ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02463487Updated Jul 24, 2023Results posted

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy as a Drug Delivery System

An interventional study of Cardinal Pro +Simultaneous Irrigation (NPWTi) and Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-24.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators plan a randomized clinical trial of 150 patients with infected diabetes-related lower extremity wounds to compare the clinical and economic effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy with continuous irrigation and negative pressure wound therapy without irrigation.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will enroll 150 patients from two centers: The University of Texas Southwestern University Hospital and Parkland Hospital. The investigators will screen and enroll patients with wounds in the inpatient setting. Patients will be randomized to receive traditional NPWT or NPWT with continuous irrigation while they are hospitalized. The average hospitalization for patients that receive NPWT is 13.3 days. Patients that do not have their wound surgically closed during hospitalization will be discharged with negative pressure wound therapy for up to a total of four weeks of therapy. After discharge from the hospital, subjects will be seen twice weekly by home health, and will be evaluated in clinic every 7 days (±7 days) up to a total of 16-week period or until 30 days after the wound heals.

Study Procedures:

Screening Procedures

  • Review and sign the Informed Consent and HIPAA Authorization
  • The study doctor will review the inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • Demographics (such as age, gender, race or ethnicity)
  • Physical exam
  • Sitting blood pressure and pulse
  • Height and weight
  • Collection of the medical and surgical history
  • Collection of the history of the wound
  • Wound assessment(s)/Debridement - various tests and measurements to assess the sensation (feeling) and circulation (blood flow) in the subject's feet and lower legs. None of these tests are invasive (using needles), uncomfortable or have risks greater than standard care.
  • Wound imaging - photographs and images of the subject's wound using acetate tracings, a digital camera and an ARANZ camera (a special type of camera that uses computer software to calculate the volume of the wound)
  • Hyperspectral imaging
  • Vascular/Neurological evaluation
  • Results of standard-of-care laboratory tests including a white blood cell count, blood chemistry (tests to see how well organs, such as the liver and kidneys are working), and blood glucose. Results of a serum pregnancy test (standard care for women of child-bearing potential as part of pre-op labs) will also be collected. About 2 tablespoons of blood will be drawn for these tests.
  • Collection of a list of the subject's current medications, including prescriptions, over-the-counter medications, supplements and herbals.

This visit will last about 2 hours.

If the subject qualifies for the study, they will participate in the following procedures:

Group Assignment

If the researchers believe the subject can take part in this study, s/he will be assigned randomly (like a flip of a coin) to receive one of the following therapies:

  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Irrigation
  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy without Irrigation

The group is assigned randomly (like flipping a coin). The sponsor or researchers do not know in advance what group assignment each subject will receive. Neither the subject nor the researchers will be allowed to choose which group s/he is assigned to.

Study Intervention

The subject will receive either:

  • Cardinal Pro +Simultaneous Irrigation (NPWTi) - Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Prontosan®, or
  • Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy (without Prontosan®)

Assigned therapy will continue in the hospital until the physician determines that the wound is ready for closure. If the subject's wound is healing, study therapy will be discontinued and standard dressings will be applied. If surgical closure is needed, the subject will return to the Operating Room for a procedure to close the wound.

If the wound is not ready for closure during the hospital stay, subjects will continue NPWT at home for the remainder of the 4 weeks of treatment. NPWT at home will be without irrigation (KCI VAC Via®).

Procedures and Evaluations during the Research The study therapy will only be given while the subject is in the hospital. S/he will continue the therapy for up to 4 weeks or until the wound is closed. Once the therapy is stopped s/he will continue to be followed by the study doctor. After the subject is released from the hospital s/he will need to see the study doctor Every 7 days (±7 days). If the subject's wound does not heal before 56 days after his/her first surgery then s/he will no longer be taking part in the study. The study doctor will continue to check the wound. If the wound closes, s/he will see the study doctor 30 days later to have the closed wound checked.

12 Month Extension:

After the end of the defined study period, the patients will be followed observationally by their electronic medical records for 12 months as it would not be feasible to ask them to return for an in-person evaluation as: patients have moved, no longer have correct contact information, as well as it would create a financial hardship on the patients to return for further visits. In order to more appropriately determine long term results from participation, a longer period of time of follow up is necessary. Related outcomes that we would like to follow over a 12-month duration are incidence of new foot ulcerations, re-ulceration of a previously healed foot wound, healing and time to healing of patients who took longer than the current study allows, duration of antibiotics received for foot infections, re-admissions to the hospital, need for subsequent surgery, amputation, loss of limb, and death. This expanded follow up period would provide valuable information to the long-term outcomes and complications of this high risk population and will help direct how future efforts may be better focused to reduce complications and improve outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Browse trials for

03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 224 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 60 across 845 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,009 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 138 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus Men/women ≥21 years old Foot or ankle wounds sized 5 cm2 -100 cm2 ABI≥0.5 or toe pressures >30 mmHg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Active Charcot arthropathy Unable to use NPWT at home Untreated bone or soft tissue infection Unable to keep research appointments Active alcohol or substance abuse

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)

    Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Irrigation: Quantum™ +Simultaneous Irrigation (NPWTi) - Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Prontosan® Intervention is receiving the Cardinal Vac with Irrigation

    Device: Cardinal Pro +Simultaneous Irrigation (NPWTi)

  • Active comparator
    Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy

    Negative Pressure Wound Therapy without Irrigation: Quantum™ (NPWT) -Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (without Prontosan®) Intervention is receiving the Cardinal Vac without Irrigation

    Device: Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceCardinal Pro +Simultaneous Irrigation (NPWTi)

    NPWT with low volume irrigation (15 cc/hr) with 1% polyhexanide biguanide (PHMB), Prontosan®

    Also known as: • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Irrigation

  • DeviceCardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy

    NPWT 125 mm Hg continuous pressure with foam interface

    Also known as: • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy without Irrigation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Healing or Coverage of the Study Wound

    How many wounds fully healed in 16 weeks. Healing defined as fully epithelialized skin with no drainage.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Adverse Events of Participants

    Total number of adverse events, including new foot ulcer formation, all-cause hospital readmission, and foot-related hospital readmission.

    Time frame: 16 Weeks

  2. Number of Participants With Wound Dehiscence After Hospital Discharge

    Dehiscence is defined as any part of a surgically closed wound that failed to heal when sutures were removed.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 14, 2020

Participant flow

The study population was comprised of patients who were admitted to hospital with a moderate or severe foot infection that required incision and drainage and parenteral antibiotics and for whom negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was indicated. Patients who fit the criteria for the study were then recruited.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy
Started7575
Completed6565
Not completed1010

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Achieved Complete Healing or Coverage of the Study Wound

How many wounds fully healed in 16 weeks. Healing defined as fully epithelialized skin with no drainage.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Healing or Coverage of the Study Wound
ParticipantsCardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)
Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Healing or Coverage of the Study Wound4445
Statistical analysis
  • Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy vs Cardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.87
SecondaryTotal Adverse Events of Participants

Total number of adverse events, including new foot ulcer formation, all-cause hospital readmission, and foot-related hospital readmission.

Time frame:
16 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Total Adverse Events of Participants
ParticipantsCardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)
New ulcer formation1218
All-cause readmission2627
Foot-related readmission1314
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Wound Dehiscence After Hospital Discharge

Dehiscence is defined as any part of a surgically closed wound that failed to heal when sutures were removed.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Wound Dehiscence After Hospital Discharge
ParticipantsCardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)
Number of Participants With Wound Dehiscence After Hospital Discharge4640
Statistical analysis
  • Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy vs Cardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.08

Adverse events

Collected over 16 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cardinal Pro (NPWT) Therapy0/75 (0%)39/75 (52%)27/75 (36%)
Cardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)0/75 (0%)41/75 (54.7%)35/75 (46.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)
All-cause hospital readmissionSurgical and medical procedures26/7527/75
Foot-related hospital readmissionInfections and infestations13/7514/75
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)
New ulcer formationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders12/7518/75
ReinfectionInfections and infestations15/7517/75

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)Total
Mean51.32 ± 8.2249.07 ± 9.7450.19 ± 9.05
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)Total
Female171633
Male5859117
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cardinal Pro (NPWT) TherapyCardinal Pro + Irrigation (NPWTi)Total
Caucasian211839
Native American112
African American303060
Hispanic232649
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lavery LA, Davis KE, La Fontaine J, Farrar JD, Bhavan K, Oz OK, Crisologo PA. Does negative pressure wound therapy with irrigation improve clinical outcomes? A randomized clinical trial in patients with diabetic foot infections. Am J Surg. 2020 Oct;220(4):1076-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.044. Epub 2020 Feb 27. PubMed 32139102 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 25, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2015 to primary completion in Dec 2019, 54 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2020, 7 months after primary completion.

Of 240 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Foot, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 35. This study's 54 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 340 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 16, 2015
First posted
Jun 4, 2015
StartActual
Jun 2, 2015
Primary completionActual
Dec 28, 2019
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2020
Results first posted
Aug 14, 2020
Last update
Jul 24, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02463487
Collaborators
Parkland Health and Hospital System
Responsible party
Larry Lavery (Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2015
Start date
Jun 2, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 28, 2019
Completion
Aug 1, 2020
Results posted
Aug 14, 2020
Last update
Jul 24, 2023

Study contacts

Lawrence A Lavery, DPM
principal investigator · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion