An interventional study of Acrylic IOL and Silicone IOL in Pseudophakia, sponsored by Alcon, a Novartis Company. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-09.
Sponsored by Alcon, a Novartis Company (formerly part of Novartis) · Not applicable and Interventional
The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term visual acuity (VA) with an acrylic IOL to a silicone or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOL in cataract patients. This study will take place in Japan.
54 studies on the registry are indexed under Pseudophakia; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 45 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Pseudophakia.
Browse Pseudophakia studies →Alcon, a Novartis Company is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
First submitted before Alcon left Novartis.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Acrylic IOL, prior implantation (1994-2000) in one or both eyes
Device: Acrylic IOL
Silicone IOL, prior implantation (1994-2000) in one or both eyes
Device: Silicone IOL
PMMA IOL, prior implantation (1994-2000) in one or both eyes
Device: PMMA IOL
Acrylic IOL for long-term implantation in the cataract patient
Also known as: AcrySof® Model MA30BA, AcrySof® Model MA60BM
Silicone IOL for long-term implantation in the cataract patient
Polymethylmethacrylate IOL for long-term implantation in the cataract patient
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at the Long-Term, Post-Implantation Visit
Measurement of best corrected (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) visual acuity (at both near and distance). Visual Acuity (VA) is measured in logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A lower logMAR value indicates better visual acuity. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (up to and including 3 months after implantation), long-term post-implantation visit (14-20 years after implantation)
Subjects were recruited from 11 study centers located in Japan.
| Milestone | AcrySof | Silicone | PMMA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 31 | 37 | 30 |
| Completed | 31 | 37 | 30 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Measurement of best corrected (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) visual acuity (at both near and distance). Visual Acuity (VA) is measured in logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A lower logMAR value indicates better visual acuity. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
| logMAR | AcrySof | Silicone | PMMA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | -0.06 ± 0.07 | -0.09 ± 0.07 | -0.07 ± 0.08 |
| Change from baseline | 0.01 ± 0.08 | 0.04 ± 0.06 | -0.01 ± 0.05 |
Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of a subject's participation in the study; retrospectively 14 to 20 years and prospectively for a single visit. This analysis group includes all subjects who used the study devices and underwent the long-term post-implantation visit examination. Ocular adverse events are presented for both study eye and non-study eye combined.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| AcrySof (Retrospective) | — | 0/31 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) |
| Silicone (Retrospective) | — | 0/37 (0%) | 3/37 (8.1%) |
| PMMA (Retrospective) | — | 0/30 (0%) | 4/30 (13.3%) |
| AcrySof (Prospective) | — | 0/31 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) |
| Silicone (Prospective) | — | 0/37 (0%) | 0/37 (0%) |
| PMMA (Prospective) | — | 0/30 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) |
| Event | AcrySof (Retrospective) | Silicone (Retrospective) | PMMA (Retrospective) | AcrySof (Prospective) | Silicone (Prospective) | PMMA (Prospective) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| posterior capsule opacificationEye disorders | 0/31 | 3/37 | 4/30 | 0/31 | 0/37 | 0/30 |
This analysis population includes all subjects who used the study devices and underwent the long-term post-implantation visit examination (Safety Set).
| Age, Customized(subjects) | AcrySof | Silicone | PMMA | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <70 years | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| ≥70 and ≤79 years | 13 | 21 | 11 | 45 |
| ≥80 and ≤89 years | 12 | 12 | 9 | 33 |
| >90 years | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | AcrySof | Silicone | PMMA | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 23 | 24 | 19 | 66 |
| Male | 8 | 13 | 11 | 32 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
The record gives a start of Jun 2015, a primary completion of May 2016 and a completion of May 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Dec 2016, 7 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.