CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02267850Updated Sep 21, 2018Results posted

Effect of Intra-Oral Photobiomodulation on Orthodontic Treatment Time

An interventional study of Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment and OrthoPulse™ in Malocclusion, sponsored by Biolux Research Holdings, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-21.

Sponsored by Biolux Research Holdings, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of OrthoPulse™, an intra-oral LED (Light Emitting Diode) photobiomodulation device, on orthodontic treatment time. This is a double-blinded RCT with half the patients receiving treatment from a sham non-functional device, serving as controls, and the other half receiving light therapy treatment from a functional OrthoPulse™. Orthodontic treatment time for the sham-control patients are compared to that of the OrthoPulse™ patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Photobiomodulation
  • Orthodontic treatment
  • Malocclusion
  • OrthoPulse™
03

In context

Malocclusion

457 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 36 across 372 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Biolux Research Holdings, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of permanent dentition
  • Eligible and scheduled for full mouth fixed orthodontic treatment.
  • Class I or Class II malocclusion (no more than ½ cusp in Class II)
  • Non-extraction in all quadrants
  • Non-smoker, non-use of chewing tobacco
  • Good oral hygiene
  • No adjunct treatment such as extra or intraoral appliances
  • Age 12-40

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant females
  • Patient is currently enrolled in another clinical study
  • Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory drug (NSAID) use during study (Acetominophen acceptable)
  • Periodontally involved teeth
  • Use of bisphosphonates
  • Unerupted erupted teeth
  • Teeth blocked out of alignment and unable to engage initial arch wire
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OrthoPulse™

    Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed orthodontic appliance treatment in conjunction with receiving daily OrthoPulse™ treatments.

    Other: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment · Device: OrthoPulse™

  • Sham comparator
    Sham-Control OrthoPulse™

    Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed orthodontic appliance treatment in conjunction with carrying out daily non-functional OrthoPulse™ treatments (untreated control).

    Other: Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment · Device: Non-Functional OrthoPulse™

Interventions

  • OtherFixed Orthodontic Appliance Treatment

    Patients are treated for full mouth fixed orthodontic appliance treatment by the qualified Principal Investigator (PI). Treatment and follow-up appointments per the traditional practices of the PI and dental office.

  • DeviceOrthoPulse™

    Patients carry out daily OrthoPulse™ treatments at home.

  • DeviceNon-Functional OrthoPulse™

    Patients carry out daily sham-OrthoPulse™ treatments at home. This is a non-functional device so patients do not receive photobiomodulation therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients.

    The amount of time that spans between the start of a patient's orthodontic treatment to when the qualified investigator deems the case complete, in that malocclusion is completely resolved and an acceptable clinical outcome is achieved.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their orthodontic treatment, an expected average of 1-2 years, depending on the severity of the case.

07

Results

Posted Mar 27, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOrthoPulse™Sham-Control OrthoPulse™
Started1514
Completed1412
Not completed12

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients.

The amount of time that spans between the start of a patient's orthodontic treatment to when the qualified investigator deems the case complete, in that malocclusion is completely resolved and an acceptable clinical outcome is achieved.

Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of their orthodontic treatment, an expected average of 1-2 years, depending on the severity of the case.
Reported as:
Mean · months
Overall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients.
monthsOrthoPulse™Sham-Control OrthoPulse™
Overall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients.19.0 ± 5.521.2 ± 6.9

Adverse events

Collected over Whole study duration, 2 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OrthoPulse™—0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Sham-Control OrthoPulse™—0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)OrthoPulse™Sham-Control OrthoPulse™Total
Mean13.4 ± 1.513.3 ± 1.013.3 ± 1.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OrthoPulse™Sham-Control OrthoPulse™Total
Female8917
Male7512
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)OrthoPulse™Sham-Control OrthoPulse™Total
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)OrthoPulse™Sham-Control OrthoPulse™Total
United States151429
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Shaughnessy Orthodontics
    Suwanee, Georgia 30024, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Nimeri G, Kau CH, Corona R, Shelly J. The effect of photobiomodulation on root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014 Jan 15;6:1-8. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S49489. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24470774 ↗
  • Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Akkus D. Effect of LED-mediated-photobiomodulation therapy on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):779-85. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1405-3. Epub 2013 Aug 29. PubMed 23990217 ↗
  • Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Yuksel Y. Light-emitting diode photobiomodulation: effect on bone formation in orthopedically expanded suture in rats--early bone changes. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(5):1263-70. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1214-0. Epub 2012 Nov 9. PubMed 23139069 ↗
  • El-Bialy T, Alhadlaq A, Felemban N, Yeung J, Ebrahim A, Hassan AH. The effect of light-emitting diode and laser on mandibular growth in rats. Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):233-8. doi: 10.2319/030914-170.1. Epub 2014 Jul 14. Erratum In: Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):177. doi: 10.2319/angl-86-01-177-177.1. PubMed 25017014 ↗
  • Uysal T, Ekizer A, Akcay H, Etoz O, Guray E. Resonance frequency analysis of orthodontic miniscrews subjected to light-emitting diode photobiomodulation therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq166. Epub 2010 Dec 27. PubMed 21187526 ↗
  • Kau CH, Kantarci A, Shaughnessy T, Vachiramon A, Santiwong P, de la Fuente A, Skrenes D, Ma D, Brawn P. Photobiomodulation accelerates orthodontic alignment in the early phase of treatment. Prog Orthod. 2013 Sep 19;14:30. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-30. PubMed 24326198 ↗
  • Dias FJ, Issa JP, Vicentini FT, Fonseca MJ, Leao JC, Siessere S, Regalo SC, Iyomasa MM. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the oxidative metabolism and matrix proteins in the rat masseter muscle. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Oct;29(10):677-84. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2879. Epub 2011 Jul 11. PubMed 21745137 ↗
  • Silveira PC, Silva LA, Fraga DB, Freitas TP, Streck EL, Pinho R. Evaluation of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in muscle healing by low-level laser therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2009 May 4;95(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jan 21. PubMed 19232497 ↗
  • Cruz DR, Kohara EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU. Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20076. PubMed 15334614 ↗
  • Esper MA, Nicolau RA, Arisawa EA. The effect of two phototherapy protocols on pain control in orthodontic procedure--a preliminary clinical study. Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Sep;26(5):657-63. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0938-6. Epub 2011 May 31. PubMed 21626017 ↗
  • Youssef M, Ashkar S, Hamade E, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M. The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2008 Jan;23(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0449-7. Epub 2007 Mar 15. PubMed 17361391 ↗
  • Sousa MV, Scanavini MA, Sannomiya EK, Velasco LG, Angelieri F. Influence of low-level laser on the speed of orthodontic movement. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Mar;29(3):191-6. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2652. Epub 2011 Jan 23. PubMed 21254890 ↗
  • Heravi F, Moradi A, Ahrari F. The effect of low level laser therapy on the rate of tooth movement and pain perception during canine retraction. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Jun;13(2):183-8. PubMed 24984620 ↗
  • Whelan HT, Smits RL Jr, Buchman EV, Whelan NT, Turner SG, Margolis DA, Cevenini V, Stinson H, Ignatius R, Martin T, Cwiklinski J, Philippi AF, Graf WR, Hodgson B, Gould L, Kane M, Chen G, Caviness J. Effect of NASA light-emitting diode irradiation on wound healing. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001 Dec;19(6):305-14. doi: 10.1089/104454701753342758. PubMed 11776448 ↗
  • Weber JB, Pinheiro AL, de Oliveira MG, Oliveira FA, Ramalho LM. Laser therapy improves healing of bone defects submitted to autologous bone graft. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Feb;24(1):38-44. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.38. PubMed 16503787 ↗
  • Saito S, Shimizu N. Stimulatory effects of low-power laser irradiation on bone regeneration in midpalatal suture during expansion in the rat. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 May;111(5):525-32. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70152-5. PubMed 9155812 ↗
  • Masha RT, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. Low-intensity laser irradiation at 660 nm stimulates transcription of genes involved in the electron transport chain. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Feb;31(2):47-53. doi: 10.1089/pho.2012.3369. Epub 2012 Dec 16. PubMed 23240874 ↗
  • Oron U, Ilic S, De Taboada L, Streeter J. Ga-As (808 nm) laser irradiation enhances ATP production in human neuronal cells in culture. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Jun;25(3):180-2. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2064. PubMed 17603858 ↗
  • Sun X, Zhu X, Xu C, Ye N, Zhu H. [Effects of low energy laser on tooth movement and remodeling of alveolar bone in rabbits]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001 Oct;19(5):290-3. Chinese. PubMed 12539482 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02267850
Lead sponsor
Biolux Research Holdings, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2014
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Results posted
Mar 27, 2018
Last update
Sep 21, 2018

Study contacts

Timothy Shaughnessy, DDS
principal investigator · Shaughnessy Orthodontics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion