CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02359318Updated Apr 21, 2022

Enamel Damages Following De-bracketing From Infiltrated Surfaces

An interventional study of Resin infiltration and Bonding and debonding of brackets. in Dental White Spots, sponsored by DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH. Completed at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-21.

Sponsored by DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Demineralisation and white-spot caries often occures during MB treatment. While resin infiltration has been proved to stop progression of enamel demineralisation, there is still a paucity of information in the literature concerning the best time point of infiltration: During or following MB treatment. Infiltration during treatment requires debonding respective brackets prior to infiltration, with subsequent re-bonding. In terms of preventing enamel damages by progression of demineralisation and enamel damages by de-bonding, it is unclear whether it was better to infiltrate enamel immediately, or to better postpone until completion of MB treatment.

This study thus aimes to evaluate if resin infiltration can prevent enamel damage due to bracket de-bonding.

Read the detailed description

Background: Orthodontic bracket debonding is known to cause side-effects such as enamel cracks or fractures. There is a lack of information on potential benefits or side-effects of removing brackets from infiltrated enamel, in terms of enamel damages, in vivo.

Purpose: To assess enamel damages following debonding in demineralised teeth with or without prior infiltration (Icon, DMG, Hamburg, Germany), compared to those following bracket removal from sound enamel, in order to provide guidelines for the right time point of infiltration of post-orthodontic lesions (during or following orthodontic treatment).

Design: Single-center, randomized, single blinded, split-mouth controlled clinical trial Subjects: 30 subjects with fixed multi-bracket (MB) appliances treated at the orthodontic clinic of Dr. Roberto Vogel, Temuco, Chile: It is planned to include 20 consecutive patients with extensive decalcifications, and 10 patients without decalcifications. Random allocation of demineralized dental arch quadrants to the different treatment groups (debond with or without prior infiltration, and sound teeth).

Investigated tooth groups: Upper and lower canines, and upper and lower incisors.

Methods: Bracket bonding procedure (Transbond XT 3M, Unitek) is identical for all patients and also for the re-attachement of brackets. Teeth allocated to the infiltration group will receive bracket removal, infiltration and rebonding of new brackets 4 weeks prior to final debonding. De-bonding procedures are identical for all patients.

Silicone replicas are made directly following bracket removal (prior to adhesive removal). Replica analysis is performed using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM780) at the Department of Cell Biology, University of Concepción, Chile.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental White Spots

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • White spot lesion
  • Resin Infiltration
  • Icon
  • Debonding
  • Enamel damages
  • Orthodontic white spots
  • Orthodontics
03

In context

Dental Caries

1,109 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Caries; 197 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 916 interventional studies indexed under Dental Caries.

Browse Dental Caries studies →

Lead sponsor

DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Multibracket apparature with: At least 4 post-orthodontic white spots on front teeth (canines and / or incisors) in upper and lower jaw (study group) OR
  • No post-orthodontic white spot or any other enamel damage - on front teeth (canines and / or incisors) in upper and lower jaw (control group) AND
  • No cavitation of vestibular tooth surface(s) AND
  • Patients willing to participate in the study and accepting to attend recall visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cavitation of vestibular tooth surface(s)
  • Participation in other study
  • History of allergy towards any dental material.
  • Subjects with any systemic and local conditions not permitting the treatment
  • Subjects with direct or indirect restorations in maxillary central or lateral incisors.
  • Subjects not willing to participate in the study
  • Subjects with fractured teeth maxillary central or lateral incisors
  • No or less than 4 post-orthodontic white spots on front teeth (canines or incisors) in upper or lower jaw (study group)
  • Post-orthodontic white spots or any other enamel damage on front teeth or incisors (control group)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Resin infiltration and de-bonding

    Patients with brackets and white spots are included in this group. After removal of the old brackets the quadrants are randomized to this intervention arm and the "no infiltration and de-bonding" arm. The teeth that are included in this intervention arm are treated by resin infiltration using Icon (DMG, Germany) according to the manufacturers´ instruction. This is followed by bonding of new brackets (Gemini metal brackets, 3M Unitek). These new brackets are finally de-bonded 4 weeks after the treatment, with silicon impressions taken before adhesive removal. Bonding and debonding of brackets is performed by one clinician (Roberto Vogel) using the same bonding and de-bonding techniques and materials for all patients.

    Procedure: Resin infiltration · Procedure: Bonding and debonding of brackets.

  • Placebo comparator
    No infiltration and de-bonding

    Patients with brackets and white spots are included in this group. After removal of the old brackets the quadrants are randomized to this intervention arm and the "resin infiltration and de-bonding" arm. The teeth that are included in this intervention arm are left untreated new brackets (Gemini metal brackets, 3M Unitek) are bonded. These new brackets are finally de-bonded 4 weeks after the treatment, with silicon impressions taken before adhesive removal. Bonding and debonding of brackets is performed by one clinician (Roberto Vogel) using the same bonding and de-bonding techniques and materials for all patients.

    Procedure: Bonding and debonding of brackets.

  • Other
    Control and de-bonding

    Patients with brackets and without white spots are included in this group. After removal of the old brackets, new brackets (Gemini metal brackets, 3M Unitek) are bonded again. These new brackets are finally de-bonded 4 weeks after the treatment, with silicon impressions taken before adhesive removal. Bonding and debonding of brackets is performed by one clinician (Roberto Vogel) using the same bonding and de-bonding techniques and materials for all patients.

    Procedure: Bonding and debonding of brackets.

Interventions

  • ProcedureResin infiltration

    Resin infiltration is done according to manufactures´ instructions after de-bonding of old brackets and prior bonding of new brackets.

    Also known as: Icon (DMG, Germany), Approximal resin infiltration kit

  • ProcedureBonding and debonding of brackets.

    Brackets (Gemini metal brackets (3M Unitek) are bonded and de-bonded by one clinician (Roberto Vogel) and using the same bonding and de-bonding techniques and materials for all patients. All brackets were finally de-bonded at the end of the treatment, with silicon impressions taken before adhesive removal.

    Also known as: Gemini metal brackets (3M Unitek)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surface damages

    Number of cracks and fractures as assessed by enamel surface analysis via silicone replicas using CLSM

    Time frame: 4 weeks after deboning

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dental Clinic
    Temuco, Araucanía 4800949, Chile
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02359318
Lead sponsor
DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH
Collaborators
Universidad de La Frontera, Universidad de Concepcion
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 10, 2015
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Jan 2017
Completion
Jan 2017
Last update
Apr 21, 2022

Study contacts

Michael Knösel
principal investigator · University Medical Center (UMG) Göttingen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion