ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02452762VITdAL-PICUUpdated Aug 13, 2021Results posted

Rapid Normalization of Vitamin D in Critically Ill Children: A Phase II Dose Evaluation Randomized Controlled Trial

A Phase 2 interventional study of Vitamin D3 and Placebo in Hypovitaminosis D, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario. Completed at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-13.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
67
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency — 9 open to participants now, 16 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Cholecalciferol · Vitamin D Deficiency.

Enrollment
117th of 228
67 · median 72
Started
2016
with 9 others
Phase 2
26 of 228
1 open now
Registered
128th of 228
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 228
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Among the 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency, this one is the 117th largest by enrollment, is one of 10 that started in 2016, is one of 26 in phase 2, and was the 128th registered.

Vitamin D Deficiency

801 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitamin D Deficiency; 60 are open to participants now.

Browse Vitamin D Deficiency studies →

Open to participants now

9 of the 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency are open now, in 7 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

4 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 9 open studies →

About cholecalciferol

Cholecalciferol: first FDA approval 2000 (INFUVITE ADULT), first EMA approval 2005. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 37 Vitamin D Deficiency studies recruiting now, 16 (43%) set no upper age limit and 18 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: Up to 17 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 228 studies testing cholecalciferol in Vitamin D Deficiency, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Documented roles for vitamin D in calcium homeostasis, cardiovascular and respiratory health, inflammation, innate immunity, and neuromuscular function have led to the hypothesis that deficiency might represent a modifiable risk factor for outcomes in critical illness. In recent years, dozens of adult studies have reported both high deficiency rates, and associations between lower vitamin D levels and organ dysfunction, health resource utilization, and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). More recently, similar observations have been made in critically ill pediatric populations. The cumulative body of basic science and clinical literature demonstrates that deficiency is common in critical illness and rapid normalization of vitamin D status could improve clinical outcomes and/or reduce health care costs. However, before conducting a phase III trial to determine whether restoration of vitamin D status improves outcomes in the PICU, the appropriate dosing regimen must be identified. Consequently, the investigators propose a phase II, double blind randomized controlled trial to determine a loading therapy dosing regimen that can safely and rapidly normalize vitamin D status in critically ill children.

Read the detailed description

Background \& Rationale: Documented roles for vitamin D in calcium homeostasis, cardiovascular and respiratory health, inflammation, innate immunity, and neuromuscular function have led to the hypothesis that deficiency might represent a modifiable risk factor for outcomes in critical illness. In recent years, dozens of adult studies have reported both high deficiency rates, and associations between lower vitamin D levels and organ dysfunction, health resource utilization, and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). More recently, similar observations have been made in critically ill pediatric populations. The cumulative body of basic science and clinical literature demonstrates that deficiency is common in critical illness and rapid normalization of vitamin D status could improve clinical outcomes and/or reduce health care costs. However, before conducting a phase III trial to determine whether restoration of vitamin D status improves outcomes in the PICU, the appropriate dosing regimen must be identified. Consequently, the investigators propose a phase II, double blind randomized controlled trial to determine a loading therapy dosing regimen that can safely and rapidly normalize vitamin D status in critically ill children.

Objectives:

Primary Objective: Determine whether a weight-based loading protocol can rapidly normalize blood vitamin D levels in critically ill children Secondary Objectives: (1) Evaluate whether a weight-based loading protocol, when compared with usual care, results in a greater occurrence of vitamin D related adverse events (hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria); and (2) determine the barriers to and feasibility of a multicenter phase III randomized control trial evaluating whether rapid vitamin D normalization improves clinical outcome and/or reduces health care spending in critically ill children.

Eligibility Criteria: The inclusion criteria for this study are: (i) Admitted to ICU, (ii) Corrected gestational age > 37 weeks to age \< 18 years, (iii) Expected ICU admission in excess of 48 hours and expected access for blood work at Day 7 of hospital admission, and (iv) Blood 25(OH)D less than 50 nmol/L (regardless of prior approach to supplementation). Exclusion criteria are: (i) Significant gastrointestinal disorder preventing enteral drug administration (e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis); (ii) Hypercalcemia (excluding transient abnormalities and those related to parenteral calcium administration for hypocalcemia); (iii) Confirmed or suspected William's syndrome; (iv) Patient known to have nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis; (v) Imminent plan for withdrawal of care or transfer to another ICU; (vi) Physician refusal; (vii) Previous enrollment in the study; (viii) Patient known to have granulomatous disease (tuberculosis or sarcoidosis), (ix) Severe liver dysfunction/liver failure; (x) Patient know to have hypersensitivity or allergy to vitamin D or any of the non-medicinal ingredients of the formulation; (xi) Patient on thiazide diuretics who is also receiving regular ongoing calcium supplementation above the daily recommended intake (for reasons other than hypocalcemia); (xii) Adolescent female of child-bearing age with a positive serum pregnancy test; or (xiii) Patient on digoxin-therapy

Patients meeting inclusion criteria #1-3 and with no exclusion criteria will be approached regarding participation. If consent is given, 25OHD will be determined and those under 50 nmol/L will be randomized. Participants will be stratified by age in two categories (above 30 days of age or below/equal to 30 days of age). Randomization/allocation concealment will be performed using a web-based randomization system.

Interventions: All participants may also receive standard vitamin D dosing (e.g. 400 IU/day). Sixty-seven patients will be randomized 2:1 to the intervention (Enteral loading arm)

  1. Enteral loading arm: 10000 IU/kg of cholecalciferol (max 400000 IU)
  2. Placebo arm: For blinding purposes, this arm will receive a placebo solution

Data Collection: Blood and urine will be collected on days 0 (enrolment day), 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge, and after interventions or triggers known to influence vitamin D status (e.g. cardiopulmonary bypass, hospital stay >30 days). Information on demographics, hospital course, adverse events, and health resource utilization will be entered into an electronic case report form.

Sample Size: Randomization of 40 children into the loading arm will provide sufficient power to estimate the proportion achieving target 25OHD with a confidence interval of ±15%. Assuming a 5% non-compliance/drop-out rate in each arm, randomization of 60 patients (total) may be required to achieve the desired power. The dosing regimen for this study was changed from a double dose to a single dose after the first seven patients were enrolled. As a result, the sample size was increased to 67 patients. All patients (n=67) will be included in the final intention to treat analysis. The 60 patients who received a single dose will be included in the per protocol analysis.

Significance: Critical illness occurs in tens of thousands of children each year in North America and can result in death, significant suffering, prolonged periods of rehabilitation, and chronic illness. High vitamin D deficiency rates in PICUs and the recognized interaction between vitamin D status and the health of multiple organ systems suggest that vitamin D could represent an inexpensive, safe means of improving outcomes and reducing health care spending. Unfortunately, approved daily dosing regimens require months to restore vitamin D levels and there have been no studies of loading therapy in pediatric critical illness. Consequently, despite significant literature suggesting vitamin D deficiency to be a modifiable risk factor, there is no evidence to inform physicians on the true benefits or risks of loading therapy. The proposed phase II clinical trial will determine how to provide cholecalciferol loads to facilitate rapid normalization of vitamin D levels, and provide initial information on toxicity.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hypovitaminosis D

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

(i) Admitted to ICU; (ii) Corrected gestational age > 37 weeks to age \< 18 years; (iii) Expected ICU admission in excess of 48 hours and expected access for blood work at Day 7 of hospital admission; (iv) Blood 25OHD less than 50 nmol/L (regardless of prior approach to supplementation)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) Significant gastrointestinal disorder preventing enteral drug administration (e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis); (ii) Hypercalcemia (excluding transient abnormalities and those related to parenteral calcium administration for hypocalcemia); (iii) Confirmed or suspected William's syndrome; (iv) Patient known to have nephrolithiasis or Nephrocalcinosis; (v) Imminent plan for withdrawal of care or transfer to another ICU; (vi) Physician refusal; (vii) Previous enrollment in the study; (viii) Patient known to have granulomatous disease (tuberculosis or sarcoidosis), (ix) Severe liver dysfunction/liver failure; (x) Patient know to have or allergy to vitamin D or any of the non-medicinal ingredients of the formulation; (xi) Patient on thiazide diuretics who is also receiving regular ongoing calcium supplementation above the daily recommended intake (for reasons other than hypocalcemia); (xii) Adolescent female of child-bearing age with a positive serum pregnancy test; or (xiii) Patient on digoxin-therapy

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
67 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Enteral Loading Arm

    Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) - Single dose at enrolment of 10000 IU/kg of cholecalciferol (max 400000 IU)

    Drug: Vitamin D3

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Arm

    Patients will receive a placebo solution equivalent in volume to the dose of cholecalciferol administered to patients in the enteral loading arm.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Also known as: Cholecalciferol

  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vitamin D Status

    The percentage of critically ill children who achieve a blood 25OHD concentration above 75 nmol/L by day 7

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Accrual Rate

    The investigators will determine the feasibility of a subsequent multicentre phase III interventional study through an evaluation of patient accrual rate. The expected patient accrual rate is 88 patients over a 2-year period (2-5 patients per month per centre; low estimate 60 patients (0-2 per month per centre). The study will be considered feasible if the patient accrual rate is achieved

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Vitamin D Related Adverse Events

    A measurable difference in clinically significant adverse events between the loading dose and placebo arms in unlikely in a phase II study. Therefore, the investigators will evaluate for potential toxicity using two well accepted surrogate outcome measures: (1) Hypercalcemia - The investigators will define hypercalcemia as an ionized calcium level above 1.40 mmol/L (children under 8 weeks as \> 1.45 mmol/l); and (2) Hypercalciuria - Hypercalciuria will be defined as an elevated calcium:creatinine ratio above age-based normal values

    Time frame: On days 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

  3. Vitamin D Axis Function - Calcium

    Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood calcium levels (i.e. calcium metabolism). Calcium levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

    Time frame: On day 0, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

  4. Vitamin D Axis Function - 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

    Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood 1,25OHD levels. 1,25 levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

    Time frame: On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

  5. Immune Function - Cathelicidin

    Immune function will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood cathelicidin levels. Cathelicidin levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

    Time frame: On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Aug 13, 2021

Participant flow

Eligible participants were recruited from participating PICUs and one Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) between January 2016 to August 2017

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEnteral Loading ArmPlacebo Arm
Started4522
Completed4019
Not completed53
Withdrew: Received >1 loading dose of cholecalciferol and analyzed separately43
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryVitamin D Status

The percentage of critically ill children who achieve a blood 25OHD concentration above 75 nmol/L by day 7

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants in study arm
Vitamin D Status
Percentage of participants in study armEnteral Loading ArmPlacebo Arm
Vitamin D Status81.6 (66.6 to 90.8)5.6 (1.0 to 25.8)
SecondaryPatient Accrual Rate

The investigators will determine the feasibility of a subsequent multicentre phase III interventional study through an evaluation of patient accrual rate. The expected patient accrual rate is 88 patients over a 2-year period (2-5 patients per month per centre; low estimate 60 patients (0-2 per month per centre). The study will be considered feasible if the patient accrual rate is achieved

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · Number of patients enrolled per month
Patient Accrual Rate
Number of patients enrolled per monthOverall Cohort
Patient Accrual Rate3.35
SecondaryVitamin D Related Adverse Events

A measurable difference in clinically significant adverse events between the loading dose and placebo arms in unlikely in a phase II study. Therefore, the investigators will evaluate for potential toxicity using two well accepted surrogate outcome measures: (1) Hypercalcemia - The investigators will define hypercalcemia as an ionized calcium level above 1.40 mmol/L (children under 8 weeks as \> 1.45 mmol/l); and (2) Hypercalciuria - Hypercalciuria will be defined as an elevated calcium:creatinine ratio above age-based normal values

Time frame:
On days 1, 2, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Vitamin D Related Adverse Events
ParticipantsEnteral Loading ArmPlacebo Arm
Hypercalcemia00
Hypdercalciuria64
No Hypercalcemia or Hypercaliuria3415
SecondaryVitamin D Axis Function - Calcium

Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood calcium levels (i.e. calcium metabolism). Calcium levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

Time frame:
On day 0, 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · mmol/mmol
Vitamin D Axis Function - Calcium
mmol/mmolEnteral Loading ArmPlacebo Arm
Day 0 - Lowest1.17 (1.13 to 1.2)1.18 (1.14 to 1.23)
Day 0 - Highest1.22 (1.17 to 1.28)1.21 (1.17 to 1.29)
Day 3 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.16 (1.06 to 1.26)1.12 (1.09 to 1.18)
Day 3 - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.21 (1.15 to 1.29)1.27 (1.14 to 1.27)
Day 7 - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.17 (1.12 to 1.23)1.17 (1.10 to 1.19)
Day 7 - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.22 (1.18 to 1.27)1.18 (1.17 to 1.30)
Hospital discharge - Lowest ionized calcium concentration1.24 (1.18 to 1.32)1.20 (1.15 to 1.27)
Hospital discharge - Highest ionized calcium concentration1.26 (1.18 to 1.32)1.24 (1.18 to 1.29)
SecondaryVitamin D Axis Function - 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

Improved signalling through the vitamin D axis will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood 1,25OHD levels. 1,25 levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

Time frame:
On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryImmune Function - Cathelicidin

Immune function will be evaluated through an evaluation of blood cathelicidin levels. Cathelicidin levels will be reported as median plus interquartile range and will be compared between the 2 study groups.

Time frame:
On day 3, 7, hospital discharge (expected average of 2 weeks)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Participants were monitored for adverse events from the time of study enrollment (administration of the study drug) until 90 days following enrollment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Enteral Loading Arm3/40 (7.5%)0/40 (0%)6/40 (15%)
Placebo Arm2/19 (10.5%)0/19 (0%)4/19 (21.1%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventEnteral Loading ArmPlacebo Arm
Persistent hypercalciuriaEndocrine disorders6/404/19
NephrocalcinosisInvestigations0/400/19
Persistent hypercalcemiaEndocrine disorders0/400/19

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Months)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Median13.4 (2.1 to 86.6)11.8 (2.1 to 87.9)12.8 (2.0 to 87.1)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Female16925
Male241034
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Canada331649
Austria112
Chile628
Mechanical ventilation required, frequency
Mechanical ventilation required, frequency(Participants)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Count of participants321648
Received catecholamines, frequency
Received catecholamines, frequency(Participants)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Count of participants20929
ICU type, frequency
ICU type, frequency(Participants)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit371754
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit325
ICU Admission season, frequency
ICU Admission season, frequency(Participants)Enteral Loading ArmPlacebo ArmTotal
Fall8412
Winter11718
Spring9413
Summer12416
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Medical University of Graz
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Victoria Hospital
    London, Ontario N6C 3T6, Canada
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada
  • Hospital Guillermo Grant Benavente
    Concepcion, Chile
09

References and documents

Publications

  • McNally D, Amrein K, O'Hearn K, Fergusson D, Geier P, Henderson M, Khamessan A, Lawson ML, McIntyre L, Redpath S, Weiler HA, Menon K; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Study protocol for a phase II dose evaluation randomized controlled trial of cholecalciferol in critically ill children with vitamin D deficiency (VITdAL-PICU study). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Dec 8;3:70. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0214-z. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29234503 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Nov 2017, 22 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2021, 3 years 9 months after primary completion.

Of 18 phase 2 interventional studies under Vitamin D Deficiency, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 45. This study's 22 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 15, 2015
First posted
May 25, 2015
StartActual
Jan 2016
Primary completionActual
Nov 2017
CompletionActual
Jan 2018
Results first posted
Aug 13, 2021
Last update
Aug 13, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02452762
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Responsible party
James Dayre McNally (Pediatric Intensivist, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 25, 2015
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Nov 2017
Completion
Jan 2018
Results posted
Aug 13, 2021
Last update
Aug 13, 2021

Study contacts

James D McNally
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Menon Kusum
study chair · Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
McIntyre Lauralyn
study chair · The Ottawa Hospital
Fergusson Dean
study chair · The Ottawa Hospital
Amrein Karin
study chair · Medical University of Graz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cholecalciferol

Start the discussion