CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02437669Updated May 28, 2019Results posted

Intranasal Hydromorphone for the Treatment of Acute Pain in Children: A Pilot Study.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Hydromorphone in Pain, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-28.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
4 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intranasal hydromorphone has been shown to be effective in reducing acute pain in adults. It has not been previously studied in children, but may be a viable option for effectively and safely reducing pain in children by administering an analgesic by the intranasal route.

This study will be a prospective, open-label pilot study of intranasal hydromorphone in children with moderate to severe acute pain presenting to the pediatric emergency department. The investigators aim to describe the amount of pain reduction associated with intranasal hydromorphone, and to determine the optimal dose of intranasal hydromorphone associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in acute pain.

Read the detailed description

Primary Aim: Determine the change in pain intensity in children with moderate to severe pain who receive intranasal hydromorphone one hour after administration.

Secondary Aim(s): Describe the incidence of minor and major adverse events associated with intranasal hydromorphone in children with acute pain.

The investigators will assess the patient's pain at baseline (prior to study drug administration), then after study drug administration: 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, and then every 30 minutes thereafter until 6 hours; administration of non-protocolized rescue medication administration (i.e. administered after first two rescue doses of IN hydromorphone); or discharge from emergency department (whichever comes first). The pain score at 60 minutes will be the primary outcome.

The investigators will evaluate qualitative improvement in pain intensity at 15- and 30-minutes after study drug administration. If there is no improvement, or worsening of pain intensity, at each assessment, an additional rescue dose rescue dose of intranasal hydromorphone will be administered. After 60 minutes, the treating physician may administer any additional rescue medications at their discretion to treat the child's pain.

The patient will be assessed for minor and major adverse events for the duration of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Intranasal
  • Hydromorphone
  • Pediatric
  • Emergency department
03

In context

Acute Pain

876 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 90 across 732 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.

Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 4 to 17 years old, inclusive
  • Moderate to severe pain (i.e. FPS-R or vNRS score of 4 or more)
  • Requires parenteral opioid analgesic to treat their pain, as decided by treating physician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or known contraindication to receiving opioids
  • Receipt of any opioid or benzodiazepine within preceding 6 hours
  • Presence of intranasal obstruction that cannot be cleared readily
  • Cannot speak English or Spanish
  • Patient unlikely to be able to complete self-report measures of pain or questionnaires
  • Known liver or kidney problems
  • Currently critically ill
  • Chronic pain condition (e.g. sickle cell disease, fibromyalgia)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intranasal hydromorphone

    Hydromorphone, intranasal. 2 mg/mL concentration. Initial dose: 0.03 mg/kg, maximum single dose 4 mg. Rescue dose: 0.015 mg/kg, maximum single dose 2 mg.

    Drug: Hydromorphone

Interventions

  • DrugHydromorphone

    To be administered by intranasal route using mucosal atomization device.

    Also known as: Dilaudid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Score on Faces Pain Scale - Revised

    Pain was measured using the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R). The FPS-R is a self-reported measure of pain that is administered using a picture of 6 different faces lined up in a row, each face representing an escalating degree of pain intensity. The faces, starting from the left-most face and moving towards the right-most face, are scored 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. A score of 0 represents no pain, a score of 10 represents "very much pain" (i.e. maximum possible pain). More information about the FPS-R can be found here: https://bit.ly/2VPk8GM

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Minor Adverse Events

    Lightheadedness, dizziness; confusion; sleepy, drowsy, tiredness; nausea; vomiting; itchiness, warm sensation; dry mouth; bad taste in mouth; rhinitis.

    Time frame: 6 hours

  2. Number of Major Adverse Events

    Oxygen desaturation, respiratory depression, hypotension, bradycardia, need for supplemental oxygen, bag-mask ventilation, airway support intervention, administration naloxone.

    Time frame: 6 hours

  3. Score on Verbal Numeric Rating Scale

    Pain was measured using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). The VNRS is a self-reported measure of pain that is administered verbally by asking a patient to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain, and 10 representing maximum pain. More information about the VNRS in children can be found here: https://bit.ly/2VZ7aWU

    Time frame: 1 hour

07

Results

Posted May 8, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntranasal Hydromorphone
Started35
Completed35
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryScore on Faces Pain Scale - Revised

Pain was measured using the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R). The FPS-R is a self-reported measure of pain that is administered using a picture of 6 different faces lined up in a row, each face representing an escalating degree of pain intensity. The faces, starting from the left-most face and moving towards the right-most face, are scored 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. A score of 0 represents no pain, a score of 10 represents "very much pain" (i.e. maximum possible pain). More information about the FPS-R can be found here: https://bit.ly/2VPk8GM

Time frame:
1 hour
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Score on Faces Pain Scale - Revised
units on a scaleIntranasal Hydromorphone
Score on Faces Pain Scale - Revised4.7 (3.7 to 5.7)
SecondaryNumber of Minor Adverse Events

Lightheadedness, dizziness; confusion; sleepy, drowsy, tiredness; nausea; vomiting; itchiness, warm sensation; dry mouth; bad taste in mouth; rhinitis.

Time frame:
6 hours
Reported as:
Number · Minor adverse events
Number of Minor Adverse Events
Minor adverse eventsIntranasal Hydromorphone
Number of Minor Adverse Events39
SecondaryNumber of Major Adverse Events

Oxygen desaturation, respiratory depression, hypotension, bradycardia, need for supplemental oxygen, bag-mask ventilation, airway support intervention, administration naloxone.

Time frame:
6 hours
Reported as:
Number · Major adverse events
Number of Major Adverse Events
Major adverse eventsIntranasal Hydromorphone
Number of Major Adverse Events0
SecondaryScore on Verbal Numeric Rating Scale

Pain was measured using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). The VNRS is a self-reported measure of pain that is administered verbally by asking a patient to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain, and 10 representing maximum pain. More information about the VNRS in children can be found here: https://bit.ly/2VZ7aWU

Time frame:
1 hour
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Score on Verbal Numeric Rating Scale
units on a scaleIntranasal Hydromorphone
Score on Verbal Numeric Rating Scale5.1 (4.2 to 6)

Adverse events

Collected over 6 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intranasal Hydromorphone0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)22/35 (62.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIntranasal Hydromorphone
Sleepy, drowsy, or tiredGeneral disorders11/35
Bad taste in mouthGeneral disorders8/35
Lightheaded, dizzyGeneral disorders8/35
Dry mouthGeneral disorders5/35
RhinitisGeneral disorders3/35
NauseaGeneral disorders2/35
ConfusionNervous system disorders1/35
ItchinessSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/35
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/35
Warm sensationGeneral disorders0/35

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intranasal Hydromorphone
Median11 (8 to 14)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intranasal Hydromorphone
Female13
Male22
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Intranasal Hydromorphone
Hispanic26
White5
Black3
More than one race1
Baseline pain score
Baseline pain score(units on a scale)Intranasal Hydromorphone
Mean7 ± 0.4
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tsze DS, Pan SS, DePeter KC, Wagh AM, Gordon SL, Dayan PS. Intranasal hydromorphone for treatment of acute pain in children: A pilot study. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;37(6):1128-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 13. PubMed 30902361 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 16, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02437669
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Responsible party
Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH (Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at CUMC, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2015
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Apr 2018
Completion
Apr 2018
Results posted
May 8, 2019
Last update
May 28, 2019

Study contacts

Daniel Tsze, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion