A Phase 2 interventional study of Vitamin D3 and Placebo in Hypovitaminosis D, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario. Completed at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-13.
Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency — 9 open to participants now, 16 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Cholecalciferol · Vitamin D Deficiency.
Among the 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency, this one is the 117th largest by enrollment, is one of 10 that started in 2016, is one of 26 in phase 2, and was the 128th registered.
801 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitamin D Deficiency; 60 are open to participants now.
Browse Vitamin D Deficiency studies →9 of the 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency are open now, in 7 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital · Sites in Pakistan
Ages 6–14
Bangladesh Medical University · Sites in Bangladesh
Ages 20–40 · Men only
National Taiwan University Hospital · Sites in Taiwan
Ages 18+
Peking University First Hospital · Sites in China
Ages 19+
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico · Sites in Mexico
Ages 5–17
By country, each count listing its studies:
Cholecalciferol: first FDA approval 2000 (INFUVITE ADULT), first EMA approval 2005. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →
Of the 37 Vitamin D Deficiency studies recruiting now, 16 (43%) set no upper age limit and 18 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.
This study: Up to 17 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
228 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 17 · Phase 2 40 · Phase 3 38 · Phase 4 34
First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 10 started in 2016.
By drug class, each counting the studies that test any of its medicines:
This study's enrollment of 67 is below the median of 78 across 590 interventional studies indexed under Vitamin D Deficiency.
Median enrollment 72 across the 228 interventional studies. Of the 179 that completed or were terminated, 44 (25%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
2 of 228 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario has 3 studies filed under Vitamin D Deficiency — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
6 of the studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 1 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT03188796Phase 3Medical University of GrazThe VITDALIZE Study: Effect of High-dose Vitamin D3 on 28-day Mortality in Adult Critically Ill Patients | 2027-07 |
| NCT04677816Wake Forest University Health SciencesImpact of Vitamin D Supplementation on the Rate of Pathologic Complete Response in Vitamin D Deficient Patients | 2026-12 |
| NCT03613116University of California, DavisHigh-dose Vitamin D Supplements in Older Adults | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT07914478Aziz Bhatti Shaheed Teaching HospitalRole of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome | 2027-03-30 |
| NCT07006714University of MiamiPreoperative Correction of Vitamin D Deficiency in Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) | 2027-07-01 |
Add all 6 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Documented roles for vitamin D in calcium homeostasis, cardiovascular and respiratory health, inflammation, innate immunity, and neuromuscular function have led to the hypothesis that deficiency might represent a modifiable risk factor for outcomes in critical illness. In recent years, dozens of adult studies have reported both high deficiency rates, and associations between lower vitamin D levels and organ dysfunction, health resource utilization, and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). More recently, similar observations have been made in critically ill pediatric populations. The cumulative body of basic science and clinical literature demonstrates that deficiency is common in critical illness and rapid normalization of vitamin D status could improve clinical outcomes and/or reduce health care costs. However, before conducting a phase III trial to determine whether restoration of vitamin D status improves outcomes in the PICU, the appropriate dosing regimen must be identified. Consequently, the investigators propose a phase II, double blind randomized controlled trial to determine a loading therapy dosing regimen that can safely and rapidly normalize vitamin D status in critically ill children.
Background \& Rationale: Documented roles for vitamin D in calcium homeostasis, cardiovascular and respiratory health, inflammation, innate immunity, and neuromuscular function have led to the hypothesis that deficiency might represent a modifiable risk factor for outcomes in critical illness. In recent years, dozens of adult studies have reported both high deficiency rates, and associations between lower vitamin D levels and organ dysfunction, health resource utilization, and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). More recently, similar observations have been made in critically ill pediatric populations. The cumulative body of basic science and clinical literature demonstrates that deficiency is common in critical illness and rapid normalization of vitamin D status could improve clinical outcomes and/or reduce health care costs. However, before conducting a phase III trial to determine whether restoration of vitamin D status improves outcomes in the PICU, the appropriate dosing regimen must be identified. Consequently, the investigators propose a phase II, double blind randomized controlled trial to determine a loading therapy dosing regimen that can safely and rapidly normalize vitamin D status in critically ill children.
Objectives:
Primary Objective: Determine whether a weight-based loading protocol can rapidly normalize blood vitamin D levels in critically ill children Secondary Objectives: (1) Evaluate whether a weight-based loading protocol, when compared with usual care, results in a greater occurrence of vitamin D related adverse events (hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria); and (2) determine the barriers to and feasibility of a multicenter phase III randomized control trial evaluating whether rapid vitamin D normalization improves clinical outcome and/or reduces health care spending in critically ill children.
Eligibility Criteria: The inclusion criteria for this study are: (i) Admitted to ICU, (ii) Corrected gestational age > 37 weeks to age \< 18 years, (iii) Expected ICU admission in excess of 48 hours and expected access for blood work at Day 7 of hospital admission, and (iv) Blood 25(OH)D less than 50 nmol/L (regardless of prior approach to supplementation). Exclusion criteria are: (i) Significant gastrointestinal disorder preventing enteral drug administration (e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis); (ii) Hypercalcemia (excluding transient abnormalities and those related to parenteral calcium administration for hypocalcemia); (iii) Confirmed or suspected William's syndrome; (iv) Patient known to have nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis; (v) Imminent plan for withdrawal of care or transfer to another ICU; (vi) Physician refusal; (vii) Previous enrollment in the study; (viii) Patient known to have granulomatous disease (tuberculosis or sarcoidosis), (ix) Severe liver dysfunction/liver failure; (x) Patient know to have hypersensitivity or allergy to vitamin D or any of the non-medicinal ingredients of the formulation; (xi) Patient on thiazide diuretics who is also receiving regular ongoing calcium supplementation above the daily recommended intake (for reasons other than hypocalcemia); (xii) Adolescent female of child-bearing age with a positive serum pregnancy test; or (xiii) Patient on digoxin-therapy
Patients meeting inclusion criteria #1-3 and with no exclusion criteria will be approached regarding participation. If consent is given, 25OHD will be determined and those under 50 nmol/L will be randomized. Participants will be stratified by age in two categories (above 30 days of age or below/equal to 30 days of age). Randomization/allocation concealment will be performed using a web-based randomization system.
Interventions: All participants may also receive standard vitamin D dosing (e.g. 400 IU/day). Sixty-seven patients will be randomized 2:1 to the intervention (Enteral loading arm)
Data Collection: Blood and urine will be collected on days 0 (enrolment day), 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge, and after interventions or triggers known to influence vitamin D status (e.g. cardiopulmonary bypass, hospital stay >30 days). Information on demographics, hospital course, adverse events, and health resource utilization will be entered into an electronic case report form.
Sample Size: Randomization of 40 children into the loading arm will provide sufficient power to estimate the proportion achieving target 25OHD with a confidence interval of ±15%. Assuming a 5% non-compliance/drop-out rate in each arm, randomization of 60 patients (total) may be required to achieve the desired power. The dosing regimen for this study was changed from a double dose to a single dose after the first seven patients were enrolled. As a result, the sample size was increased to 67 patients. All patients (n=67) will be included in the final intention to treat analysis. The 60 patients who received a single dose will be included in the per protocol analysis.
Significance: Critical illness occurs in tens of thousands of children each year in North America and can result in death, significant suffering, prolonged periods of rehabilitation, and chronic illness. High vitamin D deficiency rates in PICUs and the recognized interaction between vitamin D status and the health of multiple organ systems suggest that vitamin D could represent an inexpensive, safe means of improving outcomes and reducing health care spending. Unfortunately, approved daily dosing regimens require months to restore vitamin D levels and there have been no studies of loading therapy in pediatric critical illness. Consequently, despite significant literature suggesting vitamin D deficiency to be a modifiable risk factor, there is no evidence to inform physicians on the true benefits or risks of loading therapy. The proposed phase II clinical trial will determine how to provide cholecalciferol loads to facilitate rapid normalization of vitamin D levels, and provide initial information on toxicity.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
(i) Admitted to ICU; (ii) Corrected gestational age > 37 weeks to age \< 18 years; (iii) Expected ICU admission in excess of 48 hours and expected access for blood work at Day 7 of hospital admission; (iv) Blood 25OHD less than 50 nmol/L (regardless of prior approach to supplementation)
Exclusion Criteria:
(i) Significant gastrointestinal disorder preventing enteral drug administration (e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis); (ii) Hypercalcemia (excluding transient abnormalities and those related to parenteral calcium administration for hypocalcemia); (iii) Confirmed or suspected William's syndrome; (iv) Patient known to have nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis; (v) Imminent plan for withdrawal of care or transfer to another ICU; (vi) Physician refusal; (vii) Previous enrollment in the study; (viii) Patient known to have granulomatous disease (tuberculosis or sarcoidosis), (ix) Severe liver dysfunction/liver failure; (x) Patient know to have or allergy to vitamin D or any of the non-medicinal ingredients of the formulation; (xi) Patient on thiazide diuretics who is also receiving regular ongoing calcium supplementation above the daily recommended intake (for reasons other than hypocalcemia); (xii) Adolescent female of child-bearing age with a positive serum pregnancy test; or (xiii) Patient on digoxin-therapy
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) - Single dose at enrolment of 10000 IU/kg of cholecalciferol (max 400000 IU)
Drug: Vitamin D3
Patients will receive a placebo solution equivalent in volume to the dose of cholecalciferol administered to patients in the enteral loading arm.
Drug: Placebo
Also known as: Cholecalciferol
Vitamin D Status
The percentage of critically ill children who achieve a blood 25OHD concentration above 75 nmol/L by day 7
Time frame: 7 days
Patient Accrual Rate
The investigators will determine the feasibility of a subsequent multicentre phase III interventional study through an evaluation of patient accrual rate. The expected patient accrual rate is 88 patients over a 2-year period (2-5 patients per month per centre; low estimate 60 patients (0-2 per month per centre). The study will be considered feasible if the patient accrual rate is achieved
Time frame: 2 years
Vitamin D Related Adverse Events
A measurable difference in clinically significant adverse events between the loading dose and placebo arms in unlikely in a phase II study. Therefore, the investigators will evaluate for potential toxicity using two well accepted surrogate outcome measures: (1) Hypercalcemia - The investigators will define hypercalcemia as an ionized calcium level above 1.40 mmol/L (children under 8 weeks as \> 1.45 mmol/l); and (2) Hypercalciuria - Hypercalciuria will be defined as an elevated calcium:creatinine ratio above age-based normal values
Time frame: On days 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)
Vitamin D Axis Function - Calcium
Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood calcium levels (i.e. calcium metabolism). Calcium levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Time frame: On day 0, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)
Vitamin D Axis Function - 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D
Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood 1,25OHD levels. 1,25 levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Time frame: On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)
Immune Function - Cathelicidin
Immune function will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood cathelicidin levels. Cathelicidin levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Time frame: On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)
Eligible participants were recruited from participating PICUs and one Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) between January 2016 to August 2017
| Milestone | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 45 | 22 |
| Completed | 40 | 19 |
