A Phase 3 interventional study of OnabotulinumtoxinA and Normal Saline in Facial Rhytides and Glabellar Rhytides, sponsored by Allergan. Completed at 24 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-25.
Sponsored by Allergan · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a safety and efficacy study of onabotulinumtoxinA in subjects with upper facial rhytides (forehead lines, glabellar lines, lateral canthal lines [crow's feet lines]).
217 studies on the registry are indexed under Facies; 35 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 787 is above the median of 40 across 161 interventional studies indexed under Facies.
Browse Facies studies →Allergan is the lead sponsor of 499 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (98%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A injected into the protocol-specified areas on Day 1. Subjects will receive at least 1 and up to 3 treatments.
Biological: OnabotulinumtoxinA
OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B injected into the protocol-specified areas on Day 1. Subjects will receive at least 1 and up to 3 treatments.
Biological: OnabotulinumtoxinA
Placebo (normal saline) injected into the protocol-specified areas on Day 1. If the subject meets the re-treatment criteria, the subject will receive up to 2 treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA Dose A into the protocol-specified areas.
Drug: Normal Saline
OnabotulinumtoxinA injected into the protocol-specified areas. Subjects will receive at least 1 and up to 3 treatments.
Also known as: BOTOX® Cosmetic, botulinum toxin Type A
Placebo (normal saline) injected into the protocol-specified areas on Day 1.
Percentage of Subjects With ≥2-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both the Investigator's and Subject's Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Ratings of Forehead Line Severity at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation
The Investigator and subject each assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline assessed by both the Investigator and the subject are reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 30
Percentage of Subjects With an Investigator Rating of None or Mild on the 4-Grade FWS for Forehead Line Severity at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation
The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with a score of "none" and "mild" are reported.
Time frame: Day 30
Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Investigator's FWS Rating of Forehead Line Severity at Rest
The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at rest using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1-grade improvement assessed by the Investigator are reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 30
Percentage of Subjects Reporting Mostly Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the 5-Point Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Item 5
The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess subject satisfaction and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines. Item 5 on the FLSQ asks "How satisfied are you with the effect your treatment had on your facial lines?" Responses included: very satisfied, mostly satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The percentage of subjects reporting a score of mostly satisfied or very satisfied with treatment are reported.
Time frame: Day 60
Percentage of Subjects With ≥20-Point Improvement From Baseline on the Impact Domain of the FLSQ Among Subjects With Baseline Score ≥ 20 Points
The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess subject satisfaction and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines. The Impact Domain measures the subject's appearance-related and emotional impacts of treatment and is composed of 5 questions with a possible range of scores from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), using a transformed scale. Only subjects with baseline scores ≥ 20 are included in the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 30
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥3-Point Improvement From Baseline on Item 4 of the 11-Point Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire©
The FLO-11 assess the subject's psychological and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines. Item 4 is "I look older than my actual age because of my facial lines" with a range of possible scores from 0 = not at all to 10 = very much. Only subjects with baseline scores ≥ 3 are included in the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 30
Time to Retreatment Eligibility
Time to retreatment eligibility is defined as the number of days from treatment cycle 1 injection to the return to an Investigator FWS rating of moderate or severe at maximum eyebrow elevation. The FWS is a 4-grade scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Only subjects who achieved a ≥ 2-grade improvement on both the Investigator and subject FWS ratings at maximum eyebrow elevation on Day 30 are included in the analysis.
Time frame: 12 Months
| Milestone | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 156 | 318 | 313 |
| Completed | 126 | 271 | 287 |
| Not completed | 30 | 47 | 26 |
| Withdrew: Noncompliance | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Undisclosed alcohol abuse | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Personal reasons | 14 | 14 | 16 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 14 | 27 | 8 |
| Withdrew: Pregnancy | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lack of efficacy | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
The Investigator and subject each assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline assessed by both the Investigator and the subject are reported.
| Percentage of Subjects | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With ≥2-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both the Investigator's and Subject's Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Ratings of Forehead Line Severity at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation | 0.6 (-0.6 to 1.9) | 45.6 (40.1 to 51.1) | 53.0 (47.5 to 58.6) |
The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with a score of "none" and "mild" are reported.
| Percentage of Subjects | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With an Investigator Rating of None or Mild on the 4-Grade FWS for Forehead Line Severity at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation | 3.8 (0.8 to 6.9) | 90.3 (87.0 to 93.5) | 94.9 (92.4 to 97.3) |
The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's forehead lines at rest using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1-grade improvement assessed by the Investigator are reported.
| Percentage of Subjects | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Grade Improvement From Baseline on the Investigator's FWS Rating of Forehead Line Severity at Rest | 18.7 (12.4 to 24.9) | 85.2 (81.2 to 89.1) | 84.8 (80.8 to 88.8) |
The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess subject satisfaction and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines. Item 5 on the FLSQ asks "How satisfied are you with the effect your treatment had on your facial lines?" Responses included: very satisfied, mostly satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The percentage of subjects reporting a score of mostly satisfied or very satisfied with treatment are reported.
| Percentage of Subjects | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Reporting Mostly Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the 5-Point Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Item 5 | 3.2 (0.4 to 6.0) | 81.4 (77.1 to 85.7) | 87.9 (84.2 to 91.5) |
The FLSQ consists of 13 questions that assess subject satisfaction and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines. The Impact Domain measures the subject's appearance-related and emotional impacts of treatment and is composed of 5 questions with a possible range of scores from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), using a transformed scale. Only subjects with baseline scores ≥ 20 are included in the analysis.
| Percentage of Subjects | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With ≥20-Point Improvement From Baseline on the Impact Domain of the FLSQ Among Subjects With Baseline Score ≥ 20 Points | 19.7 (13.4 to 26.1) | 61.0 (55.5 to 66.4) | 76.1 (71.3 to 80.9) |
The FLO-11 assess the subject's psychological and appearance-related impacts associated with facial lines. Item 4 is "I look older than my actual age because of my facial lines" with a range of possible scores from 0 = not at all to 10 = very much. Only subjects with baseline scores ≥ 3 are included in the analysis.
| Percentage of Subjects | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With a ≥3-Point Improvement From Baseline on Item 4 of the 11-Point Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire© | 9.9 (5.0 to 14.9) | 66.7 (61.2 to 72.1) | 77.1 (72.2 to 81.9) |
Time to retreatment eligibility is defined as the number of days from treatment cycle 1 injection to the return to an Investigator FWS rating of moderate or severe at maximum eyebrow elevation. The FWS is a 4-grade scale, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Only subjects who achieved a ≥ 2-grade improvement on both the Investigator and subject FWS ratings at maximum eyebrow elevation on Day 30 are included in the analysis.
| Days | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to Retreatment Eligibility | 64.0 ± NA | 120.0 ± 46.4 | 126.0 ± 53.7 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | — | 2/156 (1.3%) | 21/156 (13.5%) |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | — | 7/318 (2.2%) | 90/318 (28.3%) |
| OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | — | 16/746 (2.1%) | 198/746 (26.5%) |
| Event | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abortion spontaneousPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | 0/140 | 0/278 | 2/284 |
| Lower limb fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/156 | 0/318 | 0/746 |
| Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/156 | 0/318 | 0/746 |
| LeiomyomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 1/156 | 0/318 | 0/746 |
| OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/156 | 2/318 | 0/746 |
| ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/156 | 1/318 | 0/746 |
| Fibula fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/156 | 1/318 | 0/746 |
| Foot fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/156 | 1/318 | 0/746 |
| Post procedural inflammationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/156 | 1/318 | 0/746 |
| Tibia fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/156 | 1/318 | 0/746 |
| Event | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 8/156 | 30/318 | 69/746 |
| Injection site bruisingGeneral disorders | 5/156 | 26/318 | 47/746 |
| NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations | 5/156 | 18/318 | 48/746 |
| Injection site haematomaGeneral disorders | 3/156 | 16/318 | 34/746 |
| Age, Customized(Participants) | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <65 years | 147 | 300 | 302 | 749 |
| >=65 years | 9 | 18 | 11 | 38 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Placebo (Normal Saline) Followed by OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose B | OnabotulinumtoxinA Dose A | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 140 | 278 | 284 | 702 |
| Male | 16 | 40 | 29 | 85 |
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Allergan