CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02383966CHANGE2Updated May 13, 2022Results posted

Phase III Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Cetuximab for the Treatment of Chinese Participants With Head and Neck Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cetuximab and Cisplatin/Carboplatin in Carcinoma, Squamous Cell of Head and Neck, sponsored by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-13.

Sponsored by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
243
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial aimed to assess efficacy and safety of cetuximab when given in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in Chinese participants with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) as the first-line treatment.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 243 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany is the lead sponsor of 269 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of SCCHN
  • Recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, not suitable for local-regional treatment
  • Presence of at least 1 measurable lesion according to RECIST Version 1.1
  • Signed written informed consent before any trial-related activities are carried out
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior systemic chemotherapy, except if given as part of multimodal treatment for locally advanced disease, that was completed within 6 months before randomization
  • Surgery (excluding prior biopsy for diagnosis) or irradiation within 4 weeks before trial entry
  • Previous treatment with monoclonal antibody or signal transduction inhibitors targeting epidermal growth factor receptor
  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • Known central nervous system metastasis and/or leptomeningeal disease
  • Medical or psychological condition that would not permit the participant to complete the trial or sign informed consent
  • Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria could apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
243 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil

    Drug: Cetuximab · Drug: Cisplatin/Carboplatin · Drug: 5-fluorouracil

  • Active comparator
    Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil

    Drug: Cisplatin/Carboplatin · Drug: 5-fluorouracil

Interventions

  • DrugCetuximab

    Participants received Cetuximab as an intravenous infusion at an initial dose of 400 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) on Day 1 and a subsequent dose of 250 mg/m\^2 on Day 8 and Day 15 of each 21-day treatment cycle.

    Also known as: Erbitux

  • DrugCisplatin/Carboplatin

    Cisplatin or Carboplatin (at an equivalent dose in case of intolerability of cisplatin) was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m\^2 as an intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle.

  • Drug5-fluorouracil

    Participants received 5-fluorouracil (FU) at a dose of 750 mg/m\^2/day as a continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours a day from Day 1 to Day 5 of each 21-day treatment cycle.

    Also known as: 5-FU

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)

    PFS time was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization until first observation of PD (based on imaging as assessed by IRC), or death due to any cause when death occurs within 60 days after the last tumor assessment or randomization (whichever is later). PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on trial; and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or the presence of new lesions. The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by the Investigator

    PFS time was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization until first observation of PD (radiologically confirmed by Investigator), or death due to any cause when death occurs within 60 days after the last tumor assessment or randomization (whichever is later). PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on trial; and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or the presence of new lesions. The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)

  2. Overall Survival (OS) Time

    The OS time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. If a participant was alive at the time of analysis, survival time was censored at the last date when the participant was known to be alive. If this date was after data cut-off, participants were censored at the date of data cut-off. OS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

    Time frame: Time from date of randomization up to data cutoff (assessed up to 904 days)

  3. Best Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    The Best ORR was based on imaging and classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 criteria. The BOR rate was defined as the number of participants whose BOR was either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), relative to the number of participants belonging to the trial set of interest. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)

  4. Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    The DCR was based on imaging and classified according to RECIST Version 1.1 criteria. The DCR was defined as the number of participants whose Best Overall Response is either CR, PR or stable disease (SD), divided by the number of participants belonging to the trial set of interest multiplied by 100. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on trial.

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)

  5. Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR was determined for participants whose BOR was either CR or PR. It was defined as the time from the first assessment of CR or PR until the event defining PFS time. PFS time was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization until first observation of PD (based on imaging as assessed by IRC), or death due to any cause when death occurs within 60 days after the last tumor assessment or randomization (whichever is later). CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Death and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

    An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.

    Time frame: Time from date of randomization up to data cutoff (assessed up to 904 days)

07

Results

Posted Apr 16, 2019

Participant flow

First participant signed informed consent: 31 Jul 2015, Clinical data cut-off: 19 Jan 2018.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Started16479
Completed13872
Not completed267
Withdrew: Ongoing at clinical cut-off date254
Withdrew: Randomized, but not treated13

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)

PFS time was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization until first observation of PD (based on imaging as assessed by IRC), or death due to any cause when death occurs within 60 days after the last tumor assessment or randomization (whichever is later). PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on trial; and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or the presence of new lesions. The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

Time frame:
Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)
monthsCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)5.5 (5.4 to 5.6)4.2 (3.0 to 5.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil vs Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.566 · 95% CI 0.400 to 0.803
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by the Investigator

PFS time was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization until first observation of PD (radiologically confirmed by Investigator), or death due to any cause when death occurs within 60 days after the last tumor assessment or randomization (whichever is later). PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on trial; and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or the presence of new lesions. The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

Time frame:
Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by the Investigator
monthsCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time, as Assessed by the Investigator5.5 (5.5 to 5.7)4.6 (2.9 to 5.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil vs Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.568 · 95% CI 0.406 to 0.795
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) Time

The OS time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. If a participant was alive at the time of analysis, survival time was censored at the last date when the participant was known to be alive. If this date was after data cut-off, participants were censored at the date of data cut-off. OS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.

Time frame:
Time from date of randomization up to data cutoff (assessed up to 904 days)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS) Time
monthsCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Overall Survival (OS) Time10.2 (9.3 to 11.5)8.4 (6.5 to 9.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil vs Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.705 · 95% CI 0.502 to 0.991
SecondaryBest Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The Best ORR was based on imaging and classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 criteria. The BOR rate was defined as the number of participants whose BOR was either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), relative to the number of participants belonging to the trial set of interest. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Best Overall Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Best Overall Response Rate (ORR)50 (42.1 to 57.9)26.6 (17.3 to 37.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil vs Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil · Odds ratio (or): 2.76 · 95% CI 1.52 to 5.45
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)

The DCR was based on imaging and classified according to RECIST Version 1.1 criteria. The DCR was defined as the number of participants whose Best Overall Response is either CR, PR or stable disease (SD), divided by the number of participants belonging to the trial set of interest multiplied by 100. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on trial.

Time frame:
Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
percentage of participantsCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Disease Control Rate (DCR)75.6 (68.3 to 82.0)59.5 (47.9 to 70.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil vs Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil · Odds ratio (or): 2.14 · 95% CI 1.15 to 3.95
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

DOR was determined for participants whose BOR was either CR or PR. It was defined as the time from the first assessment of CR or PR until the event defining PFS time. PFS time was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization until first observation of PD (based on imaging as assessed by IRC), or death due to any cause when death occurs within 60 days after the last tumor assessment or randomization (whichever is later). CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
Every 6 weeks starting from the date of randomization until occurrence of PD, assessed up to data-cutoff (904 days)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Duration of Response (DOR)
WeeksCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Duration of Response (DOR)18.1 (13.1 to 20.3)13.9 (8.7 to 18.1)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Death and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.

Time frame:
Time from date of randomization up to data cutoff (assessed up to 904 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Death and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
ParticipantsCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
TEAEs16375
TESAEs4621
TEAEs Leading to Death118
AEs Leading to Discontinuation278

Adverse events

Collected over Time from date of randomization up to data cutoff (assessed up to 904 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil105/163 (64.4%)46/163 (28.2%)163/163 (100%)
Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil54/76 (71.1%)21/76 (27.6%)73/76 (96.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 66
Most frequent serious events
EventCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
Lung infectionInfections and infestations6/1634/76
Tumor haemorrhageNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1633/76
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/1630/76
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1632/76
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/1632/76
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/1632/76
White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations0/1632/76
Obstructive airways disorderRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1632/76
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1631/76
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/1631/76
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent other events
EventCetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-Flurouracil
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders93/16351/76
Weight decreasedInvestigations103/16331/76
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders60/16337/76
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders73/16336/76
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders77/1631/76
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders73/16331/76
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders67/16334/76
White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations62/16325/76
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders58/16322/76
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders56/16318/76

Baseline characteristics

Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants who were randomized to study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FlurouracilTotal
Mean57.1 ± 9.5257.0 ± 8.9957.1 ± 9.34
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FlurouracilTotal
Female181230
Male14667213
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FlurouracilTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino000
Unknown or Not Reported16479243
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FluorouracilCisplatin/Carboplatin + 5-FlurouracilTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian16479243
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Research site
    Darmstadt, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Guo Y, Luo Y, Zhang Q, Huang X, Li Z, Shen L, Feng J, Sun Y, Yang K, Ge M, Zhu X, Wang L, Liu Y, He X, Bai C, Xue K, Zeng Y, Chang X, Chen W, Lin T. First-line treatment with chemotherapy plus cetuximab in Chinese patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety results of the randomised, phase III CHANGE-2 trial. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Oct;156:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.039. Epub 2021 Aug 18. PubMed 34418665 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 26, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 16, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02383966
Lead sponsor
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 10, 2015
Start date
Jul 31, 2015
Primary completion
Jan 19, 2018
Completion
Dec 20, 2021
Results posted
Apr 16, 2019
Last update
May 13, 2022

Study contacts

Medical Responsible
study director · Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion