CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02470195PROSIDIAIRUpdated Jul 7, 2016

Procedural Simulation for Difficult Airway Training in Anesthesiology Resident Education Program

An interventional study of workshop in Behaviour, sponsored by Claude Bernard University. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-07.

Sponsored by Claude Bernard University · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Difficult airway management is a crucial point that may influence outcomes of patient in this critical situation. Education for this topic is of main importance for resident of anesthesiology. Procedural simulation workshop allows participant to use device dedicated to difficult airway management. Investigators included this workshop to a state education program of anesthesiology resident in second year and compared to their homonym in another state where no specific organized workshop is integrated to the education program.

Read the detailed description

Difficult airway management is a crucial point that may influence outcome of patient in this critical situation. Education for this topic is of main importance for resident of anesthesiology. Procedural simulation workshop allows participant to use device dedicated to difficult airway management. The investigators included this workshop for smal groups of 6-10 anesthesiology resident from Rhône Alpes Auvergne french state. Participants were ask to fill out a questionnaire about their specific knowledge and experience of several devices usable in difficult airway management situation. The workshop was a small briefing as an introduction to the workshop and then small workshop of 20-45 min for specific procedural use of different devices for difficult airway management : Eischmann guide, LMA, supraglottic devices, fiberoptic with spontaneous breathing, cricothyroidotomy, jet ventilation, percutaneous tracheotomy... Investigator will compare at 6 month the incidence of use of the difficult airway devices between resident from rhone alpes auvergne following the workshop and resident from Montpellier that did not follow specific organized workshop.

02

Conditions studied

  • Behaviour
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Claude Bernard University is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Residents in 2nd year of anesthesiology residency in Rhones alpes auvergne and in Nîmes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion demand from the participant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    workshop

    workshop of procedural simulation

    Behavioral: workshop

  • No intervention
    control

    no specific workshop of procedural simulation

Interventions

  • Behavioralworkshop

    workshop for procedural simulation for education in difficult airway situation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence of use of airway devices between groups

    modification in the incidence of use of airway devices between workshop and control groups

    Time frame: 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. confidence with airway device

    questionnaire of confidence with the usability of the devices. Scale from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: 6 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CLESS
    Lyon, Rhône-Alpes 69007, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lilot M, Evain JN, Vincent A, Gaillard G, Chassard D, Mattatia L, Ripart J, Denoyel L, Bauer C, Robinson P, Duclos A, Lehot JJ, Rimmele T. [Simulation of difficult airway management for residents: prospective comparative study]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jul-Aug;69(4):358-368. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Jul 29. PubMed 31371173 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — data will be analysed by group, no plan to share data has been programmed

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02470195
Lead sponsor
Claude Bernard University
Responsible party
Lilot Marc (MD, Claude Bernard University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 12, 2015
Start date
Nov 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Jun 2016
Last update
Jul 7, 2016

Study contacts

marc Lilot, MD
principal investigator · CLESS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion