CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02490384TWIN-PEICUpdated Apr 27, 2020

Physical Exam Indicated Cerclage in Twin Gestations

An interventional study of Physical exam indicated cerclage in Twin Pregnancy, Antepartum Condition or Complication, Preterm Birth and Cervical Dilation Premature, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Terminated at 11 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-27.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
due to significant decrease of perinatal mortality in the cerclage group
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter randomized study designed to determine if physical exam indicated cerclage reduces the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth \<34 weeks in asymptomatic women with twin gestations and dilated cervix, diagnosed by pelvic exam between 16 to 23 6/7 weeks of gestation.

Read the detailed description

Twin pregnancies have 58% incidence of preterm delivery (before 37 weeks of gestation), with increased perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity. No therapy has proven effective in preventing preterm birth in twins. When cervical dilation is identified before 24 weeks in singleton pregnancies, the risk of preterm birth is 90%-100%; based on a small series of cases, approximately 50% of twin gestations with cervical dilation will be delivered prior to viability (24 weeks) and the risk of preterm birth prior to 34 and 37 weeks was 85% and 100%. Cervical dilation is the worst prognostic factor for preterm birth. There are a small number of case reports of cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies with a dilated cervix that suggest similar outcomes to those in singleton pregnancies. The investigators' objective is to determine if physical exam indicated cerclage reduces the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth \<34 weeks and improve perinatal outcome in asymptomatic women with twin gestations and dilated cervix (1 to 5 cm) between 16 to 23 6/7 weeks of gestation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Twin Pregnancy, Antepartum Condition or Complication
  • Preterm Birth
  • Cervical Dilation Premature

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cervical cerclage
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 384 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Pregnant women older than 18 years of age
  2. Diamniotic twin pregnancy
  3. Cervical dilation between 1 to 5 cm and/or visible membranes by pelvic exam or speculum exam between at 16-23 6/7 weeks gestation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Singleton pregnancy or higher order than twins multiple gestation
  2. Cervical dilation more than 5 cm
  3. Amniotic membranes prolapsed beyond external os into the vagina, unable to visualize cervical tissue
  4. More than 24 weeks of gestation
  5. Multifetal reduction after 14 weeks
  6. Monoamniotic twins
  7. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome
  8. Ruptured amniotic membranes at the time of diagnosis of dilated cervix
  9. Major fetal structural anomaly
  10. Fetal chromosomal abnormality
  11. Cerclage already in place for other indications
  12. Active vaginal bleeding
  13. Suspicion of clinical or biochemical chorioamnionitis
  14. Painful regular uterine contractions
  15. Labor (progressing cervical dilation)
  16. Placenta previa
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Physical exam indicated cerclage

    Cerclage

    Procedure: Physical exam indicated cerclage

  • No intervention
    Expectant management

    No cerclage

Interventions

  • ProcedurePhysical exam indicated cerclage

    Cervical cerclage

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Preterm delivery less than 34 weeks

    Incidence of preterm birth less than 34 weeks (any indication)

    Time frame: at delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Spontaneous preterm birth less than 34

    Incidence of spontaneous preterm birth less than 34 weeks

    Time frame: at delivery

  2. Preterm delivery less than <32 weeks, <28 weeks, or <24 weeks

    Incidence of preterm birth less than \<32 weeks, \<28 weeks, or \<24 weeks

    Time frame: at delivery

  3. Mean gestational age at delivery

    Mean value of gestational age at delivery (weeks)

    Time frame: at delivery

  4. Birth weight at birth

    Mean value (grams)

    Time frame: at delivery

  5. Gestational age at spontaneous rupture of membranes

    Mean value (weeks) through study completion

    Time frame: at presentation of rupture membranes

Other outcomes

  1. Chorioamnionitis

    Incidence

    Time frame: Time of delivery

  2. Composite adverse neonatal outcome

    Includes necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or higher), respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy, blood-culture proven sepsis

    Time frame: Incidence between birth and 28 days of age

  3. Fetal demise

    Incidence

    Time frame: Incidence before delivery

  4. Neonatal death

    Incidence

    Time frame: Incidence between birth and 28 days of age

  5. Perinatal death

    Incidence

    Time frame: Incidence before and after birth ulntil 28 days of age

  6. Maternal death

    Incidence

    Time frame: Between birth and 6 weeks postpartum

  7. Interval between diagnosis and delivery

    Mean value (days) through study completion

    Time frame: at delivery

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • George Washington University
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Albany Medical Center
    Albany, New York 12208, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Wright State University
    Dayton, Ohio 45409, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Austin Maternal Fetal Medicine St David's Health Care
    Austin, Texas 78758, United States
  • Bologna University
    Bologna, Italy
  • University of Brescia
    Brescia, Italy
  • Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II"
    Naples, Italy
  • University of Warsaw
    Warsaw, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011. Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):548-58. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3769. Epub 2013 Feb 11. PubMed 23400611 ↗
  • Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M, Van Dorsten JP, Thurnau G, Bottoms S, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Das A, Caritis SN, McNellis D. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):1047-53. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)80051-2. PubMed 8885774 ↗
  • Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Hassan SS, Yeo L. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):128.e1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.064. Epub 2010 Jun 23. PubMed 20576253 ↗
  • Rouse DJ, Caritis SN, Peaceman AM, Sciscione A, Thom EA, Spong CY, Varner M, Malone F, Iams JD, Mercer BM, Thorp J, Sorokin Y, Carpenter M, Lo J, Ramin S, Harper M, Anderson G; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. A trial of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in twins. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 2;357(5):454-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070641. PubMed 17671253 ↗
  • Schuit E, Stock S, Groenwold RH, Maurel K, Combs CA, Garite T, Spong CY, Thom EA, Rouse DJ, Caritis SN, Saade GR, Zachary JM, Norman JE, Rode L, Klein K, Tabor A, Cetingoz E, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Briery CM, Serra V, Perales A, Meseguer J, Nassar AH, Lim AC, Moons KG, Kwee A, Mol BW. Progestogens to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Mar 15;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-13. PubMed 22420582 ↗
  • Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Da Fonseca E, Creasy GW, Klein K, Rode L, Soma-Pillay P, Fusey S, Cam C, Alfirevic Z, Hassan SS. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;206(2):124.e1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 11. PubMed 22284156 ↗
  • Saccone G, Rust O, Althuisius S, Roman A, Berghella V. Cerclage for short cervix in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials using individual patient-level data. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Apr;94(4):352-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12600. Epub 2015 Mar 1. PubMed 25644964 ↗
  • Roman A, Rochelson B, Fox NS, Hoffman M, Berghella V, Patel V, Calluzzo I, Saccone G, Fleischer A. Efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):788.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Jan 28. PubMed 25637840 ↗
  • Rebarber A, Bender S, Silverstein M, Saltzman DH, Klauser CK, Fox NS. Outcomes of emergency or physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Feb;173:43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.016. Epub 2013 Nov 28. PubMed 24321466 ↗
  • Gupta M, Emary K, Impey L. Emergency cervical cerclage: predictors of success. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Jul;23(7):670-4. doi: 10.3109/14767050903387011. PubMed 19883267 ↗
  • Zanardini C, Pagani G, Fichera A, Prefumo F, Frusca T. Cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Aug;288(2):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2758-3. Epub 2013 Feb 21. PubMed 23430029 ↗
  • Miller ES, Rajan PV, Grobman WA. Outcomes after physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):46.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.034. Epub 2014 Mar 18. PubMed 24657791 ↗
  • Berghella V, Roman A. Cerclage in twins: we can do better! Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.037. No abstract available. PubMed 24972530 ↗
  • Liem S, Schuit E, Hegeman M, Bais J, de Boer K, Bloemenkamp K, Brons J, Duvekot H, Bijvank BN, Franssen M, Gaugler I, de Graaf I, Oudijk M, Papatsonis D, Pernet P, Porath M, Scheepers L, Sikkema M, Sporken J, Visser H, van Wijngaarden W, Woiski M, van Pampus M, Mol BW, Bekedam D. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Oct 19;382(9901):1341-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61408-7. Epub 2013 Aug 5. PubMed 23924878 ↗
  • Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, van Geijn HP; Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;189(4):907-10. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00718-x. PubMed 14586323 ↗
  • Roman A, Rochelson B, Martinelli P, Saccone G, Harris K, Zork N, Spiel M, O'Brien K, Calluzzo I, Palomares K, Rosen T, Berghella V, Fleischer A. Cerclage in twin pregnancy with dilated cervix between 16 to 24 weeks of gestation: retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):98.e1-98.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.172. Epub 2016 Jan 28. PubMed 26827881 ↗
  • Roman A, Zork N, Haeri S, Schoen CN, Saccone G, Colihan S, Zelig C, Gimovsky AC, Seligman NS, Zullo F, Berghella V. Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):902.e1-902.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.047. Epub 2020 Jun 25. PubMed 32592693 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 20, 2015
  • Informed consent form · May 8, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De identified data

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02490384
Lead sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Collaborators
Columbia University, Federico II University, Albany Medical College, University of Rochester, George Washington University, Wright State University, Baystate Medical Center, Università degli Studi di Brescia, University of Bologna, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Warsaw, Maternal Fetal Medicine Associates
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2015
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2019
Completion
Dec 12, 2019
Last update
Apr 27, 2020

Study contacts

Amanda Roman, MD
principal investigator · amanda.roman@jefferson.edu

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion