ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02260765Updated Feb 8, 2021

Post Marketing Study to Evaluate the Resource Utilization of Patients Suffering From Resistant Depression Treated With Deep TMS in Comparison to Treatment as Usual

An interventional study of dTMS in Depression, sponsored by Brainsway. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-08.

Sponsored by Brainsway · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was withdrawn
This study was never funded therefore no patients were enrolled.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Deep TMS compare to TAU and the different in resource utilization of treating depression with Deep TMS compare to the TAU.

The current study is a prospective semi-naturalistic, randomized study in which depressed patient who failed to respond to at least one medication or could not tolerate at least two antidepressants and are seeking for alternative treatment will be offered to join an open label study. The study designed as double arm study of which patient will have 50% chance to be randomized to one of the study groups.

The study includes two arms. The dTMS study group will be treated according to the cleared FDA treatment protocol of 4 weeks of daily treatment following by additional 12 weeks of biweekly treatment and overall of 44 treatments. The Treatment As Usual arm will be treated by their primary care physician / psychiatrist according to the usual treatment recommend to the patient clinical status

Read the detailed description

many patients do not respond to antidepressant or could not tolerate the adverse events. Hence, many patients are looking for medical alternatives. Those alternatives include psychotherapy, ECT, and TMS. The direct cost of those treatments is relatively high compare to antidepressants. However, the indirect costs including hospitalizations, physician visit, ER visits, pharmacy claims, labs and adverse events management may increase the overall costs and burden of illness for the health system. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Deep TMS compare to TAU and the different in indirect costs of treating depression with Deep TMS compare to the TAU.

The current study is a prospective semi-naturalistic, randomized study in which depressed patient who failed to respond to at least one medication or couldn't tolerate at least two antidepressants and are seeking for alternative treatment will be offered to join an open label study. Patients eligible for the study will be asked to sign the informed consent. Than patients will be randomized to either Deep TMS treatment or TAU. The Deep TMS study group will receive the TMS treatment protocol as was cleared by the FDA. The TAU study group will be treated by their primary care physician / psychiatrist according to the usual treatment recommend to the patient's clinical status. Patient may continue its current treatment (with / without medications) or switch to a new treatment. However, treatment should be stable for at least 30 days prior to baseline visit except of Fluoxetine in which 45 days are required. Patients will be followed at 4 weeks and 6 month following baseline visit. The deep TMS treatment includes 4 weeks of acute daily treatment (20 treatments) following by 12 weeks of biweekly maintenance treatment. The purpose of the study is to explore the efficacy of the Deep TMS treatment compare to TAU and to investigate the differences in resource utilization between the study groups. The study population will be based on the FDA cleared patient population for the Deep TMS treatment. Safety will be assessed by monitoring of adverse events Other assessment scales will be used during the course of the study. Efficacy will be assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Score (HDRS), the self-reported questionnaires the QIDS-SR and the PHQ-9. Quality of life will be assessed by the Q-Les-Q questionnaire. Disability will be assessed by the Sheehan Disability Scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Treatment as Usual = TAU
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Brainsway is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Outpatients
  • Patients at Healthcare Partners for at least one year
  • Men and women 22-68 years of age
  • Primary diagnosis of Major Depression, single or recurrent episode confirmed in Health Care Partners (HCP) database by ICD-9 diagnosis code
  • Subject with QIDS score > 14 Subject with an HDRS-21 score > 22
  • If treating with antidepressants patient should be stable on treatment for at least 30 days prior to baseline visit or 45 days in case of Fluoxetine
  • Capable and willing to provide
  • Able to adhere to the treatment schedule

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • QIDS-SR item 12 " Thoughts of Death or Suicide " score ≥3 or HDRS- 21 item 3 "Suicidal Ideation" score ≥3
  • Depression secondary to a general medical condition, or substance- induced;
  • History of substance abuse or dependence within the past 6 month (except nicotine and caffeine)
  • Schizophrenic disorder
  • Schizoaffective disorder
  • Bipolar disorder, except when mania/hypomania was related to administration of antidepressant medications
  • Major depression with psychotic features in the current episode
  • Delusional disorder (current or within the past year)
  • Eating disorders (current or within the past year)
  • Obsessive compulsive disorder (current or within the past year)
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder (current or within the past year)
  • Current (or within 12 months of baseline) generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder or social anxiety disorder as assessed by the investigator to be primary, causing a higher degree of distress or impairment than MDD.
  • Current (or within 12 months of baseline) personality disorder (such as antisocial, schizotypal, histrionic, borderline, narcissistic) as assessed by the investigator to be primary, causing a higher degree of distress or impairment than MDD.
  • Patients who have conductive, ferromagnetic or other magnetic- sensitive metals implanted in their head or within 30 cm of the treatment coil. Examples include cochlear implants, implanted electrodes/stimulators, aneurysm clips or coils, stents, bullet fragments, jewelry and hair barrettes
  • Patients who have active or inactive implants (including device leads), including cardiac pacemakers, implanted defibrillators, deep brain stimulators, cochlear implants, and vagus nerve stimulators
  • Known or suspected pregnancy
  • Women of and not using a medically accepted form of when engaging in sexual intercourse
  • Minimal MT found for both hands is higher than 70% of stimulator power output
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    HCP dTMS

    this arm will receive dTMS treatment

    Device: dTMS

  • No intervention
    HCP TAU

    this arm will continue with the same drugs that they are using usually, which mean treatment as usual

Interventions

  • DevicedTMS

    The Brainsway H-Coil TMS device is intended for the treatment of depressive episodes in patients suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The device technology is based on the application of deep TMS by means of repetitive pulse trains at a determined frequency

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HDRS-21

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline to 4 weeks visit in HDRS-21 score The change in HDRS-21 from baseline to 4 weeks visit will be compared between the treatment groups using a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA, SAS® MIXED procedure). Baseline HDRS-21, antidepressant treatment at baseline, will be used as covariates. Baseline HDRS-21 scores and antidepressant treatment at baseline will be entered as continuous variables so that the potential for co-linearity problems will be minimized. Remission is defined as HDRS-21 score \< 10. The remission rates at week 4 in the two groups will be compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 week from the baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Healthcare Partners
    Los Angeles, California 90015, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2014, a primary completion of Sep 2020 and a completion of Sep 2020. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 6, 2014
First posted
Oct 9, 2014
Start
Oct 2014
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2020
CompletionEst.
Sep 2020
Last update
Feb 8, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02260765
Lead sponsor
Brainsway
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 9, 2014
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Sep 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 8, 2021

Study contacts

Alexander Alexander Bystritsky, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Healthcare Partners

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion