ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02439515Updated Mar 7, 2017

Fall Prevention and Locomotion Recovery in Post-stroke Patients: A Multimodal Training

An interventional study of Cycling and Balance in Stroke, sponsored by Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-07.

Sponsored by Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study proposes a novel rehabilitative program for the recovery of locomotor abilities in post-acute stroke patients. The hypothesis is that a rehabilitative program which involves a biofeedback cycling training combining voluntary effort and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the leg muscles, and a biofeedback balance training is superior to usual care in improving walking abilities, disability, motor performance, and independence of post-acute stroke patients. The innovative approach is to investigate whether interventions which do not directly involve locomotor functions but movements similar in terms of kinematic patterns and neural commands (e.g. pedaling), or aimed at recovering an essential prerequisite for walking, such as postural control during upright stance, may improve and/or accelerate the recovery of walking abilities.

A single-blind randomized controlled study is carried out. Participants are post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke less than 6 months before recruitment, with an adult age, a low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale \<2), no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints, and able to sit up to 30 minutes. Subjects are randomized to one of two groups, one performing the novel rehabilitative program in addition to usual care (experimental group), and one performing usual care alone (control group).

The experimental program consists of 15 sessions of FES-supported voluntary cycling training followed by 15 sessions of balance training. Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback in order to maximize patients' involvement in the exercise and are performed in addition to usual care.

The control group is involved in standard physical therapy which includes stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation.

Both training programs last 6 weeks and patients are trained daily for about 90 minutes. Cycling and balance training last about 20 minutes; thus, patients in the experimental group perform only about 70 minutes of usual care.

Participants are evaluated at baseline (T1), after the end of the cycling training or after 3 weeks of usual care (post-treatment, T2), after the end of the whole intervention (post-treatment, T3), and about 6 months after the end of the intervention (follow-up, T4).

Read the detailed description

More details on the experimental training program are here provided.

The cycling training is performed on a motorized cycle-ergometer (MOTOmed, Reck GmbH) equipped with force sensors mounted at the base of the cranks (PowerForce system, Radlabor GmbH). The acquired force signals are displayed to the subjects who are asked to achieve a symmetrical involvement of the two legs. To deliver FES, a current-controlled 8-channel stimulator (RehaStim; Hasomed GmbH) is used and surface electrodes are applied in a bipolar configuration on the quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius lateralis, and tibialis anterior of both legs. Rectangular biphasic pulses with a pulse width of 400 μs and a stimulation frequency of 20 Hz are adopted. The stimulus intensity is set on each muscle the first day of training: for the paretic muscles values well tolerated by the subject and able to produce visibly good muscle contractions are identified, whereas for the healthy side lower values just above the sensory threshold are used. The stimulation timing is synchronized to the cycling movement according to physiological stereotyped activation patterns.

The balance training is performed during upright stance using a balance board (Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.). Subjects are asked to keep still or move their center of pressure following a target displayed on a screen in front of them.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • post-acute stroke
  • functional electrical stimulation
  • biofeedback
  • balance
  • cycling
  • rehabilitation
  • gait
03

In context

Stroke

7,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,012 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 50 across 5,482 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke (both ischemic or hemorrhagic) less than 6 months before recruitment
  • low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale \<2)
  • no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints
  • able to sit up to 30 minutes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological impairment (Mini mental scale \<24)
  • presence of other neurological diseases
  • spatial hemineglect
  • cardiac pacemakers
  • allergy to electrodes
  • an inability to tolerate electrical stimulation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Biofeedback training

    It consists of 15 daily sessions of voluntary cycling training augmented by functional electrical stimulation (FES) followed by 15 daily sessions of balance training (multimodal biofeedback training). Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback and last about 20 minutes. In addition to cycling or balance training, subjects perform standard physical therapy in order to reach 90 minutes of training per day.

    Device: Cycling · Device: Balance · Other: Standard physical therapy

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    It consists of 30 daily sessions of standard physical therapy. Each session last about 90 minutes.

    Other: Standard physical therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceCycling

    Voluntary cycling augmented by electrical stimulation and biofeedback

    Also known as: MOTOmed, Reck GmbH, PowerForce system, Radlabor GmbH, RehaStim; Hasomed GmbH

  • DeviceBalance

    Balance control exercises with visual biofeedback

    Also known as: Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.

  • OtherStandard physical therapy

    It consists of stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait Speed

    Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.

    Time frame: "6 weeks"

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gait speed

    Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

  2. Aerobic capacity/endurance during gait assessed by 6-minute walking test

    Subjects are asked to walk along a rectilinear corridor for 6 minutes. The distance covered is measured.

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

  3. Motor power of the paretic lower extremity assessed by Motricity Index

    Italian version; Only leg-subscale of the paretic side

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

  4. Trunk Control assessed by Trunk Control Test

    Italian version

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

  5. Abilities during activities of daily life assessed by Functional Independence Measure

    Italian version

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

  6. Risk of fall assessed by Fall Efficacy Scale

    Italian version

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

  7. Balance control assessed by Berg Balance Scale

    Italian version

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

  8. Patient's perception of the effect of the intervention assessed by Global Perceived Effect

    Italian version

    Time frame: "6 weeks"

  9. Pedaling performance assessed by Pedaling test

    A pedaling test is performed on the motorized cycle-ergometer to measure the force produced by the two sides during voluntary cycling as well as electromyography activations of the main lower limb muscles. Subjects are asked to pedal at four difference target pace (20 RPM, 30 RPM, 40 RPM, and 50 RPM), while the ergometer motor maintains a constant cadence of 10 RPM less than the target. A visual numerical cadence indicator and a metronome help the subjects to keep the constant cadence.

    Time frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks","6 months+6 weeks"

  10. Balance performance assessed by Balance test

    Postural stability is evaluated using the commercial balance board exploited in the experimental intervention program (Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.). Pre-defined assessments are used to evaluate the postural sways during upright stance both with eyes open and closed; the limits of stability in all directions (forward, backward, right, and left); and the capability to shift the weight both left/right and forward/backward.

    Time frame: "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ambrosini E, Ferrante S, Ferrigno G, Molteni F, Pedrocchi A. Cycling induced by electrical stimulation improves muscle activation and symmetry during pedaling in hemiparetic patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 May;20(3):320-30. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2191574. Epub 2012 Apr 13. PubMed 22514205 ↗
  • Ferrante S, Ambrosini E, Ravelli P, Guanziroli E, Molteni F, Ferrigno G, Pedrocchi A. A biofeedback cycling training to improve locomotion: a case series study based on gait pattern classification of 153 chronic stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Aug 24;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-47. PubMed 21861930 ↗
  • Ambrosini E, Ferrante S, Pedrocchi A, Ferrigno G, Molteni F. Cycling induced by electrical stimulation improves motor recovery in postacute hemiparetic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2011 Apr;42(4):1068-73. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599068. Epub 2011 Mar 3. PubMed 21372309 ↗
  • Ambrosini E, Parati M, Peri E, De Marchis C, Nava C, Pedrocchi A, Ferriero G, Ferrante S. Changes in leg cycling muscle synergies after training augmented by functional electrical stimulation in subacute stroke survivors: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Feb 27;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00662-w. PubMed 32106874 ↗
  • Ambrosini E, Peri E, Nava C, Longoni L, Monticone M, Pedrocchi A, Ferriero G, Ferrante S. A multimodal training with visual biofeedback in subacute stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Feb;56(1):24-33. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05847-7. Epub 2019 Sep 26. PubMed 31556542 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02439515
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
Collaborators
Politecnico di Milano
Responsible party
Simona Ferrante (PhD, Politecnico di Milano) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 8, 2015
Start date
Dec 2014
Primary completion
Jul 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 7, 2017

Study contacts

Simona Ferrante, PhD
Contact
simona.ferrante@polimi.it
+390223999004
Emilia Ambrosini, PhD
Contact
emilia.ambrosini@polimi.it
+390223999509
Simona Ferrante, PhD
principal investigator · Politecnico di Milano

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion