CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02263508MASTERKEY-265Updated Nov 14, 2022Results posted

Pembrolizumab With Talimogene Laherparepvec or Placebo in Unresected Melanoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Talimogene Laherparepvec and Pembrolizumab in Melanoma, sponsored by Amgen. Terminated at 161 sites in 21 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 95 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-14.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
713
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 95 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objectives of the Phase 1b part of the study are to evaluate the safety, as assessed by incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab in adults with previously untreated, unresectable, stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.

The primary objective of Phase 3 are to evaluate the efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec with pembrolizumab versus placebo with pembrolizumab, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) (response evaluation by blinded independent central review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) and overall survival (OS).

02

Conditions studied

  • Melanoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Talimogene Laherparepvec
  • pembrolizumab
  • KEYNOTE-034
  • MASTERKEY-265
03

In context

Melanoma

3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 713 is above the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 95 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma and stage IIIB to IVM1c for whom surgery is not recommended.
  • Subjects must have measurable disease and be a candidate for intralesional therapy administration into cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, and coagulation function.
  • Subjects with serine/threonine protein kinase B-Raf V600 (BRAFV600) wild-type tumors must not have received any prior systemic anticancer treatment consisting of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy given in a non-adjuvant setting for unresectable stage IIIB to IVM1c melanoma.
  • Subjects with B-Raf V600 (BRAFV600) mutated tumors who have received prior BRAF inhibitor therapy either alone or in combination with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor as their only prior systemic therapy are eligible.
  • Subjects who received prior adjuvant therapy for melanoma will not be excluded (including, but not limited to, interferon, ipilimumab, limb infusion/perfusion, or use of investigational agents in the adjuvant setting) with the exception that prior adjuvant therapy with inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is not allowed. However, if the subject received adjuvant therapy, the subject must have completed therapy at least 28 days prior to enrollment.
  • Subjects must have a tumor sample that is adequate for PD-L1 assessment prior to randomization.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must not have clinically active cerebral metastases.
  • Subjects must not have primary uveal or mucosal melanoma, history or evidence of melanoma associated with immunodeficiency states or history of other malignancy within the past 3 years.
  • Subjects may not have been previously treated with talimogene laherparepvec, any other oncolytic virus, pembrolizumab, or any other inhibitor of PD-1, PD-L1, or PD-L2.
  • Subjects must not have history or evidence of symptomatic autoimmune pneumonitis, glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, other symptomatic autoimmune disease, documented history of autoimmune disease or syndrome requiring systemic treatment in the past 2 years (ie, with use of disease modifying agents, steroids or immunosuppressive agents) except vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy, or evidence of clinically significant immunosuppression.
  • Subjects must not have active herpetic skin lesions or prior complications of herpetic infection and must not require intermittent or chronic treatment with an antiherpetic drug (eg, acyclovir), other than intermittent topical use.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
713 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab

    Participants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL by intralesional injection. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at up to 4 mL of 10⁸ PFU/mL began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response (CR), confirmed disease progression (PD) per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of pembrolizumab, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 2 weeks starting at the time of the third dose of talimogene laherparepvec (week 6) until confirmed PD per modified irRC, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec · Drug: Pembrolizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Phase 3 : Placebo + Pembrolizumab

    Participants received up to 4 mL placebo to talimogene laherparepvec by intralesional injection on day 1 of week 0. Subsequent doses of placebo (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, complete response per modified Immune-related Response Criteria simulating Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRC-RECIST) (iCR), confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of placebo, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Pembrolizumab · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab

    Participants received talimogene laherparepvec at an initial dose of up to 4 mL 10⁶ PFU/mL by intralesional injection on day 1. Subsequent doses of talimogene laherparepvec at 10⁸ PFU/mL (up to 4 mL) began 3 weeks after the first dose and were administered every 2 weeks until the fifth injection of talimogene laherparepvec (week 9), and then synchronously with pembrolizumab thereafter every 3 weeks until disappearance of injectable lesions, iCR, confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, intolerance of study treatment, 24 months from the date of the first dose of talimogene laherparepvec, or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants also received 200 mg pembrolizumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting on day 1 of week 0, until confirmed iPD per modified irRC-RECIST, treatment intolerance, 24 months from the first dose, or end of study, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Talimogene Laherparepvec · Drug: Pembrolizumab

Interventions

  • DrugTalimogene Laherparepvec

    Talimogene laherparepvec administered by intratumoral injection

    Also known as: IMLYGIC®, OncoVEX^GM-CSF, T-VEC

  • DrugPembrolizumab

    Administered at a dose of 200 mg as an intravenous infusion over approximately 30 minutes.

    Also known as: MK-3475, Keytruda®

  • DrugPlacebo

    Administered by intratumoral injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    A DLT was defined as any toxicity related to study drug which met any of the following criteria based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0: * Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity. * Grade 3 or higher pneumonitis. * Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting \> 3 days despite optimal supportive care, excluding grade 3 fatigue. * Any grade 3 or higher non-hematologic laboratory value if medical intervention was required, or the abnormality lead to hospitalization, or the abnormality persisted for \> 1 week. * Febrile neutropenia grade 3 or grade 4. * Thrombocytopenia \< 25 x 10\^9/L if associated with a bleeding event which does not result in hemodynamic instability but required an elective platelet infusion, or a life-threatening bleeding event which resulted in urgent intervention and admission to intensive care unit. * Grade 5 toxicity (ie, death). * Any other intolerable toxicity leading to permanent discontinuation of talimogene laherparepvec or pembrolizumab.

    Time frame: The DLT evaluation period was 6 weeks from the initial administration of pembrolizumab (week 6 to 12).

  2. Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    PFS per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease (PD) per modified RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause. PD: Increase in size of target lesions from nadir by ≥ 20% and ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir, or the appearance of a new lesion. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date. The primary analysis of PFS was specified to be conducted when 407 PFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 02 March 2020).

    Time frame: From randomization until the data-cut-off date of 02 March 2020; median (range) time on follow-up was 25.5 (0.6, 44.7) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 25.6 (0.3, 45.8) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  3. Phase 3: Overall Survival

    Overall survival (OS) is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause. Median overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.

    Time frame: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 1b: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), by Investigator assessment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart. Radiographic imaging for assessment of lesions was performed using computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound. Clinical measurement of cutaneous, subcutaneous, and palpable nodal tumor lesions was conducted with calipers.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  2. Phase 1b: Best Overall Response (BOR)

    Best overall response is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: CR, PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), or unevaluable (UE), based on investigator assessment using the modified irRC up to the start of any subsequent anti-cancer therapy. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 77 days elapsed after enrollment. Responses and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  3. Phase 1b: Durable Response Rate (DRR)

    DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment with a duration of response of at least 6 months. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  4. Phase 1b: Duration of Response (DOR)

    Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response (CR or PR) that is subsequently confirmed to the earlier of confirmed PD or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir. Response and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  5. Phase 1b: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after enrollment.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.

  6. Phase 1b: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival is defined as the time from first dose to the earlier event of confirmed PD per modified irRC or death from any cause. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment.

    Time frame: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.

  7. Phase 1b: Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival is defined as the interval from first dose to death from any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.

    Time frame: From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.

  8. Phase 3: Complete Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iCRR)

    Complete response rate per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC) simulating RECIST 1.1 (irRC-RECIST) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response assessed using the modified irRC-RECIST (iCR) evaluated by blinded independent central review. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the criteria were first met. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must have been measurable by CT or MRI only.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  9. Phase 3: Progression Free Survival Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iPFS)

    PFS per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease assessed by modified irRC-RECIST (iPD) evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death from any cause. iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20% and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir (minimum recorded tumor burden) confirmed by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the initial detection. Median iPFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date. The primary analysis of iPFS was specified to be conducted when 256 iPFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 29 September 2020).

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  10. Phase 3: Overall Survival Excluding Stage IVM1c Participants

    Overall survival is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at the last known alive date.

    Time frame: From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  11. Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed using modified RECIST version 1.1, evaluated by blinded independent central review. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. Modifications to conventional RECIST 1.1 included the following: target lesions were measurable on CT or MRI; otherwise, they were considered as nontarget lesions. A maximum of 10 target lesions was allowed with up to 5 per organ.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  12. Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    BOR is defined as the best overall visit response up to and including the first overall visit response of PD in the following order: CR, PR, SD, non-CR/Non-PD (NN), PD or UE per modified RECIST 1.1, evaluated by BICR. CR: Disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR: ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required; NN: Persistence of ≥ 1 non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD and ≥ 84 days from randomization; PD: Increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm of target lesions or any new lesion; Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments on or after the start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  13. Phase 3: Durable Response Rate (DRR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR per modified RECIST 1.1 evaluated by blinded independent central review, with a duration of response of ≥ 6 months. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  14. Phase 3: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

    Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of CR or PR to the earlier of PD per modified RECIST 1.1, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. PD was defined as an increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir of target lesions or appearance of any new lesion.

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  15. Phase 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Using RECIST 1.1

    Disease control rate (DCR) per modified RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR or SD evaluated by blinded independent central review. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  16. Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iORR)

    Objective response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or partial response assessed using modified irRC-RECIST (iPR) evaluated by blinded independent central review. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must be measurable by CT or MRI only.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  17. Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST

    BOR is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: iCR, iPR, stable disease per modified irRC-RECIST (iSD), iPD, or UE per modified irRC-RECIST (iUE), evaluated by BICR. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions confirmed by consecutive assessment ≥ 4 weeks from the date first documented. Reduction of any pathological lymph node to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after first documentation. iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20 % and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir confirmed ≥ 4 weeks from initial detection. iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD and ≥ 84 days from randomization. Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments after start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  18. Phase 3: Durable Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDRR)

    Durable response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or iPR per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review with a duration of response ≥ 6 months. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  19. Phase 3: Duration of Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDOR)

    Duration of response per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of iCR or iPR that was subsequently confirmed to the earlier of iPD per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

    Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.

  20. Phase 3: Disease Control Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDCR)

    Disease control rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR, iCR, or iSD assessed using modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.

  21. Phase 3: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score

    The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status/quality of life scale, 5 functional scales, and 9 symptom scales/items. The global health/QoL scale consists of 2 questions that ask participants to rate their overall health and overall quality of life during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The GHS/QoL subscale score was derived as the mean of each score then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100 where higher scores represent a better health status and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement. The overall change from baseline (calculated from all on-treatment visits) was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) (see model details in statistical analysis section).

    Time frame: Baseline and day 1 of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, then every 6 weeks until end of study treatment; median (range) duration of treatment was 39.0 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 54.1 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.

  22. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. TEAEs include AEs from the first dose of study drug to 30 days after the last dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: * fatal * life threatening * required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect * other medically important serious event. Treatment-emergent SAEs are any SAE occurring from first dose of study drug through 90 days after the last dose or 30 days after the last dose if new anticancer therapy was started, whichever was earlier. AEs were graded for severity using CTCAE version 4.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Fatal.

    Time frame: From first dose to 30 days after last dose (90 days for SAEs); median (range) duration was 48 (5.1, 110.1) weeks in Phase 1b, 39 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 56 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Phase 3 Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.

07

Results

Posted May 16, 2022

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 134 centers in Australia, Canada, Europe, South Africa, South Korea, and the United States. Phase 1b was an open-label, single-arm study and Phase 3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Started21346346
Received talimogene laherparepvec/placebo21345343
Received pembrolizumab21345343
Completed000
Not completed21346346
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject12317
Withdrew: Sponsor decision12165182
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up277
Withdrew: Death6151140

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

A DLT was defined as any toxicity related to study drug which met any of the following criteria based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0: * Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity. * Grade 3 or higher pneumonitis. * Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting \> 3 days despite optimal supportive care, excluding grade 3 fatigue. * Any grade 3 or higher non-hematologic laboratory value if medical intervention was required, or the abnormality lead to hospitalization, or the abnormality persisted for \> 1 week. * Febrile neutropenia grade 3 or grade 4. * Thrombocytopenia \< 25 x 10\^9/L if associated with a bleeding event which does not result in hemodynamic instability but required an elective platelet infusion, or a life-threatening bleeding event which resulted in urgent intervention and admission to intensive care unit. * Grade 5 toxicity (ie, death). * Any other intolerable toxicity leading to permanent discontinuation of talimogene laherparepvec or pembrolizumab.

Time frame:
The DLT evaluation period was 6 weeks from the initial administration of pembrolizumab (week 6 to 12).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
ParticipantsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0
PrimaryPhase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

PFS per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease (PD) per modified RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause. PD: Increase in size of target lesions from nadir by ≥ 20% and ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir, or the appearance of a new lesion. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date. The primary analysis of PFS was specified to be conducted when 407 PFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 02 March 2020).

Time frame:
From randomization until the data-cut-off date of 02 March 2020; median (range) time on follow-up was 25.5 (0.6, 44.7) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 25.6 (0.3, 45.8) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
monthsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.18.5 (5.72 to 13.54)14.3 (10.25 to 22.11)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Stratified log-rank test · p = 0.13 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.86 · 95% CI 0.71 to 1.04Cox proportional hazards model stratified by randomization factors (disease stage, prior BRAF inhibitor therapy) and baseline PD-L1 status.
PrimaryPhase 3: Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause. Median overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.

Time frame:
From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 3: Overall Survival
monthsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Overall SurvivalNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Stratified log-rank test · p = 0.77 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.97 · 95% CI 0.77 to 1.21Cox proportional hazards model stratified by randomization factors (disease stage, prior BRAF inhibitor therapy) and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 1b: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC), by Investigator assessment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart. Radiographic imaging for assessment of lesions was performed using computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound. Clinical measurement of cutaneous, subcutaneous, and palpable nodal tumor lesions was conducted with calipers.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 1b: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 1b: Objective Response Rate (ORR)61.9 (38.4 to 81.9)
SecondaryPhase 1b: Best Overall Response (BOR)

Best overall response is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: CR, PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), or unevaluable (UE), based on investigator assessment using the modified irRC up to the start of any subsequent anti-cancer therapy. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 77 days elapsed after enrollment. Responses and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 1b: Best Overall Response (BOR)
ParticipantsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Complete Response (CR)9
Partial Response (PR)4
Stable Disease (SD)1
Progressive Disease (PD)6
Unable to Evaluate (UE)1
SecondaryPhase 1b: Durable Response Rate (DRR)

DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment with a duration of response of at least 6 months. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 1b: Durable Response Rate (DRR)
percentage of participantsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 1b: Durable Response Rate (DRR)57.1 (34.0 to 78.2)
SecondaryPhase 1b: Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response (CR or PR) that is subsequently confirmed to the earlier of confirmed PD or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline; PD was defined as an increase in tumor area ≥ 25% relative to nadir. Response and PD must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 1b: Duration of Response (DOR)
monthsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 1b: Duration of Response (DOR)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPhase 1b: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD using the modified irRC per Investigator assessment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions; PR was defined as a decrease in tumor area ≥ 50% relative to baseline, response must have been confirmed by a second, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks apart; and SD was defined as any outcome not meeting the criteria for response or PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after enrollment.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed at week 6 (prior to initiation of pembrolizumab), week 18, and every 12 weeks thereafter until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 58.6 (1.4, 61.6) months.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 1b: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
percentage of participantsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 1b: Disease Control Rate (DCR)66.7 (43.0 to 85.4)
SecondaryPhase 1b: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from first dose to the earlier event of confirmed PD per modified irRC or death from any cause. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment.

Time frame:
From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 1b: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 1b: Progression-free Survival (PFS)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPhase 1b: Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the interval from first dose to death from any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last known alive date.

Time frame:
From first dose until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 70.6 (1.4, 74.5) months.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 1b: Overall Survival (OS)
monthsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 1b: Overall Survival (OS)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPhase 3: Complete Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iCRR)

Complete response rate per modified Immune-related Response Criteria (irRC) simulating RECIST 1.1 (irRC-RECIST) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response assessed using the modified irRC-RECIST (iCR) evaluated by blinded independent central review. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the criteria were first met. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must have been measurable by CT or MRI only.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Complete Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iCRR)
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Complete Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iCRR)8.1 (5.22 to 10.97)14.5 (10.75 to 18.16)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.012 · Odds ratio (or): 1.88 · 95% CI 1.15 to 3.07Adjusted odds ratio estimated using logistic regression with randomization stratification factors and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Progression Free Survival Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iPFS)

PFS per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the interval from randomization to the earlier event of progressive disease assessed by modified irRC-RECIST (iPD) evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death from any cause. iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20% and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir (minimum recorded tumor burden) confirmed by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after the initial detection. Median iPFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment if available; otherwise on their randomization date. The primary analysis of iPFS was specified to be conducted when 256 iPFS events had occurred (data cut-off date 29 September 2020).

Time frame:
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iPFS)
monthsPhase 3 : Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Progression Free Survival Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iPFS)25.3 (17.68 to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3 : Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Stratified log-rank test · p = 0.14 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.82 to 1.34Cox proportional hazards model stratified by randomization factors (disease stage, prior BRAF inhibitor therapy) and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Overall Survival Excluding Stage IVM1c Participants

Overall survival is defined as the interval from randomization to death from any cause. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants without an event were censored at the last known alive date.

Time frame:
From randomization until the end of study; median (range) time on follow-up was 34.8 (0.6, 58.3) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 36.8 (0.3, 58.4) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 3: Overall Survival Excluding Stage IVM1c Participants
monthsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Overall Survival Excluding Stage IVM1c ParticipantsNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Stratified log-rank test · p = 0.47 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.24Cox proportional hazards model stratified by randomization factors (disease stage, prior BRAF inhibitor therapy) and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed using modified RECIST version 1.1, evaluated by blinded independent central review. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. Modifications to conventional RECIST 1.1 included the following: target lesions were measurable on CT or MRI; otherwise, they were considered as nontarget lesions. A maximum of 10 target lesions was allowed with up to 5 per organ.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.141.3 (36.14 to 46.52)48.6 (43.29 to 53.82)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.081 · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 0.97 to 1.79Adjusted odds ratio estimated using logistic regression with randomization stratification factors and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

BOR is defined as the best overall visit response up to and including the first overall visit response of PD in the following order: CR, PR, SD, non-CR/Non-PD (NN), PD or UE per modified RECIST 1.1, evaluated by BICR. CR: Disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR: ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required; NN: Persistence of ≥ 1 non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD and ≥ 84 days from randomization; PD: Increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm of target lesions or any new lesion; Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments on or after the start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
ParticipantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Complete response (CR)4062
Partial response (PR)103106
Stable disease (SD)3028
Non-CR/Non-PD (NN)1611
Progressive disease (PD)120106
Unevaluable (UE)113
Missing2630
SecondaryPhase 3: Durable Response Rate (DRR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

DRR is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR per modified RECIST 1.1 evaluated by blinded independent central review, with a duration of response of ≥ 6 months. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate (DRR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate (DRR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.134.1 (29.11 to 39.10)42.2 (36.99 to 47.40)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.039 · Odds ratio (or): 1.39 · 95% CI 1.02 to 1.90Adjusted odds ratio estimated using logistic regression with randomization stratification factors and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1

Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of CR or PR to the earlier of PD per modified RECIST 1.1, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. PD was defined as an increase from nadir by ≥ 20% or ≥ 5 mm absolute increase above nadir of target lesions or appearance of any new lesion.

Time frame:
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 3: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1
monthsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed Using Modified RECIST 1.1NA (NA to NA)43.7 (NA to NA)
SecondaryPhase 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Using RECIST 1.1

Disease control rate (DCR) per modified RECIST 1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR or SD evaluated by blinded independent central review. CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions except lymph node short axis \< 10 mm; PR was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in sum of diameters in target lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Using RECIST 1.1
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Assessed Using RECIST 1.150.0 (44.73 to 55.27)56.6 (51.43 to 61.87)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.11 · Odds ratio (or): 1.28 · 95% CI 0.94 to 1.75Adjusted odds ratio estimated using logistic regression with randomization stratification factors and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iORR)

Objective response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or partial response assessed using modified irRC-RECIST (iPR) evaluated by blinded independent central review. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. Modifications to the irRC-RECIST 1.1 included an increase in the total number of target lesions and new measurable lesions to 10 with a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and target lesions must be measurable by CT or MRI only.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iORR)
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Objective Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iORR)39.9 (34.72 to 45.04)49.1 (43.87 to 54.40)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.020 · Odds ratio (or): 1.44 · 95% CI 1.06 to 1.96Adjusted odds ratio estimated using logistic regression with randomization stratification factors and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST

BOR is defined as the best overall visit response in the following order: iCR, iPR, stable disease per modified irRC-RECIST (iSD), iPD, or UE per modified irRC-RECIST (iUE), evaluated by BICR. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions confirmed by consecutive assessment ≥ 4 weeks from the date first documented. Reduction of any pathological lymph node to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after first documentation. iPD: Increase in tumor burden ≥ 20 % and at least 5 mm absolute increase relative to nadir confirmed ≥ 4 weeks from initial detection. iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD and ≥ 84 days from randomization. Missing: No postbaseline assessment, or assessments after start of first subsequent anticancer therapy, including complete or partial removal/reduction of any target lesion which contained melanoma on pathology evaluation or pathology results were unknown.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Phase 3: Best Overall Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST
ParticipantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Complete response (iCR)2850
Partial response (iPR)110120
Stable disease (iSD)5751
Progressive disease (iPD)5665
Unevaluable (iUE)6930
Missing2630
SecondaryPhase 3: Durable Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDRR)

Durable response rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR or iPR per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review with a duration of response ≥ 6 months. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDRR)
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Durable Response Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDRR)34.4 (29.39 to 39.40)45.7 (40.42 to 50.91)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.004 · Odds ratio (or): 1.59 · 95% CI 1.16 to 2.17Adjusted odds ratio estimated using logistic regression with randomization stratification factors and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Duration of Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDOR)

Duration of response per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the time from the date of an initial response of iCR or iPR that was subsequently confirmed to the earlier of iPD per modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review, or death. Participants who had not ended their response at the time of analysis were censored at their last evaluable tumor assessment date before the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation.

Time frame:
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 September 2020; median time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months in the Placebo + Pembrolizumab arm and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in the Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab arm.
Reported as:
Median · months
Phase 3: Duration of Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDOR)
monthsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Duration of Response Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDOR)NA (NA to NA)43.7 (34.53 to 43.73)
SecondaryPhase 3: Disease Control Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDCR)

Disease control rate per modified irRC-RECIST is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of iCR, iCR, or iSD assessed using modified irRC-RECIST evaluated by blinded independent central review. iCR: Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by a repeat, consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. iPR: Decrease in tumor burden ≥ 30% relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. iSD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for iCR or iPR nor sufficient increase to qualify for iPD with ≥ 84 days elapsed after randomization.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks after initiation of treatment until confirmed PD or start of new anticancer treatment; median (range) time on follow-up was 30.6 (0.6, 53.0) months and 31.4 (0.3, 52.5) months in each group, respectively.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDCR)
percentage of participantsPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Disease Control Rate Assessed Using Modified irRC-RECIST (iDCR)56.4 (51.13 to 61.58)63.9 (58.81 to 68.93)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.058 · Odds ratio (or): 1.35 · 95% CI 0.99 to 1.85Adjusted odds ratio estimated using logistic regression with randomization stratification factors and baseline PD-L1 status.
SecondaryPhase 3: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status/quality of life scale, 5 functional scales, and 9 symptom scales/items. The global health/QoL scale consists of 2 questions that ask participants to rate their overall health and overall quality of life during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The GHS/QoL subscale score was derived as the mean of each score then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100 where higher scores represent a better health status and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement. The overall change from baseline (calculated from all on-treatment visits) was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) (see model details in statistical analysis section).

Time frame:
Baseline and day 1 of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, then every 6 weeks until end of study treatment; median (range) duration of treatment was 39.0 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 54.1 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score
score on a scalePhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score-0.20 ± 1.02-0.02 ± 1.02
Statistical analysis
  • Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab vs Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab · Mixed Model for Repeated Measures · p = 0.84 · Difference: 0.19 · 95% CI -1.67 to 2.05
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject, including worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. TEAEs include AEs from the first dose of study drug to 30 days after the last dose. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: * fatal * life threatening * required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect * other medically important serious event. Treatment-emergent SAEs are any SAE occurring from first dose of study drug through 90 days after the last dose or 30 days after the last dose if new anticancer therapy was started, whichever was earlier. AEs were graded for severity using CTCAE version 4.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Fatal.

Time frame:
From first dose to 30 days after last dose (90 days for SAEs); median (range) duration was 48 (5.1, 110.1) weeks in Phase 1b, 39 (0.1, 107.3) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 56 (0.1, 109.6) weeks in Phase 3 Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
Any treatment-emergent adverse events21331338
Grade ≥ 220279306
Grade ≥ 313151161
Grade ≥ 422933
Serious adverse events8141154
Leading to discontinuation of talimogene laherparepvec/Placebo02426
Leading to discontinuation of pembrolizumab24143
Fatal adverse events14245

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality: From enrollment (Phase 1b) or randomization (Phase 3) to end of study, up to 75 months in Phase 1b and 58 months in Phase 3. SAEs: From first dose of study drug to 90 days after last dose or 30 days after last dose if new anticancer therapy was started. AEs: From first dose to 30 days after last dose; median (range) duration of exposure was 48 (5.1, 110) weeks in Phase 1b, 39 (0.1, 107) weeks in Placebo + Pembrolizumab and 56 (0.1, 110) weeks in T-VEC + Pembrolizumab arm.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab6/21 (28.6%)8/21 (38.1%)21/21 (100%)
Phase 3: Placebo + Pembrolizumab156/346 (45.1%)141/344 (41%)305/344 (88.7%)
Phase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab146/346 (42.2%)154/344 (44.8%)317/344 (92.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 264
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/214/3447/344
Malignant melanomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2126/34427/344
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders1/212/3441/344
Autoimmune hepatitisHepatobiliary disorders1/211/3441/344
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders1/211/3441/344
Cytokine release syndromeImmune system disorders1/210/3440/344
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosisInfections and infestations1/210/3440/344
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/214/3444/344
Meningitis asepticInfections and infestations1/210/3440/344
Lumbar spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/210/3440/344
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 68
Most frequent other events
EventPhase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + Pembrolizumab
FatigueGeneral disorders15/2194/344137/344
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders13/2173/34470/344
PyrexiaGeneral disorders10/2133/344128/344
HeadacheNervous system disorders9/2144/34462/344
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/2142/34461/344
ChillsGeneral disorders8/2117/34473/344
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/2166/34482/344
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders8/2144/34458/344
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/2161/34492/344
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders7/2129/34456/344

Baseline characteristics

All enrolled participants

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
Mean60.2 ± 13.462.3 ± 14.563.1 ± 13.762.6 ± 14.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
Female13127147287
Male8219199426
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
Hispanic or Latino091322
Not Hispanic or Latino21337331689
Unknown or Not Reported0022
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian04711
Black (or African American)0123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
White21335327683
Other061016
Disease Stage per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th Edition
Disease Stage per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th Edition(Participants)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
Stage IIIB - IVM1a9169169347
Stage IVM1b/c12177177366
Prior Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase B-Raf (BRAF) Inhibitor Therapy
Prior Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase B-Raf (BRAF) Inhibitor Therapy(Participants)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
Yes—292958
No—317317634
Programmed Cell Death-1 Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status
Programmed Cell Death-1 Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Status(Participants)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
Positive17218231466
Not Positive4128115247
BRAF V600 Mutation Status
BRAF V600 Mutation Status(Participants)Phase 1b: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Placebo + PembrolizumabPhase 3: Talimogene Laherparepvec + PembrolizumabTotal
Mutation4116124244
Mutation not present17215211443
Missing/unknown0151126
08

Study locations

161 sites
  • Research Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35243, United States
  • Research Site
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Research Site
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Research Site
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • Research Site
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • Research Site
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Research Site
    Los Angeles, California 90024, United States
  • Research Site
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • Research Site
    Riverside, California 92505, United States
  • Research Site
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Research Site
    San Francisco, California 94117, United States
  • Research Site
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Research Site
    Miami Beach, Florida 33140, United States
  • Research Site
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Research Site
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Research Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Research Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Research Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Research Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Research Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Research Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Research Site
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Research Site
    Fridley, Minnesota 55432, United States
  • Research Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110-1093, United States
  • Research Site
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Research Site
    Buffalo, New York 14263, United States
  • Research Site
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Research Site
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Research Site
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Research Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45209, United States
  • Research Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Research Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Research Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, United States
  • Research Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, United States
  • Research Site
    Germantown, Tennessee 38138, United States
  • Research Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, United States
  • Research Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Research Site
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Research Site
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
  • Research Site
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • Research Site
    Seattle, Washington 98109-1023, United States
  • Research Site
    North Sydney, New South Wales 2060, Australia
  • Research Site
    Waratah, New South Wales 2298, Australia
  • Research Site
    Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia
  • Research Site
    Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia
  • Research Site
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Research Site
    Woodville South, South Australia 5011, Australia
  • Research Site
    Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
  • Research Site
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • Research Site
    Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
  • Research Site
    Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia
  • Research Site
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
  • Research Site
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Research Site
    Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Research Site
    Salzburg, 5020, Austria
  • Research Site
    Wien, 1090, Austria
  • Research Site
    Bruxelles, 1200, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Liege, 4000, Belgium
  • Research Site
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada
  • Research Site
    London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
  • Research Site
    Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Quebec, G1R 2J6, Canada
  • Research Site
    Brno, 656 53, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Olomouc, 775 20, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Ostrava-Poruba, 708 52, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Praha 10, 100 34, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Praha 2, 128 08, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Praha 8, 180 81, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Helsinki, 00290, Finland
  • Research Site
    Bordeaux Cedex, 33075, France
  • Research Site
    Grenoble Cedex 9, 38043, France
  • Research Site
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Research Site
    Lyon cedex 08, 69373, France
  • Research Site
    Marseille cedex 05, 13385, France
  • Research Site
    Nantes Cedex 1, 44093, France
  • Research Site
    Paris, 75010, France
  • Research Site
    Pierre Benite Cedex, 69495, France
  • Research Site
    Toulouse cedex 9, 31059, France
  • Research Site
    Vandoeuvre les Nancy, 54511, France
  • Research Site
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Research Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Research Site
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Research Site
    Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Research Site
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Research Site
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Research Site
    Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Research Site
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Research Site
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • Research Site
    Mannheim, 68167, Germany
  • Research Site
    München, 80337, Germany
  • Research Site
    Regensburg, 93053, Germany
  • Research Site
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • Research Site
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
  • Research Site
    Athens, 11527, Greece
  • Research Site
    Athens, 18547, Greece
  • Research Site
    Heraklion - Crete, 71110, Greece
  • Research Site
    Ioannina, 45500, Greece

Showing the first 100 of 161 sites across 21 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ribas A, Dummer R, Puzanov I, VanderWalde A, Andtbacka RHI, Michielin O, Olszanski AJ, Malvehy J, Cebon J, Fernandez E, Kirkwood JM, Gajewski TF, Chen L, Gorski KS, Anderson AA, Diede SJ, Lassman ME, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Long GV. Oncolytic Virotherapy Promotes Intratumoral T Cell Infiltration and Improves Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy. Cell. 2017 Sep 7;170(6):1109-1119.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.027. Erratum In: Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):1031-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.035. PubMed 28886381 ↗
  • Dummer R, Hoeller C, Gruter IP, Michielin O. Combining talimogene laherparepvec with immunotherapies in melanoma and other solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017 Jun;66(6):683-695. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-1967-1. Epub 2017 Feb 25. PubMed 28238174 ↗
  • Chesney JA, Ribas A, Long GV, Kirkwood JM, Dummer R, Puzanov I, Hoeller C, Gajewski TF, Gutzmer R, Rutkowski P, Demidov L, Arenberger P, Shin SJ, Ferrucci PF, Haydon A, Hyngstrom J, van Thienen JV, Haferkamp S, Guilera JM, Rapoport BL, VanderWalde A, Diede SJ, Anderson JR, Treichel S, Chan EL, Bhatta S, Gansert J, Hodi FS, Gogas H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):528-540. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00343. Epub 2022 Aug 23. PubMed 35998300 ↗
  • Watanabe D, Goshima F. Oncolytic Virotherapy by HSV. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1045:63-84. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7230-7_4. PubMed 29896663 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 15, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 16, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02263508
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2014
Start date
Dec 8, 2014
Primary completion
Mar 11, 2021
Completion
Mar 11, 2021
Results posted
May 16, 2022
Last update
Nov 14, 2022

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion