ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02290821Updated Apr 19, 2017Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1% Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Acute Blunt Trauma Injuries

A Phase 3 interventional study of placebo and Placebos in Acute Blunt Soft Tissue Injuries/Contusions, sponsored by Novartis. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-19.

Sponsored by Novartis · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
215
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will assess the analgesic efficacy of DSG 1% compared to placebo in the reduction of the pain associated with acute blunt trauma injuries.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Blunt Soft Tissue Injuries/Contusions

Browse trials for

03

In context

Contusions

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Contusions; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 215 is above the median of 90 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Contusions.

Browse Contusions studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis is the lead sponsor of 714 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects aged 16 years and over Fresh impact injury of the upper or lower limbs, not requiring admittance to hospital \& meeting baseline pain intensity level Anticipated time between injury and treatment must be ≤ 6 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pain medication prior to randomization Topical analgesic or anti-inflammatory treatment over the previous month in the area to be treated Any physical impairment that would influence efficacy assessments, such as peripheral or central neurological disease, significant back pain, painful conditions of the upper or lower extremities Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
215 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    diclofenac sodium gel 1%

    diclofenac sodium gel 1%

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo

    Drug: Placebos

Interventions

  • Drugplacebo
  • DrugPlacebos
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences Over 24 Hours After Initiating Treatment (SPID 24)

    The primary efficacy outcome was the time-weighted SPID 24 (POW). Sum of pain intensity differences over 24 hours after initiating treatment (SPID 24) for the ITT population. SPID 24 derived from spontaneous Pain Intensity scores assessed over 24 hours on a 0 (No pain) - 10 (Pain as bad as you can imagine) Numerical Rating Scale. SPID 24 was computed using the trapezoidal rule, i.e. Σ \[T(i) - T(i-1)\] x \[((PID)(i-1) + PID(i))/2\] in an obvious notation, where T(i) is nominal time and PID(i), the pain intensity difference at Time i, is the baseline pain intensity (PI) score - PI score at Time i. Scores were assessed hourly for the first 4 hours and then every 2 hours whilst subjects were awake. Linear interpolation was used to compute an exact SPID as of 24 hours. SPID-24 was computed after all imputation of missing assessments and post-rescue assessments had been completed.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Results

Posted Apr 19, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDiclofenac Sodium Gel 1%Placebo
Started109106
Completed103103
Not completed63
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Unable or unwilling to cooperate with20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up32

Outcome measures

PrimarySum of Pain Intensity Differences Over 24 Hours After Initiating Treatment (SPID 24)

The primary efficacy outcome was the time-weighted SPID 24 (POW). Sum of pain intensity differences over 24 hours after initiating treatment (SPID 24) for the ITT population. SPID 24 derived from spontaneous Pain Intensity scores assessed over 24 hours on a 0 (No pain) - 10 (Pain as bad as you can imagine) Numerical Rating Scale. SPID 24 was computed using the trapezoidal rule, i.e. Σ \[T(i) - T(i-1)\] x \[((PID)(i-1) + PID(i))/2\] in an obvious notation, where T(i) is nominal time and PID(i), the pain intensity difference at Time i, is the baseline pain intensity (PI) score - PI score at Time i. Scores were assessed hourly for the first 4 hours and then every 2 hours whilst subjects were awake. Linear interpolation was used to compute an exact SPID as of 24 hours. SPID-24 was computed after all imputation of missing assessments and post-rescue assessments had been completed.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences Over 24 Hours After Initiating Treatment (SPID 24)
units on a scaleDiclofenac Sodium Gel 1%Placebo
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences Over 24 Hours After Initiating Treatment (SPID 24)42.9 ± 40.645.5 ± 42.6

Adverse events

Collected over 7 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Diclofenac Sodium Gel 1%—0/109 (0%)4/109 (3.7%)
Placebo—0/106 (0%)2/106 (1.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDiclofenac Sodium Gel 1%Placebo
headacheNervous system disorders4/1092/106

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Diclofenac Sodium Gel 1%PlaceboTotal
Mean27.3 ± 10.726.3 ± 8.526.8 ± 9.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Diclofenac Sodium Gel 1%PlaceboTotal
Female172441
Male9282174
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Diclofenac Sodium Gel 1%PlaceboTotal
United States109106215
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • US Site
    Bradenton, Florida, United States
  • US Site
    Port Orange, Florida, United States
  • US Site
    Boise, Idaho, United States
  • US Site
    Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
  • US Site
    Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • US Site
    Brooklyn, New York, United States
  • US Site
    Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • US Site
    State College, Pennsylvania, United States
  • US Site
    Bellaine, Texas, United States
  • US Site
    Houston, Texas, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2014, a primary completion of Sep 2015 and a completion of Sep 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2017, 1 year 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 11, 2014
First posted
Nov 14, 2014
Start
Dec 2014
Primary completionActual
Sep 2015
CompletionActual
Sep 2015
Results first posted
Apr 19, 2017
Last update
Apr 19, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02290821
Lead sponsor
Novartis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 14, 2014
Start date
Dec 2014
Primary completion
Sep 2015
Completion
Sep 2015
Results posted
Apr 19, 2017
Last update
Apr 19, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion