A Phase 2 interventional study of HR and FOLFOX4 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-25.
Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the third most frequent cause of cancer death worldwide. Hepatic resection (HR) is the conventional ''curative'' treatment for HCC. In both the European and the United States Proposed Guidelines for HCC, HR is recommended only for patients with preserved liver function and with early stage HCC. Unfortunately, because of tumor multifocality, portal vein invasion, and underlying advanced cirrhosis, only 10% to 30% of HCCs are amenable to such a ''curative'' treatment at the time of diagnosis. Transarterialchemoembolization (TACE) has become the most popular palliative treatment for patients with unresectable HCC, and it is no longer considered as a contraindication to HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Unfortunately, the long-term outcomes are generally poor for HCC treated with TACE, especially for HCC with PVTT. To improve on the results of treatment of HCC with PVTT, attempts have been made to perform HR for these patients. HCC with PVTT remains a contraindication to liver transplantation because of the high rate of tumor recurrence, and because of the severe shortage of donor organs. HR remains the only therapeutic option that may still offer a chance of cure. With advances in surgical techniques, it has become feasible to remove all gross tumors, including PVTT, which has extended to the main portal vein, safely by surgery. More HCC with PVTT, which previously were considered as unresectable, have become resectable.Recent studies have even shown favorable long-term survival outcomes of HR in well-selected cases of HCC with PVTT. However, the recurrence rate after HR for PVTT is still high and the prognosis for patients with HCC with PVTT is very poor. Systemic chemotherapy is considered to be one of the main treatments for malignant tumors. HCC is known to be highly refractory to conventional systemic chemotherapy because of its heterogeneity and multiple etiologies. Before the advent of the molecular-targeted agent sorafenib, which has subsequently become the standard of care, no standard systemic drug or treatment regimen had shown an obvious survival benefit in HCC. Nowadays, there is no systemic chemotherapy regimen had been definitively recommended as the standard for treating HCC. Clinical activity of several regimens containing oxaliplatin (OXA) in advanced HCC had been demonstrated in phase II studies. In a phase II study of the FOLFOX4 (infusional fluorouracil [FU], leucovorin[LV], and OXA) regimen in Chinese patients with HCC, median overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months, mean time to progression was 2.0 months, and the response rate (RR) was 18.2%. The safety profile was acceptable. Recently, the results of a phase Ⅲ randomize study showed that FOLFOX4 served as palliative chemotherapy can induce higher overall survival, progression-free survival and response rate comparing to doxorubicin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from Asia. The safety data was also acceptable.So the investigators' hypothesis is that post-surgery FOLFOX4 can reduce high recurrence rate after HR for HCC with PVTT. The aim of this open-label, single prospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HR combined with FOLFOX4 systemic chemotherapy for patients with HCC with PVTT.
6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 51 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.
Browse Carcinoma studies →Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,644 studies on the registry; 602 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. HR ; 2. FOLFOX4 4 weeks after HR
Procedure: HR · Drug: FOLFOX4
HR: HR was carried out under general anesthesia using a right subcostal incision with a midline extension. Intraoperative ultrasound was routinely performed. Pringle's maneuver was routinely used with a clamp/unclamp time of 10 minutes/5 minutes.Thrombectomy was performed according to the location and extent of PVTT. The en bloc technique was used for patients if the portal vein branch could be ligated with a sufficient safety margin between its root and the tip of the thrombus
FOLFOX4(Oxaliplatin + 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin): 4 weeks after HR; Drug: Oxaliplatin + 5- Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Day 1: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m² 2h IV infusion, leucovorin 200mg/m² 2h IV infusion, 5-fluorouracil 400mg/m² IV bolus, 5-fluorouracil 600mg/m2 22h IV infusion. Day 2: Leucovorin 200mg/m² 2h IV infusion, 5-fluorouracil 400mg/m² IV bolus, 5-fluorouracil 600mg/m² 22h IV infusion. Repeated every 2 weeks
Recurrence rate
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Complications reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grading version 4.0
Time frame: 2 years
Recurrence-free survival
Time frame: 2 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sun Yat-sen University