CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02378311GRIPUpdated Jan 14, 2016

Handlebar Grip Related Injury Prevention (GRIP) Study: Are Exposed Metal Handlebar Ends a Risk Factor for Injury?

An observational study in Injuries, Trauma and Wounds and Injuries, sponsored by Andrew Neilson. Completed. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 15 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-14.

Sponsored by Andrew Neilson · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
1 Day to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cycling injuries are the 3rd most common mechanism of injury in 7-13 year olds[1]. Bicycle injuries have remained one of the commonest causes of paediatric abdominal trauma for over 60 years[2,3]. 15% of child cyclist injuries involve impact with a handlebar; two-thirds of those are abdominal injuries[4]. Handlebar impact is now the commonest mechanism of major paediatric abdominal injury[3]. Serious handlebar injuries often occur after apparently minor falls; they are not unique to riders performing stunts[5].

One small study found that the metal handlebar ends were often exposed on bikes of children sustaining severe abdominal injuries[6]. Most European safety standards do not test grip durability[7-10]. Day-to-day use can damage rubber grips, exposing the underlying metal handlebar tube.

This feasibility study aims to test the research methods that will be used in a subsequent nationwide multicentre study. The main study will investigate the association between injuries and handlebar grip condition.

Children attending study hospitals with any bicycle or kick scooter injury will be invited to participate. Parents of injured children will be invited to complete questionnaires regarding circumstances surrounding the injury and condition of the handlebar ends on the bike or scooter involved. Clinical information regarding the injury will also be collected. The handlebar end condition will be compared between children sustaining a handlebar end injury [Cases] and riders whose injury did not involve the handlebar [Controls].

If exposed handlebar ends are more prevalent amongst riders with handlebar end injuries, injury prevention strategies can focus on methods to prevent damage occurring to grips through day-to-day use. If no such association is found, prevention strategies can be focused elsewhere, such as on design of effective protective clothing.

Data collection for this feasibility study will occur between March 2015 and September 2015.

The Chief Investigator, Mr. Andrew Neilson, funds the feasibility study.

Read the detailed description

Injuries are the most common cause of death of children aged 1-14 years in the European Union[11]. In the United States cyclist injuries are the 3rd most common mechanism of injury in 7-13 year olds, after motor vehicle collisions (MVC) and falls[1]. Bicycle injuries have remained one of the most common causes of paediatric abdominal trauma for over 60 years[2,3]. The vast majority (95-98%) of child cyclists admitted due to abdominal trauma are over 5 years old[2,3]. As with most mechanisms of injury, boys are injured more frequently than girls. Around three quarters of injured child cyclists are boys[12].

In a recent UK study, handlebar end impact was the mechanism that most frequently resulted in major intra-abdominal trauma in children. Impact with a handlebar end was implicated in 29% of cases. This was ahead of falls (20%), pedestrians (8%) and MVC occupants (8%)[3]. A study conducted in Australia found 15% of child cyclist injuries involved impact with a handlebar, and 10% of all child cyclist injuries were abdominal handlebar injuries[4]. A study in Philadelphia found that 8% of all paediatric bicycle-related trauma admissions involved handlebars impacting the abdomen resulting in an injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of 2 or greater[13].

The majority of handlebar injury case series reported in the literature relate to children's abdominal injuries. The peak incidence occurs between 6 and 14 years of age[4]. However, adults can also sustain serious handlebar related injuries[14-16] and 36% of all handlebar injured patients sustain only extra-abdominal injuries[4]. It is not just pedal cyclists who are at risk of these injuries. Incidents also involve non-motorized kick scooters, moto-cross bikes, motorbikes and quad bikes[3,4].

Crash investigations have found that serious handlebar injuries often occur after apparently minor incidents; they are not unique to riders performing stunts or those riding BMX bikes[5,6]. There is a typical sequence of events common to many of these handlebar injuries[5]. The child loses control of the bike and begins to fall. The front wheel rotates through 90 degrees so that it is perpendicular to the child's body. The child continues to fall forwards, landing on the upturned handlebar end.

Children's bikes and scooters often have damaged rubber grips with exposed metal handlebar ends. This occurs through day-to-day use. Each time the child drops their bike or scooter on its side, the handlebar end contacts the ground. When it does so, the metal tube inside the rubber grip cuts into that rubber. With time, a circle is cut from the rubber end, exposing the metal pipe within.

Handlebar end injuries can occur both when the handlebar ends are exposed and when they are intact. Two studies from the 1990s have looked at the condition of the handlebar end implicated in such injuries[5,6].

Acton et al published a series of 21 patients who reported handlebar impact as the cause of their injuries. Re-interview found that metal handlebar ends were exposed on bikes of all 10 children who sustained a major abdominal injury, whilst exposed handlebar ends were present on only one bike of 8 respondents with minor abdominal injuries[6].

Winston et al included detailed analysis on 4 riders who sustained serious abdominal injuries due to landing on a handlebar end. They found that these serious injuries occurred in 3 riders despite the presence of protective rubber covering on the handlebar ends. The rider who impacted an exposed metal handlebar end, however, had a particularly serious injury. He was a 6-year-old boy who sustained a life threatening liver laceration[5].

Identifying if there is an association between the condition of handlebar grips and the likelihood of sustaining an injury is the ultimate aim of the main GRIP study. This feasibility study aims to test the intended methodology prior to rolling out a nationwide multicentre study. The feasibility study will allow power calculations to be performed for the nationwide study. The primary outcome of the nationwide study will address whether children falling onto exposed metal handlebar ends are at a greater risk of sustaining an injury than those who fall onto handlebars with intact rubber grips. A sub-study will explore whether there is any relationship between injury severity and grip condition.

Our clinical experience tells us that serious handlebar injuries do occur even when handlebar grips are intact. The investigators also know through anecdotes that some riders fall onto their handlebar ends and never attend hospital because no injury or only a minor injury is sustained. The cases presenting to tertiary paediatric units represent the 'tip of the iceberg'. A study to accurately identify the number of children who fall onto a handlebar but do not present to hospital is unlikely to be feasible. This is why the investigators have designed a case-controlled study.

If the nationwide multicentre GRIP study rejects the null hypothesis, then the investigators can focus on passive injury prevention strategies relating to handlebar ends. There are two aspects that could easily be addressed by safety standards. Grip durability and grip end minimum diameter. Improved durability should reduce the number of bikes or scooters in circulation with exposed metal handlebar ends. Larger diameter ends distribute any end-on impact over a larger surface area and hence reduce the pressure exerted on the point of contact.

Currently only one of the many applicable European safety standards includes a drop test of handlebar grip durability[9]. This standard for BMX bikes was introduced in 2012. However, the drop test has not been included in the more recently published standard for Bicycles for Young Children[10].

A minimum grip diameter requirement has been included in the standard for Bicycles for Young Children. It specifies that handlebars shall be fitted with handlebar grips, and that such grips shall be of resilient material and shall have an enlarged and covered end not less than 40mm in diameter[10]. That standard applies only to bikes suitable for children up to around 5 years of age. There is no such minimum handlebar end diameter requirement applied to bicycles ridden by children over 5 years of age, or to kick scooters. These standards simply require the handlebar to be fitted with handgrips or end plugs[7-9].

If, however, the nationwide multicentre GRIP study accepts the null hypothesis, the investigators can focus handlebar-related injury prevention on more complex mechanical solutions such as steering limiters or compressible handlebar ends, and on design of effective protective clothing. Some of the secondary outcomes the investigators propose addressing will be useful if it is found that exposed handlebar ends are not a risk factor for this injury mechanism.

02

Conditions studied

  • Injuries
  • Trauma
  • Wounds and Injuries
  • Children
  • Child

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bike
  • Bicycle
  • Scooter
  • Handlebar
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 135 across 1,597 observational studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Andrew Neilson as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Children attending either one of two tertiary paediatric hospital emergency departments and paediatric surgical units in the United Kingdom.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children 0-15 years inclusive
  • Presenting to either of the study hospitals for assessment or treatment
  • Sustained an injury or suspected to have sustained an injury (i.e. AIS >=0)
  • Due to an incident involving any non-motorized bicycle, tricycle or kick scooter

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incidents where the injured child was involved in a motor vehicle collision
  • Incidents where the injured child was injured by another rider (e.g. injured child run over by a cyclist)
  • Incidents involving a bicycle fitted with 'bull bars'
  • Patients for whom neither parent / guardian is fluent in English (if the history is clear from a parent, the patient will be eligible for inclusion)
  • If an eligible patient is dead on arrival the family will not be invited to participate, and they will not subsequently be contacted
  • If an eligible patient dies during their admission, they will be withdrawn from further involvement in the study and the family will not be contacted
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cases

    Those satisfying the inclusion \& exclusion criteria whose injury involved impact with the handlebar end who have sustained an injury more severe than a skin or subcutaneous tissue contusion from an end-on handlebar impact

  • Controls

    Those satisfying the inclusion \& exclusion criteria in whom the handlebars were not implicated in the mechanism of injury

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility

    To demonstrate the feasibility of a study researching whether or not exposed handlebar ends are a risk factor for injury in child bike and scooter riders.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Research methodology

    To test the research methodology proposed for a future nationwide multicentre study.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Power calculation data collection

    To collect data required to do power calculations for a future nationwide multi centre study: The percentage of riders who did impact the handlebar end. The ratio of recruited Cases to Controls. The percentage who don't know whether they impacted the handlebar end. The percentage who don't know which handlebar end they hit. The proportion of intact, damaged and exposed handlebar ends in each group. The percentage whose handlebar ends are both in the same condition.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Cases & Controls

    The total number of eligible Cases \& Controls identified in each department.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Recruitment

    The number identified by recruitment step 1a, 1b and 1c. Number recruited by reminder letters. Number of recruited participants who are eligible. Number completing questionnaire Part 2 without need for reminder. Number who respond to SMS, email, telephone or postal reminders for questionnaire Part 2. Proportion of responses to questionnaire Part 2 completed online versus using paper questionnaire. Proportion of incomplete versus complete questionnaire datasets. Number invited to participate in a telephone interview (Part 3). Number consenting to that interview; qualitative reasons for non-participation. Number completing that interview.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Study acceptability

    Qualitative feedback from participants about the acceptability and design of the study. Qualitative feedback from recruiters about their willingness to recruit potential participants, the acceptability and design of the study.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Use of photographs

    What proportion upload photos of their handlebar ends using the online form. What proportion of those using the paper questionnaire Part 2 email photos. Can an investigator grade handlebar condition using photos submitted by participants? If so, what is the inter-observer agreement between the parent's assessment and that of the investigator using the photograph.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Design & resources

    Assess and record where possible the workload and resources required in each department. Record staff questions to aid compilation of an FAQ document for the national study.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tracy ET, Englum BR, Barbas AS, Foley C, Rice HE, Shapiro ML. Pediatric injury patterns by year of age. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jun;48(6):1384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.041. PubMed 23845634 ↗
  • Bergqvist D, Hedelin H, Lindblad B, Matzsch T. Abdominal injuries in children: an analysis of 348 cases. Injury. 1985 Jan;16(4):217-20. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(85)80001-2. PubMed 3967900 ↗
  • Getting to grips with handlebar injuries: a call for collaboration to inform legislative change. British Association of Paediatric Surgeons Annual Congress, Bournemouth 2013.
  • Nataraja RM, Palmer CS, Arul GS, Bevan C, Crameri J. The full spectrum of handlebar injuries in children: a decade of experience. Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Dec 8. PubMed 24321415 ↗
  • Winston FK, Shaw KN, Kreshak AA, Schwarz DF, Gallagher PR, Cnaan A. Hidden spears: handlebars as injury hazards to children. Pediatrics. 1998 Sep;102(3 Pt 1):596-601. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.3.596. PubMed 9738182 ↗
  • Acton CH, Thomas S, Clark R, Pitt WR, Nixon JW, Leditschke JF. Bicycle incidents in children--abdominal trauma and handlebars. Med J Aust. 1994 Mar 21;160(6):344-6. PubMed 8133818 ↗
  • BSI. BS EN 14766:2005. Mountain bicycles: Safety requirements and test methods. British Standards Institution; 2006.
  • BSI. BS EN 14619:2005. Roller sports equipment and kick scooters: Safety requirements and test methods. British Standards Institution; 2005.
  • BSI. BS EN 16054:2012. BMX bicycles: Safety requirements and test methods. British Standards Institution; 2012.
  • BSI. BS EN ISO 8098:2014. Cycles. Safety requirements for bicycles for young children. British Standards Institution; 2014.
  • EuroSafe, Injury Database, European Commission, Swansea University, KFV. Injuries in the European Union, Issue 4. Summary of injury statistics for the years 2008-2010. European Association for Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion (EuroSafe); 2013.
  • Acton CH, Thomas S, Nixon JW, Clark R, Pitt WR, Battistutta D. Children and bicycles: what is really happening? Studies of fatal and non-fatal bicycle injury. Inj Prev. 1995 Jun;1(2):86-91. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.2.86. PubMed 9346002 ↗
  • Winston FK, Weiss HB, Nance ML, Vivarelli-O'Neill C, Strotmeyer S, Lawrence BA, Miller TR. Estimates of the incidence and costs associated with handlebar-related injuries in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Sep;156(9):922-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.9.922. PubMed 12197801 ↗
  • Nehoda H, Hochleitner BW. Subcapsular liver haematomas caused by bar ends in mountain-bike crashes. Lancet. 1998 Jan 31;351(9099):342. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)78334-3. No abstract available. PubMed 9652623 ↗
  • Bohmer JH, Proust AF. Adult bicycle handlebar injury. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;24(5):624-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.12.022. No abstract available. PubMed 16938607 ↗
  • Neofytou K, Michailidou M, Petrou A, Loizou S, Andreou C, Pedonomou M. Isolated jejunal perforation following bicycle handlebar injury in adults: a case report. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2013;2013:678678. doi: 10.1155/2013/678678. Epub 2013 Aug 5. PubMed 23984116 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02378311
Lead sponsor
Andrew Neilson
Collaborators
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford
Responsible party
Andrew Neilson (Clinical Research Fellow, Paediatric Surgery, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2015
Start date
Mar 2015
Primary completion
Sep 2015
Completion
Oct 2015
Last update
Jan 14, 2016

Study contacts

Andrew G Neilson, MBChB, MRCS
principal investigator · Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion