CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02424877SandRAUpdated Oct 5, 2017

Cell Phone Based Automated Monitoring of Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

An interventional study of SandRA in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Medcare Oy. Completed at 2 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 17 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-05.

Sponsored by Medcare Oy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2013, registered Apr 2015).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
165
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether automated remote monitoring of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis by the SandRA software and short message service of cell phones increases patient compliance and helps to identify patients needing re-assessment of medication before scheduled visits. This might result in better clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness.

Read the detailed description

To improve monitoring of patients with early RA the investigators have developed an automated remote monitoring system SandRA (Showing-any-need-for-Re-Assessment) based on short message service (SMS) of cell phones and patients' global assessment of the severity of RA (PtGA) on a numeric scale of 0 to 10.

SandRA software sends every 2 to 6 weeks automatically an SMS to a patient's cell phone, and the patient answers by one push on keyboard. The patients' answers are recorded in SandRA and automatically analysed. If answers indicate non-adherence, adverse events, or missed target, the system automatically sends SMS: "Your nurse will call you within 2 work days", and the nurse gets an alarm by e-mail. If needed, an extra visit is arranged for treatment adjustment.

Preliminary studies show that PtGA given by cell phone has sufficient convergent validity. Structured feedback from patients has been favourable and most professionals assess the system as feasible.

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of SandRA monitoring on clinical outcomes of RA, on patients' quality of life and drug adherence, as well as consumed resources. Cost-effectiveness of SandRa is estimated.

Methods Consecutive incident patients (200) with RA are enrolled. Those, who can use SMS messages of cell phone, who understand the SandRA system, and are willing, are included. After informed consent the patients are randomized into two groups: 1) SandRA group and 2) control group.

The patients randomized into SandRA group are instructed as usual. Regular doctor visits are scheduled at 3 months and at 6 months, when the SandRa monitoring ends. The following clinical data will be gathered. 1) ACR core data set at baseline, at 3 and 6 months, and at possible extra visits; 2) radiographs of the hands and the feet at baseline (if not taken within 6 months); 3) antirheumatic medication and the possible causes of switches and changes over the 6 months 4) patient confidence (VAS) at each doctor visit; 5) quality of life (SF-36) at baseline and at 6 months. Patient feedback of the system by a structured questionnaire is gathered at 6 months.

The patients in the control group are treated as usual. Follow-up visits are scheduled as needed. The same clinical data as in SandRA group are collected at baseline and at 6 months.

In the both groups concomitant diseases and medications as well as age, sex, and education level are recorded at baseline. The consumption of resources is assessed as the number of contacts (doctor visits, nurse visits, as well as phone calls scheduled and non-scheduled) with the outpatient clinic over the 6-month follow-up.

In addition, the patients are assessed at 12 months, when the ACR Core Data Set is gathered.

The radiographs at baseline and ACR Core Data Set at doctor visits, safety laboratory tests, and assessment visits at 3, 6, and 12 months are included in the normal clinical care. No extra visits are required because of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • drug treatment
  • compliance
  • outcome
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 165 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Medcare Oy as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Fulfillment of the EULAR 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis
  • Commencement of the first anti rheumatic medication
  • Ability to use short message service of cell phones,
  • Comprehension of the function of the SandRA monitoring system
  • Willingness to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to fulfill the inclusion criteria.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
165 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SandRA

    cell phone monitoring

    Procedure: SandRA

  • No intervention
    Control

    conventional monitoring

Interventions

  • ProcedureSandRA

    SandRA software sends SMS messages to a patient asking questions about the usage and adverse effects of prescribed drugs and about the severity of rheumatoid arthritis. The answer messages are interpreted automatically.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. remission

    number of remissions at each arm, defined by no tender or swollen joints (44 joints) and normal CRP

    Time frame: at 6 months (co-primary 12 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. patient confidence

    visual analogue scale

    Time frame: at 0, 3, and 6 months

  2. quality of life

    SF-36

    Time frame: at 0, 3, and 6 months

  3. drug adherence

    stoppage of drugs, adverse events

    Time frame: during 6 months

  4. consumption of resources

    extra phone calls, extra visits

    Time frame: during 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Central Finland Central Hospital
    Jyväskylä, FI-40620, Finland
  • South Karelia Central Hospital
    Lappeenranta, FI-53130, Finland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mottonen T, Hannonen P, Leirisalo-Repo M, Nissila M, Kautiainen H, Korpela M, Laasonen L, Julkunen H, Luukkainen R, Vuori K, Paimela L, Blafield H, Hakala M, Ilva K, Yli-Kerttula U, Puolakka K, Jarvinen P, Hakola M, Piirainen H, Ahonen J, Palvimaki I, Forsberg S, Koota K, Friman C. Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial. FIN-RACo trial group. Lancet. 1999 May 8;353(9164):1568-73. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08513-4. PubMed 10334255 ↗
  • Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A, McMahon AD, Lock P, Vallance R, Kincaid W, Porter D. Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004 Jul 17-23;364(9430):263-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16676-2. PubMed 15262104 ↗
  • Brus H, van de Laar M, Taal E, Rasker J, Wiegman O. Determinants of compliance with medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of self-efficacy expectations. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jan;36(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00087-1. PubMed 10036560 ↗
  • Schoels M, Kapral T, Stamm T, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Step-up combination versus switching of non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a retrospective observational study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Aug;66(8):1059-65. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.061820. Epub 2007 Feb 16. PubMed 17307765 ↗
  • Rohekar G, Pope J. Test-retest reliability of patient global assessment and physician global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2009 Oct;36(10):2178-82. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090084. Epub 2009 Sep 15. PubMed 19755617 ↗
  • Pincus T, Bergman M, Sokka T, Roth J, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Visual analog scales in formats other than a 10 centimeter horizontal line to assess pain and other clinical data. J Rheumatol. 2008 Aug;35(8):1550-8. Epub 2008 Jun 15. PubMed 18597409 ↗
  • Kuusalo L, Sokka-Isler T, Kautiainen H, Ekman P, Kauppi MJ, Pirila L, Rannio T, Uutela T, Yli-Kerttula T, Puolakka K; SandRA Study Group. Automated Text Message-Enhanced Monitoring Versus Routine Monitoring in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Mar;72(3):319-325. doi: 10.1002/acr.23846. PubMed 30740935 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02424877
Lead sponsor
Medcare Oy
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2015
Start date
Aug 1, 2013
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2016
Completion
Jan 2, 2017
Last update
Oct 5, 2017

Study contacts

Kari Puolakka, MD, PhD
principal investigator · South Carelia Central Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion