An interventional study of Standard FA+FCT and Pragmatic FA+FCT in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Matthew J O'Brien, PhD, BCBA-D. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Months to 83 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-08.
Sponsored by Matthew J O'Brien, PhD, BCBA-D · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The main purpose of this study is to determine the most efficient way for families to reduce problem behavior in their children with an autism spectrum disorder. Parents will be trained using telehealth to use applied behavior analysis (ABA) procedures to improve child behavior and communication. The study compares an established type of ABA assessment and treatment to a briefer, more streamlined version of this same type of assessment/treatment.
Managing challenging behavior in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) can profoundly improve quality of life for children and families. However, many families lack access to research-based treatment, such as applied behavior analysis (ABA). This study is a randomized trial comparing outcomes of treatment for ASD using either a standard Functional Analysis Plus Functional Communication Training (FA+FCT) package or a pragmatic version that offers a briefer, less time-intensive model of FA+FCT. Both types of FA+FCT are provided via telehealth in family homes to maximize generalizability to real-life settings. Providing ABA through telehealth makes an effective treatment accessible across geographic barriers so that no child is excluded based on where they live. The study also examines key family factors that influence successful outcomes.
The study has 3 primary aims: (1) To assess outcomes for ABA telehealth by assigning children to either a Pragmatic FA+FCT group or to a group receiving Standard FA+FCT. Outcomes will be compared based on the percent reduction in problem behavior, communication increases, time to achieve outcomes, treatment fidelity, family acceptance of treatment, and generalization and maintenance of treatment gains. (2) The study will assess the relation of family factors to treatment efficacy and acceptability by assessing parent stress, mood, and social support in relation to outcomes. (3) Cost effectiveness will be assessed in relation to the treatment methods used and the efficiency of ABA telehealth.
The study will include 102 children who meet eligibility criteria from among a larger sample of 150 children. Thirty-six children will receive intervention in each of three states: Iowa, Georgia, and Texas. Study design is a randomized trial using an intent-to-treat analysis. Half of the sample will be randomized to Pragmatic FA+FCT and half to Standard FA+FCT. Treatment will be provided via telehealth using FCT, which is a function-based ABA technique in which parents are trained to be therapists under the direction of behavior consultants. Study procedures typically are completed within 6 months, and follow-up assessments occur 6 months after treatment completion. Data analyses include comparisons between assessment groups, single-case designs examining responses in individual children, cost analyses, and regression analyses of the effects of family factors on outcomes.
The investigators prior research shows that problem behavior can be reduced by over 90% in most children with ASD after 4-6 months of telehealth treatment. If Pragmatic FA+FCT can reduce problem behavior at rates comparable to Standard FA+FCT, then treatment can be started sooner and families can achieve successful outcomes at lower cost. Although pragmatic FA+FCT provides less behavioral information, it may be more resistant to treatment relapse because it does not involve reinforcing high rates of problem behavior.
Exclusion Criteria:
Parents are coached via weekly telehealth visits to use Functional Analysis (FA) to assess problem behavior and Functional Communication Training (FCT) to treat the problem behavior identified.
Behavioral: Standard FA+FCT
Parents are coached via weekly telehealth visits to use a brief, streamlined version of Functional Analysis (FA) to assess problem behavior and to follow that assessment with Functional Communication Training (FCT) to treat the problem behavior identified. The version of FCT used in the Pragmatic arm involves significantly less data scoring and graphing than the version used in the Standard arm.
Behavioral: Pragmatic FA+FCT
Standard Functional Analysis and Functional Communication Training
Pragmatic Functional Analysis and Functional Communication Training
Percent Reduction in Problem Behavior
Rate of problem behavior (destruction, aggression, self-injury, noncompliance, etc.) is computed by scoring the frequency of these target behaviors during observation sessions completed before treatment and at the end of treatment.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to End of Treatment (typically within 4-6 mos.)
Plan to share: Yes — Data for individual participants will be made available through the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) using the access tools and procedures implemented within NDAR. NDAR is one of the databases that is part of the NIMH Data Archive.
Supporting information: Csr
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Matthew J O'Brien, PhD, BCBA-D