An interventional study of Reflectance confocal microscopy and Punch biopsy in Carcinoma, Basal Cell, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Completed at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-13.
Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the one-stop-shop concept, using real-time in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy as diagnostic tool, prior to surgical management of new primary basal cell carcinoma
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer diagnosed in white populations worldwide. The rising incidence of BCCs is becoming a major worldwide public health problem (1,11). Between 1973 and 2009, the European standardized rate quadrupled from 40 to 165 per 100,000 person-years for men and from 34 to 157 for women, most probably as a result of more intensive UV exposure (12). This is supported by previous published epidemiological literature indicating that ultraviolet radiation is an important risk factor for BCC with a significant increase among outdoor workers (13,14). Despite the low mortality from BCC, multiple and recurring tumors confer a high morbidity and considerable burden for health care providers and health budgets. Although BCC does not seem to have a high effect on patients' quality of life, patients suffering from BCC are definitely interested in efficacy, low recurrence rates and cosmetic outcome of their therapies.(15). Meanwhile resources available at hospitals have not increased proportionally and therefore optimizing effectiveness of present treatment modalities in daily dermatologic practice is mandatory (16).
Clinically, BCC are characterized by small, translucent, or pearly papules, with raised teleangiectatic edges (17) . Most of the BCC occur in sun-exposed skin of the head and neck area (18,19). Sensitivity and positive predictive value for the clinical diagnosing of BCC by dermatologists has been reported to be 95.4% and 85.9%, respectively (20). However, dividing between BCC subtypes is not always possible upon clinical assessment. To date, histological analysis of punch biopsy remains the golden standard to confirm the clinical diagnosis of BCCs and dividing between the following subtypes: nodular (nBCC), micronodular (mnBCC), infiltrating (iBCC) and superficial (sBCC) (10). Of those, nBCC and sBCC have a less aggressive growth pattern in comparison to mnBCC and iBCC. Additionally, mixed type BCC (mtBCC) can be defined as a combination of subtypes and are frequently composed of aggressive subtypes (21). Surgical excision remains the standard of treatment, with Mohs micrographic surgery typically utilized for high-risk lesions (22). Based upon the histological growth pattern, BCC are surgically removed with a margin of either 3mm (nBCC and sBCC) or 5mm (mnBCC, iBCC) in accordance with current Dutch guidelines (10).
Due to the rising incidence of BCC there is a need for more efficient, non-invasive methods to diagnose BCCs. The use of real-time in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) to diagnose BCCs has proven successful to address this need. Various studies have demonstrated that RCM is safe and accurate (sensitivity and specificity) to diagnose BCCs(2-6). Reported sensitivity and specificity for RCM in diagnosing BCC range from 83%-100% and 79%-97%, respectively (7). Furthermore, Peppelman et al. and Longo et al. recently reported on RCM features that might divide between nodular, micronodular, superficial and infiltrative subtypes of BCC (8,9).
In 2012, van der Geer et al reported on the feasibility of a one-stop-shop (OSS) concept for the treatment of skin cancer patients (23). One-stop-shop implies that at the day of the initial outpatient clinic consultation, diagnosis and treatment plan both take place. In their study, pre-operative frozen section histology was used to confirm BCC diagnosis and subtype. The mean throughput time was 4 hours and 7 min, no complications were observed, and patient satisfaction was high (23). Incorporating RCM as non-invasive diagnostic tool in a BCC OSS concept for lesions suitable for conventional surgical excision might further reduce time between clinical diagnosis and treatment, administrative workload and costs.
The aim of our study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the one-stop-shop concept, using real-time in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (Vivascope 1500; Lucid Technologies, Henrietta, NY, USA) as diagnostic tool, prior to surgical management of new primary BCCs, of all subtypes, in the general population.
6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.
Browse Carcinoma studies →Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The Vivascope 1500 will be used (CE certified, Lucid Technologies, Henrietta, NY, USA). Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) imaging will be performed for intended use only and interpreted on the Vivascope workstation by two investigators independently at both study locations. The investigators will be blinded to the results of the reference standard. After RCM imaging subjects will receive OSS surgical excision according to subtype. Clinically suspected primary BCCs that are not confirmed by RCM will also receive surgical treatment with a margin of 3mm.
Device: Reflectance confocal microscopy · Procedure: Surgical excision
Clinical suspected primary BCCs, of all subtypes, will be diagnosed by conventional 3mm punch biopsy of the most elevated part of the lesion. Punch biopsies will be performed under local anesthetics using 1% xylocaine/adrenaline. HE stained sections of the punch biopsies will be evaluated by an experienced board certified pathologist. Subjects will receive surgical excision according to subtype within 6 weeks after punch biopsy has been performed. Clinically suspected new primary BCCs that are not confirmed by punch biopsy will also receive surgical treatment with a margin of 3mm.
Procedure: Punch biopsy · Procedure: Surgical excision
Also known as: Confocal microscopy, Vivascope 1500
Also known as: Biopsy
Excision of the suspected basal cell carcinoma lesion under local anesthetics
Also known as: Surgical removal, Surgery
Comparison between one stop shop using reflectance confocal microscopy in the surgical treatment of BCC and current standard of care using punch biopsy, by assessing incomplete surgical excision on the final pathology report.
Assessment will be performed by an experienced board certified pathologist. The number of incomplete excisions will be compared between study- and control group.
Time frame: Within the first week after surgical excision of suspected BCC lesion
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) between RCM and punch biopsy in both diagnosing and subtyping BCCs
Sensitivity and specificity of RCM for diagnosing and subtyping BCC, will be separately analyzed by comparing RCM diagnosis and subtype with final pathology reports of the study group. This will be performed by using unidentifiable saved RCM images of all included lesions of the study group.
Time frame: Within the first week after surgical excision of suspected BCC lesion
Comparison of patient satisfaction between study group and standard of care (control) group by using a standardized web-based questionnaire for patient reported outcome in the management of skin diseases (www.huidvragen.info)
An adjusted version of this web-based questionnaire has previously been published to assess patient satisfaction among patients suffering from psoriasis (van Cranenburgh OD et al. Satisfaction with treatment among patients with psoriasis: a web-based survey study. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;169(2):398-405). The outcome of the questionnaire will be compared between study- and control group.
Time frame: As assessed at the post-operative visit 3 months after surgical excision
Comparison of throughput time, defined by the time between arrival at consultation until end of surgical treatment at our outpatient clinic, between study group and standard of care (control) group.
Time frame: As assessed at the post-operative visit 3 months after surgical excision
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)