CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02252978Updated Jul 5, 2018

Ciprofloxacin Compared to Placebo in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy

A Phase 2 interventional study of ciprofloxacin and placebo in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Withdrawn at 2 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-05.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was withdrawn
No funding support
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This phase II trial studies ciprofloxacin compared to an inactive treatment (placebo) in diagnosing prostate cancer in patients undergoing removal of prostate cells or tissues for examination (biopsy). Ciprofloxacin is an antibiotic, a type of drug used to treat infections caused by bacteria. Giving ciprofloxacin to patients undergoing a prostate biopsy may help to lower abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels caused by bacterial infection of the prostate gland and may or may not affect the detection rate of prostate cancer.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the non-inferiority of the rate of detection of prostate cancer in men with decreased serum PSA values treated with placebo compared to ciprofloxacin prior to prostate biopsy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the change in PSA from randomization to biopsy in men treated with ciprofloxacin versus those treated with placebo.

II. To compare the rates of post-biopsy complications (including duration of hematuria, hematochezia, hematospermia, fever > 101°F, and hospital admission rates related to biopsy, sepsis, and pain) between men treated with ciprofloxacin versus those treated with placebo.

TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or erectile dysfunction are associated with abnormal PSA or prostatic inflammation reported in the biopsy specimen.

II. To determine the correlation between change in PSA from randomization to biopsy and urinalysis pre- and post-ciprofloxacin versus placebo.

III. To determine the correlation between change in PSA and prostate massage pre- and post-ciprofloxacin versus placebo.

IV. To determine the qualitative and quantitative difference in flora (ciprofloxacin resistant organisms) obtained from rectal swab pre- and post- two week course of ciprofloxacin vs. placebo.

V. To correlate prostate symptom severity (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) with erectile function (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]) at baseline.

VI. To correlate urinary, prostate massage or rectal swab findings to pathology findings including cancer, inflammation, prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN), atypical acinar proliferation (ASAP) or other findings at the end of the study.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients receive ciprofloxacin orally (PO) twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks.

ARM II: Patients receive ciprofloxacin PO BID for 2 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,367 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,397 are open to participants now.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Abnormal serum PSA (total > 2.5 ng/ml or other clinically important biomarker parameters, including PSA velocity and density) associated with or without normal digital rectal examination
  • Men who have elected to proceed with a diagnostic prostate biopsy
  • Any prostate size
  • Willingness and ability to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prostate cancer
  • Urine culture positive for significant urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • A history of antibiotic use within one month prior to initial PSA level measurement
  • Allergy to fluoroquinolones
  • Currently taking imperative medications with significant drug-drug interaction with ciprofloxacin
  • Compromised renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of \< 30 ml/min/1.73m\^2
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I (ciprofloxacin)

    Patients receive ciprofloxacin PO BID for 2 weeks.

    Drug: ciprofloxacin · Other: quality-of-life assessment · Other: laboratory biomarker analysis

  • Placebo comparator
    Arm II (placebo)

    Patients receive placebo PO BID for 2 weeks.

    Other: placebo · Other: quality-of-life assessment · Other: laboratory biomarker analysis

Interventions

  • Drugciprofloxacin

    Given PO

    Also known as: Cipro, CPFX

  • Otherplacebo

    Given PO

    Also known as: PLCB

  • Otherquality-of-life assessment

    Ancillary studies

    Also known as: quality of life assessment

  • Otherlaboratory biomarker analysis

    Correlative studies

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prostate cancer detection rates

    Will be compared between groups using a binomial test to compare rates in the two groups. Groups will also be compared using logistic regression models to adjust for any pre-treatment patient level characteristics.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in PSA

    The data will be analyzed on a logarithmic scale to stabilize the variance. The change in log PSA from randomization to biopsy will be compared between the two groups using a two-sample t-test. In addition, the baseline log PSA levels will be compared between the two groups and if they are found to be imbalanced a 1-way analysis of covariance will be used to compare groups by including the baseline pre-randomization log-PSA value as the covariate in the model.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  2. Rates of post-biopsy complications (including duration of hematuria, hematochezia, hematospermia, fever > 101°F, and hospital admission rates related to biopsy, sepsis, and pain)

    Will be compared between groups using Chi-square tests (or Fisher's Exact tests if the expected cell counts are below 5).

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. BPH or erectile dysfunction

    In order to determine if BPH or erectile dysfunction are associated with abnormal PSA or prostatic inflammation reported in the biopsy specimen, 2x2 Chi Square tests will be used where each measure will be dichotomized. In addition, the consistency of these associations across the two treatment groups will be examined using a 3-way table and examining the Breslow Day test to see whether the odds ratios for each treatment are comparable.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  2. Change in urinalysis pre- and post-treatment

    In order to determine the correlation between change in PSA from randomization to biopsy and urinalysis pre- and post-ciprofloxacin, the Pearson correlations of the change in PSA with white blood cells pre- and post-ciprofloxacin vs. placebo will be estimated. If the data is found to be non-normal the Spearman rank correlations will be used for this analysis.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  3. Change in prostate massage outcomes

    The correlation between change in PSA and prostate massage pre- and post-ciprofloxacin vs placebo will be determined. Will examine whether there is a significant difference in PSA changes between the ciprofloxacin group and placebo group for different prostate massage outcomes using a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. Will consider creating contrasts within the ANOVA model to test whether there is an ordered (possibly linear) relationship between levels of prostate massage and PSA change values (i.e., fitting a one-degree of freedom contrast within the ANOVA models).

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  4. Change in flora levels

    In order to determine the qualitative and quantitative difference in flora obtained from rectal swab pre- and post- two week course of ciprofloxacin vs. placebo 2-sample t-tests will be used to compare the change in these measures (for quantitative measures) and 2x2 Chi-Square tests to examine qualitative changes (Improve Yes/no by treatment group).

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  5. Prostate symptom severity (IPSS) and erectile function (IIEF-5)

    To assess the correlation between prostate symptom severity (IPSS) and erectile function (IIEF-5) at baseline to ciprofloxacin or placebo treatment, an analysis of covariance model will be fit that examines the follow-up measure (IPSS) as the outcome, with the treatment indicator and IIEF-5 measure as predictors and their interaction included to see if the relationship depends on treatment.

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Pathology findings

    In order to correlate urinary, prostate massage or rectal swab findings to pathology findings including cancer, inflammation, prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia, atypical acinar proliferation or other findings will either estimate Pearson or Spearman correlations (depending on the distribution of the measures) or one measure is binary (i.e., cancer yes/no) then will examine 2-sample t-tests.

    Time frame: Up to 1 month

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Veterans Administration Medical Center.
    Salisbury, North Carolina 28144, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02252978
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 30, 2014
Start date
Jul 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Last update
Jul 5, 2018

Study contacts

K. C. Balaji
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion