ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02363322Updated Jun 5, 2019Results posted

Putative Investigational Therapeutics in the Treatment of Patients With Known Ebola Infection

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp and A/Current Standard of Care Alone in Ebola Virus Infection, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Completed at 11 sites in 4 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-05.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Ebola is a viral infection that can spread quickly and causes life-threatening disease. Right now there is an Ebola outbreak in many countries in West Africa. There are no approved treatments for Ebola. But possible treatments are being developed. Researchers need to study these treatments to see if they help people get better.

Objective:

  • To identify possible Ebola treatments. Also, to learn if adding 1 or more experimental drugs to advanced Ebola care can reduce the risk of death.

Eligibility:

  • People who have recently been diagnosed with Ebola, usually by a test called the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and have been hospitalized in an isolation unit for treatment.

Design:

  • Participants will be randomly assigned to Group A or B. Both groups will get advanced level care. One group will also get an experimental drug.
  • Participants may have blood tests. They may have another PCR test.
  • Researchers will try to learn how the participant got Ebola.
  • Participants put in the experimental drug group may start taking medicine within 24 hours of enrollment. It may be given by mouth or intravenously. Additional doses may be needed.
  • Participants may have a series of timed blood tests over the first 24 to 48 hours after they take the medicine.
  • Blood will be drawn frequently. Other body fluids (urine, stool, vaginal fluid, etc.) may also be collected.
  • Participants will be followed for up to 60 days. They may be evaluated for any long-term effects of the experimental treatment(s). They may be asked to return for 1 or more outpatient visits.
  • For consenting participants, follow-up will be extended for up to one full year past Day 58 with contact/visits every 1-3 months to assess for a history of signs or symptoms potentially consistent with late onset of virologic relapse syndrome.
Read the detailed description

Ebolaviruses (EBOV) are members of the Filoviridae and are known primarily as the underlying cause of severe viral hemorrhagic fevers with disturbingly high case fatality rates. Between 1994 and the present, there have been many EBOV outbreaks affecting mostly central Africa, with 2 large outbreaks in 1995 in Kikwit, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and in Gulu, Uganda in 2000-2001. However, the 2014 West African outbreak significantly exceeds all previous outbreaks in geographic range, number of patients affected, and in disruption of typical activities of civil society.

There is strong consensus that the most important element necessary to improve survival from Ebola infection is the provision of full hemodynamic support in the form of aggressive fluid replacement, ability to diagnose and correct severe metabolic derangements, and other standards of modern medical care available in resource-rich environments. However, against this background, a small series of investigational agents or interventions have also been proposed as putative antiviral strategies of potential utility in treating this infection. Unfortunately, phase 1/2 data supporting the safety and efficacy of these agents is generally lacking, and thus there should be equipoise as to which, if any, of these interventions should be utilized in the treatment of severe infection.

In this multicenter randomized trial, we propose a flexible trial design with frequent interim monitoring to facilitate early elimination of poorly performing treatments as well as the introduction of new candidate therapies. The trial allows for a series of pairwise comparisons of novel interventions against a background of optimized medical care, with the goal of determining whether one or more of these interventions can improve the mortality over that achievable through optimized standard-of- care (oSOC) alone. The primary endpoint of this trial will be comparative mortality at Day 28, with a number of secondary endpoints that hopefully will generate generalizable knowledge about the relative safety and antiviral activity of these adjunctive interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ebola Virus Infection

Keywords

  • Medical Countermeasures
  • VHF
  • EVD
03

In context

Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is below the median of 94 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola.

Browse Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,446 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 405 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 302 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females with documented positive PCR for Ebola virus infection within 10 days of enrollment
  • Willingness of study participant to accept randomization to any assigned treatment arm
  • Access to oSOC
  • All males and females of , must be willing to use highly effective methods of [e.g. absolute abstinence from potentially reproductive sexual activity, hormonal, surgical or multiple barrier/combined], from time of enrollment for the duration of study participation.
  • Must agree not to enroll in another study of an agent prior to completion of last required protocol visit (Day 58)
  • Ability to provide personally, or by a legally-authorized [per applicable local laws and regulations] representative [LAR] if the patient is unable to do so.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would place the patient at an unreasonably increased risk through participation in this study, including any past or concurrent conditions that would preclude randomization to one or more of the assigned treatment arms.
  • Prior treatment with any antiviral drug therapy against Ebola infection other than experimental vaccines, within 5 half-lives or 30 days, whichever is longer, prior to enrollment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A/Current Standard of Care Alone

    A/Current Standard of Care Alone: Optimized standard of care to include aggressive fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic support, and other interventions available in an optimized care setting

    Other: A/Current Standard of Care Alone

  • Experimental
    B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp

    B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp: ZMapp (Trademark) + Optimized standard of care to include aggressive fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic support, and other interventions available in an optimized care setting. ZMapp 50mg/kg IV administered every third day for 3 infusions.

    Drug: B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp · Other: A/Current Standard of Care Alone

Interventions

  • DrugB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp

    Triple monoclonal cocktail of antibodies against Zaire species of Ebola virus

  • OtherA/Current Standard of Care Alone

    Optimized standard of care for Ebola virus infection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Death at Day 28

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With ZMapp Infusion-related Adverse Events

    Adverse events related to ZMapp infusions

    Time frame: 10 Days

  2. Plasma Viral Load

    Time to viral clearance

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Results

Posted May 14, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Due to the severity of the underlying illness (Ebola infection) only infusion-related adverse events were captured.

Participant flow

Beginnning in March 2015 through November 2015 a total of 72 patients were enrolled at sites in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, and the United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneA/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp
Started3636
Completed3536
Not completed10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10

Outcome measures

PrimaryMortality

Death at Day 28

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality
ParticipantsA/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp
Mortality138
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ZMapp Infusion-related Adverse Events

Adverse events related to ZMapp infusions

Time frame:
10 Days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With ZMapp Infusion-related Adverse Events
participantsA/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp
Hypotension—7
Elevation in fever—8
Tachycardia—4
Tachypnea—3
Hypertension—3
Confusion—2
Seizure—1
Difficulty Breathing—1
Chills—1
Vomiting—1
Agitation—1
SecondaryPlasma Viral Load

Time to viral clearance

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Plasma Viral Load
daysA/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp
Plasma Viral Load13 (0 to 28)9 (0 to 28)

Adverse events

Collected over 8 months, from March 2015 through November 2015. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
A/Current Standard of Care Alone13/35 (37.1%)13/35 (37.1%)0/35 (0%)
B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp8/36 (22.2%)11/36 (30.6%)32/36 (88.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventA/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp
Death due to EVDInfections and infestations10/352/36
Multi-organ failure due to EVDInfections and infestations2/353/36
Worsened renal insufficiencyRenal and urinary disorders1/350/36
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/350/36
Death due to Hypotensive ShockVascular disorders1/350/36
Head InjuryNervous system disorders1/350/36
Death due to sepsisInfections and infestations0/351/36
Generalized seizureNervous system disorders0/351/36
Hypovolemic shock due to acute hemorrhageVascular disorders0/351/36
Severe diarrheaGastrointestinal disorders0/351/36
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventA/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp
Elevation in FeverInfections and infestations—8/36
HypotensionVascular disorders—7/36
TachycardiaVascular disorders—4/36
TachypneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders—3/36
HypertensionVascular disorders—3/36
ConfusionNervous system disorders—2/36
SeizureNervous system disorders—1/36
Difficulty BreathingRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders—1/36
ChillsInfections and infestations—1/36
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders—1/36

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)A/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMappTotal
Mean27.9 ± 16.424.3 ± 18.326.1 ± 17.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)A/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMappTotal
Female172340
Male191332
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)A/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMappTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American312960
White101
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported4711
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)A/Current Standard of Care AloneB/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMappTotal
Liberia235
United States101
Guinea5712
Sierra Leone282654
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
  • CTE Forecariah
    Forecariah, Guinea
  • Monrovia Medical Unit
    Monrovia, Liberia
  • ELWA III Hospital
    Paynesville, Liberia
  • Police Training School 1 (PTS1), Western Rural District
    Freetown, Sierra Leone
  • Emergency Ebola Treatment Unit
    Goderich, Sierra Leone
  • Police Training School 2
    Hastings, Sierra Leone
  • Chinese Friendship Hospital
    Jui, Sierra Leone
  • International Medical Corps (IMC) Kambia
    Kambia, Sierra Leone
  • International Medical Corps (IMC) Lunsar
    Port Loko, Sierra Leone
  • Adventist Development and Relief Ebola Treatment Unit
    Waterloo, Sierra Leone
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Joffe S. Evaluating novel therapies during the Ebola epidemic. JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1299-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.12867. No abstract available. PubMed 25211645 ↗
  • Kanapathipillai R. Ebola virus disease--current knowledge. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):e18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1410741. No abstract available. PubMed 25251632 ↗
  • Piot P, Muyembe JJ, Edmunds WJ. Ebola in west Africa: from disease outbreak to humanitarian crisis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;14(11):1034-1035. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70956-9. Epub 2014 Oct 1. No abstract available. PubMed 25282665 ↗
  • PREVAIL II Writing Group; Multi-National PREVAIL II Study Team; Davey RT Jr, Dodd L, Proschan MA, Neaton J, Neuhaus Nordwall J, Koopmeiners JS, Beigel J, Tierney J, Lane HC, Fauci AS, Massaquoi MBF, Sahr F, Malvy D. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of ZMapp for Ebola Virus Infection. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1448-1456. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1604330. PubMed 27732819 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02363322
Collaborators
The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Liberia, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Sierra Leone, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, The Ministry of Health and Public Hygiene, Guinea
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 16, 2015
Start date
Mar 13, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2017
Completion
Dec 31, 2017
Results posted
May 14, 2019
Last update
Jun 5, 2019

Study contacts

Richard T Davey, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion