CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02383875OpticoursesUpdated Mar 9, 2015

An Interventional Study to Reduce Social Disparities in Diet Quality in the Northern Districts of Marseille

An interventional study of Opticourses in Nutritional Quality of Food Purchases, sponsored by Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-03-09.

Sponsored by Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
189
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Opticourses project aims to improve the nutritional quality/price (NQP) ratio of the food purchases of people claiming to be facing financial problems. Following one of the main principles of the French National Nutrition and Health Program (PNNS), the project starts from the principle that to modify food consumption favourably and durably, one must act on both the demand and the supply (see figure). The "demand" part of the project is based on participatory workshops, and the "supply" part relies on intervention of social marketing in shops.

Read the detailed description

The demand part of the project is based on intervention sessions consisting in five two-hour workshops with about ten participants. The workshops were based on the people's actual purchases and notably on their till receipts. During the five sessions, the receipts were used as intervention tools: participants and research staff discussed the receipts brought in by them all, and exchanged ideas and experiences around food purchasing behaviors.

  • First workshop: Opticourses intervention presentation, discussion about grocery shopping strategies, explanation of protocol for receipt collection and annotation, two quiz on nutritional knowledge, food shopping exercise on a catalog;
  • Second workshop: discussion about the receipt collection and help to participants encountering difficulties, food groups teaching;
  • Third workshop: till receipts delivery by each participant, food with a high nutritional quality for their price teaching;
  • Fourth workshop: individual return on the nutritional quality of food purchase on the basis of till receipts analysis, individual objectives to improve the nutritional quality of food purchase at no additional cost, discussion about discount food representations, two quiz on nutritional knowledge, food shopping exercise on a catalog;
  • Fifth workshop: assessment of the Opticourses intervention with the participants, discussion about their behavioral modification regarding grocery shopping.

The supply part of the project aims at influencing the supply by means of social marketing. The research team intervenes in two "discount" shops (DIA retailer) in the northern districts in order to influence the food supply. In collaboration with the agency Link Up, a specialist in social marketing, a campaign to promote foods with a good NQP ratio has been launched (from January until June 2014). This public health campaign has the aim of making good NQP foods visible, available and attractive. For 6 months, all the foods with a good NQP ratio in the shop (identified by the research team) are put at the front of the shelves. Consumers can spot them thanks to a logo, "EAT TOP", accompanied by the claim "Nutritious and inexpensive; that's TOP". Good NQP foods are presented with the support of flyers and recipes, simple and accessible to everyone. Also, placing at the head of the gondola and in-store exhibitions are planned around star foods of the month. During the first two months, fish and canned foods will be given the most prominence. Consumers will find in the flyers made available: nutritional information, tips and tricks for cooking them, simple cheap recipes (less than 1€ per person) combining these good NQP foods (sardine rillettes, tuna pâté, etc.) and a TOP selection of good NQP foods available in the store.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nutritional Quality of Food Purchases

Keywords

  • nutrition economics
  • food expenditure
  • nutritional quality
  • low income
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • living in the northern districts of Marseille
  • willingness to be involved in an intervention session aimed at improving the nutritional quality of food purchases under budgetary constraints

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
189 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Opticourses education intervention

    People living in the northern districts of Marseille with in very deprived social situation: very low incomes, heavy financial dependence on social benefits, over-representation of people covered by arrangements for controlling poverty and people covered by free social security

    Behavioral: Opticourses

Interventions

  • BehavioralOpticourses

    An intervention session consisted of five two-hour educative workshops which aimed to help people to improve the nutritional quality of food purchases under budgetary constraints.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic of nutritional quality of food purchases

    Opticourses participants collected food purchase receipts for their household over a one-month period which constituted a detailed record of the quantities of food entering their household. They were asked to save all till receipts for foods consumed at home. To facilitate data collection, participants were given a notebook of food purchases in which they could find step-by-step instructions, example receipts, and, on the last page, an envelope in which to collect the receipts. In case of incomplete or ambiguous printed information regarding the name of the shop, the name of a food, the quantities purchased or the price paid for a food, participants were instructed to write it on the receipt. Expenditure without receipts (gifts or other sources) was to be recorded in the notebook. The participants were also requested to ask other household members to keep their till receipts.

    Time frame: One-month - Between the first and the third workshop

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nutritional knowledge assessment: food groups

    At the first workshop, Opticourses participants had to answer a quiz about food groups in order to assess their knowledge prior to the Opticourses intervention. At the fourth workshop, they answered the same quiz which permitted us to measure the intervention effect.

    Time frame: At the first workshop and 6 weeks later at the fourth

  2. Nutritional knowledge assessment: food with a high nutritional quality for their price

    At the first workshop, Opticourses participants had to answer a quiz about their knowledge of what is a food with a high nutritional quality for its price prior to the Opticourses intervention. At the fourth workshop, they answered the same quiz which permitted us to measure the intervention effect.

    Time frame: At the first workshop and 6 weeks later at the fourth

  3. Experimental economics: food purchases on catalog

    At the first workshop, Opticourses participants were asked to shop for food for two days and for all the members of their household on the basis of a food catalog. This catalog included food items with different price options. At the fourth workshop, they did it once again which permitted it to evaluate the intervention effect on their purchase intention regarding nutritional quality and price.

    Time frame: At the first workshop and 6 weeks later at the fourth

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tharrey M, Dubois C, Maillot M, Vieux F, Mejean C, Perignon M, Darmon N. Development of the Healthy Purchase Index (HPI): a scoring system to assess the nutritional quality of household food purchases. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):765-775. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003154. Epub 2018 Nov 26. PubMed 30472975 ↗
  • Perignon M, Dubois C, Gazan R, Maillot M, Muller L, Ruffieux B, Gaigi H, Darmon N. Co-construction and Evaluation of a Prevention Program for Improving the Nutritional Quality of Food Purchases at No Additional Cost in a Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Population. Curr Dev Nutr. 2017 Sep 13;1(10):e001107. doi: 10.3945/cdn.117.001107. eCollection 2017 Oct. Erratum In: Curr Dev Nutr. 2018 Jun 19;2(7):nzy023. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzy023. PubMed 29955680 ↗
  • Marty L, Dubois C, Gaubard MS, Maidon A, Lesturgeon A, Gaigi H, Darmon N. Higher nutritional quality at no additional cost among low-income households: insights from food purchases of "positive deviants". Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Jul;102(1):190-8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.104380. Epub 2015 May 27. PubMed 26016868 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02383875
Lead sponsor
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute, France
Responsible party
Nicole Darmon (PhD, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 9, 2015
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2014
Completion
Aug 2014
Last update
Mar 9, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion