CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02446613Updated Apr 4, 2018Results posted

Follow-up Study to Investigate the Effect of GSK2245035 on Nasal Allergic Reactivity in Subjects Completing Treatment in Study TL7116958

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pollen allergen extract in Asthma and Rhinitis, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-04.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the duration of effect of GSK2245035 on allergic reactivity by repeating a nasal allergen challenge (NAC) approximately one year after treatment in subjects from TL7116958. This is a single centre, single period study in subjects with respiratory allergy/allergies who completed the study TL7116958 in 2014 to investigate the long term effect of previous treatment with GSK2245035 compared with placebo on total nasal symptoms elicited by nasal allergen challenge. Subjects and staff will remain blinded to the treatment received in the TL7116958 study (GSK2245035 or placebo). The study will consist of a screening visit to assess eligibility criteria, a study period consisting of a single visit when the nasal allergen challenge will be performed, and follow up by phone or a clinic visit at the discretion of the investigator 4-7 days following the allergen challenge. Eligible subjects will participate in this study for approximately70 days total from screening to follow up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma and Rhinitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Allergic Rhinitis
  • Nasal allergen challenge
  • Allergic Asthma
  • Effect on Allergen Reactivity
03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 89 across 906 interventional studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult subjects with allergic rhinitis who completed study TL7116958 in 2014.
  • Healthy as determined by the investigator or medically qualified designee based on a brief physical examination.
  • Males and non-pregnant females.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unresolved respiratory tract infection (RTI) at the time of study visit 2 NAC. Investigator discretion will be used regarding RTIs that have resolved during the 4 weeks preceding study visit 2.
  • Unresolved asthma exacerbation requiring hospitalization and/or treatment with oral steroids or high doses of inhaled steroids at the time of study visit 2 NAC.

Investigator discretion will be used regarding exacerbations that have resolved since screening visit.

  • A change in medical history since completion of the study TLR7116958 that in the opinion of the investigator and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) medical monitor may pose additional risk factors.
  • Subjects with a history of treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy since completion of the TL7116958 study; subjects that have taken an investigational drug that, in the opinion of the investigator or designee, would have an effect on the nasal allergen challenge
  • Subjects using steroid treatment (nasal steroids, 4 weeks; oral steroids, 4 weeks; inhaled steroids, 4 weeks) for allergic rhinitis and/or asthma prior to study visit 2, nasal allergen challenge
  • Subjects using antihistamines (nasal antihistamines, 48 hours; oral antihistamines 72 hours), decongestants (nasal decongestants, 24 hours; oral decongestants, 24 hours.), prior to study visit 2, nasal allergen challenge.
  • Subject is mentally or legally incapacitated.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Nasal allergen challenge

    Subjects do not receive study medication in this study 204509. Subjects who carried from study TL7116958 treatment group GSK2245035 will undergo NAC with pollen allergen extract.

    Other: Pollen allergen extract

Interventions

  • OtherPollen allergen extract

    Pollen (tree, grass or ragweed) allergen extracts will be provided by the research unit and diluted as required in normal saline. The specific pollen allergen extract that will be used for the nasal allergen challenge will be selected according to each subject's individual allergic sensitivity demonstrated in the previous study, TL7116958. If possible, extracts remaining from this study in 2014 will be used, provided they have not reached their expiry date.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Sym. Score (TNSS) at Post-NAC 15 Minutes (Min)

    TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym. scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from baseline was measured as the value recorded at 15 min post-NAC minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] and post-NAC 15 min)

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 1 h

    TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from baseline was measured as the value recorded at a specified time point minus Baseline value. Weighted mean (WM) 0-1h of 15, 30 min and 1 h was reported.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC], 15 to post-NAC 1h)

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h

    TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from baseline was measured as value recorded at a specified time point minus Baseline value. WM 0-6 h of 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h was reported.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)

  4. Maximum (Max) Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h

    TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym.: nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Par rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym. scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). BL values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from BL was measured as the value recorded at a specified time point minus BL value. The max change from BL from the set of individual PNIF % reduction measurements made over the 0 to 6 h sampling period.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) at Post-NAC 15 Min

    PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min and 1h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. The baseline value were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). WM 0-1 h of 15, 30 min and 1 h was reported. WM were derived by first calculating the AUC using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing by the time interval. If available, actual times were used in the calculation, otherwise planned relative times were used for the calculation.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] and post-NAC 15 min)

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in the PNIF Over Post-NAC 1 h

    PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min and 1h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). WM 0-1 h of 15, 30 min and 1 h was reported. WM were derived by first calculating the AUC using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing by the time interval. If available, actual times were used in the calculation, otherwise planned relative times were used for the calculation.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 1 h)

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in the PNIF up to Post-NAC 6 h

    PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). WM 0-6h of 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h was reported. WM were derived by first calculating the AUC using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing by the time interval. If available, actual times were used in the calculation, otherwise planned relative times were used for the calculation.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)

  8. Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in PINF Over Post-NAC 6 h

    PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). Maximum change from Baseline till 6h was reported.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Individual Nasal Sym. Including Sneezing, Nasal Congestion, Rhinorrhoea and Nasal Itch.

    Four individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing were recorded at Baseline (pre-NAC) and at post-NAC 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The baseline value were the latest pre-dose assessments. Mean change from Baseline at 15 min, WM0-1h, WM 0-6h, and maximum change over 0-6 h were reported. Change from Baseline was measured as the value recorded at a specified time point minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)

07

Results

Posted Mar 15, 2017

Participant flow

Participants (par) of All subjects population (ASP) from study TL7116958 who passed screening for study 204509 were used as safety population for this study. All outputs using information from study TL7116958 were analyzed using ASP and stand alone outputs for this study were analyzed using Safety population.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Started610
Completed610
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Sym. Score (TNSS) at Post-NAC 15 Minutes (Min)

TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym. scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from baseline was measured as the value recorded at 15 min post-NAC minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] and post-NAC 15 min)
Reported as:
Median · Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Sym. Score (TNSS) at Post-NAC 15 Minutes (Min)
Score on a scalePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Sym. Score (TNSS) at Post-NAC 15 Minutes (Min)3.8 (1.22 to 6.53)5.9 (3.91 to 7.81)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Mean difference (final values): 2.1 · 95% CI -1.41 to 5.43The posterior probability statement value for change from baseline in post-challenge TNSS ≤0 was 0.1071.
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 1 h

TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from baseline was measured as the value recorded at a specified time point minus Baseline value. Weighted mean (WM) 0-1h of 15, 30 min and 1 h was reported.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC], 15 to post-NAC 1h)
Reported as:
Median · Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 1 h
Score on a scalePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Mean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 1 h2.4 (0.24 to 4.63)3.4 (1.70 to 4.96)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Mean difference (final values): 1.0 · 95% CI -1.98 to 3.75The posterior probability statement value for change from baseline in post-challenge TNSS ≤0 was 0.2417.
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h

TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from baseline was measured as value recorded at a specified time point minus Baseline value. WM 0-6 h of 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h was reported.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)
Reported as:
Median · Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h
Score on a scalePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Mean Change From Baseline in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h1.2 (0.04 to 2.33)1.6 (0.73 to 2.44)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Median difference (final values): 0.4 · 95% CI -1.08 to 1.87The posterior probability statement value for change from baseline in post-challenge TNSS ≤0 was 0.2876.
PrimaryMaximum (Max) Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h

TNSS was obtained from 4 individual nasal sym.: nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing. Par rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The individual sym. scores were combined to produce a TNSS. TNSS were reported as median (credible interval). BL values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Change from BL was measured as the value recorded at a specified time point minus BL value. The max change from BL from the set of individual PNIF % reduction measurements made over the 0 to 6 h sampling period.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)
Reported as:
Median · Score on a scale
Maximum (Max) Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h
Score on a scalePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Maximum (Max) Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the TNSS Over Post-NAC 6 h4.1 (1.41 to 6.80)5.9 (3.83 to 7.87)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Median difference (final values): 1.9 · 95% CI -1.86 to 5.34The posterior probability statement value for change from baseline in post-challenge TNSS ≤0 was 0.1453.
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) at Post-NAC 15 Min

PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min and 1h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. The baseline value were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). WM 0-1 h of 15, 30 min and 1 h was reported. WM were derived by first calculating the AUC using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing by the time interval. If available, actual times were used in the calculation, otherwise planned relative times were used for the calculation.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] and post-NAC 15 min)
Reported as:
Median · Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) at Post-NAC 15 Min
Percent changePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Percent Change From Baseline in the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) at Post-NAC 15 Min27.6 (15.87 to 39.63)32.2 (23.71 to 40.72)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Median difference (final values): 4.6 · 95% CI -10.70 to 19.71The posterior probability statement value for percentage reduction in the reductions of PNIF ≤0 was 0.2665.
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in the PNIF Over Post-NAC 1 h

PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min and 1h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). WM 0-1 h of 15, 30 min and 1 h was reported. WM were derived by first calculating the AUC using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing by the time interval. If available, actual times were used in the calculation, otherwise planned relative times were used for the calculation.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 1 h)
Reported as:
Median · Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in the PNIF Over Post-NAC 1 h
Percent changePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Percent Change From Baseline in the PNIF Over Post-NAC 1 h20.8 (5.45 to 35.84)25.0 (14.69 to 36.05)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Median difference (final values): 4.3 · 95% CI -14.97 to 24.38The posterior probability statement value for percentage reduction in the reductions of PNIF ≤0 was 0.3266
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in the PNIF up to Post-NAC 6 h

PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). WM 0-6h of 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h was reported. WM were derived by first calculating the AUC using the trapezoidal rule, and then dividing by the time interval. If available, actual times were used in the calculation, otherwise planned relative times were used for the calculation.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)
Reported as:
Median · Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in the PNIF up to Post-NAC 6 h
Percent changePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Percent Change From Baseline in the PNIF up to Post-NAC 6 h6.3 (-7.56 to 20.47)7.3 (-2.98 to 17.68)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Median difference (final values): 1.1 · 95% CI -17.47 to 19.20The posterior probability statement value for percentage reduction in the reductions of PNIF ≤0 was 0.4528
PrimaryMaximum Percent Change From Baseline in PINF Over Post-NAC 6 h

PNIF data recorded at Baseline pre-challenge and at 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h. The percent change from Baseline and at specified time point was derived by the formula (PNIF at Baseline minus PNIF at Post-NAC specified time point) divided by PNIF at Baseline) multiplied by 100. The baseline values were the latest pre-dose assessments. Percent change in PNIF were reported as median (credible interval). Maximum change from Baseline till 6h was reported.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)
Reported as:
Median · Percent change
Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in PINF Over Post-NAC 6 h
Percent changePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in PINF Over Post-NAC 6 h33.3 (16.89 to 49.33)39.9 (29.18 to 51.53)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Once Weekly vs GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly · Median difference (final values): 6.6 · 95% CI -13.69 to 28.04The posterior probability statement value for percentage reduction in the reductions of PNIF ≤0 was 0.2525
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Individual Nasal Sym. Including Sneezing, Nasal Congestion, Rhinorrhoea and Nasal Itch.

Four individual nasal sym. including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal itch and sneezing were recorded at Baseline (pre-NAC) and at post-NAC 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6h. Participants rated sym. on a 4-point scale. For nasal blockage and congestion the scores were (0= Breathing through nose freely and easily, 1= Slight difficulty breathing through nose, 2= Moderate difficulty breathing through nose and 3= Severe difficulty breathing through nose). For rhinorrhoea, nasal itching and sneezing (0= None: No sym. whatsoever; Absent, 1= Mild: Sym. is present, noticeable but not bothersome, 2= Moderate: Sym. is bothersome, but tolerable and 3= Severe: Sym. which are bothersome, harder to tolerate). The baseline value were the latest pre-dose assessments. Mean change from Baseline at 15 min, WM0-1h, WM 0-6h, and maximum change over 0-6 h were reported. Change from Baseline was measured as the value recorded at a specified time point minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Baseline [pre-NAC] to post-NAC 6 h)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Individual Nasal Sym. Including Sneezing, Nasal Congestion, Rhinorrhoea and Nasal Itch.
Score on a scalePlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Sneezing, 15 min1.33 ± 1.3661.50 ± 1.080
Sneezing, WM 0-1 h0.56 ± 0.7060.56 ± 0.641
Sneezing, WM 0-6 h0.40 ± 0.4960.19 ± 0.463
Sneezing, Max 0-6 h1.33 ± 1.3661.60 ± 1.075
Rhinorrhoea, 15 min0.50 ± 0.5481.60 ± 1.075
Rhinorrhoea, WM 0-1 h0.15 ± 0.3001.16 ± 0.924
Rhinorrhoea, WM 0-6 h-0.06 ± 0.3830.60 ± 0.791
Rhinorrhoea, Max 0-6 h0.50 ± 0.5481.60 ± 1.075
Nasal itching , 15 min0.67 ± 1.0331.50 ± 0.850
Nasal itching , WM 0-1 h0.44 ± 0.8321.15 ± 0.733
Nasal itching , WM 0-6 h0.05 ± 0.6840.60 ± 0.556
Nasal itching , Max 0-6 h0.83 ± 0.7531.60 ± 0.843
Nasal blockage , 15 min1.17 ± 0.7531.70 ± 0.675
Nasal blockage , WM 0-1 h0.73 ± 0.5331.26 ± 0.641
Nasal blockage , WM 0-6 h0.43 ± 0.4850.64 ± 0.500
Nasal blockage , Max 0-6 h1.33 ± 0.8161.80 ± 0.632

Adverse events

Collected over Serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from participant's consent for participation in the study till follow-up contact (4 to 7 day post Visit 2). Adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of Study Visit 2 NAC until the follow-up contact.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Once Weekly—0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)
GSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once Weekly
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/60/10
Diabetes mellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/60/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Placebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once WeeklyTotal
Mean41.3 ± 12.8240.4 ± 12.0240.8 ± 11.90
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once WeeklyTotal
Female4812
Male224
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Once WeeklyGSK2245035 20 ng, i.n., Once WeeklyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White41014
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02446613
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2015
Start date
Jun 22, 2015
Primary completion
Aug 10, 2015
Completion
Aug 10, 2015
Results posted
Mar 15, 2017
Last update
Apr 4, 2018

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion