A Phase 4 interventional study of TAP block with Bupivacaine at 0.25% and Placebo saline solution in Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Patricia Salazar Villegas. Status unknown at 2 sites in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-11-24.
Sponsored by Patricia Salazar Villegas · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Acute postoperative pain is one of the most important centers of therapeutic attention in postoperative phase of any procedure. It is a complex entity that requires a multiple intervention to be treated and, depending on the intervened surgical site, it has different approaches.
Despite attempts to reduce postoperative pain by implementing management protocols, rates of pain prevalence from moderate acute to severe pain are still reported as high as 50% in the first 24 postoperative hours. Among the surgeries that report greater intensity of postoperative pain is open inguinal Herniorrhaphy. That is why several techniques have been described for the management of acute pain in this surgery postoperative, among which PAT blocking has shown to be beneficial in some studies. However, some reports question its usefulness but with the emergence of ultrasound-guided techniques for its realization, interest in this blockage has grown back.
This study aims to demonstrate the utility of the PAT blocking in the management of acute pain of pre-peritoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with mesh.
The cases will be recorded by an external agent who will verify compliance with the protocol by the treating physicians (surgeons and anesthesiologists); additionally this agent will interview patients for the processing of the instrument and will also collect the proper information of the procedure. At random and in an unannounced way, visits will be made to the centers of attention to verify that the procedure was done according to what had been agreed.
Additionally when the full record of the patients is registered in a database, they will be called one by one to confirm the information collected. Further records are sought in the systematized medical history in order to verify additional information.
a. Quality assurance plan: i. Each record will be completed by an external agent to the surgical procedure who will be trained for this work according to the methodological design of the study.
ii. Regular visits are made to the information collection site to confirm compliance with attention and randomization protocols.
iii. Information collected on the instrument will be confirmed with each patient's the clinical history.
b. Data verification for range and consistency: i. Each of the instruments for each unit of analysis will be typed in a database by the same person (who will be trained in the methodological design of the study) who will monitor that each variable has been collected according to the categories previously established for that variable.
ii. One second revision of the database will be carried out by one of the researchers who will review column by column categories, so that they are consistent with the predefined rules for that range: Additionally, compatibility between these categories and other categories of variables that must be compatible will be verified. For example, the hour of completion of surgery is later than the start time, etc.
c. Verification of data for Accuracy, Completeness and Representativeness i. Each instrument collected will be verified, with surgical description carried out by the surgeon, anesthesia report made by the anesthesiologist and medical developments made by the hospital physician in charge of patient care in the postoperative period. In case of finding any inconsistency, the confirmation of the information will proceed through an additional call to the patient and the treating specialists if necessary.
ii. Record of the patient's inclusion in the protocol of the clinical trial, guiding the treating physicians in the active pursuit of the variables under study, will be included in all electronic medical records.
d. Data Dictionary:
Intervention: Application of local PAT anesthetic. Source: Currency format (Randomization). Code: Does not apply. Ranges: Yes (Intervention), No (Placebo). Type: Intervention.
e. Standard Operation Procedures: i. Registration operation:
Patient Recruitment:
Data collection:
Data management:
ii. Analysis Activities:
<!-- -->
Data analysis:
Information of the instruments will be typed for the development of a database which will be complemented by the intervention variable the day determined to collect the sample. After that it will be delivered to the researchers who will undertake the analysis and interpretation so that later they can make the socialization of results.
Adverse effects report:
Whenever an adverse outcome is evidenced, it will be reported to the researchers and treating physicians (surgeon and anesthesiologist). Additionally the patient will be informed. Likewise it will be notified on clinical trial data base.
Change management:
f. Evaluation of the sample size:
i. Number of participants: The sample size was calculated using the formula for mean difference in analytical studies with a confidence index of 95%, a margin of error of 5%, a statistical power of 80%, a variance of 10% and a minimum differential detection value of 2.8%, compared to which a sample of 40 patients was obtained. With a loss rate of 10% the sample size was expanded to 44 patients.
ii. Years participated: Since it is an acute pain study 24 hours were determined to monitor.
g. Missing data plan:
i. Missing data will be completed with clinical history, interview o professionals involved with patient care, calls and / or visits to patients. If data loss remains an analysis by intention to treat will proceed.
h. Statistic analysis plan: i. Frequency distribution and qualitative variables association tables will be made, statistical significance for p values less than 0.05 will be determined, association between intervention variable and primary outcome and secondary outcome variables will be sought using for t his purpose the statistics analysis plan.
5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.
Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →This is the only study on the registry with Patricia Salazar Villegas as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention: Injection of local anesthetics in the transverses abdominal plane
Drug: TAP block with Bupivacaine at 0.25%
Placebo: Injection of saline solution in the transverses abdominal plane
Drug: Placebo saline solution
Application of 20 mL of local anesthetic bupivacaine at 0.25% in the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) under ultrasound guidance. This area (TAP) is between the anterior fascia of the transverse abdominal muscle and the posterior fascia of the internal oblique muscle, through which the thoracic nerve fibers and a portion of the first lumbar pass. This intervention will be done 10 minutes before conducting the ipsilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy in a single application.
Also known as: TAP block, Infiltration of local anesthetic, Local anesthesia in inguinal herniorrhaphy
Application of 20 mL of saline solution in the transverse abdominis plane (TAP).
Also known as: Saline solution
Postoperative acute pain measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) from 1-10 with 1 being the lowest and 10 the highest intensity after one hour of anesthesia suspension.
Time frame: 1 hour after the suspension of anesthesia
Opioid Consumption 1
Number of rescue doses of 2 mg of Morphine each one, used for pain management in the first hour after stopping the administration of anesthetic agents
Time frame: 1 hour after the suspension of anesthesia
Adverse reactions 1
Adverse reactions present in the first hour after the suspension of anesthesia
Time frame: 1 hour after the suspension of anesthesia
Postoperative acute pain 2
Time frame: 24 hours after the suspension of anesthesia
Adverse reactions 2
Time frame: 24 hours after the suspension of anesthesia
Opioid Consumption 2
Time frame: 24 hours after the suspension of anesthesia
This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.