| Not completed | 5 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Received >1 loading dose of cholecalciferol and analyzed separately | 4 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
The percentage of critically ill children who achieve a blood 25OHD concentration above 75 nmol/L by day 7
| Percentage of participants in study arm | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D Status | 81.6 (66.6 to 90.8) | 5.6 (1.0 to 25.8) |
The investigators will determine the feasibility of a subsequent multicentre phase III interventional study through an evaluation of patient accrual rate. The expected patient accrual rate is 88 patients over a 2-year period (2-5 patients per month per centre; low estimate 60 patients (0-2 per month per centre). The study will be considered feasible if the patient accrual rate is achieved
| Number of patients enrolled per month | Overall Cohort |
|---|---|
| Patient Accrual Rate | 3.35 |
A measurable difference in clinically significant adverse events between the loading dose and placebo arms in unlikely in a phase II study. Therefore, the investigators will evaluate for potential toxicity using two well accepted surrogate outcome measures: (1) Hypercalcemia - The investigators will define hypercalcemia as an ionized calcium level above 1.40 mmol/L (children under 8 weeks as \> 1.45 mmol/l); and (2) Hypercalciuria - Hypercalciuria will be defined as an elevated calcium:creatinine ratio above age-based normal values
| Participants | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Hypercalcemia | 0 | 0 |
| Hypdercalciuria | 6 | 4 |
| No Hypercalcemia or Hypercaliuria | 34 | 15 |
Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood calcium levels (i.e. calcium metabolism). Calcium levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
| mmol/mmol | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Day 0 - Lowest | 1.17 (1.13 to 1.2) | 1.18 (1.14 to 1.23) |
| Day 0 - Highest | 1.22 (1.17 to 1.28) | 1.21 (1.17 to 1.29) |
| Day 3 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration | 1.16 (1.06 to 1.26) | 1.12 (1.09 to 1.18) |
| Day 3 - Highest ionized calcium concentration | 1.21 (1.15 to 1.29) | 1.27 (1.14 to 1.27) |
| Day 7 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration | 1.17 (1.12 to 1.23) | 1.17 (1.10 to 1.19) |
| Day 7 - Highest ionized calcium concentration | 1.22 (1.18 to 1.27) | 1.18 (1.17 to 1.30) |
| Hospital discharge - Lowest ionized calcium concentration | 1.24 (1.18 to 1.32) | 1.20 (1.15 to 1.27) |
| Hospital discharge - Highest ionized calcium concentration | 1.26 (1.18 to 1.32) | 1.24 (1.18 to 1.29) |
Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood 1,25OHD levels. 1,25 levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Immune function will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood cathelicidin levels. Cathelicidin levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Collected over Participants were monitored for adverse events from the time of study enrollment (administration of the study drug) until 90 days following enrollment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteral Loading Arm | 3/40 (7.5%) | 0/40 (0%) | 6/40 (15%) |
| Placebo Arm | 2/19 (10.5%) | 0/19 (0%) | 4/19 (21.1%) |
| Event | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Persistent hypercalciuriaEndocrine disorders | 6/40 | 4/19 |
| NephrocalcinosisInvestigations | 0/40 | 0/19 |
| Persistent hypercalcemiaEndocrine disorders | 0/40 | 0/19 |
| Age, Continuous(Months) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 13.4 (2.1 to 86.6) | 11.8 (2.1 to 87.9) | 12.8 (2.0 to 87.1) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 16 | 9 | 25 |
| Male | 24 | 10 | 34 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | 33 | 16 | 49 |
| Austria | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Chile | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Mechanical ventilation required, frequency(Participants) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 32 | 16 | 48 |
| Received catecholamines, frequency(Participants) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 20 | 9 | 29 |
| ICU type, frequency(Participants) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pediatric Intensive Care Unit | 37 | 17 | 54 |
| Neonatal Intensive Care Unit | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| ICU Admission season, frequency(Participants) | Enteral Loading Arm | Placebo Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fall | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Winter | 11 | 7 | 18 |
| Spring | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| Summer | 12 | 4 | 16 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: No
Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Nov 2017, 22 months.
Results were first posted in Aug 2021, 3 years 9 months after primary completion.
Of 18 phase 2 interventional studies under Vitamin D Deficiency, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 45. This study's 22 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Cholecalciferol
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario