CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02433132MUCO-BROCCUpdated Sep 28, 2017

Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis by Analyzing Nasal Brushing

An interventional study of Nasal brushing in Cystic Fibrosis and Atypical Form of Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-28.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The diagnosis of CF is currently based on the discovery of two CFTR gene mutations and / or a positive sweat test (> 60mmol / l). A significant number of patients with atypical cystic fibrosis (chronic sino-pulmonary disease with a single mutation in the CFTR gene and / or a test of the intermediate sweat between 30 and 60 mmol / l) undetected by these techniques are behind specialized care while irreversible lung damage is already existed. Currently, the measurement of nasal potential difference in vivo (DPN), which evaluates the transportation of chlorine in the nasal epithelium with an electrode, is proposed for the diagnosis of atypical forms. However DPN dependent nasal local conditions when analysing do not always offer the possibility of concluding the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. It is necessary to develop new and more reliable diagnostic tests for the detection of cases of atypical cystic fibrosis. The authors propose to develop a new diagnostic technique based on the study of bioelectric properties of a preparation of nasal cells of the subject obtained by brushing and placed in primary culture (CCBN).

Read the detailed description

Autosomal recessive, CF is caused by mutations in the CFTR gene whose nature determines the clinical expression and severity of the disease affecting mainly the respiratory, digestive and genital. Respiratory pathology is mainly responsible for the morbidity and mortality of patients with cystic fibrosis. CFTR, which is ion channel carrying chlorine, plays an essential role in respiratory disease through its involvement in the changes of surface liquid covering the respiratory epithelial cells.

Currently the measurement of nasal potential difference in vivo (DPN) can cause arguments electrophysiological diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (chlorine transport default) for patients with atypical form but can be rendered difficult or non-interpretable by the lack of cooperation of the patient (especially in the children who do not support the presence of the probe into the nose) or mostly due to poor local conditions related to infectious diseases rhino sinus of these patients.

It is necessary to develop new and more reliable diagnostic tests for the detection of cases of atypical cystic fibrosis. The study of ion transport from nasal epithelial cells collected by brushing (NBC) in the diagnosis of atypical forms of cystic fibrosis is tested in this trial as a new diagnostic test.

This research will focus on three groups:

  1. Of patients with cystic fibrosis adults.
  2. adult patients with atypical form
  3. people who do not have cystic fibrosis

Depending on the patient group, there will be only one CCBN or CCBN and DPN or CCBN and DPN and genetic analysis to verify the absence of mutation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Atypical Form of Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Adults
  • Atypical form
  • Nasal brushing
  • Epithelial cells
  • Ion transport
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 128 is above the median of 36 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • For patients with cystic fibrosis and those with atypical form:

    • Inclusion at least 30 days after a general or local infection of the upper airways
  • For controls:

    • No history or Sino-pulmonary pathology and negative identification of mutations in the CFTR gene
  • For all subjects involved in research:

    • Information and obtaining informed consent of the subjects.
    • Age ≥ 18 years
    • affiliation to a social security scheme or of such a regime

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For all participants :

    • Taking a per os corticoids or topical corticosteroid treatment in the nose in the month preceding the nasal brushing or measurement of nasal potential difference
    • ORL surgical history of under 2 months
    • cauterization of the inferior turbinate of under 2 months
    • Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide (such as lidocaine) or with one of the components, including methyl parahydroxybenzoate contained in the excipient.
    • Porphyria.
    • Epilepsy not controlled by treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
128 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Diagnostic test

    Diagnostic test will be perform on cell from nasal brushing

    Other: Nasal brushing

Interventions

  • OtherNasal brushing

    The CCBN test is to evaluate the ion transport in the nasal epithelial cells taken from a subject by brushing the inferior turbinate with a mini-brush after local anesthesia. Analysis of ion transport is carried out ex vivo on the primary culture of nasal epithelial cells after brushing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of the CCBN test

    The primary endpoint is composite. The diagnostic quality of the test CCBN is the analysis of nasal epithelial cells: * in basal short-circuit current, * in amiloride-sensitive current corresponding to ENaC * cyclic AMP-dependent current corresponding to CFTR

    Time frame: 14 days after nasal brushing

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nasal potential difference

    The nasal potential difference will be evaluated : * in basal, * after infusion of a solution of amiloride, * after infusion of a solution without amiloride chloride, * after infusion of a solution of amiloride and isoproterenol (agonist of cAMP).

    Time frame: 14 days after nasal brushing

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil
    Creteil, 94010, France
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02433132
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2015
Start date
Mar 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2017

Study contacts

Virginie Prulière-Escabasse, MD, PhD
Contact
virginie.escabasse@chicreteil.fr
(0)145175597 ext. +33
Candy Estevez, CRA
Contact
candy.estevez@hmn.aphp.fr
(0)149813752 ext. +33
Virginie Prulière-Escabasse, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal of Creteil

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion