CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02289079Updated May 10, 2023Results posted

TAP Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine in Robotic Hysterectomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine in Acute Pain, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-10.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to compare pain control after robotic hysterectomy surgery using either liposomal bupivacaine or Bupivacaine when injected during a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Robotic hysterectomy is when a patient is electively having robotic assisted removal of one's uterus. Both medications liposomal bupivacaine and Bupivacaine are standard of care in these types of surgeries.

Read the detailed description

Treatment technique:

The patient will be in the supine position. The transversus abdominis muscle layer will be identified with the ultrasound. Using sterile technique, skin infiltration with 2% lidocaine will occur, 2 cm medial to the ultrasound probe. An 22g Nerve block needle will then be inserted and advanced under ultrasound guidance until it is below the fascial covering of the transversus abdominis muscle layer. Gentle aspiration for air, or blood will be performed and either 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 parts epinephrine or 30 mL of liposomal bupivacaine mixed 1:1 with normal saline will be injected under ultrasound guidance. For each 5cc of local anesthetic injected, aspiration will be performed. Upon completion of the injection, the needle will then be removed. This will then be completed on the contralateral side. The patient will be monitored in the preoperative area until he/she is brought into the operating room for their procedure.

When the operation is complete the patient will either be discharged home or brought to the ward where each day a member of the research team will evaluate the patient for signs of complications and ask the patient their minimum and maximum pain score.

If patients have met criterion for discharge to home including pain \<4/10, independence of intravenous analgesia, and are stable for discharge medically, but are awaiting placement, the time of discharge for the purposes of the study will be the day they have met such criterion as opposed to the day of actual discharge, as this can vary depending on patient placement.

If the patient is discharged prior to 72 hours post injection, then the patient will receive one phone call at 24 hours post injection, 48 hours post injection , and 72 hours post injection +/- 5 hours. During this phone call the patient will be asked about pain score, narcotic use, overall satisfaction via a recorded patient questionnaire, quality of recovery via a quality of recovery survey, and assessed if any adverse events have occurred.

Adequate analgesia will be defined as \<3 VAS at rest, and if VAS is greater than 3 adjustments in oral or intravenous pain medications will be given as determined by the nurse.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Acute Pain

876 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 90 across 732 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,184 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 132 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • those who present for elective robotic assisted hysterectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non english speaking
  • chronic pain
  • on opioids greater than 1 weeks
  • chronic anticoagulation
  • allergy to local anesthetics
  • use of spinal or epidural for surgery
  • lack of patient cooperation
  • contraindication to regional anesthesia
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    liposomal bupivacaine TAP

    these patients receive a subcostal TAP with liposomal bupivacaine

    Drug: liposomal bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    bupivacaine TAP

    These patients receive a subcostal TAP with bupivacaine

    Drug: Bupivacaine

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine
  • Drugliposomal bupivacaine
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post Operative Opioid Use

    To determine if liposomal bupivacaine provides decreased narcotic use when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block

    Time frame: 0-72 hours after injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale

    This was a measure of patient's reported pain on a 0-10 verbal numerical rating scale. 10 being worst pain. The maximal value for the time period 48-72 hours was chosen as the maximal pain during that time period.

    Time frame: 48-72 hours

  2. Post Operative Length of Stay

    To determine if liposomal bupivacaine provides decreased length of stay when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block

    Time frame: up to 30 days after surgery

  3. Patient Satisfaction as Assessed Via Patient Survey

    To determine if liposomal bupivacaine improves quality of recovery post-operatively when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block via a patient survey either in person or via telephone.

    Time frame: assessed at 72 hours after injection

07

Results

Posted Jan 18, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLiposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAP
Started3030
Completed2829
Not completed21
Withdrew: Physician decision20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPost Operative Opioid Use

To determine if liposomal bupivacaine provides decreased narcotic use when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block

Time frame:
0-72 hours after injection
Reported as:
Median · micrograms of fentanyl equivalents
Post Operative Opioid Use
micrograms of fentanyl equivalentsLiposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAP
Post Operative Opioid Use24.9 (0 to 86.7)51.7 (0 to 249.7)
SecondaryNumerical Rating Scale

This was a measure of patient's reported pain on a 0-10 verbal numerical rating scale. 10 being worst pain. The maximal value for the time period 48-72 hours was chosen as the maximal pain during that time period.

Time frame:
48-72 hours
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Numerical Rating Scale
scores on a scaleLiposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAP
Numerical Rating Scale3 (0 to 8)5 (0 to 10)
SecondaryPost Operative Length of Stay

To determine if liposomal bupivacaine provides decreased length of stay when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block

Time frame:
up to 30 days after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · Hours
Post Operative Length of Stay
HoursLiposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAP
Post Operative Length of Stay11 ± 9.117 ± 13.9
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction as Assessed Via Patient Survey

To determine if liposomal bupivacaine improves quality of recovery post-operatively when compared to bupivacaine when injected in a TAP block via a patient survey either in person or via telephone.

Time frame:
assessed at 72 hours after injection
Reported as:
Number · participants satisfied with pain control
Patient Satisfaction as Assessed Via Patient Survey
participants satisfied with pain controlLiposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAP
Patient Satisfaction as Assessed Via Patient Survey2624

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Liposomal Bupivacaine TAP—0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)
Bupivacaine TAP—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Liposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAPTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years202545
>=65 years8513
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Liposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAPTotal
Female283058
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Liposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAPTotal
United States283058
weight
weight(kilograms)Liposomal Bupivacaine TAPBupivacaine TAPTotal
Mean89.3 ± 25.198.5 ± 34.293.5 ± 30.2
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hutchins J, Delaney D, Vogel RI, Ghebre RG, Downs LS Jr, Carson L, Mullany S, Teoh D, Geller MA. Ultrasound guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for patients undergoing robotic assisted hysterectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):609-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 6. PubMed 26056753 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02289079
Lead sponsor
University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2014
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2014
Completion
Oct 2014
Results posted
Jan 18, 2016
Last update
May 10, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion