ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02263807MPFLUpdated Oct 27, 2022

Knee Function in Patients With Two or More Episodes of Patella Dislocations

An interventional study of MPFL Group and Control in Joint Instability, sponsored by Asbjorn Aroen. Completed at 2 sites in Norway. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-27.

Sponsored by Asbjorn Aroen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2010, registered Dec 2011).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients aged 12 - 30 years, with recurrent patella dislocations, are consecutively included into a randomized prospective study. This study comparess the outcome of two forms of treatment for recurrent patella dislocation. One group is offered reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the second group is offered a standardized training program.

Read the detailed description

Introduction:

Patella dislocation is a serious knee injury whose peak incidence occurs in patients aged 10-17 years and is associated with a high rate of re-dislocation. Knee injuries frequently cause long-term disability and reduced physical activity among adolescents and young persons. Surgery in this patient group requires a low tolerance for complications, meaning that physical therapy might offer more successful outcomes in many knee injury cases. The proposed project studies a particular patient cohort subjected to recurrent dislocation of the patella.

Aim:

The principal objective of this clinical, randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare knee function and symptoms in patients with recurrent patella dislocation randomized into treatment with surgical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) with those of patients in a standardized physiotherapy program designed to stabilize the patella and improve patient function.

Materials and methods:

Patients aged 12-30 years who have experienced two or more patella dislocations are randomized into groups receiving either MPFL reconstruction or physical therapy only. Follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, and 36 months involve functional tests, validated knee scores, arthroscopic examination, and cartilage-specific MRI protocols for the knee.

02

Conditions studied

  • Joint Instability

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Patella luxation
03

In context

Joint Instability

115 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Instability; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is above the median of 46 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Joint Instability.

Browse Joint Instability studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Asbjorn Aroen as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • More than one luxation
  • Norwegian citizens
  • Unilateral problems
  • Age range 12-30 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-Generalized degenerative changes

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MPFL group

    Arthroscopy and MPFL reconstruction

    Procedure: MPFL Group · Procedure: Control

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Arhroscopy and rehabilitation

    Procedure: Control

Interventions

  • ProcedureMPFL Group

    MPFL reconstruction or standard treatment followed by physiotherapy

    Also known as: MPFL surgery

  • ProcedureControl

    Arthroscopy followed by active rehabilitation

    Also known as: Arthroscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reoperation

    Numbers of reoperation in the two treatment groups

    Time frame: 2011-2022

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patella reluxation

    Number of reluxation of patella in the two treatment groups

    Time frame: 2011-2022

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Akershus University Hospital
    Lørenskog, 1476, Norway
  • Akershus University Hospital
    Lørenskog, 1478, Norway
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Straume-Naesheim TM, Randsborg PH, Mikaelsen JR, Sivertsen EA, Devitt B, Granan LP, Aroen A. Recurrent lateral patella dislocation affects knee function as much as ACL deficiency - however patients wait five times longer for treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2689-7. PubMed 31286929 ↗
  • Straume-Naesheim TM, Randsborg PH, Mikaelsen JR, Aroen A. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is superior to active rehabilitation in protecting against further patella dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Oct;30(10):3428-3437. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06934-3. Epub 2022 Mar 28. PubMed 35347375 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2010 to primary completion in Jan 2022, 140 months.

Of 36 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Joint Instability, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 37. This study's 140 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 41 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 22, 2011
First posted
Oct 13, 2014
StartActual
May 2010
Primary completionActual
Jan 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 2022
Last update
Oct 27, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02263807
Lead sponsor
Asbjorn Aroen
Responsible party
Asbjorn Aroen (Professor, Orthopaedic Surgeon, University Hospital, Akershus) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2014
Start date
May 2010
Primary completion
Jan 2022
Completion
Jan 2022
Last update
Oct 27, 2022

Study contacts

Asbjørn Årøen, MD,PhD
study chair · University Hospital, Akershus

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion