CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02365675Updated Feb 19, 2015

Wound Dressings for Pemphigus and Pemphigoid

An interventional study of Cotton gauze with petrolatum and Cellulose acetate with petrolatum in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid, sponsored by Fundación Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de la Dermatología A.C.. Status unknown at 2 sites in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-19.

Sponsored by Fundación Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de la Dermatología A.C. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2014), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of four dressings (covers) namely: gauze with petrolatum , cellulose acetate with petrolatum , pure carboxymethylcellulose with silver and nanocrystalline silver to improve the new growth of skin, reduce pain and itch in persons suffering from pemphigus and pemphigoid.

Read the detailed description

Pemphigus and pemphigoid are the most frequently autoinmune bullous diseases seen in dermatology. Despite all the treatments that have been studied for the management of bullous skin diseases, there is insufficient information about the best skin dressing or cover that can be used in affected or denuded areas in these conditions.

Therefore we will compare the efficacy of four different covers (gauze with petrolatum , cellulose acetate with petrolatum , pure carboxymethylcellulose with silver and nanocrystalline silver) in providing faster healing and decreasing pain and itch.

Each patient with the diagnosis of either pemphigus or pemphigoid will have a full skin examination and 4 of the most affected areas will be randomly assigned to receive each of the 4 treatments previously described.

There is no clinical study focused specifically on the materials that will be used in this study. There are few isolated cases reported that can not be taken as a basis. Considering the above and based on the clinical experience, we consider it appropriate to conduct a pilot study with a total of 10-14 patients, with it we will perform a sample calculation, considering a potential alpha error of 0.05, yielding the beta error by subtracting 1.0 to the power sample calculated .

In all of the patients 4 affected areas of 8 cm x 8 cm ( 64 cm2 ) will be selected and marked with the letters A, B , C and D. The investigator will generate randomization tables where previously established and numbered treatments 1 to 4 will be randomly assigned to each of the four areas. Thus all patients will receive the 4 therapies but randomly in the 4 areas previously selected.

The variables that will be studied are:

  • Total area affected : Consists of the sum of the percentages of skin that is not healthy in the 64 cm2
  • Intensity of pain: sensory unpleasant emotional experience that occurs from the potential or actual injury tissue . Will be assessed by visual analog scale, validated method.
  • Erythema: Inflammation of the skin surface caused by excess blood supply, causing redness.
  • Itch: cutaneous unpleasant sensation and of variable intensity that causes an urge to scratch to get relief. Will be assessed by visual analog scale, validated method.
  • Healing: Reparing process of an altered tissue, resulting in the formation of a scar tissue. Will be measured based on the reduction of wound area percentage. It shall be measured in cm2 with ImageJ® program ( ImageJ® , US National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland , USA , ( http : //imagej.nih.gov/ij/ ) ) .
  • Ulcer: injury depressed by loss of epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous tissue . They will be measured in total area in cm2 by ImageJ® program.
  • Blisters, pustules or vesicles: are elemental skin lesions with a liquid content ranging from light to heavy white. They will be measured in total area in cm2 by ImageJ® program.

Procedure description:

Day 0

  • The patient will be evaluated to determine if is eligible according to the selection criteria.
  • The protocol will be explained in clear words so that the patient understands it.
  • The patient will have to sign the informed consent.
  • Total body surface area will be revalutatd to select the 4 most severely affected areas in the trunk or limbs of 8 cm x 8 cm each and that will be assigned with a letter from A to D.
  • With an indelible marker the 4 vertices of each of the previously selected areas will be marked.
  • A label graduated in millimeters will be placed at the bottom edge of the marked areas.
  • A panoramic picture of each of the four areas will be taken to ensure that if the label is lost, we can replicate it in the next visit.
  • An aproach picture of each of these four areas will be taken.
  • The selected areas will be cleaned with sterile saline.
  • Clinical evaluation will be performed and the section of the report format will be filled.
  • The envelope containing randomization numbers will be opened to decide which dressing skin cover will be used to each of the selected areas.
  • The dressings (covers) will be placed on each of the selected areas. Above it conventional gauze will be placed and this cure will be pinned up with conventional elastic white band.
  • The patient will recieve the appointments of the 6 subsequent valorations.
  • The patient will recive the prescription for the systemic management of the bullous skin disease.
  • The patient will receive a second prescription explaining how he should be healing between each visit. If it is an inpatient, the healing and measurement will be performed by the medical personnel assigned. The family will be explained how to perform the healing and at the end of his hospital stay a prescription will be given with the instructions. Also the next control appointment will be given.
  • Pictures will be downloaded and the presence of abnormal skin will be measured using a standardized measurement program ( ImageJ® , US NationalInstitutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland , USA , ( http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ ) ). All data obtained will be registered in the report format made specifically for this trial.

Subsequent visits ( 7, 14, 21 , 28, 35 )

  • The presence of systemic or local adverse effects at any of the 4 areas of study will be asked.
  • The 4 areas will be discovered using saline and gently drying. The healling and the further steps are the same as the ones explained above.
  • All the data obtained will be recorded on the report format.

Final visit (day 42)

  • The patient will be told he or she is no more in the protocol and which of the dressings worked the best.
  • The patient will receive his or her next appoinment.
  • A prescription with the systemic treatment will be given.
  • A second prescription will be given, explaining how to perform the healings.
  • All data obtained will be recorded to the further results analysis.

Results will be presented as percentages or proportions for categorical variables and by mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. The percentage of epithelialization between the four groups will be compared with Chi Square RxC. Continuous numerical variables will be compared with one way ANOVA in the case of homoscedastic variances or by Kruskall Wallis variance in the case of heteroskedastic variances. The results will be adjusted in relation to the received systemic treatment (duration, intensity), the location of the lesions and its chronicity with multivariate lienal regression analysis . For bivariate anaysis a significant value of p \< 0.05 will be used. For multivariate analysis a p \< 0.10 value will be used. STATA version 13.0 for Mac wiil be used.

Tables and grapfhs will be used to present the results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pemphigus
  • Pemphigoid

Keywords

  • Pemphigus
  • Pemphigoid
  • Wound Healing
  • Itch
  • Pain
  • Wound dressing
  • Topical treatment
03

In context

Pemphigoid, Bullous

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Pemphigoid, Bullous; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 29 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Pemphigoid, Bullous.

Browse Pemphigoid, Bullous studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundación Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de la Dermatología A.C. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus , pemphigus vegetans, paraneoplastic pemphigus or bullous pemphigoid
  • At least four areas of active disease in the trunk or limbs of 8 x 8 cm characterized by denudation, ulceration, scabs or blisters.
  • Capable of being evaluated weekly either as outpatient or hospitalized
  • Actively treated with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs for pemphigus or pemphigoid control
  • Willing to sign an informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hypersensitivity to any of the components of the skin dressings that will be used.
  • Patients who have participated in any clinical trial in the last 30 days.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cotton gauze with petrolatum

    The dressing to be used is regular cotton gauze impregnated in petrolatum (a mixture of solid hydrocarbons) creating a film that reduces the adherence of the gauze to the wound.

    Device: Cotton gauze with petrolatum

  • Active comparator
    Cellulose acetate with petrolatum

    The dressing to be used is a mesh or tulle base of cellulose acetate polymers that do not easily adhere to the wound impregnated in petrolatum (a mixture of solid hydrocarbons).

    Device: Cellulose acetate with petrolatum

  • Active comparator
    Nanocrystalline silver

    The dressing to be used consists of two layers of a silver-coated, high-density polyethylene mesh, enclosing a single layer of an apertured non-woven fabric of rayon and polyester. The three components are ultrasonically welded together to maintain the integrity of the dressing in use. Silver is applied to the polyethylene mesh by a vapour deposition process, which results in the formation of microscopic 'nanocrystals' of metallic silver.

    Device: Nanocrystalline silver (Acticoat)

  • Active comparator
    Carboxymethylcellulose with ionic silver

    The dressing to be used is a soft, sterile, non- woven pad dressing made from sodium carboxymethylcellulose containing 1.2% silver in an ionic form.

    Device: Carboxymethylcellulose with ionic silver (Aquacel Ag)

Interventions

  • DeviceCotton gauze with petrolatum
  • DeviceCellulose acetate with petrolatum

    Also known as: Curity non-adhering dressing

  • DeviceNanocrystalline silver (Acticoat)

    Also known as: Acticoat

  • DeviceCarboxymethylcellulose with ionic silver (Aquacel Ag)

    Also known as: Aquacel Ag

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound Healing Percentage of a 64 cm2 area of epithelialized skin

    Percentage of a 64 cm2 area of epithelialized skin

    Time frame: 42 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Using the visual analog scale a decrease in pain score

    Using the visual analog scale a decrease in pain score

    Time frame: 42 days

  2. Itch Using the visual analog scale a decrease in itch score

    Using the visual analog scale a decrease in itch score

    Time frame: 42 days

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
    Mexico, DF 14000, Mexico
    Recruiting
  • Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea González
    Mexico, DF 14080, Mexico
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Amagai M. Preface to Journal of Dermatology special issue: pemphigus updates from around the world. J Dermatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):2. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.12774. No abstract available. PubMed 25558945 ↗
  • Mimouni D, Anhalt GJ, Lazarova Z, Aho S, Kazerounian S, Kouba DJ, Mascaro JM Jr, Nousari HC. Paraneoplastic pemphigus in children and adolescents. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Oct;147(4):725-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04992.x. PubMed 12366419 ↗
  • Mutasim DF. Autoimmune bullous dermatoses in the elderly: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Drugs Aging. 2010 Jan 1;27(1):1-19. doi: 10.2165/11318600-000000000-00000. PubMed 20030429 ↗
  • Kirtschig G, Khumalo NP. Management of bullous pemphigoid: recommendations for immunomodulatory treatments. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5(5):319-26. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200405050-00005. PubMed 15554733 ↗
  • Martin LK, Werth V, Villanueva E, Segall J, Murrell DF. Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006263.pub2. PubMed 19160272 ↗
  • Joly P, Roujeau JC, Benichou J, Delaporte E, D'Incan M, Dreno B, Bedane C, Sparsa A, Gorin I, Picard C, Tancrede-Bohin E, Sassolas B, Lok C, Guillaume JC, Doutre MS, Richard MA, Caux F, Prost C, Plantin P, Chosidow O, Pauwels C, Maillard H, Saiag P, Descamps V, Chevrant-Breton J, Dereure O, Hellot MF, Esteve E, Bernard P. A comparison of two regimens of topical corticosteroids in the treatment of patients with bullous pemphigoid: a multicenter randomized study. J Invest Dermatol. 2009 Jul;129(7):1681-7. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.412. Epub 2009 Jan 29. PubMed 19177141 ↗
  • Wojnarowska F, Kirtschig G, Highet AS, Venning VA, Khumalo NP; British Association of Dermatologists. Guidelines for the management of bullous pemphigoid. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Aug;147(2):214-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04835.x. PubMed 12174090 ↗
  • Khumalo NP, Murrell DF, Wojnarowska F, Kirtschig G. A systematic review of treatments for bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol. 2002 Mar;138(3):385-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.138.3.385. PubMed 11902990 ↗
  • Kirtschig G, Middleton P, Bennett C, Murrell DF, Wojnarowska F, Khumalo NP. Interventions for bullous pemphigoid. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD002292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002292.pub3. PubMed 20927731 ↗
  • Dressler DP, Skornik WA. Burn wound dressings. II. Effect on wound sepsis. J Trauma. 1971 Apr;11(4):325-30. No abstract available. PubMed 5551730 ↗
  • Sibbald RG, Contreras-Ruiz J, Coutts P, Fierheller M, Rothman A, Woo K. Bacteriology, inflammation, and healing: a study of nanocrystalline silver dressings in chronic venous leg ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007 Oct;20(10):549-58. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000294757.05049.85. PubMed 17906429 ↗
  • Gravante G, Caruso R, Sorge R, Nicoli F, Gentile P, Cervelli V. Nanocrystalline silver: a systematic review of randomized trials conducted on burned patients and an evidence-based assessment of potential advantages over older silver formulations. Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Aug;63(2):201-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181893825. PubMed 19571738 ↗
  • Asz J, Asz D, Moushey R, Seigel J, Mallory SB, Foglia RP. Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis in a pediatric patient with a nanocrystalline silver dressing. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Dec;41(12):e9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.08.043. PubMed 17161178 ↗
  • Chen J, Han CM, Lin XW, Tang ZJ, Su SJ. [Effect of silver nanoparticle dressing on second degree burn wound]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jan 1;44(1):50-2. Chinese. PubMed 16620649 ↗
  • Murrell DF, Daniel BS, Joly P, Borradori L, Amagai M, Hashimoto T, Caux F, Marinovic B, Sinha AA, Hertl M, Bernard P, Sirois D, Cianchini G, Fairley JA, Jonkman MF, Pandya AG, Rubenstein D, Zillikens D, Payne AS, Woodley D, Zambruno G, Aoki V, Pincelli C, Diaz L, Hall RP, Meurer M, Mascaro JM Jr, Schmidt E, Shimizu H, Zone J, Swerlick R, Mimouni D, Culton D, Lipozencic J, Bince B, Grando SA, Bystryn JC, Werth VP. Definitions and outcome measures for bullous pemphigoid: recommendations by an international panel of experts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Mar;66(3):479-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.06.032. Epub 2011 Nov 5. PubMed 22056920 ↗
  • Daroczy J, Szalai I. [Use of polyurethane foil for wound covering]. Orv Hetil. 1991 Jun 2;132(22):1203-4. Hungarian. PubMed 2067830 ↗
  • Patange VS, Fernandez RJ, Motla MU, Mahajan SA. Dressing wounds with potato peel. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1996 Sep-Oct;62(5):286-8. PubMed 20948091 ↗
  • Dumas V, Roujeau JC, Wolkenstein P, Revuz J, Cosnes A. The treatment of mild pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus with a topical corticosteroid. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Jun;140(6):1127-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02895.x. PubMed 10354082 ↗
  • Grando SA. New approaches to the treatment of pemphigus. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004 Jan;9(1):84-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1087-0024.2004.00826.x. PubMed 14870992 ↗
  • Vun YY, Lun K, Strutton G. Use of biosynthetic dressings in paraneoplastic pemphigus. Australas J Dermatol. 2004 May;45(2):133-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2004.00067.x. PubMed 15068464 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02365675
Lead sponsor
Fundación Nacional para la Enseñanza y la Investigación de la Dermatología A.C.
Collaborators
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Responsible party
Jose Contreras-Ruiz (Head of the Interdisciplinary Wound and Ostomy Care Center. Division of Dermatology., Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 19, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Jan 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 19, 2015

Study contacts

Jose Contreras-Ruiz, MD
Contact
dermayheridas@gmail.com
+525540003000 ext. 3502
Karla Lopez-Ortiz, MD
Contact
karlitaav24@hotmail.com
+5215585583329
Jose Contreras-Ruiz, MD
principal investigator · Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion