CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02346773Updated Dec 9, 2015

Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation on Brain and Behaviour in Healthy Children.

An interventional study of ω-3 LC-PUFA and Placebo in Behaviour, sponsored by University of Nottingham. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 9 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-09.

Sponsored by University of Nottingham · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Currently, there is considerable interest in the possibility that dietary supplementation with fatty acids, mostly omega-3 fatty acids, will have potential benefits for brain development. Epidemiological and clinical studies support the idea that relative disappearance of omega-3 diet from the diet in developed countries has been linked with increases in both physical and mental disorders. Omega-3 deficiency may lead to cognitive impairment, motor dysfunction and visual acuity problems. It is further known that families with lower socioeconomic status may have poorer diet and, consequently, may not realize their full potential regarding their cognitive abilities. The aim of this project is to evaluate effectiveness of a diet intervention rich in omega-3 acid in healthy children 9-to-12 years old from less well-off families.

Read the detailed description

Background It has been established that a safe environment, adequate stimulation, and parental care play a major role in brain development. An adequate diet is also critically important for brain development in growing children. It has been suggested that omega-3 fatty acids are essential to human health as well as cognitive development. Omega-3 acid is important during prenatal human brain development, especially for synaptogenesis. Levels of omega-3 amino acids in during prenatal and early postnatal (breastfeeding) periods depend on their levels in maternal circulation. Later on, omega-3 must be present in the child's diet. It seems that omega-3 deficiency may associated with impaired visual acuity, cognition, cerebellar dysfunction and other neurological disorders (Haag, 2003; Review). Thus, omega-3 supplementation may be beneficial in children with poor diet, often associated with a lower socioeconomic level (Northstone et al. 2008).

Aims and Design We assessed effects of Omega-3 supplementation on brain and behaviour of 40 healthy children 9-to-12 years old. Since diet supplementation may be beneficial in particular to children with poor diet, we recruited children in less well-off neighbourhoods, as determined by the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007. Our aim was to examine differences on cognitive performance pre and post diet supplementation.

The brain structure was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cognitive abilities as well as behavioural problems were assessed using a comprehensive battery of tests and questionnaires. To evaluate the effectiveness of the supplementation, we collected a blood sample to investigate the fatty acids level in the blood. The above assessments were carried out twice: before and after a 3-month dietary intervention.

The dietary intervention included a daily use, for a period of three months, of margarine enriched (Experimental group) or not (placebo group) with Omega-3 fatty acids. We hypothesized that this intervention will improve some cognitive deficits (such as attention, processing speed) and behavioural symptoms (e.g. depression, aggressiveness, impulsivity) together with an impact on brain structure (e.g. white-matter properties related to myelination).

Experimental Protocol Each participant participated in two phases: a clinical assessment phase (to assure exclusion and inclusion criteria) and an experimental phase. The experimental phase consisted of the baseline (pre-intervention) assessment, the diet intervention (3 months) and the post-intervention assessment.

At baseline, both groups (enriched diet and placebo) underwent a cognitive assessment and MRI. Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire about the child's behaviour and some demographical data such as number of children, education etc. Children were also asked to provide a blood sample, which was taken by a fully trained and licensed team member.

After the baseline assessment, experimental group (n=20) and control group (n=20) followed a diet supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids or placebo diet respectively. The intervention lasted for three months and then the tests were re-administered for both groups (cases and controls). Parents were also asked to complete a brief questionnaire to measure children's behaviour.

02

Conditions studied

  • Behaviour
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Nottingham is the lead sponsor of 455 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Child in target age (9-12 yrs)
  • Child native language English
  • Child is available for providing a blood sample
  • Child is available for MRI scan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. eating fatty fish/shellfish more than once a week;
    1. using ω-3 and/or ω-6 LC-PUFA supplements more than once a week;
    1. consuming products fortified with ω-3 LC-PUFA (EPA and/or DHA >100 mg/day) in the three months prior to study participation;
    1. positive history of alcohol abuse during pregnancy;
    1. positive history of malignancy and heart disease requiring heart surgery;
    1. Premature birth (\< 35 weeks) and/or detached placenta
    1. Hyperbilirubinemia requiring transfusion
    1. severe mental illness (e.g. autism, schizophrenia) or mental retardation;
    1. MRI contraindications
    1. Type 1 diabetes
    1. Epilepsy
    1. Brain tumour
    1. Head trauma with loss of consciousness >30 minutes
    1. Muscular dystrophy, myotonic dystrophy
    1. Nutritional and metabolic diseases (e.g. failure to thrive, phenylketonuria)
    1. Hearing deficit (requiring hearing aid)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ω-3 LC-PUFA group

    The intervention product was a full fat (80%) margarine. The active intervention product contained 590 mg docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and 650 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) per 10-g daily serving.

    Dietary Supplement: ω-3 LC-PUFA

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    The placebo product was a similar margarine with the same sensory properties, but with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA; refined plant oils) replacing EPA and DHA; total saturated fatty acids (SAFA) and ω-6 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) content were similar between the active and placebo products.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementω-3 LC-PUFA

    The intervention product was a full fat (80%) margarine.Participants were provided with one-month supply of the intervention product (including reserve products) at the onset of the intervention and received a new supply monthly. The intervention products were provided in neutral serving-sized cups, each containing 10 grams of margarine.The child's parents were instructed to have their child consume one complete portion pack (10 g) of margarine per day. The margarine had to be consumed as spread on sandwiches, crackers or bread rolls.The intervention product could be consumed on various periods over the day or all at one occasion. Every day a new portion pack had to be used, even if there was margarine left in the package of the previous day.

  • OtherPlacebo

    The placebo product was a similar margarine with the same sensory properties, but with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA; refined plant oils) replacing EPA and DHA; total saturated fatty acids (SAFA) and ω-6 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) content were similar between the active and placebo products.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Multi-modal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Investigating the effects of three months of EPA&DHA supplementation on brain structure of healthy children 9-to-12 years old.

    Time frame: Change from baseline MRI measures (DTI, MTR, MRS) at 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive assessment as measured by neuropsychological testing

    Neuropsychological testing: Intelligence Quotient (WISC-IV), Processing Speed (Trail Making Test), Selective \& Sustained Attention (Ruff 2\&7 Test), Working Memory (Self Ordered Pointing Test), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

    Time frame: Change from baseline cognitive assessment at 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Brain and Body Centre, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham
    Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02346773
Lead sponsor
University of Nottingham
Collaborators
Unilever R&D
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2015
Start date
Nov 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Last update
Dec 9, 2015

Study contacts

Tomáš Paus, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Rotman Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion