CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02354157Updated Feb 3, 2015

The Nutritional Effect of Parental Use of Food as a Reward

An observational study in Children's Nutrition Intake, sponsored by McGill University. Completed. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-03.

Sponsored by McGill University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
207
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Control rules are common parental practices that use food as reward to encourage children to conduct parents' preferred behaviors. This field observational study aims to examine whether control rules are associated with children's increased fat, carbohydrate and total energy intake in everyday eating, and whether this effect is moderated by individual differences in sensitivity to reward, and by gender differences.

Read the detailed description

Control rules are parental practices that use food as an instrumental reinforcer to encourage children to behave in a normative manner in non-food domains. Since food high in fat or sugar is usually chosen as a reinforcer for control rules, these rules may lead to children's increased preference and every day intake of food high in sugar/fat. Research propositions were examined in 207 six to twelve-year-old children (97 boys and 110 girls). Their parents reported the children's everyday dietary intake through a food frequency questionnaire, and provided information regarding the children's sensitivity to rewards as well as an indication of how frequently they enforce family control rules.

02

Conditions studied

  • Children's Nutrition Intake

Keywords

  • children dietary pattern
  • control rules
  • instrumental learning
  • food reinforcement
03

In context

Lead sponsor

McGill University is the lead sponsor of 244 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The parents or guardians of 207 children (97 boys and 110 girls) aged from 6 to 12 (M=8.98, SD=1.67) completed the study. Participants were recruited from metropolitan Montreal, Canada.

Inclusion criteria

  • participants have 6-12 years old children

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N.A.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
207 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Otherno intervention

    no intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Food Frequency Questionnaire

    A web-based Food Frequency Questionnaire was used to aske participants' parents to recall their children's food intake over the last month based on a list of 136 individual food items or food clusters, which covered eight categories of food and beverages. For each individual food item or cluster, participants were asked to indicate how frequently their children consumed that food and the typical portion size.

    Time frame: last month recall

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02354157
Lead sponsor
McGill University
Collaborators
Dalhousie University
Responsible party
Laurette Dube (Professor, McGill University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 3, 2015
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2013
Completion
Jul 2013
Last update
Feb 3, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion