ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02288039Updated Mar 9, 2017

Quality of Life in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Social Identity Based Intervention

An interventional study of Social Identity goal-based Intervention in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-09.

Sponsored by Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main aim of pulmonary rehabilitation is to improve the quality of life of patients that have been diagnosed with chronic lung disease. The challenge for pulmonary rehabilitation is that many patients do not complete their agreed or prescribed training targets which may be related to the way pulmonary rehabilitation is delivered. There is a belief among doctors and other healthcare professionals delivering pulmonary rehabilitation care that patients who are working together as part of a group may better accomplish their agreed training targets (intervention). The intervention aims to encourage members of the group to interact and support each other during the rehabilitation sessions in order to attain agreed pulmonary rehabilitation goals

Read the detailed description

Previous research indicates that self-management interventions vary, comprising of patient education, action planning, goal setting, cognitive behavioural therapy and motivational interviewing. The delivery of these interventions was largely conducted through individual sessions either face-to-face or telephone conversations, or through the individual distribution of booklet information. As such, research has heavily focused on individual-focused self-management interventions in order to facilitate QoL in COPD patients. It is not surprising that interventions have largely taken an individualistic approach given that sufferers of COPD are diagnosed and treated as individuals (e.g., in hospital, or when visiting the doctor). However, at times COPD management is delivered in groups (e.g., exercise/ education rehabilitation sessions). Indeed, the group-management of COPD treatment for improving the QoL of COPD patients has largely remained unexplored. Therefore, a significant limitation of self-management approaches used to-date concerns the lack of consideration given to group-management interventions. The proposed study therefore aims to address this limitation by investigating the a group-based psychological intervention.

Participants will be assigned to one of two groups: 1) the control group containing standard care; and 2) the intervention group containing standard care plus the intervention. Participants will attend weekly rehabilitation classes for 8 weeks, regardless of the rehabilitation group assigned. In addition, participants will complete a quality of life questionnaire that will ask questions about subjective feelings. The questionnaire will take about 20 minutes to complete. The questionnaire will be completed at the start of the 8-week rehabilitation programme, at the mid-point, and at the end of the rehabilitation programme.

In the intervention arm of the study participants will take part in three focus group discussions. The focus group discussions will be with members of the research team and the rest of your rehabilitation group. The first two sessions help participants plan strategies in order to get the most benefit from the rehabilitation programme. The third session will entail some reflection regarding how well participants thought the programme had addressed their rehabilitation needs. Finally, all participants will complete the quality of life questionnaire again at 3 months after completing the 8-week rehabilitation programme by return stamp-addressed envelope.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

  • Pulmonary
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,253 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 707 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 84 is above the median of 70 across 3,008 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inclusion criteria are that patients score between 1 and 4 on the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale and have not previously been enrolled on a pulmonary rehabilitation programme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients excluded from the study based on these criteria will be assigned to a rehabilitation group not involved in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Social Identity Goal-Based Intervention

    Participants will receive collaborative goal-setting

    Other: Social Identity goal-based Intervention

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    Participants will receive usual standard treatment

Interventions

  • OtherSocial Identity goal-based Intervention

    Phase 1: collaborative group discussion in order to establish what group members want to achieve by the end of their 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Phase 2: further collaborative group discussion with the emphasis on evaluating, monitoring, and providing feedback on goal attainment. Phase 3: focus group interviews with an emphasis on reviewing the goal setting process that patients have engaged with.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) scores from baseline

    QoL measured using Euroquol EQ-5D-3L and 5L questionnaires

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in magnitude of social identification score measured using a standardised scale from baseline

    The intervention fidelity will be assessed through determining whether social identification has been achieved. This will be measured with four items (from Doosje, Ellemers, \& Spears, 1995; e.g. 'Do you see yourself as part of the \[COPD exercise group\]', 'Are you pleased to be part of the \[COPD group\]', 'Do you feel strong ties with others in the \[COPD exercise group\]?', 'Do you identify with others in the \[COPD exercise group\]. These scales are widely used and amended in this form and are generally found to provide a good index of the theoretical construct of social identification (e.g. see Haslam et al., 2004).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

  2. Change in disease-specific quality of life (QoL) scores from baseline

    This will be determined using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaires. Additionally, the Survey Short Form (SF-36) will also be administered

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change in anxiety and depression scores from baseline

    These will be determined using the Hospital and Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

  2. Change in exercise adherence rates from baseline

    This is defined as the number of prescribed exercise sessions performed

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

  3. Change in functional capacity score from baseline

    This is defined as total distance covered in a 6 minutes walk test.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

  4. Healthcare resources use

    We will assess the use of healthcare resources. We will specifically examine the issue of staff time in association with the delivery of the social identity intervention.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Cost-effectiveness

    and conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis. We will assess the incremental costs per QALY both from the NHS and societal perspectives.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital
    Liverpool, L14 3PE, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Iyer A, Jetten J, Tsivrikos D, Postmes T, Haslam SA. The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;48(Pt 4):707-33. doi: 10.1348/014466608X397628. Epub 2009 Feb 5. PubMed 19200408 ↗
  • Haslam SA, O'Brien A, Jetten J, Vormedal K, Penna S. Taking the strain: social identity, social support, and the experience of stress. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;44(Pt 3):355-70. doi: 10.1348/014466605X37468. PubMed 16238844 ↗
  • Veenstra K, Haslam SA, Reynolds KJ. The psychology of casualization: evidence for the mediating roles of security, status and social identification. Br J Soc Psychol. 2004 Dec;43(Pt 4):499-514. doi: 10.1348/0144666042565380. PubMed 15601506 ↗
  • Levy AR, Matata B, Pilsworth S, Mcgonigle A, Wigelsworth L, Jones L, Pott N, Bettany M, Midgley AW. An intervention for pulmonary rehabilitators to develop a social identity for patients attending exercise rehabilitation: a feasibility and pilot randomised control trial protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jan 27;4:40. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0238-z. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29423258 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2015 to primary completion in Sep 2016, 18 months.

Of 796 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 45. This study's 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 848 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2014
First posted
Nov 11, 2014
StartActual
Mar 2015
Primary completionActual
Sep 2016
CompletionActual
Sep 2016
Last update
Mar 9, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02288039
Lead sponsor
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
Edge Hill University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 11, 2014
Start date
Mar 2015
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Last update
Mar 9, 2017

Study contacts

Bashir Matata, PhD
study director · Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion