - a subscale within the Knee Society Score (KSS) with its individual subscale score. The Total Functional Activities Score subscale interprets the functional knee health of each patient via a series of tests such as walking/standing (30 points), standard activities (30 points), advanced activities (25 points), and sports/recreational activities (15 points). Deductions to score are made for factors that limit a patient's mobility, such as needing to use an ambulatory device. The subscale scoring system ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a subscale
Functional Activities Subscale Score Within the Knee Society Score (KSS) Measure
Score on a subscaleConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee Replacement
Baseline Score42.34 ± 16.3140.38 ± 13.0743.56 ± 12.38——38.87 ± 13.53
1 Year Score77.16 ± 16.4773.65 ± 16.9988.94 ± 6.20——71.20 ± 23.63
Change in Score34.82 ± 21.7333.27 ± 18.2845.39 ± 13.18——32.33 ± 19.21
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction Subscale Score Within the Knee Society Score (KSS) Measure

Measuring and comparing the differences between iTotal and off the shelf knees with patient reported outcomes. "Patient Satisfaction", a subscale within the Knee Society Score (KSS), was utilized to capture this metric. The Patient Satisfaction subscale combines scores given for certain responses (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied) across 5 questions. These questions are designed to determine the level of satisfaction a patient has with their implant across both everyday and active activities. This score ranges from 0-40, with higher scores indicating higher levels of patient satisfaction.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Satisfaction Subscale Score Within the Knee Society Score (KSS) Measure
score on a scaleConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee Replacement
Baseline Score12.49 ± 7.0913.62 ± 6.5015.67 ± 7.65——15.50 ± 6.67
1 Year Score33.78 ± 8.2832.00 ± 7.8037.44 ± 3.81——32.93 ± 6.84
Change in Score21.29 ± 10.7618.38 ± 9.6321.78 ± 8.08——17.73 ± 8.71
SecondaryIncidents of Major Procedure-related and Device Related Complications (Including Revision Rates)

All complications were stratified according to clinicaltrials.gov reporting standards and each site labeled each complication as either device-related, non-device-related, procedure-related, and non-procedure-related.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · Patients with Events
Incidents of Major Procedure-related and Device Related Complications (Including Revision Rates)
Patients with EventsConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee Replacement
Major Procedure Related Complications1251——3
Device Related Complications (including revision)100——0

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year post-operation.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ConforMIS iTotal Knee Replacement0/81 (0%)13/81 (16%)26/81 (32.1%)
DePuy Total Knee Replacement0/28 (0%)6/28 (21.4%)7/28 (25%)
Zimmer Total Knee Replacement0/19 (0%)2/19 (10.5%)1/19 (5.3%)
Biomet Total Knee Replacement———
Smith & Nephew Total Knee Replacement———
Stryker Total Knee Replacement0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)7/19 (36.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee Replacement
SASGeneral disorders13/816/282/19——0/19
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee Replacement
Procedure Related ComplicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications12/815/281/19——3/19
Thrombotic ComplicationsVascular disorders0/810/280/19——2/19
Pain/Stiffness ComplicationsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/812/280/19——0/19
Infection-related ComplicationInfections and infestations5/810/280/19——1/19
Wound ComplicationsGeneral disorders5/810/280/19——1/19

Baseline characteristics

Our analysis expected a broader range of off the shelf implants, but no included patients received Biomet or Smith \& Nephew Total Knee Replacements.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee ReplacementTotal
<=18 years0000000
Between 18 and 65 years42101000567
>=65 years39189001480
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee ReplacementTotal
Mean65.728 ± 7.48267.321 ± 6.84263 ± 8.524——68.105 ± 6.59065.986 ± 7.468
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee ReplacementTotal
Female451913——1289
Male3696——758
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee ReplacementTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000——00
Asian020——02
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000——00
Black or African American1260——220
White681619——17120
More than one race000——00
Unknown or Not Reported140——05
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ConforMIS iTotal Knee ReplacementDePuy Total Knee ReplacementZimmer Total Knee ReplacementBiomet Total Knee ReplacementSmith & Nephew Total Knee ReplacementStryker Total Knee ReplacementTotal
United States732719——10128
Germany810——919
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • University of California in San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Sharp Healthcare
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Denver-Vail Orthopedics
    Parker, Colorado 80134, United States
  • Yale School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
  • Tufts University
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • University of Missouri
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
  • OrthoNY
    Albany, New York 12205, United States
  • The Lindner Center for Research and Education
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2015 to primary completion in Nov 2022, 88 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2025, 2 years 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 28, 2015
First posted
Jul 10, 2015
StartActual
Jul 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Nov 16, 2022
CompletionActual
Nov 16, 2022
Results first posted
Oct 8, 2025
Last update
Nov 21, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02494544
Lead sponsor
Restor3D
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2015
Start date
Jul 1, 2015
Primary completion
Nov 16, 2022
Completion
Nov 16, 2022
Results posted
Oct 8, 2025
Last update
Nov 21, 2025

Study contacts

Mary O'Connor, MD
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion