CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02369263Updated Feb 23, 2015

DVT Ultrasound in the Emergency Department

An observational study in Deep Vein Thrombosis and DVT, sponsored by Emergency Medicine Physicians, Nevada. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-23.

Sponsored by Emergency Medicine Physicians, Nevada · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
288
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Emergency Medicine (EM) Residents routinely conduct bedside ultrasound exams in the Emergency Department (ED) employing the two point compression method. This study endeavors to investigate the accuracy and utility of bedside ultrasound for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in the ED by EM Residents by comparing the results of that exam against the gold standard of a DVT ultrasound performed in the Radiology Department and interpreted by a Radiologist.

Read the detailed description

For subjects with suspicion of DVT to the Emergency Department, an EM Resident will perform a bedside non-diagnostic two point compression DVT Ultrasound. Subjects will then receive a diagnostic DVT Ultrasound in the Radiology Department with official radiologist interpretation. The bedside ultrasound will not interfere with or delay the diagnostic ultrasound. Patient demographic and clinical data will be collected for validation purposes. Validation of the The EM Resident interpretation will be accomplished by comparison to the official Radiologist interpretation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Vein Thrombosis
  • DVT

Keywords

  • Deep Vein Thrombosis
  • DVT
  • Leg Swelling
  • Leg Pain
  • Blood Clot
03

In context

Thrombosis

1,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombosis; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 288 is above the median of 213 across 586 observational studies indexed under Thrombosis.

Browse Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Emergency Medicine Physicians, Nevada as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Departmetn suspicious of DVT

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 or older
  • Suspect of having DVT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known DVT
  • DVT with in previous 6 months
  • DVT Ultrasound within the last 6 months
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
288 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Outcome measures is the proportion of agreement between Resident performed two point DVT ultrasaound and the Radiologist interpertation of a formal DVT ultrasound.

    Two point Emergency Medicine Resident preformed DVT Ultrasound (5 minute procedure) results will be compared as a proportion to Radiologist interpreted ultrasonographer performed DVT Ultrasound results.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center of Southern Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89102, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02369263
Lead sponsor
Emergency Medicine Physicians, Nevada
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2015
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Nov 2014
Last update
Feb 23, 2015

Study contacts

Jamie Baydoun, MD
principal investigator · Emergency Medicine Physicians

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion