An interventional study of Inspiratory muscle training and Sham inspiratory muscle training in Sarcoidosis, sponsored by Gazi University. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-21.
Sponsored by Gazi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Respiratory muscle weakness results with decreased exercise capacity, worse fatigue, dyspnea and quality of life in patients with sarcoidosis. However, no study investigated the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT), therefore effects of IMT on outcomes in patients with sarcoidosis were investigated.
Patients were diagnosed with sarcoidosis according to the criteria of the latest American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous (WASOG) Disorders statement on sarcoidosis. Primary outcome measurement was respiratory muscle strength, secondary outcomes were, exercise capacity quality of life, fatigue and depression.
285 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoidosis; 58 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 54 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoidosis.
Browse Sarcoidosis studies →Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 548 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention: Treatment group received inspiratory muscle training (IMT) using POWERbreathe Classic threshold loading device .
Device: Inspiratory muscle training
Sham: Control group received sham inspiratory muscle training using POWERbreathe Classic threshold loading device .
Device: Sham inspiratory muscle training
Treatment group received inspiratory muscle training (IMT) using threshold loading device (POWERbreathe Classic, IMT Technologies Ltd. Birmingham, England) at 40% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The MIP was measured at supervised session each week, and 40% of measured MIP value was the new training workload. The treatment group trained for 30 min-per/day, 7 days/week, for 6 weeks. Six sessions at home and 1 session were performed at department.
Control group received sham inspiratory muscle training (IMT) at fixed workload, 5% of MIP using threshold loading device (POWERbreathe Classic device IMT Technologies Ltd. Birmingham, England). The control group trained for 30 min-per/day, 7 days/week, for 6 weeks. Six sessions at home and 1 session were performed at department.
Maximum inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength (MIP, MEP)
Mouth pressure device
Time frame: 6 weeks
Exercise Capacity
Six-minute walk test (6MWT)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Maximal Exercise Capacity
Modified incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Fatigue
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Pulmonary function and diffusing capacity
Spirometry
Time frame: 6 weeks
Peripheral muscle strength
Hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: 6 weeks
Dyspnea
Modified Borg and Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scales
Time frame: 6 weeks
Depression
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS))
Time frame: 6 weeks
Quality of life
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (Turkish versions of all scales)
Time frame: 6 weeks
No study locations are listed for this record.
The record gives a start of Apr 2012, a primary completion of Sep 2013 and a completion of Apr 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.