CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02384109Updated Sep 27, 2019

A Pharmacist-Coordinated Implementation of the Diabetes Prevention Program

An interventional study of Shared decision-making with pharmacists and Standard care from primary care providers in Prediabetic State, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 20 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-27.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
521
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This proposed project will translate evidence-based strategies for diabetes prevention within the framework of an existing and highly utilized pharmacist-led diabetes care program. Our team includes investigators and practitioners with experience in implementing the DPP (Diabetes Prevention Program) as well as in community-based research. This proposal represents an opportunity to rapidly implement an innovative project addressing a critical area of significant unmet need, as the required key health system and community infrastructure are already in place. The intended outcome is the creation of a practical, effective and sustainable approach to increase evidence-based diabetes prevention strategies that can readily be adopted in other systems.

Read the detailed description

The staggering number of Americans with prediabetes, now 1 in 3 adults,(1, 2) reinforces the urgency of implementing effective action to prevent incident diabetes. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) have demonstrated that both intensive lifestyle change and metformin significantly reduce the risk of progression to diabetes compared to placebo.(3-5) Prior efforts to disseminate treatment with lifestyle into practice have resulted in variable uptake and very limited population reach,(6) and their has been minimal to virtually no uptake of metformin for the treatment of prediabetes.

Within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System, the investigators have developed a program that embeds pharmacists in ambulatory clinics to co-manage patients with primary care physicians. The program, called Managing your Medications for Education and Daily Support (MyMEDS), has enrolled and treated almost 250 patients with diabetes and poorly-controlled cardiovascular risk factors in 14 primary care clinics over the last 12-months. Because of its effectiveness, leadership at UCLA Health has disseminated this program to all 28 primary care clinics in the system, and covers program-related costs including the pharmacists' salaries and appointment scheduling. The MyMEDS program is now part of routine clinical operations and represents a promising resource that could be mobilized to improve care for patients with prediabetes.

The investigators propose to implement a novel and pragmatic diabetes prevention intervention leveraging and extending the existing MyMEDS infrastructure. Within 10 of 20 randomly selected intervention clinics, the investigators will facilitate appointments for patients with prediabetes to the MyMEDS pharmacists. The pharmacists will educate patients about the DPP and engage them in shared decision-making about diabetes prevention, using a decision aid developed by HealthWise©. They will jointly develop a plan of care that includes intensive lifestyle change (preferred strategy since it has the greatest probability of reducing incident diabetes mellitus (DM)) and/or metformin, or take no immediate action and the pharmacist will communicate this decision to the primary care physician via our electronic health record (EHR). For participants who select lifestyle change, the investigators will partner with the YMCA (Young Men's Christian Association) of Metropolitan Los Angeles, which offers the DPP at multiple locations at sliding-scale rates. The YMCA will track attendance and participation in 16 weekly lifestyle change sessions and report this data to the pharmacists and study team (see Appendix 1 for letter of support). Patients can also participate in the UCLA DPP which is a separate DPP delivered on the UCLA campus. For patients who also select metformin, pharmacists will prescribe the medication as permitted under California law SB 493.(7) Pharmacists will see patients with prediabetes in routine follow-up to reinforce the care plan. This will be a pragmatic trial, and research funds will not be used to support delivery of the intervention. Rather than measuring the impact of lifestyle and/or metformin on incident diabetes or other clinical parameters, our primary endpoint will measure improvements in active engagement of treatment for prediabetes. The Specific Aims are as follows:

  1. In a practice level, cluster-randomized, intention-to-treat trial, to test the effectiveness of using pharmacists to implement diabetes prevention strategies among patients with prediabetes, as compared to patients receiving usual care, on several outcomes with pre-planned stratification of a-e by age (\<60 vs > 60 years):

    1. Uptake of intensive lifestyle change and/or metformin at 4 months (primary outcome)
    2. Proportion of patients who achieve >5% weight loss at 4 and 12 months
    3. Adjusted mean weight loss at 4 and 12 months, as a percentage of body weight at baseline
    4. Adjusted change in A1c at 12 months
    5. Adjusted change in systolic blood pressure at 12 months
  2. To evaluate characteristics that will influence long-term sustainability of this intervention, among those in the intervention arm the investigators will measure:

    1. Acceptability to patients, physicians, pharmacists, clinic staff, and community partners including the YMCA
    2. Patient-reported psychosocial impact of their prediabetes, both positive and negative, stratified by the treatment selected
    3. Uptake of intensive lifestyle change and/or metformin at 4 months, by age (\< 60 vs. 60+), gender, and race/ethnicity
    4. The incremental cost of program implementation per participant who successfully initiates lifestyle change and/or metformin.

I

02

Conditions studied

  • Prediabetic State

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prediabetic State

999 studies on the registry are indexed under Prediabetic State; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 521 is above the median of 65 across 844 interventional studies indexed under Prediabetic State.

Browse Prediabetic State studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI (Body Mass Index) of >=24 (>=22 for Asians)
  • Prediabetes based on A1c values of 5.7-6.4%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any recorded A1c values of >6.5%
  • ICD-9 billing codes of 250.xx
  • Use of any antiglycemic medication
  • Current or past participation in the Diabetes Prevention Program prior to providing informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
521 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Pharmacist-coordinated shared decision making about treatment for pre-diabetes (lifestyle change and/or metformin), using a decision tool

    Behavioral: Shared decision-making with pharmacists

  • Placebo comparator
    Usual Care

    Usual care for patients with a diagnosis of pre-diabetes

    Other: Standard care from primary care providers

Interventions

  • BehavioralShared decision-making with pharmacists

    Pharmacist will engage patient using Healthwise (TM) Decision Tool to help match their personal preferences and values with treatment options, specifically lifestyle change with a goal of 7% weight loss or metformin. Patients interested in lifestyle change will be referred to a CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention)-approved diabetes prevention program, and pharmacists will coordinate with primary care providers to prescribe metformin for patients interested in this treatment.

  • OtherStandard care from primary care providers

    Primary care providers address pre-diabetes as part of usual care, which may involve no action, referrals, or treatment with medications.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Uptake of evidence-based diabetes prevention (lifestyle change or metformin)

    Either attending 4/16 or 9/16 lifestyle change sessions, or taking metformin

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Weight change

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Change in A1c

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Change in systolic blood pressure

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

20 sites
  • Toluca Lake Health Center
    Burbank, California 91505, United States
  • 100 Medical Plaza Primary Care Suites 455 & 490
    Los Angeles, California 90024, United States
  • Internal Medicine Women's Health Clinic Suites 250 & 290
    Los Angeles, California 90024, United States
  • UCLA Internal Medicine Family Westwood Suite 465
    Los Angeles, California 90024, United States
  • UCLA Internal Medicine Geriatrics Suite 365 & 420
    Los Angeles, California 90024, United States
  • CPN Brentwood
    Los Angeles, California 90049, United States
  • CPN West Washington Internal Medicine
    Los Angeles, California 90066, United States
  • Pacific Palisades
    Pacific Palisades, California 90272, United States
  • 12th Street Clinic
    Santa Monica, California 90401, United States
  • Wilshire Office
    Santa Monica, California 90401, United States
  • CPN Santa Monica 15th Street Family Medicine Practice
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • CPN/Santa Monica Parkside
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Santa Moica Bay Physicians/20th Street 10th Floor
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Santa Monica Bay Physicians Plaza
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Santa Monica Bay Physicians/20th Street 3rd Floor
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Santa Monica Internal Medicine
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • UCLA Family Health Clinic
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Santa Moica Bay Physicians Ocean Park
    Santa Monica, California 90405, United States
  • Jack H. Skirball Health Center
    Woodland Hills, California 91364, United States
  • CPN Woodland Hills Practice
    Woodland Hills, California 91367, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moin T, Duru OK, Turk N, Chon JS, Frosch DL, Martin JM, Jeffers KS, Castellon-Lopez Y, Tseng CH, Norris K, Mangione CM. Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making for Diabetes Prevention: 12-Month Results from the Prediabetes Informed Decision and Education (PRIDE) Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2652-2659. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05238-6. Epub 2019 Aug 30. PubMed 31471729 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 27, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02384109
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Kenrik Duru (Associate Professor of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 10, 2015
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2019
Completion
Jun 2019
Last update
Sep 27, 2019

Study contacts

Kenrik Duru, MD, MSHS
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion