An interventional study of Ultrasound Guidance and Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulation in Saphenous Nerve Block, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-02.
Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery have the option of having a nerve block administered by their Anesthesiologist. The nerve block numbs the foot and results in less post-operative nausea and vomiting, and better pain control. Two different techniques for blocking the saphenous nerve to the foot have been described and are both commonly used at St. Paul's hospital. The goal of this study is to compare the success rates of these two techniques.
Purpose / Hypothesis This clinical study is a prospective, controlled, randomized, single-blinded trial designed to investigate the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided blockade of the saphenous nerve in conjunction with nerve stimulation has a higher success rate when compared to ultrasound alone. These research interventions represent what is considered to be an improvement on the standard practice at St. Paul's, which is to block the saphenous nerve with one of any number of saphenous nerve blocks, using a number of different techniques (i.e. ultrasound-guided, nerve stimulation, blind field block); the effectiveness of which has been inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to identify if one technique has a great success rate over another, which would ultimately result in increased success rates of saphenous nerve blocks and patient care.
Study Design The study will be a randomized, single-blinded trial of 80 subjects who are undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Informed consent will be obtained from all study subjects. Subjects will be randomized to one of two saphenous nerve block techniques to be administered by an experienced regional anesthesiologist at St. Paul's Hospital. Once the nerve block is completed the success will be evaluated by an investigator blinded to the procedure. Once the 30min evaluation is completed anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The subject will then be contacted at 2 and 7 days after block administration to assess for delayed complications.
Intravenous access will be gained and non-invasive blood pressure measurements will be recorded every five minutes. Continuous electrocardiography and oxygen saturation monitoring will be maintained throughout the procedure and for at least 60 minutes afterwards. Light sedation will be provided, with the goal of maintaining verbal contact with the subject throughout the procedure. Where clinically appropriate, the study block may be preceded by an ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
Saphenous nerve blockade will be preformed using a transsartorial approach. Subjects in both groups will be positioned prone. The ultrasound probe will be placed in the transverse plane on the medial aspect of the thigh 3-5cm cephalad to the superior border of the patella (area marked). An attempt will then be made to identify the saphenous nerve, which runs deep to the sartorius muscle within the subsartorial fascial plane. The nerve will appear hyperechoic, round or oval shaped. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum scan time of 3 minutes prior to needle entry. Up to 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine will be used for skin infiltration of the injection site. The block will then be preformed as to the protocols below depending on group allocation. A thirty minute evaluation of the saphenous nerve block will occur during the normal monitoring period after the placement of a block.
Following completion of the thirty-minute evaluation, anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. This may include spinal or general anesthesia.
All subjects will be contacted by telephone at two and seven days post procedure for a follow up interview to assess for delayed complications associated with the procedure.
The medications used for the nerve blocks in the study will include only ropivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1%. For subject sedation, midazolam and fentanyl will be used. None of these medications are considered study drugs; rather they are commonly used anesthetic medications. While used in the study, these drugs themselves are not being investigated. The same medications will be used on subjects not enrolled in the study.
Study Treatment Group 1 - Saphenous nerve block using ultrasound guidance The needle will be placed with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structures (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial facial plane of the sartorius muscle if the nerve is not visible). A total of 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be used for the block. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block.
Study Treatment Group 2 - Saphenous nerve blockade using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation The needle will be place with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structure (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial fascial plane if the nerve is not visible). The Pajunk MultiStim SENSOR nerve stimulator will then be turned on, starting at 1.0 milliamp (mA) until a tapping sensation is elicited in the medial or anterior aspect of the ankle. The amplitude of the nerve stimulator will then be gradually decreased with maintenance of the tapping sensation by making small adjustments in needle location. The end-point for nerve localization will be a tapping sensation in the area of the medial malleolus at ≤ 0.6 mA. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum search time of 5 minutes from needle entry to elicitation of the tapping sensation. Once a tapping sensation is elicited in the ≤ 0.6 mA range, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site. If a tapping sensation is elicited but not ≤ 0.6 mA within 5 minutes then 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site where the lowest amplitude tapping sensation was elicited. If no tapping sensation is elicited from the subject after 5 minutes, an injection of 10 mL of ropivacaine will be made below the Sartorius muscle in the subsartorial fascial plane. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block.
University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Saphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance alone
Device: Ultrasound Guidance
Saphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation
Device: Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulation
Ultrasound guidance will be used to place a saphenous nerve block
Ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation will be used to place a saphenous nerve block
Block Success
Complete absence of sensation to pinprick at two different anatomic areas of the saphenous nerve at thirty minutes
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Block Failure Rate
Persistent sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes (i.e., absence of any evidence of blockade \[decreased or complete absence of sensation\] at both areas: normal sensation.
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Any Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation)
Participants with any evidence of blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial tibial condyle)
Time frame: 30 min
Incomplete Block Rate
incomplete \[decreased only\] loss of sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes at both areas of assessment
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Speed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade)
Median (Kaplan-Meier curve "survival") time required to reach complete absence of sensation to pinprick at the two different anatomic areas of assessment in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial condyle of the tibia).
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation
successful elicitation of any "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution within the 5 min stimulation time limit
Time frame: 5 minutes
Mean Minimum Stimulation Current
the mean minimum stimulation current magnitude to elicit "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution (cf. 3.2.3 below)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation at < 0.6 Milliampere (mA)
Successful elicitation of "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at ≤ 0.6 mA
Time frame: 5 minutes
Time Required to Administer Block
The time required for the block to be completed (from scanning to removal of needle)
Time frame: 10 minutes
Immediate Complications
Any complications as a result of block placement (e.g. local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, pain etc.)
Time frame: 60 minutes post block completion
Delayed Complications
Any complication as a results of nerve block placement (e.g. persistent paresthesia, nerve injury)
Time frame: 7 days post operative
| Milestone | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 40 | 40 |
| Allocated | 40 | 40 |
| Analyzed | 40 | 40 |
| Completed | 40 | 40 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Complete absence of sensation to pinprick at two different anatomic areas of the saphenous nerve at thirty minutes
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Block Success | 18 | 22 |
Persistent sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes (i.e., absence of any evidence of blockade \[decreased or complete absence of sensation\] at both areas: normal sensation.
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Normal sensation | 1 | 3 |
| Decreased or no sensation | 39 | 37 |
Participants with any evidence of blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial tibial condyle)
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Any Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation) | 39 | 37 |
incomplete \[decreased only\] loss of sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes at both areas of assessment
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Decreased sensation | 21 | 15 |
| Normal or no sensation | 19 | 25 |
Median (Kaplan-Meier curve "survival") time required to reach complete absence of sensation to pinprick at the two different anatomic areas of assessment in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial condyle of the tibia).
| Minutes | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Speed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade) | 25.0 (20.0 to 30.0) | 17.5 (15.0 to 25.0) |
successful elicitation of any "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution within the 5 min stimulation time limit
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|
| Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation | 32 |
the mean minimum stimulation current magnitude to elicit "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution (cf. 3.2.3 below)
| mA | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|
| Mean Minimum Stimulation Current | 0.39 (0.31 to 0.48) |
Successful elicitation of "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at ≤ 0.6 mA
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|
| Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation at < 0.6 Milliampere (mA) | 25 |
The time required for the block to be completed (from scanning to removal of needle)
| s | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Time Required to Administer Block | 207 ± 76 | 314 ± 125 |
Any complications as a result of block placement (e.g. local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, pain etc.)
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Local anesthetic systemic toxicity | 0 | 0 |
| Hematoma | 0 | 0 |
| Pain on needle manipulation | 1 | 0 |
| Paresthesia | 3 | 2 |
| Positive aspiration (of blood) | 0 | 1 |
| Pruritus of the blocked leg in saph. n. distrib. | 1 | 0 |
| Transient increase in pain in medial malleolus | 1 | 0 |
Any complication as a results of nerve block placement (e.g. persistent paresthesia, nerve injury)
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Paresthesia | 0 | 1 |
| Other | 0 | 0 |
Median (Kaplan-Meier curve "survival") time required to reach any evidence of sensory blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) in the area 2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus only
| Minutes | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Speed of Onset for Any Blockade in the Area 2 cm Proximal to the Medial Malleolus Only | 30.0 (20.0 to 30.0) | 17.5 (15.0 to 25.0) |
Sensation to pinprick with an 18 gauge blunt needle was assessed individually at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve: Here, the results are reported for the area 2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus only
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| 2 = absent sensation | 24 | 31 |
| 1 = decreased sensation | 14 | 5 |
| 0 = normal sensation (no block) | 2 | 4 |
Sensation to pinprick with an 18 gauge blunt needle was assessed individually at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve: Here, the results are reported for the area 10 cm distal to the medial tibial condyle only
| participants | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance + Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| 2 = absent sensation | 21 | 23 |
| 1 = decreased sensation | 17 | 14 |
| 0 = normal sensation (no block) | 2 | 3 |
Percentage of block failure (persistent sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes -- i.e., absence of any evidence of blockade \[decreased or complete absence of sensation\] at both areas: normal sensation) among participants in the Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation group with response versus no response to nerve stimulation
| participants | Responders to Nerve Stimulation | Non-responders to Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Block failure (normal sensation) | 0 | 3 |
| No block failure (decreased or no sensation) | 32 | 5 |
Collected over Adverse event data were collected immediately (i.e., on the day of the intervention/postoperative day 0); on postoperative days 2 and 7, patients were contacted via telephone to enquire about the presence of any delayed complications. In case of presence of any delayed complications at the day 7 follow-up, patients were to be contacted every 7 days until symptom resolution, and further investigations and/or management were to be provided at this time.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Guidance | — | 0/40 (0%) | 3/40 (7.5%) |
| Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation | — | 0/40 (0%) | 2/40 (5%) |
| Event | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation |
|---|---|---|
| Paresthesia (on regional nerve block needle manpulation/advancement)Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 3/40 | 2/40 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 50 ± 15 | 53 ± 14 | 52 ± 15 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 22 | 29 | 51 |
| Male | 18 | 11 | 29 |
| Body Mass Index(kg/m^2) | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 26 ± 3 | 25 ± 4 | 25 ± 4 |
| American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status(participants) | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| I or II | 37 | 33 | 70 |
| III to V | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Type of surgery(participants) | Ultrasound Guidance | Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foot/ankle joint reconstruction/fusion/arthrodesis | 15 | 24 | 39 |
| Arthroscopy/debridement | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| Mass/hardware removal | 9 | 3 | 12 |
| Fracture fixation | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| Tendon repair/transfer | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Amputation | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of British Columbia