ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02403011Updated Nov 9, 2015

Investigating the Effectiveness of Mobilization on Congenital Muscular Torticollis and Deformational Plagiocephaly

An interventional study of soft tissue mobilization and home program controlled once six weeks in Congenital Muscular Torticollis, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged Up to 6 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-09.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2015), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 6 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates the effect of soft tissue mobilization in babies with neck muscle problem. Babies received soft tissue mobilization or home exercises program

Read the detailed description

Objectives: Investigating the effectiveness of soft tissue mobilization in babies with congenital muscular torticollis and deformational plagiocephaly.

Design: A Randomized controlled trial design Setting: University research department Participants:Babies with congenital muscular torticollis, aged between 0-6 months, who had a head tilt from 5 to 20 degrees and no other health problems were the participants of the study. The study included two groups; home program group was seen once every six weeks, the study group in addition to the home program also received soft tissue mobilization three times in a week. All groups received a baseline home program consisting of positioning, handling strategies plus stretching, stretching and strengthening exercises, environmental adaptations and classical massage. Babies were allocated to two groups by sealed envelope randomization. Babies were evaluated initially, at sixth weeks, at 12 weeks and follow-up at 18 weeks with muscle function scale, head tilt and ear shift assessments which included photographing method, neck normal range of motions (lateral flexion and rotation) and plagiocephaly severity scale

02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Muscular Torticollis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Congenital Muscular Torticollis
  • Manual Therapy
  • Infant
03

In context

Congenital torticollis

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Congenital torticollis; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 32 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Congenital torticollis.

Browse Congenital torticollis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 1,009 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 6 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Babies with congenital muscular torticollis and secondary deformational plagiocephaly
  • Head tilt from 5 to 20 degrees
  • Age between 0-6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have another health problem such as neurological, vertebral anomalies, craniosynostosis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Soft tissue mobilization group

    soft tissue mobilization was applied three times in a week and home program exercises were recommended which consisted of positioning the neck and head, handling strategies, stretching exercises, strengthening exercises according to babies neurodevelopmental level and environmental adaptations

    Other: soft tissue mobilization

  • Experimental
    Home program controlled once six weeks

    Home program which consisted of positioning the neck and head, handling strategies, stretching exercises, strengthening exercises according to babies neurodevelopmental level and environmental adaptations were recommended

    Other: home program controlled once six weeks

Interventions

  • Othersoft tissue mobilization

    soft tissue mobilization technique has three phases. First phase 'the passive mobilization phase' is applied by gentle but tight gripping of the SKM muscle two or three fingers below the muscle origo and the muscle is mobilized rhythmically in the antero-posterior direction. Secondly, after gently continue to hold the muscle the baby was encouraged to do active repetitive cervical rotation to the affected side by means of catching the babies attention with colored and sonorous toys. Third phase was mobilization with stretching. Caregiver holds the baby on his/ her affected side while the therapist gently grips and withholds the muscle. Therapist mobilizes the muscle in the antero-posterior direction and stretch the muscle

  • Otherhome program controlled once six weeks

    Home program which consisted of positioning the neck and head, handling strategies, stretching exercises, strengthening exercises according to babies neurodevelopmental level and environmental adaptations

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Head tilt with photographic method

    Baby lies supine while taking photo of baby's habitual head position. The angle between the two lines, connecting eyes pupils and connecting acromions, is assessed.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in head tilt at 6th weeks of treatment, at the end of the treatment/12th weeks, at follow up/18th weeks

  2. plagiocephaly severity scale

    scale which has 5 subgroups as following frontal asymmetry, occipital flattening, head tilt, fascial asymmetry, ear asymmetry.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in at 6th weeks of treatment, at the end of the treatment/12th weeks, at follow up/18th weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Passive range of motion

    Baby lies in supine position and caregiver holds the baby's upper extremities by stabilizing shoulders to prevent compansatuar movements. For lateral flexion therapist bends the neck to opposite side from affected SCM. For neck rotation, therapist rotate the neck to affected SCM.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline in at 6th weeks of treatment, at the end of the treatment/12th weeks, at follow up/18th weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey
    Recruiting
    • Ayse KARADUMAN · Contact
    • Fatma UYGUR, PT PhD · Principal investigator
    • Hilal KEKLICEK, PT MSc · Sub investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2014, a primary completion of Nov 2015 and a completion of Nov 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2015
First posted
Mar 31, 2015
Start
Jan 2014
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2015
CompletionEst.
Nov 2015
Last update
Nov 9, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02403011
Responsible party
hhotaman (Research Assistant, PhD, PT, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 31, 2015
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2015 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2015 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2015

Study contacts

Hilal KEKLİCEK, PhD, PT
Contact
hhotaman23@gmail.com
0903123051576 ext. 138
Fatma UYGUR, Prof, PhD
Contact
fztuygur@yahoo.com
0903123051576 ext. 139
Hilal KEKLİCEK, PhD,PT
principal investigator · Hacettepe University,Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion