ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT02460887Updated Dec 3, 2024

The Role of Induction Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Era of IMRT

A Phase 3 interventional study of Gemcitabine and cisplatin in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-03.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
236
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to verify that induction gemcitabine and cisplatin plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is non-inferior to concurrent weekly cisplatin plus IMRT for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Read the detailed description

Patients with non-keratinizing NPC T1-4N2-3或T3-4N0-1M0 (UICC/AJCC 7th edition) are randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy or CCRT alone. Patients in experimental group receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m² d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Patients in control group receive IMRT concurrently with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m² up to 7cycles.

IMRT is given as 2.0-2.33 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumor.

Our primary endpoint is failure-free survival (FFS). Secondary end points include overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) rates and toxic effects. All efficacy analyses are conducted in the intention-to-treat population, and the safety population include only patients who receive their randomly assigned treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Keywords

  • nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • induction chemotherapy
03

In context

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

824 studies on the registry are indexed under Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; 281 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 236 is above the median of 84 across 674 interventional studies indexed under Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Browse Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,680 studies on the registry; 609 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma (including WHO II or III).
  • Tumor staged as T1-4N2-3或T3-4N0-1M0 (according to the 7th AJCC edition).
  • Satisfactory performance status: Karnofsky scale (KPS) ≥ 70.
  • Adequate marrow: leucocyte count ≥ 4000/μL, hemoglobin ≥ 90g/L and platelet count ≥ 100000/μL.
  • Adequate liver function: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) \< 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin ≤1.5×ULN.
  • Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min.
  • Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • WHO Type keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Treatment with palliative intent.
  • Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer.
  • Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period).
  • History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume).
  • Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes.
  • Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose > 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
236 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Induction chemotherapy+IMRT gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen Patients receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m² d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before radiotherapy, and then receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT).

    Drug: Gemcitabine · Drug: cisplatin · Radiation: Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator

    IMRT and concurrent cisplatin Patients receive intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT), concurrently with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m² up to 7cycles.

    Drug: cisplatin · Radiation: Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy

Interventions

  • Experimental arm: Patients receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m² d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before IMRT.

  • Experimental arm: Patients receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² d1,8) and cisplatin (80mg/m² d1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles before IMRT.

    Also known as: DDP

  • Active Comparator arm: Patients receive weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m² up to 7cycles during IMRT.

    Also known as: DDP

  • RadiationIntensity-modulated Radiotherapy

    Intensity modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) is given as 2.0-2.33 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumor.

    Also known as: IMRT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failure-free survival

    Failure-free survival rate is calculated from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure or death from any cause, whichever is first.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Overall survival is calculated from randomization to death from any cause.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Locoregional failure-free survival

    Locoregional failure-free survival is calculated from randomization to the first locoregional failure.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Distant failure-free survival

    Distant failure-free survival is calculated from randomization to the first remote failure.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Overall response rate

    Overall response rate at 3 months after completion of IMRT

    Time frame: 3 months after completion of IMRT

  5. Number of participants with adverse events

    Incidence of acute and late toxicity

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Quality of life during treatment

    Quality of life is measured by FACIT questionnaire.

    Time frame: During whole chemotherapy and IMRT treatment.For experimental arm, an expected average of 12 weeks; for active comparator arm, an expected average of 6 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen L, Hu CS, Chen XZ, Hu GQ, Cheng ZB, Sun Y, Li WX, Chen YY, Xie FY, Liang SB, Chen Y, Xu TT, Li B, Long GX, Wang SY, Zheng BM, Guo Y, Sun Y, Mao YP, Tang LL, Chen YM, Liu MZ, Ma J. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70320-5. Epub 2011 Dec 7. PubMed 22154591 ↗
  • Hui EP, Ma BB, Leung SF, King AD, Mo F, Kam MK, Yu BK, Chiu SK, Kwan WH, Ho R, Chan I, Ahuja AT, Zee BC, Chan AT. Randomized phase II trial of concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):242-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1545. Epub 2008 Dec 8. PubMed 19064973 ↗
  • Haddad R, O'Neill A, Rabinowits G, Tishler R, Khuri F, Adkins D, Clark J, Sarlis N, Lorch J, Beitler JJ, Limaye S, Riley S, Posner M. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sequential chemoradiotherapy) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer (PARADIGM): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):257-64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70011-1. Epub 2013 Feb 13. PubMed 23414589 ↗
  • Cohen EE, Karrison TG, Kocherginsky M, Mueller J, Egan R, Huang CH, Brockstein BE, Agulnik MB, Mittal BB, Yunus F, Samant S, Raez LE, Mehra R, Kumar P, Ondrey F, Marchand P, Braegas B, Seiwert TY, Villaflor VM, Haraf DJ, Vokes EE. Phase III randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2735-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6309. Epub 2014 Jul 21. PubMed 25049329 ↗
  • Fountzilas G, Ciuleanu E, Bobos M, Kalogera-Fountzila A, Eleftheraki AG, Karayannopoulou G, Zaramboukas T, Nikolaou A, Markou K, Resiga L, Dionysopoulos D, Samantas E, Athanassiou H, Misailidou D, Skarlos D, Ciuleanu T. Induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin versus the same concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) with biomarker evaluation. Ann Oncol. 2012 Feb;23(2):427-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr116. Epub 2011 Apr 27. PubMed 21525406 ↗
  • Yi J, Huang X, Gao L, Luo J, Zhang S, Wang K, Qu Y, Xiao J, Xu G. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Feb 18;9:56. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-56. PubMed 24533569 ↗
  • Zhang L, Zhang Y, Huang PY, Xu F, Peng PJ, Guan ZZ. Phase II clinical study of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;61(1):33-8. doi: 10.1007/s00280-007-0441-8. Epub 2007 Mar 20. PubMed 17909810 ↗
  • He X, Ou D, Ying H, Zhu G, Hu C, Liu T. Experience with combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):1027-33. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1669-9. Epub 2011 Jun 26. PubMed 21706324 ↗
  • Lee AW, Lau WH, Tung SY, Chua DT, Chappell R, Xu L, Siu L, Sze WM, Leung TW, Sham JS, Ngan RK, Law SC, Yau TK, Au JS, O'Sullivan B, Pang ES, O SK, Au GK, Lau JT; Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group. Preliminary results of a randomized study on therapeutic gain by concurrent chemotherapy for regionally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: NPC-9901 Trial by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):6966-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7542. PubMed 16192584 ↗
  • Chan AT, Teo PM, Ngan RK, Leung TW, Lau WH, Zee B, Leung SF, Cheung FY, Yeo W, Yiu HH, Yu KH, Chiu KW, Chan DT, Mok T, Yuen KT, Mo F, Lai M, Kwan WH, Choi P, Johnson PJ. Concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: progression-free survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 15;20(8):2038-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149. PubMed 11956263 ↗
  • Lee AW, Lau KY, Hung WM, Ng WT, Lee MC, Choi CW, Chan CC, Tung R, Cheng PT, Yau TK. Potential improvement of tumor control probability by induction chemotherapy for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2008 May;87(2):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 10. PubMed 18329742 ↗
  • Xu T, Hu C, Zhu G, He X, Wu Y, Ying H. Preliminary results of a phase III randomized study comparing chemotherapy neoadjuvantly or concurrently with radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2012 Mar;29(1):272-8. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9803-x. Epub 2011 Jan 30. PubMed 21279704 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02460887
Responsible party
Pei-Yu Huang (Professor, Sun Yat-sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2015
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Apr 2022
Completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 3, 2024

Study contacts

Pei-Yu Huang, M. D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Sun Yat-sen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Gemcitabine

Start the discussion