ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02342171Ebola-TxUpdated Jul 22, 2019Results posted

Emergency Evaluation of Convalescent Plasma for Ebola Viral Disease (EVD) in Guinea

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Convalescent Plasma in Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola, sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium. Completed at 1 site in Guinea. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-22.

Sponsored by Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
606
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an emergency, phase 2/3, open-label, non-randomized, clinical trial that will evaluate Convalescent Plasma (CP) added to standardized supportive care (SC) in patients with confirmed Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). No patient will be refused CP when compatible products are available and all efforts will be made to maximize CP availability during the study. EVD patients recruited during the period before CP becomes available or for whom no compatible CP is available will be given SC and will be followed for study outcomes. Data from these SC patients will be the used as comparator in the analysis of the study. The primary objective of the study is to assess if CP + SC improves the 14 day survival of patients, compared to SC alone.

The Investigators aim to enroll a total number of 130 - 200 patients who will be treated treated with CP assuming equal numbers of patients treated with SC alone. If there would be insufficient patients treated with SC, patients treated at the research site prior to study start may be included in the comparison group.

Patients will be recruited in the Ebola Treatment centre managed by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Conakry, Guinea. All patients and/or relatives presenting at the centre will be informed about the study, and will be invited to provide consent at the time of admission inside the treatment centre. Only patients for whom ebola infection is confirmed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) will be enrolled in the study. After inclusion, eligibility to the intervention will be reassessed on regular intervals. If the eligibility criteria are not met by 48 hours after inclusion, only SC will be continued.

In line with the guidance of the World Health Organization (WHO), two units of CP will be given. EVD patients will be transfused with ABO-compatible CP using standard procedures. Details on the modalities of transfusion can be found in the WHO guidance document and the MSF guidelines on blood transfusion. All patients will be under close observation for transfusion-related adverse reactions during and up to 4 hours after transfusion. 24 hours after the start of transfusion, a blood sample will be collected for viral load assessment. All other aspects of patient management will be according to MSF clinical guidelines. The decision to discharge a patient should be taken on clinical grounds, but can be supported by the laboratory results. After discharge, the patient will be followed up by the study team until day 30.

Read the detailed description

West-Africa is being ravaged by the worst outbreak of Ebola Viral Disease (EVD) ever witnessed. Nine months after its onset, the outbreak has spiraled and currently appears to be out of control. One of the key factors contributing to the high mortality is the lack of any proven effective EVD specific treatment. The identification of effective therapies is a medical and public health priority. Convalescent whole blood (CWB) and convalescent plasma (CP) have been prioritized by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be evaluated within a short time span, so that widespread use for therapy could be implemented rapidly if proven effective. Both CWB and CP contain EBV antibodies and either could potentially be of value as EVD therapy, however their efficacy in Ebola must still be demonstrated. .

This is an emergency, phase 2/3, open-label, non-randomized, clinical trial that will evaluate CP added to standardized supportive care (SC) in patients with confirmed EVD. No patient will be refused CP when compatible products are available and all efforts will be made to maximize CP availability during the study. EVD patients recruited during the period before CP becomes available or for whom no compatible CP is available will be given SC and will be followed for study outcomes. Data from these SC patients will be the used as comparator in the analysis of the study.

The primary objective of the study is to assess if CP + SC improves the 14 day survival of patients, compared to SC alone. Secondary objectives are;

  • to assess 30 day survival on CP + SC
  • to assess the relationship between EV antibody levels in donated CP and survival in patients receiving CP
  • to assess the relationship between EV antibody levels in donated CP and changes in levels of viral RNA in the blood of patients receiving CP
  • to assess the occurrence of serious adverse reactions (SARs) related to CP transfusion in Ebola patients
  • to assess the occurrence of safety risks related to CP transfusion in health workers administering the treatments
  • to determine risk factors for mortality despite administration of CP (for identification of patients most likely to benefit)

The Investigators aim to enroll a total number of 130 - 200 patients treated with CP assuming equal numbers of patients treated with SC alone. The number of patients treated with SC will be determined by the time interval for CP to become available for treatment and the availability of CP throughout the study. If there would be insufficient patients treated with SC, patients treated at the research site prior to study start may be included in the comparison group.

Patients will be recruited in the Ebola Treatment centre managed by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Conakry. All patients and/or relatives presenting at the centre will be informed about the study, and will be invited to provide consent at the time of admission inside the treatment centre. Only patients for whom ebola infection is confirmed via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) will be enrolled in the study. After inclusion, eligibility to the intervention will be assessed at the time of enrollment (when the patient is moved to the area for patients with confirmed Ebola) and will be reassessed on regular intervals as long as the patient did not receive plasma transfusion. The re-assessment of eligibility to receive CP happens at 8h and at 12h, and is repeated until 48 hours after inclusion. If the eligibility criteria are not met by 48 hours after inclusion, only SC will be continued.

A patient is not eligible to receive CP if they meet one of the following criteria:

  • History of allergic reaction to blood or plasma products (as judged by the investigator or treating physician); (this first criterion is definite and will not be re-assessed)
  • Medical conditions in which receipt of additional fluid related to the transfusion (250-500 ml or in the case of children 10 ml/kg) may be detrimental to the patient (e.g. decompensated congestive heart failure or renal failure).
  • Patients in shock unresponsive to fluid challenge
  • Patients in shock with signs of multi-organ failure, defined as oliguria/anuria AND impaired consciousness AND/OR jaundice
  • Condition of patient where the procedure of plasma administration carries a risk for the staff

In line with the WHO guidance, two units of CP will be given. EVD patients will be transfused with ABO-compatible CP using standard procedures. Details on the modalities of transfusion can be found in the WHO guidance document and the MSF guidelines on blood transfusion. All patients will be under close observation for transfusion-related adverse reactions during and up to 4 hours after transfusion. 24 hours after the start of transfusion, a blood sample will be collected for viral load assessment. All other aspects of patient management will be according to MSF clinical guidelines.

The decision to discharge a patient should be taken on clinical grounds, but can be supported by the laboratory results. After discharge, the patient will be followed up by the study team until day 30.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola

Keywords

  • Ebola Viral Disease
  • Convalescent Plasma
  • Developing Countries
03

In context

Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 606 is above the median of 94 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola.

Browse Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • PCR-confirmed, symptomatic infection with Ebola virus
  • Patient's, guardian's or representatives' willingness to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A patient is not eligible to receive CP if they meet one of the following criteria:

  • History of allergic reaction to blood or plasma products (as judged by the investigator or treating physician);
  • Medical conditions in which receipt of additional fluid related to the transfusion (250-500 ml or in the case of children 10 ml/kg) may be detrimental to the patient (e.g. decompensated congestive heart failure or renal failure).
  • Patients in shock unresponsive to fluid challenge
  • Patients in shock with signs of multi-organ failure, defined as oliguria/anuria AND impaired consciousness AND/OR jaundice
  • Condition of patient where the procedure of plasma administration carries a risk for the staff
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
606 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Convalescent Plasma

    Convalescent Plasma: 400-500 mL from two donors (2 x 200-250 ml) and 10mL/kg for small adults and children \<45kg

    Other: Convalescent Plasma

  • No intervention
    standard care

    The control arm will consist of historical controls having being treated with standard of care

Interventions

  • OtherConvalescent Plasma

    Patients will be treated with plasma from recovered EVD patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival at Day 14 After Start of Intervention

    Effect of convalescent plasma in improving patients survival at day 14; it will be considered clinically significant if there is an absolute decrease in the case fatality rate of 20% or more, compared to SC alone

    Time frame: 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With 30 Days Survival

    Effect of convalescent plasma in improving patients survival at day 30

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Titer of Ebola Viral RNA

    To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (EBOV IgG) in donated plasma and the changes in levels of viral RNA in patients who received Convalescent Plasma. The outcome shows the overall association between antibody dose category and change in Cycle threshold (Ct) value pre and post transfusion (Ct is the number of cycles that have to be run before reaching a threshold value of a positive result).

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Titer of Ebola Viral RNA

    To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (neutralizing antibodies) in donated plasma and the changes in levels of viral RNA in patients who received Convalescent Plasma. The outcome shows the overall association between antibody dose category and change in Cycle threshold (Ct) value pre and post transfusion (Ct is the number of cycles that have to be run before reaching a threshold value of a positive result).

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Number of Participants Who Died Corresponding to EV Antibody Levels (Anti-EBOV IgG)

    To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (anti-EBOV IgG) and death in patients who received Convalescent Plasma

    Time frame: 14 days

  5. Number of Participants Who Died Corresponding to EV Antibody Levels (Neutralizing Antibodies)

    To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (neutralizing antibodies) and death in patients who received CP

    Time frame: 14 days

  6. Number of Transfusion-related Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs)

    To assess the occurrence of serious adverse reactions (SARs) related to CP transfusion in Ebola patients

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Number of Professional Safety Incidents

    To assess the occurrence of safety risks related to CP transfusion in health workers administering the treatments. This will be observed throughout the study

    Time frame: 9 months

  8. Mortality Risk Factor: Ct

    To determine Ct as risk factor for mortality despite administration of CP.

    Time frame: 30 days

  9. Mortality Risk Factor: Age

    To determine age as risk factor for mortality despite administration of CP.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Results

Posted Jul 1, 2019
Limitations and caveats
There are clear limitations with respect to the use of a historical control group, and we cannot exclude the possibility that unmeasured confounding factors may have biased the mortality comparison.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneConvalescent PlasmaStandard Care
Started99507
Completed84418
Not completed1589
Withdrew: Death487
Withdrew: Received favipiravir100
Withdrew: Missing cycle treshold value10
Withdrew: Unknown outcome01
Withdrew: Missing age data01

Outcome measures

PrimarySurvival at Day 14 After Start of Intervention

Effect of convalescent plasma in improving patients survival at day 14; it will be considered clinically significant if there is an absolute decrease in the case fatality rate of 20% or more, compared to SC alone

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Survival at Day 14 After Start of Intervention
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard Care
Survival at Day 14 After Start of Intervention58260
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 30 Days Survival

Effect of convalescent plasma in improving patients survival at day 30

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With 30 Days Survival
ParticipantsConvalescent Plasma
Number of Participants With 30 Days Survival57
SecondaryTiter of Ebola Viral RNA

To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (EBOV IgG) in donated plasma and the changes in levels of viral RNA in patients who received Convalescent Plasma. The outcome shows the overall association between antibody dose category and change in Cycle threshold (Ct) value pre and post transfusion (Ct is the number of cycles that have to be run before reaching a threshold value of a positive result).

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Cycles
Titer of Ebola Viral RNA
CyclesConvalescent Plasma
Lowest dose (antibody range 176.4 - 511.9)1 (1 to 1)
Middle dose (antibody range 513.3 - 740.6)3.24 (0.87 to 5.61)
Highest dose (antibody range 747.9 - 1628.7)2.34 (-0.09 to 4.78)
SecondaryTiter of Ebola Viral RNA

To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (neutralizing antibodies) in donated plasma and the changes in levels of viral RNA in patients who received Convalescent Plasma. The outcome shows the overall association between antibody dose category and change in Cycle threshold (Ct) value pre and post transfusion (Ct is the number of cycles that have to be run before reaching a threshold value of a positive result).

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Cycles
Titer of Ebola Viral RNA
CyclesConvalescent Plasma
Lowest dose ((antibody range 176.4 - 511.9)1 (1 to 1)
Middle dose (antibody range 513.3 - 740.6)0.30 (-2.30 to 2.90)
Highest dose (antibody range 747.9 - 1628.7)-0.46 (-2.99 to 2.08)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died Corresponding to EV Antibody Levels (Anti-EBOV IgG)

To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (anti-EBOV IgG) and death in patients who received Convalescent Plasma

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Corresponding to EV Antibody Levels (Anti-EBOV IgG)
ParticipantsConvalescent Plasma
Low (antibody range 176.4 - 511.9)5
Medium (antibody range 513.3 - 740.6)11
High (antibody range 747.9 - 1628.7)8
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died Corresponding to EV Antibody Levels (Neutralizing Antibodies)

To assess the relationship between EVD antibody levels (neutralizing antibodies) and death in patients who received CP

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Corresponding to EV Antibody Levels (Neutralizing Antibodies)
ParticipantsConvalescent Plasma
Low(antibody range 176.4 - 511.9)6
Medium (antibody range 513.3 - 740.6)8
High (antibody range 747.9 - 1628.7)10
SecondaryNumber of Transfusion-related Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs)

To assess the occurrence of serious adverse reactions (SARs) related to CP transfusion in Ebola patients

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Number · SARs
Number of Transfusion-related Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs)
SARsConvalescent Plasma
Number of Transfusion-related Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs)0
SecondaryNumber of Professional Safety Incidents

To assess the occurrence of safety risks related to CP transfusion in health workers administering the treatments. This will be observed throughout the study

Time frame:
9 months
Reported as:
Number · Professional safety incidents
Number of Professional Safety Incidents
Professional safety incidentsConvalescent Plasma
Number of Professional Safety Incidents0
SecondaryMortality Risk Factor: Ct

To determine Ct as risk factor for mortality despite administration of CP.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality Risk Factor: Ct
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard Care
10-24.9 cycles1190
25-29.9 cycles1156
30-39.9 cycles412
SecondaryMortality Risk Factor: Age

To determine age as risk factor for mortality despite administration of CP.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality Risk Factor: Age
ParticipantsConvalescent PlasmaStandard Care
<5 years old115
5-15 years old110
16-44 years old1690
>45 years old843

Adverse events

Collected over All adverse events related to the intervention up to 4 hours after completion of the transfusion. All deaths possibly related to the intervention up to 14 days after completion of the transfusion.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Convalescent Plasma26/84 (31%)0/84 (0%)8/84 (9.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventConvalescent Plasma
Increase in temperatureGeneral disorders5/84
Itching or skin rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/84
NauseaGeneral disorders1/84

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
Median29 (0 to 75)28 (0 to 87)28 (0 to 87)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
Age — <5 years52328
Age — 5-15 years85361
Age — 16-44 years56258314
Age — >45 years158499
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
Female48210258
Male36208244
Cycle-threshold on PCR
Cycle-threshold on PCR(Number of cycles)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
Median27.3 (19.2 to 35.8)26.0 (15.2 to 39.4)26.3 (15.2 to 39.4)
Number of participants per PCR Cycle-threshold interval
Number of participants per PCR Cycle-threshold interval(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
<25 cycles21159180
25.0-29.9 cycles41183224
>29.9 cycles227698
Nausea and vomiting
Nausea and vomiting(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
Count of participants42203245
Diarrhea
Diarrhea(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
Count of participants29155184
Weakness or asthenia
Weakness or asthenia(Participants)Convalescent PlasmaStandard CareTotal
Count of participants77353430

12 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Ebola Treatment Center
    Donka, Guinea
09

References and documents

Publications

  • van Griensven J, Edwards T, de Lamballerie X, Semple MG, Gallian P, Baize S, Horby PW, Raoul H, Magassouba N, Antierens A, Lomas C, Faye O, Sall AA, Fransen K, Buyze J, Ravinetto R, Tiberghien P, Claeys Y, De Crop M, Lynen L, Bah EI, Smith PG, Delamou A, De Weggheleire A, Haba N; Ebola-Tx Consortium. Evaluation of Convalescent Plasma for Ebola Virus Disease in Guinea. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):33-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511812. PubMed 26735992 ↗
  • van Griensven J, Edwards T, Baize S; Ebola-Tx Consortium. Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma in Relation to Dose of Ebola Virus Antibodies. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2307-2309. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1609116. Epub 2016 Nov 14. No abstract available. PubMed 27959686 ↗
  • Edwards T, Semple MG, De Weggheleire A, Claeys Y, De Crop M, Menten J, Ravinetto R, Temmerman S, Lynen L, Bah EI, Smith PG, van Griensven J; Ebola_Tx Consortium. Design and analysis considerations in the Ebola_Tx trial evaluating convalescent plasma in the treatment of Ebola virus disease in Guinea during the 2014-2015 outbreak. Clin Trials. 2016 Feb;13(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/1740774515621056. Epub 2016 Jan 14. PubMed 26768570 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2015, a primary completion of Jul 2015 and a completion of Jul 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2019, 4 years after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2015
First posted
Jan 19, 2015
Start
Feb 2015
Primary completionActual
Jul 2015
CompletionActual
Jul 2015
Results first posted
Jul 1, 2019
Last update
Jul 22, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02342171
Collaborators
National Blood Transfusion Centre (NBTC), Conakry, Guinea, Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry, National Center for Training and Research of Maferinyah, Guinea, Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale. Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo, University of Oxford, University of Liverpool, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Aix Marseille Université, UBIVE, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, Etablissement Français du Sang, Belgian Red Cross, Institut Pasteur, Dakar, Sénégal, Médecins Sans Frontières, Belgium, World Health Organization, International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 19, 2015
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Results posted
Jul 1, 2019
Last update
Jul 22, 2019

Study contacts

Johan van Griensven, MD
study chair · ITM
Niankoye Haba, MD
principal investigator · National Blood Transfusion Centre (NBTC), Conakry, Guinea

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion