ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02477774Updated Sep 22, 2022Results posted

Arista for ALT Donor Sites to Reduce Drain Output

An interventional study of ARISTA in Seroma, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-22.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-blinded multi-institutional randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Arista hemostatic matrix powder (Arista® AH, C. R. Bard, Inc. Davol, Warwick, RI) in reducing drainage output in anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap donor sites. Increased drainage from donor sites can lead to seroma formation with possible secondary infection, delayed hospital discharge, and additional home care needs for drain care. Arista is an inert plant based absorbable surgical hemostatic powder that can be easily applied to broad surgical fields to reduce bleeding and seroma rates. Therefore, its application to free flap donor sites may bear significant potential benefit.

Specific Aim 1: The main hypothesis of the study is that the use of Arista in anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap donor sites prior to closure will reduce postoperative drain outputs and time to drain removal compared to ALT donor sites closed without Arista.

Specific Aim 2: This study will also evaluate the secondary hypotheses that Arista will reduce postoperative ALT donor site seromas and patient hospital length of stay.

Read the detailed description

Free tissue transfer is a commonly performed procedure, especially at tertiary care hospitals. In free tissue transfer, "spare tissue" from one area of the body (donor site) is re-implanted to an area that is need of reconstruction (defect site). When relocated, the "spare tissue" is given vitality and blood supply at its new location by microscopically sewing and connecting its feeding artery and vein to an artery and vein in or near the defect site. Hence, this operation is referred to as "microvascular free tissue transfer" or "free flap". Defect sites most commonly result from tumor or cancer removal and trauma related injuries. Free flaps are frequently used to reconstruct breast tissue after mastectomy, head and neck cancer resections, extremity injuries, and chronically infected wounds. The indications, utilization, and expertise in free flap surgery continue to grow, providing patients with enhanced outcomes of otherwise difficult cancers and wounds.

Since its original description in 1984 the ALT microvascular free flap has become an increasingly integral part of head and neck reconstructive surgery.1, 2 ALT free flaps have been shown to be a reliable method for several reconstructive procedures with minimal donor site morbidity.2-4 The ALT free flap is composed of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and fat of the anterolateral thigh. The blood supply to this area is from the lateral circumflex femoral artery and vein. These vessels along with the tissues of the anterolateral thigh are carefully dissected and removed as a single unit to be re-implanted in a different part of the body.

Multiple options exist for soft tissue free flap donor sites similar to the ALT. However, a distinct advantage of the ALT free flap over others is the minimal donor site morbidity that the patient undergoes. Patients are able to fully ambulate and function after the surgery, and are left with only a well-healed scar line. Despite its many advantages, postoperative fluid collections continue to be problematic in the ALT donor site. Studies have reported seroma rates in ALT donor sites as high as 5% although this likely underestimates the true incidence of clinically significant postoperative fluid collections and wound complications in this patient population.2 ALT free flaps require a large amount of tissue dissection and removal, creating a large potential space in the lateral thigh that often requires prolonged postoperative suction drainage and pressure dressings in efforts to minimize fluid accumulation.

Research in optimal postoperative management for the ALT donor site is lacking. Current management without the use of Arista often requires a surgical drain for 7-14 days, which can delay patient discharge and expose patients to increased risk of postoperative wound infections. There is a paucity of data on methods to reduce ALT donor site drain output and seromas. Surgeons often use a combination of closed suction surgical drains and pressure dressings to try and reduce the amount of fluid collection in the thigh donor sites. Although this does provide some advantage, if these techniques are required for a prolonged time, unnecessary hospital stay and patient morbidity are attained. According the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, an average inpatient hospitalization in 2009 cost $2,000 per day, and is increasing.5 If the use of a single bottle of Arista could reduce just 1 hospital day per patient it could save at least $80,000 dollars a year at our department alone. Further, the associated morbidity and health care costs of potential seroma or infected seroma complications may be avoided.

A randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating improved methods to reduce postoperative drainage from ALT donor sites could provide critical information on how to best serve our patients, eliminate unnecessary hospital stay, and reduce overall cost. Once studied in a controlled single flap environment, these methods could be then expanded to other or all free flap donor sites.

According to the manufacturer, Arista uses Microporous Polysaccharide Hemospheres (MPH) technology to catalyze the clotting cascade and effectively dehydrate tissue to initiate hemostasis in broad areas. Major advantages of Arista are that it has been shown to be safe and effective across multiple surgical disciplines, is completely absorbed in 24-48 hours, and contains no human or animal components.6-8

Sindwani et al. was the first to report effectiveness and safety of Arista as a hemostatic agent in otolaryngology demonstrating its application in controlling postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery.8 Zhang et al. demonstrated success rate of 100% in the prevention of seromas in patients undergoing resection of malignant tumors in multiple locations, including the lower extremity.7 Arista was recently shown to be useful in reducing postoperative chest tube output and hemostasis time in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.6

These previous works support the idea that Arista could be effective in reducing postoperative fluid collection and drainage time in free flap donor sites. However, this would be a new application of Arista with wide applicability that has not been previously described.

1.1 Research Rationale and Possible Influence On Clinical Practice

Reconstructive surgery has evolved in a recent era of increased attention to patient satisfaction and cost savings. The ALT free flap has been proven to be highly successful; however, optimal management of the donor site postoperatively is an area in need of additional gains via research. Decreasing free flap donor site drain output and earlier drain removal could improve the quality of life of our patients, significantly decrease the cost of their care, and potentially decrease drain-associated infections. If this study were to demonstrate Arista to reduce postoperative donor site drainage and seroma rates and/or a decrease in hospital length of stay resulting from early surgical drain removal, it could dramatically affect the way we take care of our patients.

This study seeks to critically evaluate current clinical practice paradigms to better understand the influence of Arista use in free flap donor sites. A prospective, multi-institutional, randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial is the clearest methodology to evaluate the possible benefits of Arista. Additionally, study in the ALT free flap alone, a single and commonly performed free flap, limits bias and confounding variables. No clinical trial of this level has been performed on this topic; thus, our proposal is novel and the findings of the study are potentially important.

02

Conditions studied

  • Seroma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Anterolateral Thigh
03

In context

Seroma

101 studies on the registry are indexed under Seroma; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 100 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Seroma.

Browse Seroma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction
  • Patient must be 18 years of age or older.
  • The patient must have capacity to be able to sign a study-specific prior to study entry.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (for female patients).
  • Patients who will require anticoagulant medications other than routine DVT prophylaxis within 8 days postoperatively.
  • Presence of clotting or bleeding disorder.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arista

    Arista to ALT donor site

    Device: ARISTA

  • No intervention
    Control

    No Arista to ALT donor site

Interventions

  • DeviceARISTA

    According to the manufacturer, Arista uses Microporous Polysaccharide Hemospheres (MPH) technology to catalyze the clotting cascade and effectively dehydrate tissue to initiate hemostasis in broad areas. Major advantages of Arista are that it has been shown to be safe and effective across multiple surgical disciplines, is completely absorbed in 24-48 hours, and contains no human or animal components

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Drain Output

    The primary outcome analyzed in this study will be total drain output (mL) in an effort to determine if the addition of Arista to the wound bed decreases overall wound drainage and drain output.

    Time frame: 1-14 days after Surgery

  2. Number of Participants With the Development of ALT Donor Site Seroma

    ALT donor site will be evaluated for seroma

    Time frame: 30 days postoperative

  3. Timing to Drain Removal

    Given that drain output influences time of drain removal, assessment will be made to determine if timing of drain removal differs between groups.

    Time frame: 30 days postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital Length of Stay

    Will eval hospital length of stay for both groups

    Time frame: 30 days postoperative

07

Results

Posted Sep 22, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAristaControl
Started2926
Completed2926
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Drain Output

The primary outcome analyzed in this study will be total drain output (mL) in an effort to determine if the addition of Arista to the wound bed decreases overall wound drainage and drain output.

Time frame:
1-14 days after Surgery
Reported as:
Mean · ml
Total Drain Output
mlAristaControl
Total Drain Output284 ± 153317 ± 178
PrimaryNumber of Participants With the Development of ALT Donor Site Seroma

ALT donor site will be evaluated for seroma

Time frame:
30 days postoperative
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With the Development of ALT Donor Site Seroma
ParticipantsAristaControl
Number of Participants With the Development of ALT Donor Site Seroma64
PrimaryTiming to Drain Removal

Given that drain output influences time of drain removal, assessment will be made to determine if timing of drain removal differs between groups.

Time frame:
30 days postoperative
Reported as:
Mean · days
Timing to Drain Removal
daysAristaControl
Timing to Drain Removal5.9 ± 1.56.5 ± 1.6
SecondaryHospital Length of Stay

Will eval hospital length of stay for both groups

Time frame:
30 days postoperative

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arista0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)
Control0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AristaControlTotal
Mean65 ± 1264 ± 1364 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AristaControlTotal
Female10414
Male192241
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)AristaControlTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2016, a primary completion of Dec 2020 and a completion of Dec 2020. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Sep 2022, 1 year 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2015
First posted
Jun 23, 2015
Start
Jul 2016
Primary completionActual
Dec 2020
CompletionActual
Dec 2020
Results first posted
Sep 22, 2022
Last update
Sep 22, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02477774
Collaborators
Davol Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 23, 2015
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2020
Completion
Dec 2020
Results posted
Sep 22, 2022
Last update
Sep 22, 2022

Study contacts

Rahul Seth, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion