CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02441998Updated May 13, 2015

Real-Time Characterizations of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow Band Imaging

An observational study in Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-13.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
26
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related death in the United States. Colonoscopy is the most commonly performed screening procedure and diminutive polyps (\<5mm) are the most commonly found polyps during colonoscopy. Although these polyps have a very low risk of harboring malignancy, they are routinely removed to determine surveillance intervals.

Narrow Band Imaging is equipped on widely available colonoscopes and in expert hands can allow accurate real-time optical histologic diagnosis of colorectal polyps. If this practice can be applied widely, there is significant potential for cost savings.

This has led to a 'characterize, resect and discard' strategy where polyps determined to be hyperplastic (benign with no neoplastic potential) can be left in place and those determined to be adenomatous (have neoplastic potential) can be resected and discarded.

It is unclear if endoscopists without prior expertise or training in Narrow Band Imaging can achieve adequate diagnostic accuracy to put 'characterize, resect and discard' into wide practice.

Read the detailed description

Gastroenterologists without prior training in NBI from two affiliated academic hospitals will participate in an ex-vivo training session in which they will view a short audiovisual tool describing previously validated NBI criteria to determine polyp histology, followed by reviewing 80 videos of diminutive polyps under NBI and will record predicted polyp histology and degree of confidence. After each video, targeted feedback regarding actual polyp histology and NBI criteria supporting the diagnosis will be provided. Participants will then employ NBI in real-time colonoscopy (in-vivo) and record predicted polyp histology, degree of confidence and predicted surveillance intervals based on NBI interpretations. Each study polyp will be sent for histology separately. Performance will be assessed by comparing predicted histology with actual histology. Structured performance feedback will be given to promote practice-based learning, establish a real-time learning curve and determine the number of observations required to achieve competency in-vivo.

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether endoscopists with no prior experience or training in Narrow Band Imaging can achieve the thresholds set forth by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: For diminutive colorectal polyp diagnoses made with 'high-confidence,' a (1) greater than or equal to 90% negative predictive value in the rectosigmoid colon and a (2) greater than or equal to 90% agreement in surveillance intervals predicted by narrow band imaging and those based on the current gold standard of histology.

The secondary outcomes for the in-vivo phase included (1) evaluating overall group performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values) of optical diagnoses using NBI based on degree of confidence and location within the colon, (2) evaluating individual performance on the ASGE benchmarks, (3) determining predictors of performance, and (4) determining real-time learning effect in the setting of ongoing, structured performance feedback. The secondary outcomes for the ex-vivo (training) phase included (1) evaluating overall performance by degree of confidence, (2) determining predictors of performance during training and (3) evaluating a learning effect in the setting of ongoing feedback during training.

Sample size was calculated to show an NPV of 90% or higher assuming that the true NPV is 95% for rectosigmoid polyps characterized with "high-confidence," based on 26 participating endoscopists and within-endoscopist correlation of 0.05. This will require 336 total rectosigmoid non-adenoma polyps characterized with "high-confidence," and assuming approximately 22% rectosigmoid polyps, 70% with high confidence and 80% hyperplastic, the study will require approximately 2,727 polyps and 1,364 colonoscopies in total, assuming approximately two polyps per colonoscopy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Diminutive Polyps
  • Narrow Band Imaging
  • Colonic Polyps
  • colonoscopy
  • diagnostic imaging
  • optical diagnosis
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 250 across 1,226 observational studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Practicing gastroenterologists from 2 academic medical centers

Inclusion criteria

  • Active member of division of Gastroenterology
  • Performs colonoscopy
  • No prior training in Narrow Band Imaging
  • Informed consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Low annual colonoscopy volume (\<200 per year)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherEducation intervention: Training in Narrow Band Imaging

    Two hour training session in interpretation and application of narrow band imaging technology

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ASGE PIVI Thresholds: >90% NPV in rectosigmoid, > 90% agreement in surveillance intervals

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. In vivo overall and individual performance assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Ex vivo overall and individual performance assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ladabaum U, Fioritto A, Mitani A, Desai M, Kim JP, Rex DK, Imperiale T, Gunaratnam N. Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):81-91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.054. Epub 2012 Oct 3. PubMed 23041328 ↗
  • Patel SG, Rastogi A, Austin G, Hall M, Siller BA, Berman K, Yen R, Bansal A, Ahnen DJ, Wani S. Gastroenterology trainees can easily learn histologic characterization of diminutive colorectal polyps with narrow band imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Aug;11(8):997-1003.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Mar 1. PubMed 23466714 ↗
  • Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1174-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.009. Epub 2008 Dec 10. PubMed 19187781 ↗
  • Rastogi A, Keighley J, Singh V, Callahan P, Bansal A, Wani S, Sharma P. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2422-30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.403. Epub 2009 Jul 7. PubMed 19584829 ↗
  • Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, Vance M, Guenther T, Saunders BP. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Dec;10(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70329-8. Epub 2009 Nov 10. PubMed 19910250 ↗
  • ASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PubMed 25597420 ↗
  • Patel SG, Schoenfeld P, Kim HM, Ward EK, Bansal A, Kim Y, Hosford L, Myers A, Foster S, Craft J, Shopinski S, Wilson RH, Ahnen DJ, Rastogi A, Wani S. Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):406-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Oct 30. PubMed 26522260 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02441998
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
University of Colorado, Denver
Responsible party
Swati Patel (Clinical Lecturer, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 12, 2015
Start date
Oct 2013
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
May 13, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion