CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02473042Updated Dec 5, 2025Results posted

Intraoperative Acupoint Stimulation to Prevent Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

An interventional study of Electrical Stimulation and Zofran in Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting and Breast Cancer, sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-05.

Sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
188
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if light electrical stimulation to the wrist area during surgery is feasible in women having breast surgery.

Read the detailed description

Study Groups:

If you are eligible to take part in this study, you will be randomly assigned (as in the flip of a coin) to 1 of 2 study groups. This is done because no one knows if one study group is better, the same, or worse than the other group.

If you are in Group 1, you will receive light electrical stimulation to the wrist area during surgery. You will also receive standard of care drugs to reduce PONV. If you have nausea or you are vomiting after surgery, you will receive additional standard of care drugs for those symptoms. You may ask the study staff for information about how the drugs are given and their risks.

If you are in Group 2, you will receive standard of care drugs to reduce PONV only (you will not receive electrical stimulation). If you have nausea or you are vomiting after surgery, you will receive additional standard of care drugs for those symptoms.

Electrical Stimulation:

The electrical stimulation is applied through a small sticky pad that is connected to a machine called a neuromuscular blockade monitor (NMBN). NMBNs are routinely used by anesthesiologists to monitor drug levels in muscles during surgery.

The pad will be placed on your wrist after you receive anesthesia and removed at the end of surgery so you will not know what group you are in.

Study Procedures:

Both Groups:

  • You will have blood (about 2 teaspoons) collected intravenously (through your IV) during surgery. This blood will be used for genetic testing that may explain why people respond differently to treatments for nausea and vomiting.
  • You will complete a questionnaire about your pre-treatment expectations and your nausea every 15 minutes after you wake up after surgery until you leave the clinic. It should take about 2-3 minutes to complete the questionnaire each time.

Length of Study:

Your participation in this study will be over once you leave the clinic after surgery.

This is an investigational study. The NMBM monitor is commercially available and FDA approved for use by anesthesiologists to monitor drug levels in the muscles during surgery. Its use in this study to control nausea/vomiting is investigational.

Up to 176 participants will be enrolled in this study. All will be enrolled at MD Anderson.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting
  • Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • Post-operative nausea and vomiting
  • PONV
  • Breast cancer
  • Neuromuscular blockade monitor
  • NMBM
  • Breast cancer surgery
  • Prophylactic anti-emetics
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Zofran
  • Ondansetron
  • Dexamethasone
  • Decadron
  • Phenergan
  • Promethazine
  • Phenazine
  • Phencen
  • Prometh
  • Prorex
  • V-Gan
  • Pepcid
  • Famotidine
  • Questionnaire
  • Survey
03

In context

Vomiting

1,100 studies on the registry are indexed under Vomiting; 134 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 188 is above the median of 107 across 935 interventional studies indexed under Vomiting.

Browse Vomiting studies →

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 2,999 studies on the registry; 581 are open to participants now.

Of its 599 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 402 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults at least 18 years of age
  2. Female gender
  3. History of patient reported PONV, CINV or motion sickness
  4. Patients scheduled for Breast Surgery
  5. Sign an informed consent indicating they are aware of the investigational nature of this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients scheduled for paravertebral block
  2. Upper extremity deformity contralateral to the site of disease that could interfere with accurate point location or alter the energy pathway as defined by traditional acupuncture theory
  3. Local skin infections at or near the acustimulation site
  4. Pre-existing nausea and vomiting, defined as nausea or vomiting requiring pharmacological treatment greater than 3 times in the week preceding screening
  5. History of CVA or other central nervous system disorder resulting in residual weakness or paresis of extremity contralateral to the site of disease
  6. Grade III or IV upper extremity peripheral neuropathy
  7. Cardiac pacemakers. Patients involved in this protocol will receive electrical stimulation. For safety reasons, electrical stimulation should be avoided in patients with pacemakers
  8. Metal implants for the treatment extremity. For safety reasons, use of electrical stimulation should be avoided
  9. Current acknowledged use of any illicit drugs, medical marijuana (including Marinol), or evidence of alcohol abuse as defined by The American Psychiatric Association criteria. This includes patients who are currently in the recovery process.
  10. Pregnancy as this would alter anesthesia plan
  11. Bowel obstruction
  12. Surgery that would not allow access to at least one P6 site.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
188 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Electrical Stimulation + Standard of Care Antiemetics

    Participants receive light electrical stimulation to the wrist area during surgery. Participants also receive standard of care drugs to reduce post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Questionnaire completed about participant's pre-treatment expectations and their nausea about 15 minutes after they wake up after surgery, then every 30 minutes until they leave the clinic.

    Procedure: Electrical Stimulation · Drug: Zofran · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Phenergan · Drug: Pepcid · Behavioral: Questionnaire

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care Antiemetics

    Participants receive standard of care drugs to reduce post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Questionnaire completed about participant's pre-treatment expectations and their nausea about 15 minutes after they wake up after surgery, then every 30 minutes until they leave the clinic.

    Drug: Zofran · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Phenergan · Drug: Pepcid · Behavioral: Questionnaire

Interventions

  • ProcedureElectrical Stimulation

    Electrical stimulation to the wrist initiated at 1mHz, 1 pulse/second using two leads on a nerve stimulator. Stimulation continued throughout the breast surgery.

  • DrugZofran

    4 mg by vein for 1 dose.

    Also known as: Ondansetron

  • DrugDexamethasone

    10 mg by vein for 1 dose.

    Also known as: Decadron

  • DrugPhenergan

    6.25 mg by vein for 1 dose.

    Also known as: Promethazine, Phenazine, Phencen, Prometh, Prorex, V-Gan

  • DrugPepcid

    10 mg by vein for 1 dose.

    Also known as: Famotidine

  • BehavioralQuestionnaire

    Questionnaire completed about 15 minutes after participant wakes up after surgery, then every 30 minutes until they leave the clinic. It should take about 2 - 3 minutes to complete the questionnaire.

    Also known as: Survey

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Intervention to Prevent Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    Examine the efficacy of electrical stimulation of P6 combined with prophylactic anti-emetics versus pharmacological prophylaxis alone in preventing the incidence of PONV following breast surgery in patients at high-risk for PONV Complete control is defined as "No nausea≥3 \& No vomiting \& No use of anti-emetic during PACU stay"

    Time frame: During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge, an average of 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Conducting Study

    Determine the study feasibility where feasibility is defined by at least 20% of screened patients meeting inclusion criteria ability, 50% of these patients consenting, and 75% of patients within the acupuncture study arm completing all procedures

    Time frame: At study consent and at PACU discharge

  2. Efficacy of Intervention to Prevent Need for Rescue Anti-emetics

    Examine the effects of intra-operative NMBM stimulation of P6 on whether or not any anti-emetics were used compared to the control group

    Time frame: During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge, an average of 1 day

  3. Satisfaction

    Examine group differences in post-operative patient satisfaction with PONV management. Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with their nausea and vomiting management on a scale of 0-10, where "0" equals "very dissatisfied", and "10" equals "extremely satisfied".

    Time frame: At discharge from post-operative anesthesia care unit

  4. Efficacy of Intervention to Result in Decreased PACU Length-of-stay

    Explore if intra-operative NMBM stimulation of P6 results in decreased PACU length-of-stay

    Time frame: During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge, an average of 1 day

  5. Expectancy

    Explore the associations between expectancy and response to P6 stimulation. Step 1 of 2 compares expectancy answers between groups. The expectancy questionnaire asks participants what their expectation is of the effects of the intervention on lowering their nausea after surgery, lowering their pain after surgery, enabling them to cope with nausea and/or pain better, and enabling them to have a better recovery after surgery. Possible answers are "Not at all agree", "A little agree", "Moderately agree", "Mostly agree", and "Completely agree".

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Expectancy and Response to P6 Stimulation

    Explore the associations between expectancy and response to P6 stimulation. Step 2 of 2 compares baseline expectancy answers and response to P6 stimulation outcome directly, without taking into account group assignment. The P6 stimulation outcome was categorized as "Fail" or "Success", where "Success" is defined as "No nausea≥3 \& No vomiting \& No use of anti-emetic during PACU stay".

    Time frame: During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge

07

Results

Posted Dec 5, 2025

Participant flow

The recruitment period occurred between March 2016 to June 2018. 609 potential patients were identified from the breast surgery schedule and were approached to assess their interest in participation and eligibility screening, of which, 233 patients met eligibility criteria. Of these 233 eligible patients, 188 patients consented to the trial.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInterventionControl
Started9292
Completed8686
Not completed66
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Patient became ineligible after enrollment25
Withdrew: Surgery started before study preparation could be completed01
Withdrew: Pacu data unable to be collected30

Outcome measures

PrimaryEfficacy of Intervention to Prevent Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

Examine the efficacy of electrical stimulation of P6 combined with prophylactic anti-emetics versus pharmacological prophylaxis alone in preventing the incidence of PONV following breast surgery in patients at high-risk for PONV Complete control is defined as "No nausea≥3 \& No vomiting \& No use of anti-emetic during PACU stay"

Time frame:
During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge, an average of 1 day
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Efficacy of Intervention to Prevent Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
ParticipantsInterventionControl
Fail1912
Success6771
Missing Information03
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.2787
SecondaryFeasibility of Conducting Study

Determine the study feasibility where feasibility is defined by at least 20% of screened patients meeting inclusion criteria ability, 50% of these patients consenting, and 75% of patients within the acupuncture study arm completing all procedures

Time frame:
At study consent and at PACU discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility of Conducting Study
ParticipantsEntire Study
Screened eligible233
Consented188
Completed study86
SecondaryEfficacy of Intervention to Prevent Need for Rescue Anti-emetics

Examine the effects of intra-operative NMBM stimulation of P6 on whether or not any anti-emetics were used compared to the control group

Time frame:
During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge, an average of 1 day
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Efficacy of Intervention to Prevent Need for Rescue Anti-emetics
ParticipantsInterventionControl
No4554
Yes1411
04554
1610
271
310
SecondarySatisfaction

Examine group differences in post-operative patient satisfaction with PONV management. Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with their nausea and vomiting management on a scale of 0-10, where "0" equals "very dissatisfied", and "10" equals "extremely satisfied".

Time frame:
At discharge from post-operative anesthesia care unit
Reported as:
Mean · Satisfaction score
Satisfaction
Satisfaction scoreInterventionControl
Satisfaction8.92 ± 2.519.25 ± 1.79
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Control · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8252
SecondaryEfficacy of Intervention to Result in Decreased PACU Length-of-stay

Explore if intra-operative NMBM stimulation of P6 results in decreased PACU length-of-stay

Time frame:
During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge, an average of 1 day
Reported as:
Mean · number of minutes
Efficacy of Intervention to Result in Decreased PACU Length-of-stay
number of minutesInterventionControl
Efficacy of Intervention to Result in Decreased PACU Length-of-stay120 ± 53.07119.46 ± 49.88
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Control · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.8277
SecondaryExpectancy

Explore the associations between expectancy and response to P6 stimulation. Step 1 of 2 compares expectancy answers between groups. The expectancy questionnaire asks participants what their expectation is of the effects of the intervention on lowering their nausea after surgery, lowering their pain after surgery, enabling them to cope with nausea and/or pain better, and enabling them to have a better recovery after surgery. Possible answers are "Not at all agree", "A little agree", "Moderately agree", "Mostly agree", and "Completely agree".

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Expectancy
ParticipantsInterventionControl
Response to ASES_Coping question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree138
Response to ASES_Coping question: Moderately Agree1418
Response to ASES_Coping question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree4537
Response to ASES_Coping question: Missing1423
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree116
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Moderately Agree1817
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree4340
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Missing1423
Response to ASES_Pain question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree1717
Response to ASES_Pain question: Moderately Agree1818
Response to ASES_Pain question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree3729
Response to ASES_Pain question: Missing1423
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree1410
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Moderately Agree1312
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree4542
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Missing1423
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.3908
  • Intervention vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.6029
  • Intervention vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.7785
  • Intervention vs Control · Chi-squared · p = 0.8434
SecondaryExpectancy and Response to P6 Stimulation

Explore the associations between expectancy and response to P6 stimulation. Step 2 of 2 compares baseline expectancy answers and response to P6 stimulation outcome directly, without taking into account group assignment. The P6 stimulation outcome was categorized as "Fail" or "Success", where "Success" is defined as "No nausea≥3 \& No vomiting \& No use of anti-emetic during PACU stay".

Time frame:
During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Expectancy and Response to P6 Stimulation
ParticipantsFailSuccess
Response to ASES_Coping question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree615
Response to ASES_Coping question: Moderately Agree625
Response to ASES_Coping question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree972
Response to ASES_Coping question: Missing1026
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree512
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Moderately Agree727
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree973
Response to ASES_Nausea question: Missing1026
Response to ASES_Pain question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree727
Response to ASES_Pain question: Moderately Agree530
Response to ASES_Pain question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree956
Response to ASES_Pain question: Missing1025
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Not at all Agree/A little Agree717
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Moderately Agree420
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Mostly Agree/Completely Agree1076
Response to ASES_Recovery question: Missing1025
Statistical analysis
  • Fail vs Success · Chi-squared · p = 0.2742
  • Fail vs Success · Chi-squared · p = 0.2747
  • Fail vs Success · Chi-squared · p = 0.5608
  • Fail vs Success · Chi-squared · p = 0.1014 (There is no statistically significant association between expectancy and complete PONV control.)

Adverse events

Collected over During stay in post-operative anesthesia care unit, until discharge, an average of 1 day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention0/86 (0%)0/86 (0%)4/86 (4.7%)
Control0/86 (0%)0/86 (0%)11/86 (12.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInterventionControl
Muscle weakness upper limb [right]Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/863/86
Muscle weakness upper limb [left]Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/862/86
Numbness in left armNervous system disorders1/862/86
Numbness in right armNervous system disorders0/861/86
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/861/86
Paresthesia [left]Nervous system disorders1/861/86
Paresthesia [right]Nervous system disorders0/861/86
HematomaVascular disorders1/860/86

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)InterventionControlTotal
Mean57.41 ± 10.3258.35 ± 11.7157.88 ± 11.02
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)InterventionControlTotal
Female8686172
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)InterventionControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino161329
Not Hispanic or Latino6971140
Unknown or Not Reported123
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)InterventionControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian6915
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American549
White7164135
More than one race4812
Unknown or Not Reported011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)InterventionControlTotal
United States8686172
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 21, 2018
  • Informed consent form · Apr 14, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02473042
Lead sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 16, 2015
Start date
Mar 1, 2016
Primary completion
Nov 26, 2024
Completion
Nov 26, 2024
Results posted
Dec 5, 2025
Last update
Dec 5, 2025

Study contacts

Alicia M. Kowalski, MD
principal investigator · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion