A Phase 3 interventional study of Experimental and Sham comparator in Heart Failure, sponsored by Celyad Oncology SA. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-11.
Sponsored by Celyad Oncology SA · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the C3BS-CQR-1 in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Patients with chronic heart failure secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy being on standard of care will be screened per the protocol inclusion and exclusion criteria. Enrolled patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to either standard of care and C3BS-CQR-1 injection (treatment group) or standard of care undergoing a sham procedure (control group). Patients randomized to the treatment group, for which C3BS-CQR-1 production met release criteria, will undergo endoventricular injection of the C3BS-CQR-1 using injection catheter.
5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →Celyad Oncology SA is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Inability to perform a Six-Minute Walk Test due to physical limitations other than HF including:
One arm with standard of care and C3BS-CQR-1 injection (treatment group) using intramyocardial catheter injection.
Biological: Experimental
One arm with standard of care undergoing a sham procedure (control group)using intramyocardial catheter injection. .
Biological: Sham comparator
One active arm with standard of car and treatment with C3BR-CQR-1 using intramyocardial injection
Also known as: C3BR-CQR-1
One arm with standard of care undergoing a sham procedure
Efficacy of C3BS-CQR-1 injection based on a hierarchical composite score
1. Died of CV cause 2. Hospitalized 2 or more times for HF 3. Hospitalized once for HF 4. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) total score worsened by 10 or more points 5. MLHFQ total score neither worsened by 10 or more points nor improved by 10 or more points, or died of non-CV cause 6. MLHFQ total score improved by 10 or more points
Time frame: 52 weeks
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Celyad Oncology SA