CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02267772Updated Jan 22, 2021Results posted

IV Acetaminophen vs IV Morphine for Pain Control in Pregnant Women

An interventional study of IV Acetaminophen and IV Morphine in Pain Management in Pregnant Women, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-22.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
Difficulties in recruitment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
163
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Purpose: To determine if IV acetaminophen can 1) decrease pain in pregnancy women, 2)reduce the amount of opioid use in pregnant women who encounter pain, 3) reduce maternal and fetal adverse effects compared to opioids.

Design: This is a comparative effective trial that is a randomized, controlled trial of IV acetaminophen vs. IV morphine in pregnant women.

Procedures: Women meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to IV acetaminophen or IV morphine. The IV acetaminophen group will get up to four standard doses of IV acetaminophen during their stay at the hospital. The second group will get up to six standard doses of morphine. Subjects will complete a pain scale after medication administration and will be asked about any side effects.

Read the detailed description

Rationale for this clinical trial The goal of analgesia in pregnancy is to reduce pain while minimizing both maternal and fetal adverse effects. Current opioids used in pregnancy provide minimal pain relief and are associated with adverse effects. IV acetaminophen has been shown to significantly improve pain control following cesarean section and in the first stage of labor. Moreover, IV acetaminophen reduces the need and consumption of opioids following surgery. If IV acetaminophen can be as effective in controlling pain associated with maternal medical conditions and uterine contractions with labor, then the use of parenteral opioids in pregnant women and its exposure to the fetus could be reduced. This could provide new opportunities in the medical management of pain in pregnancy. Thus we propose a comparative effectiveness trial of IV acetaminophen compared to IV morphine.

Hypothesis:

We hypothesize that IV acetaminophen is as effective as IV morphine in reducing pain in pregnant women. In doing so, IV acetaminophen can reduce the amount of narcotics needed in women with pain.

Objectives:

To determine if IV acetaminophen can:

  1. Decrease pain in pregnant women
  2. Reduce the amount of opioid use in pregnant women who encounter pain
  3. Reduce maternal and fetal adverse effects compared to opioids

Study Design:

For this comparative effective trial, we propose a randomized, controlled trial of IV acetaminophen vs. IV morphine in pregnant women. Prior studies have confirmed that IV acetaminophen is effective in controlling pain compared to placebo.[14,20] Thus, administering just a placebo for pain control is not justified at this time.

We will include 3 different groups of pregnant populations who encounter pain for different reasons.

Group 1: Pregnant women with uterine contractions, but not in labor Group 2: Pregnant women with uterine contractions in the first stage of labor Group 3: Pregnant women with a medical condition associated with pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management in Pregnant Women
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Group 1. We will include pregnant women greater than 24 weeks of pregnancy who present with uterine contractions, but are not in labor and who are warranting treatment with intravenous medication for pain control as part of their routine treatment. This will be defined as the presence of uterine contractions documented on the tocodynamometer. However, the cervix remains less than 2 cm dilated and has not changed after 1 hour after re-examining her cervix.[23]

Group 2. We will include pregnant women greater than 34 weeks of pregnancy who present with uterine contractions and are in the first stage of labor and who are warranting treatment with intravenous medication for pain control as part of their routine treatment. This will be defined as the presence of uterine contractions documented on the tocodynamometer and cervical dilation greater than 2 cm, but less than 6 cm. [23]

Group 3. We will include pregnant women greater than 16 weeks of pregnancy who present with pain due to a maternal medical condition including sickle cell crisis, pyelonephritis, pancreatitis, cholecystitis, nephrolithiasis or headache and who are warranting treatment with intravenous medication for pain control as part of their routine treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

We will exclude women less than 18 years of age, less than 16 weeks gestation, with weight less than 50 kg, and contraindications to acetaminophen including reported elevated liver function tests, hepatic injury, hepatic disorder, active liver disease, alcoholism, chronic malnutrition, known coagulopathy, hemorrhage, creatinine > 1.0, or known allergy or hypersensitivity to acetaminophen. We will also exclude women who have received any opioids within the last 24 hours.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
163 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IV Acetaminophen

    IV acetaminophen for pain control

    Drug: IV Acetaminophen

  • Active comparator
    IV morphine

    IV morphine for pain control

    Drug: IV Morphine

Interventions

  • DrugIV Acetaminophen

    IV Acetaminophen

  • DrugIV Morphine

    IV Morphine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The visual analogue scale (VAS) ranges from 0mm to 140mm. The subject will be asked to mark with a pen on the scale to rate their pain. Negative differences in scores indicated a pain score worse than baseline and positive differences indicated an improved pain score from baseline.

    Time frame: baseline, 120 minutes after administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Relief Based on a 5 Point Verbal Scale

    Time frame: 24 hrs

  2. Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Medications

    Time frame: 24 hours after administration

  3. Quantity of Rescue Medication Over 24 Hours

    Time frame: 24 hours after administration

  4. Total Amount of Study Drug Administered

    Time frame: 24 hours after administration

  5. Patient's Global Satisfaction at 24 Hours

    This will be patient reported.

    Time frame: 24hrs

  6. Number of Participants With Maternal Side Effects

    Maternal side effects include nausea, vomiting, headache, pruritus, insomnia, and drowsiness.

    Time frame: 1 hour after administration

  7. Number of Participants With Fetal Heart Rate Changes

    Changes in fetal heart rate tracing include acceleration, decelerations, and variability.

    Time frame: 1 hour after administration

07

Results

Posted Jan 22, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
Started5052
Randomized5052
Received study drug4852
Completed4852
Not completed20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Pain Intensity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The visual analogue scale (VAS) ranges from 0mm to 140mm. The subject will be asked to mark with a pen on the scale to rate their pain. Negative differences in scores indicated a pain score worse than baseline and positive differences indicated an improved pain score from baseline.

Time frame:
baseline, 120 minutes after administration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pain Intensity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
score on a scaleIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
pre-labor group2.67 ± 3.83.2 ± 5.1
first stage of labor group-18.2 ± 13.2-4.8 ± 12.5
SecondaryPain Relief Based on a 5 Point Verbal Scale
Time frame:
24 hrs

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Received Rescue Medications
Time frame:
24 hours after administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Medications
ParticipantsIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Medications3019
SecondaryQuantity of Rescue Medication Over 24 Hours
Time frame:
24 hours after administration

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTotal Amount of Study Drug Administered
Time frame:
24 hours after administration
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams
Total Amount of Study Drug Administered
milligramsIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
pre-labor group1600 ± 952.26.4 ± 1.9
1st stage of labor group1055 ± 2292.3 ± 0.72
SecondaryPatient's Global Satisfaction at 24 Hours

This will be patient reported.

Time frame:
24hrs

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Maternal Side Effects

Maternal side effects include nausea, vomiting, headache, pruritus, insomnia, and drowsiness.

Time frame:
1 hour after administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Maternal Side Effects
ParticipantsIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
nausea22
vomiting03
headache56
pruritus24
insomnia57
drowsiness1715
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Fetal Heart Rate Changes

Changes in fetal heart rate tracing include acceleration, decelerations, and variability.

Time frame:
1 hour after administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Fetal Heart Rate Changes
ParticipantsIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
absence of accelerations412
late decelerations11
minimal or absent variability43

Adverse events

Collected over 1 hour after administration. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IV Acetaminophen0/48 (0%)1/48 (2.1%)21/43 (48.8%)
IV Morphine0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)15/51 (29.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
Adverse reaction to demerol administered as rescue medication, which required narcan for reversalGeneral disorders1/480/52
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIV AcetaminophenIV Morphine
DrowsinessGeneral disorders17/4315/51
InsomniaGeneral disorders5/437/51
HeadacheGeneral disorders5/436/51
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/434/51
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/433/51
NauseaGeneral disorders2/432/51

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)IV AcetaminophenIV MorphineTotal
Mean27.0 ± 5.527.5 ± 6.027.3 ± 5.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IV AcetaminophenIV MorphineTotal
Female4852100
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)IV AcetaminophenIV MorphineTotal
Asian112
Black192443
Caucasian5813
Hispanic192140
Other224
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)IV AcetaminophenIV MorphineTotal
United States4852100
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Lyndon B Johnson Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77026, United States
  • Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ankumah NE, Tsao M, Hutchinson M, Pedroza C, Mehta J, Sibai BM, Chauhan SP, Blackwell SC, Refuerzo JS. Intravenous Acetaminophen versus Morphine for Analgesia in Labor: A Randomized Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;34(1):38-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584143. Epub 2016 May 16. PubMed 27182992 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 10, 2014

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02267772
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Responsible party
Jerrie Refuerzo (Associate Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 17, 2014
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Apr 27, 2019
Completion
Apr 27, 2019
Results posted
Jan 22, 2021
Last update
Jan 22, 2021

Study contacts

Jerrie S Refuerzo, MD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion